Dragonking's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dragonking's Profile › Dragonking's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 (of 118 pages)
A lot of buy transanctions going on in transcorp. |
Agbalowomeri: Dexter likes AfriprudMonkey hunting ![]() |
Gombs: That guy has a problem answering 'why' questions oBut you couldnt even answer any of the questions given to you ![]() |
Joagbaje: Dwell on the account I gave dude. There were several incidencesHe hid because he was a coward and there were no bodyguards to protect him. John 10:39 Therefore they sought again to take him: but he escaped out of their hand, Joagbaje: Did he escape ? If yes why?He escaped because it is evident enough that there is no protection from god. Now let me ask, why wasnt peter, james and john around to body guard jesus since you claimed he assigned them as his personal bodyguards during the mob attack? |
![]() |
Gombs: https://i793.photobucket.com/albums/yy219/anthonymoton/beyoncelaugh.gif AlfaSelltzer: Simple, because Peter was with a Terrorist! No wonder Satan wanted to sign him up! |
AlfaSelltzer: Why ws Peter with a sword?Hahaha..that was a gud one. |
Gombs: So this is the reason why you used 'but' to answer a 'Why' question?Peter was with a sword yet he failed to protect jesus when attacked by the mob..This is even more hilarious. BTW, james and john were missing in the body guard work at that period.. What is the essence of having a sword when you cant use it.. You guys are just a bunch of jerry curled clowns. ![]() |
Dexterax: I agree.If you knew then you would have sold at N36. All the same, nice one. |
brainpowerng: What else do I need to do for Morgan Capital to credit my account? I have called several times and even email but all to no avail. Since Monday!!!Hmmm. This is wrong..Hope say the money no be millions millions |
Gombs: They asked you "Why" in class you either out of semi literacy or embarrassing ignorance answered "but"... you really didn't do question tags in school.If we are to go with this dumb idea, literally i was the first to ask why? and you never gave an answer. So you are displaying the ignorance not me with your ninjas and butcher crap. |
Joagbaje: He concealed himself . Hiding and mingling through the crowd. Any person with common sense should know what Jesus did here, don't try to be dishonest . There were several incidences. In Some cases he was protected supernaturally and others he took measures. Read the account hereGuy, According to this story, Jesus hid himself then he walked right through the crowd. so we can say that in all probability he rendered himself invisible or the crowd didnt see him. Luke 4:30: but he passed right through the crowd and went on his way. This means he went right infront of them through the crowd and went his way. How many MOG can do this? Definitely not one. Even according to the passage of Luke: the mob handled jesus and even pushed him away. before he now walked pass through them. Luke 4: 28-30: 28 All the people in the synagogue were furious when they heard this. 29 They got up, drove him out of the town, and took him to the brow of the hill on which the town was built, in order to throw him off the cliff. 30 But he walked right through the crowd and went on his way. ^^^Once again, no bodyguards..No peter, james and john with swords here to defend their master. |
LambanoPeace: You didn't do question tag in your High school days? I asked "Why" I expect a "because" not "but"^^^This is rubbish..no need to waste time with you. |
LambanoPeace: I tire o! DragonKing, it's really fine if you can't or don't want to answerI have answered, so stop running away. Bunch of religious cowards. You say peter, james and john were jesus body guards and followed him where ever jesus went..So what happened when jesus was almost attacked by the mob? where did peter, james and john go to? Did they forget the sword at home?? @Gombs |
LambanoPeace: I tire o! DragonKing, it's really fine if you can't or don't want to answerI have answered, so stop running away. Bunch of religious cowards. You say peter, james and john were jesus body guards and followed him where ever jesus went..So what happened when jesus was almost attacked by the mob? where did peter, james and john go to? Did they forget the sword at home? |
Gombs: Ogbeni answer her/him joor... why was peter with a sword? Was he Sumarai or a gangster? Or butcher? Or suya man?Guy i have answered you severally..Peter was with a sword but it was against the wish of jesus. QED. Let me ask, where was peter with his sword when jesus hid himself from the mob? Why didnt he come out in commando style to defend his master? What happened to your other body guards (james and john) when the mob wanted to attack jesus? Abi dem go piss? |
LambanoPeace: Why was it again you said Peter was with a sword? Let me assume Jesus wasn't aware even though Gombs proved beyond reasonable doubt that Jesus was fully aware.Why didnt peter use the sword when the mob wanted to attack jesus in John 8:59? Where were his so-called body guards or ninjas according to Gombs (Peter, james and john) that jesus had to hide before he walked pass through the mist of the mob? You will only believe what you want to believe. |
LambanoPeace: I see how you trying to run away from your idiocy! Change focal point from the bodyguards to adultery! That was a cowardly move bro! But nicely played^^Look at this jerry curled eediot..who is changing stance here..I still hold on to my stance and everything is valid. I have asked questions they have not answered. So before you come out to spew trash, think again and read properly. |
Gombs: Oh well!... no need dragging with dragonking... posterity would judge for themselvesHe isnt an adulterer, rather he was just having inappropriate relationships with other female members of the church and not his wife..Konji na ba.stard! ![]() Dont worry, more is coming out and definitely it will be too hot for him to handle. ![]() |
Joagbaje: Yes of course , he has fulfilled his ministry and He protected himself till he was arrested, death is the next phase. . Paul protected himself , mobilized soldiers for protection (indirectly) he also escape mob by flee a city smuggled in a basket. But when his MINUSTRY was over ,he had a different disposition . He was ready to die.I dont know why you keep on with this merry-go-round. Here is my previous response to you on this issue.vvv Its a shame that you dont even know and understand your bible stories.Ask yourself, what happened that the angry mob diddnt see jesus even when he walked pass them in their midst according to the story? As for paul, i still stand that he never used or moved around with armed men when he wants to minister or walking down the road. |
Joagbaje: Stop being silly, he didn't commit any adultery.Oh yes, he just had inappropriate relationships with female members of the church. He was even caught with laying his head down on the laps of one of his female biitches. You are being brainwashed. |
Joagbaje: That's not an issue. I picked my point of emphasis for a reason. Security is common sense. We trust in dods protection and we also take physical measures. Jesus took physical measures. Paul took physical measures. But faith is still in God to even make the physical measures workMatthew 26:52-53: Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? ^^I repeat, here in this passage, it is evident and jesus stated it clearly that he doesnt need man's protection that if indeed he needed protection he would have called on his father to give him legions of angels. A proclaimed MOG who is suppose to have the so-called almighty power of God yet cant rely on that power of God but that of men is fake and powerless. Nothing more. Your jesus has stated it clearly. |
mbaemeka: Stop being an ignorant churl. I don't know Pastor Chris Okotie from Adam besides I don't believe he regularly does that. He did it after making some controversial statement about the Roman catholics and I don't think it is status quo in his services.There is no need to justify the adulterer called chris..This is just the beginning and definitely he would be exposed..This divorce saga is just the beginning of the end. |
Gombs: Too much conjecture in your writ...and it's appalling. Peter, James and John by virtue of fheir occupation must have been muscular, I almost dropped my tab in epileptic laughter when you said James is due to matyrdom... and Jesus wanted to use Peter as the rock which he'd establish the Church, Peter is not any rock, , what Peter said was the rock on which the church stands. Quit assuming, go studyYou assume. How is John muscular when he was even the youngest? Gombs: Yet they had swords with them? Where they butchers?How many of them had sword with them? There were only two literal swords and only peter held onto his sword as he didnt understand what jesus meant..Why did jesus rebuke peter and told him that if he needed protection he would call on his daddy to send legion of angels to protect him? Please explain that? Gombs: So Jesus NEVER knew Peter moved around with a sword? Mind explaining the below bold for me?^^I believe i have answered this, so let me repeat it again. Now, lets find out if Jesus was talking about the literal swords to be taken? If He meant the literal swords why did He rebuke Peter for using the sword against His enemy? Gombs: [NLT] Luke 22:49 When the other disciples saw what was about to happen, they exclaimed, “Lord, should we fight? We brought the swords!”Before the event that happened in Luke 22:49, go to Luke 22: 38: where it was stated that the disciples had only two swords, so how on earth do they want to protect jesus with only two swords? Not all of them had swords as there were only two swords before the event in verse 49. Luke 22:38: The disciples said, "See, Lord, here are two swords." "That's enough!" he replied. Even here, jesus literally rebuked them for not understanding him, thats why the saying "That's enough!" ends with an exclamation which shows that he shouted or rebuked them. Gombs: Refer to verse 49 above. You still never answer me o...why were they with swords? Were they Sumarai or Ninjas? Or Jesus had no knowledge of their possession of arms yet he knew Judas ws stealing from the bag and was indeed the devil?Peter held unto his sword against the wish of jesus according to the story. Matthew 26:52-53: Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? ^^I repeat, Here in this passage, it is evident and jesus stated it clearly that he doesnt need man's protection that if indeed he needed protection he would have called on his father to give him legions of angels. Jesus never told them to get physical swords and he obviously did not mean the literal sword as he rebuked Peter for using it. |
mbaemeka: You are making daft references and suppositions. Pastor Chris has held conferences of over a million people seated including armed robbers and cultists. He stood there for hours preaching and ministering and there was no police officer or armed men around him and nothing happened.I posted two pictures of the two pastor chris using armed men..one using armed men right on top the altar while another one walking around with heavy security and yes it is a fact that your master moves around with armed men..Check the beginning of this thread when bluetooth stated that pastor christ usually moves about with not only his entourage but also with heavy security before he lodges into the hotel in portharcourt for his randy escapades. Yet you decided to single handedly pick out and justify oyakilome but what will you now say of okotie? What excuse do you want to give for him? I am sure he was in aso rock right? Stop being a dumb brainwashed jerry curled mofo and smell the truthful breeze of fresh air. |
@Joagbaje i can still give you some other hints and passages in your bible that you can use against me again. ![]() I am ever ready to help as long as you are no longer brainwashed. |
Gombs: You said :I think you find it difficult to understand english. Letme help you again. Now i asked a question, protection as a free man? And concluded it will an answer , No...Meaning, did paul get armed men to protect him when he was free and wasnt in prison? ANSWER: No. Pastor chris is roaming freely without any threat but for a supposedly MOG to start carrying armed men and commandoes about is not only pitiful but also a mockery to the religion called Christianity. What happened to God's power? Abi e don finish? As for your other question, i have answered it..although the question was a bit childish but i answered it all the same. |
Gombs: Dragon king, a quiz quiz1. According to my knowledge of the bible, Peter was always with jesus as i presume that jesus wanted to use peter as the rock upon which he would establish the Church. John was beloved by jesus so it is rational that he of all people will be with jesus. As for james, i believe is due to martyrdom.. None of these men followed jesus in order to act as a body guard. 2. Peter carried the sword with him but it was never the instruction of jesus. Jesus rebuked Peter in the bible for taking his instructions to utilize a sword literally. So ask yourself, why would he want them to carry swords if they were not to use them in the first place? |
Gombs: Is pastor chris a free man?Is pastor chris in prison? |
Joagbaje: Luke 22:36-39Now, lets find out if Jesus was talking about the literal swords to be taken? If He meant the literal swords why did He rebuke Peter for using the sword against His enemy? Matthew 26:52-53: Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? ^^Here in this passage, it is evident and jesus stated it clearly that he doesnt need man's protection that if indeed he needed protection he would have called on his father to give him legions of angels. Jesus never told them to get physical swords and he obviously did not mean the literal sword as he rebuked Peter for using it. Now, Luke 22:38: And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said unto them, It is enough. Look closely and observe that Jesus did not say "the two swords were enough", but said, "It is enough". So if Jesus meant about the literal swords, how could two swords be enough for twelve people if they were going to war or fight an angry mob? And if Jesus meant just two swords were enough then He would be contradicting His own words earlier, where he told all of them should have a sword each! Can you see you guys don't understand your bible. Revelation even talks about the sword that jesus will use, as his weapon, to defeat his own enemies. Revelation 19:15: and out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations. We can see that the sword that comes from His mouth is not physical swords but a word. |
Gombs: Did he get protection? Yes or NoProtection as a free man? The answer is NO. he didt get protection. |
Joagbaje: Luke 22:36-39I knew you would quote this when i deliberately pointed it out to you..This simply shows that you dont even understand your bible..i will explain it now. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 (of 118 pages)



.