₦airaland Forum

SpencerForbes:
I honestly can't believe people are still thinking like Dtruthspeaker in this 2026. This your 'nonsense psychology' is something else! 😂

It’s either you're too old for this generation or you're just too young to have seen the world yet.

We have possessed kids but calling possessed because his stubborn means you’re still operating on old OS😂😂😂

Eveu transcends all generations, therefore

No man is justified in doing evil on the ground of expedience.
— Theodore Roosevelt.

Ow sorry Umbrateeth04, nairaland's bot is kicking out your answers because even them know that they are invalid (just kidding and hoping you truly do not have a valid counter )

Maybe if you remove all the words were you insalting me the bot may allow your post.

brain54:
I'm sorry about that...

I promise not to do it again!

"When you expose a man to the light, he will either change or scream- Anonymous

brain54:
I know...


Sorry once again. Thanks for exposing me!

You exposed yourself.

brain54:


Okay bro...


My bad. Sorry about everything I said or did. I didn't to rattle or offend you.


I was wrong bro. How are you doing?

No madam, you did not bother me. You only reacted as you must. For as heated ororo must shout when water enters it, so also you had to shout when one of your several secrets eves and sins was exposed. So, i understand.

brain54:
Stay on point bro...


Get help soon. My prayers are with you!

Keep screaming woman, one day like the BBL girl, it would be your turn to stand before God.

A clear case of
John 3:20-21;
Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be reproved

brain54:



You seem to be confirming my comments...



And no it's not coming from a place of hate or wickedness.

If you would make that kind of comments about your hatred for kids 9 and 6 then check yourself bro!

All these is you wailing for you thought no one saw you transfering wi chi to your child or children, in secret.

We even see how you yourself avoid them. You don't even embrace them.

But if it is a good boy now, you people would be hugging out the life and light from him until darkness remains.

Shout and abuse me all you want but now you know that people are watching and seeing all the ivus you were secretly doing to children

SpencerForbes:
You're quoting someone who hasn't even raised a child and calling it 'fact' just because it's a thread? 😂

If someone opens a topic now saying 'Spencerforbes is gay,' does that mean I’ve automatically become gay? Will you start telling people I'm gay because you saw a thread by someone who doesn't even know me?

I’ve told you before: stop taking every thread by anonymous strangers to heart. Every small argument, you run to Nairaland for 'research.' You keep quoting links from teenagers and kids in early puberty as 'facts' without even checking Google. If your convictions are based solely on Nairaland threads, then you truly have a long way to go.

I have told you before that you need to go to Yaba. Day by day Alzi or Dmen is eating you down.

I clearly said that people have seen these things therefore, i am showing you others who have but Dmun eaten you has made sure you cannot understand.

And all over the world these discussions go on. But i am talking to Nigerians about Nigerians, so naira land is perfect.

But see Quora
Does anyone believe some babies are born evil? If so, why?
Yes. Ev/bad people are ev/bad when they are babies, children, teenagers, adults, and elderly. They just learn how to hide it as they get older. Just like not every old lady is sweet, not every child is good....

If you ever hang around enough kids you find out that they’re all ivu conniving, selfish, lying, little sob’s.

I do think all kids are ev. Being respectful, sharing, kind, loving, gentle, and all the other good things are learned. Young kids have been proven able to lie since their birth.

Vic Kendera don finish you.

If you ever hang around enough kids you find out that they’re all ev..., conniving, selfish, lying, little sob’s.(i even see that there are naturally good children as well as naturally ivu ones

I do think all kids are evil. Being respectful, sharing, kind, loving, gentle, and all the other good things are learned. Young kids have been proven able to lie since their birth.

How I see it. You either have a characteristic or you don’t. So, you have things like hate, disrespect, selfishness and anger which are not a character trait in themselves but rather a lack of. Ever hear “You lack character”? When you lack the trait of Love, you have Hate. Lack Kindness and you get Selfishness. Lack Patience and you get Anger.

So kids are a clean slate and they lack all the good things that make an honorable human being. They have to learn them from their parents and the community around them. So when you see an abnormally bad kid, usually but not always, there’s a terrible parent nearby.

SpencerForbes:
Stop demonizing children! 😂 It’s clear you’ve never handled kids before. This 'everything is spirit7ual' narrative is tired.

I taught a Pastor’s son who was the definition of 'stubborn.' The father kept flogging him, forgetting that he (the father) was actually a terror during his own youth. Today, that same boy is a calm, cool gentleman. Children grow out of these phases. Your way of thinking needs an update. 💯

I know you are allergic to Truth but whether you like it or not, people see these things going on and we all talk about it.

https://www.nairaland.com/8170938/children-very-evil-never-having#131244251

Re: Children Are Very Evil! Never Having One. by Nobody: 2:20pm On Jul 31, 2024
AlphaMale666:
Children are born of evil! I've seen this with my own very eyes!
Yes, according to another theory in psychology. However, the evil lies dormant unless when activated by external environmental factors. So those children you are talking about do evil due to what they are constantly being exposed to.

So, keep burying your head in the ground, these things are going on everyday

brain54:
You sound like you have mental health issues already...

Do something about it!

See guilty conscience.
Whether i talk or not, God has seen all the Wike. ness you people are doing and one day like the only fans boy, your turn shall come

While now disciplining the elder one, in fact, the disciplining became too much and too wrong, she then drew tightly the younger one to herself. In fact too tightly, that it was wrong, for she had never done this before.

In fact, before all these i had already come to the conclusion that the mother loved the first born but kind of did not like the second one, though physically you cannot see the difference. However, anyone who knows women would know the tell tale signs of when a woman does not like a person.

So, her unusual activity of drawing the boy close was noticeable.

And i have patiently waited all these years to see what she was upto.

And lo and behold, that good son has now become a bad one. The boy has completely changed and I hate him with my whole heart and soul, while I am now beginning to like the elder one for in all of his bad, i still saw the good in him.

But, for the younger one, ah, i don't like him at all. I now no longer talk to him nor acknowledge his presence whereas the elder one still made it a point of duty to greet me and run to me whenever he sees me as he normally did when he was a toddler even though i later did not like him and i did not want to see him again. But he kept greeting me.

But, this younger one, i don't even want him to greet me for he is very horrible to look at. The dem... ns in him are very plenty.

So, it is now clear what the mother has been doing to him since and that is why i said many mothers won't miss he..., for i see these things every single day how good boys and good girls are turned to vampayas

There is this woman with 2 children, boys, ages around 9 and 6 who has a kiosk near my place. And the first boy was a baby when she got the kiosk And i love babies and so i was naturally drawn to him but there was something about him i did not like about him which i perceived whenever I saw and played with him.

I kept watching him as he grew and then his younger brother came. Ooh what a the lightfull angel boy he was. Oo he was so good looking as in you will see a boy who will naturally be good person and oh i loved him (i naturally love good people and i naturally hate bad people)

And this was when it became clear why I did not like the first born, for when this second boy was born, his ivuu came out in full force. He was always doing something dangerous to the younger ones, climbing over the younger one, pressing his head into the ground, beating and pinching him. And the younger one took it. He didn't really cry unless h the pain was too much. And you can see that younger one loved the elder one as he always followed him wherever that one moved to.

And the elder one did like his brother too but just that you can see that something makes him want to make his brother cry. And that one, was almost like a super hero toddler. Even when the elder one would crash him dangerously down in those days he was crawling and using things to stand and move, he almost would not cry for the hit.

And it is only after the boy cries after a barrage of different hits like pushing the younger one down when running across as the younger one is even trying to stretch and catch him, is when he would stop.

And in all these it is we who are passing by or watching them who will shout "hey! Stop it. Stop playing rough play"

And, finally, as feared, the elder his brother wounded his brother, near the eyes on his head. The wound had to be stitched and this was when the boy was about 1 plus.

And then in all of these things it was clear that the elder one was going to be an agbero

And in all these, their mother was there doing as if she was not seeing what was happening but because of she perceived that people were talking behind her back that her son is growing, it was thereafter she started controlling the elder one's rough behaviour.

Then she did something else.

Sonnobax15:

Dem no dey tell person.

Same way my own banny has been misbehaving of recent. Na her own bestie tell her to calm down,say if she mistakenly lose a calm and nice guy like me, thinking say good guys dey out there,na then she go realize say na only scorpion kings full outside.

Since then,she come calm pass ice water

You suppose drop that thing. She jus dey use you

FSBoperator:
Every Palestinian can tell you his ancestral line back to Jacob but not one of your fake Jews can go further back than 4 generations.

Google says you are lying.

While it is not scientifically or historically proven that every single Palestinian can trace their ancestry directly to Jacob, studies show that modern Palestinians are descended from the ancient inhabitants of the Levant, including ancient Judeans who remained in the region.

Modern Palestinians have diverse ancestral roots in the Levant, with genetic evidence indicating that a significant portion descends from the indigenous populations of the region, including ancient Canaanites and Israelites who remained in the land and later converted to Christianity and Islam. While Palestinians share Levantine ancestry, they are not direct descendants of the biblical Philistines, nor all exclusively descended from Jacob (the patriarch of the 12 Tribes of Israel)

The "Jacob" Question: While the 12 Tribes of Israel (Jews) are traditionally traced back to Jacob, the modern Palestinian population is a mix of these ancient inhabitants, along with later Arab, Byzantine, and other regional populations.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+3
Origins of the Name "Palestine"
The name "Palestine" is derived from the "Peliset" (Philistines)...

Biko, why Lie? Maka why?

PulaPower:
The truth is there’s no truth anywhere. Everything are just cooked up lies..

We’re all being deceived & controlled by some certain mysterious people..

Your only hope to survive is to be strong

Like the lies you yourself have just said

adekolaelect:
Only African make the culture of those people as their way of worship. What they call religion was organised to control majority and they will promise you invisible eternal life which no one can say how it be except their theories call book of God.

And your pagan politicians and babalawos were not controlling before, right?

FSBoperator:
You can start by telling us why the star of remphan is on the flag of modern day Talmudic fake Israel.

You see black and you call it white and when they point this simple fact for you, you say it is conspiracy theory.

Was Stephen who was murdered for pointing this very fact out also a conspiracy nutjob?

You can start by telling us how the Israelis who returned to that area of Palestine were fakes?

And how the Palestines are the rea Isrealis?

Roycemadeit:
You’re confusing what exists with what is justified.

A lion hunts out of natural instinct. A man dominating a woman is not instinct, it’s conditioning reinforced by culture, religion, and history. One is survival. The other is a system.

Power lasting a long time doesn’t make it natural, it just means it wasn’t challenged effectively. [b]Slavery lasted too. That didn’t make it truth.

You too just made the same error of confusing what exists with what is justified for is slavery justified?

Umbrateeth04:
9you are even more ignorant than i thought you are

Let me school you..you naive, clueless, unknowledgeable being
In Book of Genesis 5:2, the verse says that God “called their name Adam” (in some translations). Here’s what that means:
The word “Adam” comes from the Hebrew (adam)”, which can mean “human,” “mankind,” or “humankind”, not just a specific male name.
So in this verse, it’s being used in a collective sense—referring to both the man and the woman together as humanity.
What about Eve?
The woman is specifically named Eve later in Genesis 3:20, where Adam gives her that name.
Simple takeaway
Genesis 5:2 is not saying Eve’s personal name was Adam.
It’s saying that both male and female together were called “human” (Adam) in a general sense...

I still repeat Adam and eve were not equal before the curse take for instance their biological and physical differences as evidence that God did not intend for them to be equal in role or authority, even before the Fall.
The primary arguments regarding physical strength include:
Designed for Protection and Labor:Adam was created with greater physical strength, he was naturally designed for the roles of protector and provider. if God intended for them to be interchangeable or exactly equal, He would have given them identical physical capabilities.
The "Weaker Vessel" Concept: Some interpretations of 1 Peter 3:7, which refers to women as the "weaker vessel," are applied retrospectively to the Garden of Eden. this "weakness" refers to a physical body that is a "vessel" for the soul, suggesting that while their spirits may be equal, their physical design creates a natural hierarchy of capability.
Adam’s Role as Worker: Adam was placed in the garden to "till and keep it" (Genesis 2:15) before Eve was created. this heavy physical labor was assigned specifically to him because of his superior strength, establishing a distinct, non-equal role from the beginning.
Eve as the "Helper": the term "helper" (ezer) implies a secondary role where Eve supports Adam's primary mission. her physical design—typically smaller and less muscular—was a deliberate choice to reflect this supportive, rather than leading, role.

How you waste your time talking Off Point and on irrelevancies in the guise teaching is wonderful to behold.

And it just proves that you have nothing valid to say hence the resort to the fallacy of Red Herring.

In the end you said nothing.

And you can repeat all you want but you have still not given any valid counter to the argument and your red herring seals it.

If anything, you rather even confirmed that before the fall they were equal for he only called her eve after the fall which is what I have been saying since.

So, you see, you are arguing phoo....shly

Umbrateeth04:
Point of correction equality never existed even before the fall/curse
evidence that God established a functional hierarchy from the start.
Key Arguments for Pre-Fall Inequality
often from a complementarian perspective, suggest that while Adam and Eve were equal in essence (both bearing God's image), they were unequal in role and authority based on the following:
The Order of Creation: The fact that Adam was created first is seen as a sign of "primogeniture"—the biblical principle where the firstborn or first-created holds the leadership position.
The Source of the Mandate: God gave the original command regarding the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil to Adam before Eve was created. This implies Adam was the primary moral guardian and was responsible for teaching the law to Eve.
The Naming of Eve: In ancient biblical culture, naming something was an act of exercising authority over it. Adam named the animals, and he also named his partner "Woman" (Ishshah) before the Fall.
The Purpose of Creation: Genesis 2:18, which states Eve was created for Adam to be his "helper" (ezer). the direction of this service (Eve helping Adam, rather than Adam helping Eve) indicates a specific authority structure.
Representational Headship: When humanity fell, God called out to Adam first, even though Eve had eaten the fruit first. this shows God held Adam accountable as the "head" or legal representative of the pair...

Though, this departs from the point but i will address it.

And correction as you can see that the name "Eve" came only after she had made them fall but her name too was Adam. Genesis 5:2 shows you this.

So, you see, even the name "Adam" belonged to both of them even though male Adam was first.

So you see none of these prove that male Adam was superior to female Adam for Genesis 1: 26 -31/ 2:23 and 25 shows that everything male Adam had was equally shared by female Adam, even down to his name.

Thus, when God was calling for Adam after the fruit, any of them could have answered but female Adam could not answer because she was more wrong than male Adam so, knowing women she must push him to answer on their behalf for as we all know that a person who has sinned the most cannot come out from hiding first exactly how the student who always comes late is always at the back of the line of late comers. (Anyway, this is aside)

But the bottomline is that there is no evidence of male Adam being superior to female Adam before the fall and all that you presented are unsubstantiated constructs created to give male Adam an edge of superiority over female Adam because they could find no substance.

Umbrateeth04:
which rebuttals did you reveal here that i will have to challenge?...
By using an olosho and a thief example..is that even a befitting rebuttal to the previous discourse?
You haven't given me any reasonable tangible data, or questionnaires you carried out recording the content of discussion neither have you given me analysis and statistics for you to arrive at this ur futile conclusions?

Your rebuttal of your olosho and thief analogy is very lame..as I have given you a rebuttal on that as well whereby the double standards is seen visible in a realistic perspective...you are just going in circles

Is it now after you have already responded to it but you could not counter it that you real eyes that it is not a "befitting rebuttal"?

Now you are lying that you countered it forgetting that this is a thread and that everything we said is permanently recorded down here and you cannot change your mouth by Lying.

And your Lying just makes it worse and proves that you do not have any valid argument to make again so now you have started resorting to lying in your loss of the argument.

See what you said.

"cut that crap

You forgotten the adage used by your fellow scum men...I type in quote "a padlock which many key can open is disregarded as useless and should subsequebtly be thrown away while a key that opens many padlock is called the masterkey"....you failed to understand that women will be shamed for doing the exact thing men do..to them men and women are not the same...stop trying to defend what is undefendable

You mentioned the 2natashas...hahaha haha boy is trying to use the minority to uphold a vague viewpoint
1.How many matriarch do we have as opposed to patriarch?...."


I knew you were going to forget what you have said and that you must lie when you real eyes that you don't have any valid argument to make again. So, i set you up.

And now you real eyes you have nothing to reasonable and valid to say again, do noe you have returned back to your very statement, which of course you thought was a counter at the time whereas the whole thing was OFF POINT and Fallacy of Appeal to the suffering of woman

The issue is not whether the woman is shamed nor that men do the same thing (Tu que quo Fallacy) nor that many women do not achieve matriarchy.

All these are Outside the point of argument (O.P) OFF POINT

Whereas the, point is what valid counter can you give to my rebuttal that when you do a wrong and disgraceful thing, you get lowered and shamed and all your equals will become better than you.

And there is nothing like that here.
Only empty wailings and emotional noise making.

SpencerForbes:
Focus on Your Personal Salvation and Move On

So what if she was guilty? Does that automatically clear you as a man? As a man, you’re supposed to be a solution-finder, not someone dwelling on the past. Instead of pointing fingers, our focus should be on finding solutions for this present generation.

Whether Adam or Eve sinned first doesn’t even matter anymore. Even if they didn't eat that fruit, I believe the devil would have still found a way to lure man out of Paradise—unless you think the first humans weren't planning on having children and expanding.

If you allow what people say about Jesus to shake your personal faith, then you aren't a real follower. The era of the Crusaders is over. You don't need to defend your belief with "tooth and nail" in 2026.

Some people even claim Jesus was gay. Does that make it true? No! Personal salvation should be the main topic now. Even the Bible says those chapters are for reference and teaching, not for fault-finding. We’ve learned the lessons, we’ve faced the consequences—now let’s find the way out.

"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent," John Calvin

Defending Christianity is a necessary part and proof that a person believes in God. That is why you see Paul defended, advocated and fought for God till he died.

And thank God i can participate in the fight for i checked and found that no one, anywhere has properly condemned/corrected this rubbish and false accusation they say about God, the Bible and Christianity.

So I must draw out all the damnable evidence which made God cast away the woman from His Presence and from His Sight and point out why/how womankind fell from their estate where they were equal to the man, to a place where they are lower than the man.

And all these falsehood is flying around because no one has pointed out and resounded clearly that this inequality arose because the woman committed the greatest and highest and worsest sin no human being in the world can ever attain .

Hitler in all of his murders and wipe out of the jews, still could not reach a quarter of her record for she is the one who, a lone perfectly and completely wiped out humanity and the human race in one sharp swoop of a second where maybe it would take 1000 nukes and a 100 personnel to completely wipe out thi world.

But, she did it even in a second; destroying all that God had created on this world and for this world.

There is no way God can forgive that

And this is what everybody should know as they have falsely accused and talked shi... about God, the Bible and Christianity to their peril

SpencerForbes:
Stop this blame game; it’s not helping anyone. Both of them sinned against God, and we are all facing the consequences today. Both male and female came from Adam, so where is this selective logic coming from?

If God followed this your "gender war" reasoning, He would have punished only Eve and exonerated Adam since he wasn’t the direct target of the serpent.

In fact, your argument only proves that Adam was a Legendary Simp. The law was given directly to him; he was supposed to be the "Head," yet he chose to join the sin instead of standing his ground.

Your logic is like catching two people committing adultery and blaming only the lady for "seducing" the man. Was the man a zombie? Does he not have a mind of his own?

Both of them fell hand. Period.

As it appears on the surface. But just is requires us to dig deeper, especially as false accusations have arisen against Christianity from it

So, now its time for us to re-examine and evaluate every shred of evidence against them to ascertain the just and proper guilt and to lay it up whom it properly lays upon to clear the innocent Name of Christianity.

For if you and your ancestors have been falsly accused you would seek to clear your name, which means that if you were covering up for somebody before, that person must be left exposed to carry the whole fault and guilt.

So, it is needful and necessary that the woman on whom everyone accuses Christianity of disregarding be left exposed and shown to the world that it she alone who committed an unforgettable crime and therefore it is her own fault that she is regarded of little worth.

And male Adam is just like a man charged with the armed robbers who robbed and killed people at a bank, whereas his crime is that some of the stolen was deposited into his account which he spent.

There isn't any lawyer who is representing that man who won't point out that he is only guilty of one crime which is receiving of stolen property which carries only a term of imprisonment.
Whereas he is not guilty of armed robbery and murder both of which carry death penalty. Which means in God's Hands such a person is liable to daiee twice.

Meanwhile, our Adam never partook in the plan to commit robbery, nor in the robbery itself nor was he in the vicinity of the robbery. So, he is not guilty of robbery.

Same thing for the real Adam.

Man (Adam male) was nowhere in the place where Woman (female Adam) was conspiring and conniving with the serpent on how to rob God of His Godship by taking God by surprise in her suddenly being "a god" thereby leaving her place to elavate herself by doing an act that she was expressly prohibited forewarned from doing.

So while woman was seeking to coup d'etat God, aka Treason and Mutiny, all of which carry the death penalty.

And so you see all the debts of deaths woman is owing God and that she must pay as God has Sworn.

Meanwhile, Man (Adam male) was not thinking about any of those things and therefore he did not commit the crime of Treason/Mutiny/Coup d'etat.

So, can you see that at this point man (male Adam) was innocent since whereas Female Adam was already guilty of at least 6 offences to wit-

Charge 1- Conspiring and conniving with an enemy. (Treason)

Charge 2- Plotting and Seeking to overthrow God vernment aka Government by desiring to be a god Coup d'etat (Treason)

Charge 3- Seeking to elavate herself beyond her estate.

Charge 4- First human to. blatantly Disobey and Disregard God's Commandment.

Charge 5- Counseling and Procuring an innocent man to become an accomplice in her commission of her crimes

In all these, man was still very much innocent but woman was already over guilty.

So how can man and woman be equal before men and God?

With these who cannot see that a woman's fate is sealed already?

And in all this man (male Adam) had not yet committed the crime.

https://www.nairaland.com/6319053/when-eve-charged-court-charges#97161190

Umbrateeth04, if you are not biased come and give us a just and fair assessment, if you can

Do not change post oo.

Now you see why people say Genesis 3:16 changed it for women and that it is not exactly the Genesis 3:16 but all the events which led to Genesis 3:16.

And Genesis 3:16 is just an interim Judgement (Google what interim Judgement means).

Go and reread it, you would see that her case is not over yet unlike the other 2.

And it is even in our laws that a person convicted of crimes cannot hold office and that is why in God's Offices, it is only men who are qualified to hold it

SpencerForbes:
Stop this blame game; it’s not helping anyone. Both of them sinned against God, and we are all facing the consequences today. Both male and female came from Adam, so where is this selective logic coming from?

If God followed this your "gender war" reasoning, He would have punished only Eve and exonerated Adam since he wasn’t the direct target of the serpent.

In fact, your argument only proves that Adam was a Legendary Simp. The law was given directly to him; he was supposed to be the "Head," yet he chose to join the sin instead of standing his ground.

Your logic is like catching two people committing adultery and blaming only the lady for "seducing" the man. Was the man a zombie? Does he not have a mind of his own?

Both of them fell hand. Period.

As it appears on the surface. But just is requires us to dig deeper, especially as false accusations have arisen against Christianity from it

So, now its time for us to re-examine and evaluate every shred of evidence against them to ascertain the just and proper guilt and to lay it up whom it properly lays upon to clear the innocent Name of Christianity.

For if you and your ancestors have been falsly accused you would seek to clear your name, which means that if you were covering up for somebody before, that person must be left exposed to carry the whole fault and guilt.

So, it is needful and necessary that the woman on whom everyone accuses Christianity of disregarding be left exposed and shown to the world that it she alone who committed an unforgettable crime and therefore it is her own fault that she is regarded of little worth.

And male Adam is just like a man charged with the armed robbers who robbed and killed people at a bank, whereas his crime is that some of the stolen was deposited into his account which he spent.

There isn't any lawyer who is representing that man who won't point out that he is only guilty of one crime which is receiving of stolen property which carries only a term of imprisonment.
Whereas he is not guilty of armed robbery and murder both of which carry death penalty. Which means in God's Hands such a person is liable to daiee twice.

Meanwhile, our Adam never partook in the plan to commit robbery, nor in the robbery itself nor was he in the vicinity of the robbery. So, he is not guilty of robbery.

Same thing for the real Adam.

Man (Adam male) was nowhere in the place where Woman (female Adam) was conspiring and conniving with the serpent on how to rob God of His Godship by taking God by surprise in her suddenly being "a god" thereby leaving her place to elavate herself by doing an act that she was expressly prohibited forewarned from doing.

So while woman was seeking to coup d'etat God, aka Treason and Mutiny, all of which carry the death penalty.

And so you see all the debts of deaths woman is owing God and that she must pay as God has Sworn.

Meanwhile, Man (Adam male) was not thinking about any of those things and therefore he did not commit the crime of Treason/Mutiny/Coup d'etat.

So, can you see that at this point man (male Adam) was innocent since whereas Female Adam was already guilty of at least 6 offences to wit-

Charge 1- Conspiring and conniving with an enemy. (Treason)

Charge 2- Plotting and Seeking to overthrow God vernment aka Government by desiring to be a god Coup d'etat (Treason)

Charge 3- Seeking to elavate herself beyond her estate.

Charge 4- First human to. blatantly Disobey and Disregard God's Commandment.

Charge 5- Counseling and Procuring an innocent man to become an accomplice in her commission of her crimes

In all these, man was still very much innocent but woman was already over guilty.

So how can man and woman be equal before men and God?

With these who cannot see that a woman's fate is sealed already?

And in all this man (male Adam) had not yet committed the crime.

https://www.nairaland.com/6319053/when-eve-charged-court-charges#97161190

Umbrateeth04:
do you really know the meaning of bias?...you just use words that has no correlation to the discourse just to make a futile point that is already dead on arrival...

Where did you get your data, analysis, and survey to come into the unrealistic conclusion that your religion doesn't reek of sexism and misogyny even when the evidence is glaring in your fallible bible ?
What you don't know is far greater than you...its quite glaring, obvious and undeniable,...in some cases silence is far more better than exhibiting an embarrassing or blatant lack of understanding...the funny part is how you delude yourself with confidence on a subject you know nothing about .

In your case is willful ignorance, you refuse to accept and acknowledge facts that are clearly presented to you..your ability to argue passionately about a topic while getting all the basic facts wrong is shameful and disgraceful

Every grown person knows what bias is and the types of bias people play and how biased people never listen to nor consider any information opposing their bias. And that is what you have already done as your question "Where did you get your data, analysis, and survey to come..." proves it. Especially as I even showed you where they all came from in rebuttal of the facts that fuel your bias, yet here you asking for what I have already answered.

So, your bias rules you beyond reason and you cannot be reasoned out of it especially as it stands you have still not challenged none of my rebuttals.

So if Trump, Putin or Kim Jong blew up the world today how many of you would forgive him should you meet him in Jupiter after the wipe out?

Would you and your families ever respect him and his family? Osu, single mother things, Anini, Abacha, Buhari, Hitler, Idi Amin family things already answer you.

Shall any of these peoples and families be able to lift up their heads before you?

No

In appearance, would it not look like all of you are dominating them?

Yes.

That is the same thing that hit women and in addition they go swimming in runs.

So, i ask who has respect and regard for a runs girl?

No one.

So, how do you expect Holy God to allow this same woman who destroyed His house and His people to come near Him or represent Him in any of His Place?

Her wrongdoing brought in ivu and deathe

Meanwhile, In the world she was brought in, there was no deathe or sickness or cuss.

Only Life and blessings and God gave both male and female/man and woman dominion.

But she brought in ivu and deathe. And as we later see, murder follows and then ivu and Wike.nes increased beyond comprehension.

And then we see that God has a thing for the First and He places great Value in the first.

https://www.nairaland.com/8281391/god-thing-first-there-always#133098226

So, let us count the First things at this point that are of great value to God
1) The LORD, later known as Jesus Christ, The First Son of God
2) this world of man
3) Adam male
4)Adam female.
5) the serpent aka Satan, the first Sinner.

Now among these, who was the first to sin?

Satan is already cancelled out as he had sinned already

So among these who was the first to sin?

And the clear answer is female Adam.

And so, in addition to her being the first female she then gave herself a second world record of being the first human to offend God.
And it is not that she did 1 small offence but that she threw a world ending nuclear bomb.

And then she blew the bomb even before the world as the world just started.

Excluding those sects and religions and societies which have been condemned for violating women and female rights on the ground of masochism, we all came to meet and notice that there is a separation, preference and prevailing of the man over the woman.

Note: even women prefer the man over their fellow women

And Note Again, this phenomenon is seen only in man vs woman; and not in boy vs girl or male vs female.

So, generally, sexism and the claim that the man is dominant to the woman is confined to a man vs woman situation.

And what caused this imbalance?

By the Bible, it points to that the female/woman was the first human being to do a Wrong aka sin

And it is not that she sinned one small overlook able wrong like maybe breaking a plate or that she failed to water the crops.

But, rather she committed a world ending crime, like Trump or Putin or Kim Jong pressing the button to launch nuclear bombs around the world