₦airaland Forum

Pedrocross4568:
Is there a school where women learn these behaviors?
Women can be quite difficult to understand.
Please continue buying those items; just don’t disclose the total cost.

Was she not the first to know evil? So being very bad is in her DNA and she does not need to go to any school to learn just like a fish did not go to any school to learn how to swim

SisterAnn:
Your wife's concern is borne out of love and nothing more.

And even the Op knows this but just decided to troll his wife.

Single men advicing married men only on NL.

Lies!

This is how you people always wrap and hide your wickedness.

Because you people know that men look at things only from the good angle especially when they can never see and imagine that the woman who acted like she loves them and whom they married to become their wife would be doing any wickedness to them, under the covers of True-Lies and half truths and double speak.

This is just an example of how women's wickedness is packaged.

dangermouse:
Indirectly telling you to stop buying. She considers it her duty and i bet she is a stay at home wife right?

Where else do you want her to get money from, when you keep buying those food items?

That is women for you.

Exactly.
She's man pullingnating him to stop buying so that she can collect the money. She's trying to control him

You men sef you just open your mouth waaah without thinking. Do you people not know that she knows that this is how you people would react?

Then therefore do you people not see that she is saying another thing that you don't consciously get?

And check it, do you people notice that it is only or mostly you men who are reacting?

Common sense no tell una to wonder why women no dey talk too?

Dat na why women go dey continue to play una like doll baby yet una tink say na dem be fufu

Stop talking rubbish. If killing of bandits and bad people is good then God's killing in good affirms His Goodness and Uprightness.

Not to talk of the fact that He has a Right to kill. So just go and wait for your turn

Hmm see Punishment!

Kobojunkie:
All the man simply needed to do in that case is file for formal dissolution of the marriage. Case closed. No judge can force anyone to have sex with another, regardless of marital status.

Exactly how no judge forces a willing employee on an unwilling employer

Gabrielshow24:
Talk is cheap 😂,bring out evidence!

We are all aware of the "miracle of the sun". Pls, bring out how you came to an objective conclusion that Mary "was" ...or "is" "Ina...".

Until then, keep your hearsays to yourself 🤨.

He yabbing the Catholics

Abeg leave those European pagans

Chidix123:
but the child is not the mother.

See The Law
Fetus sequitur ventrem[/] or [I]Partus sequitur ventrem,- that which is born follows the womb,”

Children follow their mother's status.

And what is the status of this woman of pleasure?

Answer: A Stranger and outsider who gives sechual pleasure to people having no rights in my house

Therefore, the child is "filius populi"

And that is why you see Cubana chief priest reject the child and woman screaming that she has a child for him. I bet his lawyers are just waiting for her

Chidix123:
but the child is your own not an outsider.

That's the power of consent. Exactly like if your accountant uses your account to do 419 would you accept it, since it's your account?

Or if your driver uses your vehicle to rob and kidnap people, so when he gives you the money from his action you would accept it since it is your vehicle?

Chidix123:
Bro no matter at least give them something small so they can use it to guide

It is that giving that gives them that right. If you remind the child mama that that is not the contract, there is nothing the constitution can do

Chidix123:
they may start to cause problems when the man dies so it is better that the man will share everything and give everyone something before leaving the world. The constitution is very clear on that.

Shame on my family if they don't know their rights and allow a stranger to take what I never intended to give to them.

But I kukuma trust my children, dem already know law

Chidix123:
but the constitution said they should have equal shares and when a man dies he will not be there to say anything. The court will decide it for him.

No. The constitution did not say equal share. It only said that such a child has a right to take.

And now here begins the problem which I have solved which is under what circumstance?

Now in truth that pronouncement of Law is right and good and all and I support that which is right and good, however, it is not all right and good.

So, check it, the times when that laws is applied is in situations where the man truly does not mind having other outside children. They are even happy about it. So, they are under that law.

But my case is different, my contract with the wilful participant was clearly "a pleasure only arrangement" which clearly removes a child from the equation. An equation which she also guarantees under the feeling of safe and discreet sex.

So, if she departs from the contract, then it means that she on her own just wanted to have and carry a child on her own. So she and the child have no right to come near my house and my family's property, whether I'm dead or alive

And the court will support me. Cases dey

Samantha125:
What do you mean "a child you did not intend to have"?

Wouldn't you'd have been the one who'd have decided to step outside of your marriaga without any protection?

Whether you like it or not, you'd have brought that child to the world and he or she would be entitled to get equal share of your assets upon your passing.

I did not go out to step out of my marriage. I went out to have "swim" and play.

I did not go out to buy or rent or acquire a kid.

Infact I dodged all those fertile women who if I do atishoo, a baby may follow to pick a woman who knows I just want to fun with her and that's all. No baby is wanted or expected.

Also, the partner in fun also offers this safe sex as she represents one nights fun

All these are the fine prints of the contract of fun exactly how it is written on bottles "liquid content only". So this one is a contract of pleasure only.

So, if she allows herself to get pregnant then, it is her own liability exactly how we use a hotel or Airbn and then they will call me because of the soap foams left in the bathroom?

If they like let them not flush it.

For me, no child I have outside my wife will ever get even a match stick. The woman who birthed the child knew the contract did not include her having children exactly as you women say you have a right not to get pregnant even when the husband wants to.

Kobojunkie:
Are you suggesting that the man should exclude the side-chick's children from getting anything by writing a will? That is cruel!

Yes!

A child that I did not intend to have and I did not take care of in my lifetime has no right to part take in my main family's benefits.

EmperorIsaac:
Is the child of a side-chick not a human being? Rubbish message.

Orphans too are human beings and no one is giving them anything

Blakjewelry:
My concept of perfection differs from the ops, if we are talking about a self sustaining system as a perfect system I will agree but the op idea of a perfect system and how evil came to be is flawed.

Ok

I am a good looking guy. I use to date a girl but broke up with her. She love me so much and I also love her in return. But each time we have sex, she doesn't take much time to cum which is OK for me. She can cum within first round. After she cum, she will hate me and no longer allow me to touch her for another round. My touch will irritate her from then on.

I always felt bad over her attitude. I love her so much and she herself wanted me to marry her. But deep in my heart, I just knew I will never marry such a person because of her aftersex irritation.

What could be wrong with her?

Now, I know why?

It is because you have killed her, just like Satan did to female Adam.

Then, she too went to do to Adam, laying the tradition of you disvirgin her and she disvirgins him, and everybody divirgining themselves and everybody dying.

So you can now see another why women hate men

In principle, it is the same but in real eyeity, it is worse for a man to sleep with a married woman.

Why?

Because men are the only ones who still have value before God.

Women do not.

Why?

Because, it was woman who was the first to offend God by sinning. And God has a thing for the first person who does something whether good or bad eg Satan (first to offend God by sinning), male Adam, Abel, (acceptable sacrifice), Cain (murder), Cain's grandson (Polygamy), Enoch (first born again), Esau, King Saul etc.

And that is why you see God and the bible mostly speak to men and why we can all see and feel God silently hating women.

So, women sleeping with married men is no news for they have always done that and have done things worse than that tay, tay.

But for men who do it, they are either already dead like women and so like women, they are in the same place. But for a boy who does it, it is from that day, he and everyone will see that he "dies" and his life and living completely changes. And it is from after that day that things which never happened to him, start happening to him and his fellow deadies are there to tell him that it is normal, and they shall be right because forever all those abnormal things shall become a part of his life and living getting worse and worse. And then, he and women will be in the same place.

https://www.nairaland.com/2248983/sex-destroyed-me-took-away#32577031

And you know the crazy thing, if you stay away from sex it is then women will start pursuing you, smiling and being nice to you and giving you gifts. Including the beautiful ones and the very beautiful ones and the super beautiful ones and so on, and it would seem like you are in control of their lives and that they would do anything you tell them of course including comot pant.

Na still the same trap!

If you fall, you would know that you were living before

They are giving him bail for murder?

Earthkumy:
Bible says my people perish because of lack of knowledge

If you read you won't suffer lack of knowledge

You will have a of of answers to help you

At the cost of causing God to suffer insalt and abuse? I leave you in God's Hands

CoolUsername:
There were three points in that post. Is that too much for you to handle?

See, you used the word "too". Exactly proving my point that you were indeed committing the fallacy by trying to make it difficult.

CoolUsername:
Weren't you the one who brought up the man was born without arms and legs? Did you forget what you typed or you just trying avoid the question?

It is you now pretending like you do not see that I pointed out that you are unable to respond.

CoolUsername:
How does this apply to children born with genetic defects or children affected by natural disasters?

See how you have changed post yet again? You asked "Why are innocent children born without limbs if evil is caused by our choices? Who chose that?"

Now I have answered you,
you have still changed post to genetic defects as if being born without limbs is not also genetic defect.

If indeed you truly have a point answer the questions I asked you which is,

The evils that fall on children are they not arising from the activities of their adults?

Is it that the children are living on their own and in their own world then evil just came and hit them fiam?

CoolUsername:
This doesn't refute my point. Bad outcomes are only possible because God specifically made provision for them. In other words, God consciously and knowingly created every evil scenerio that will ever befall everyone in the world because he created the world with the knowledge that we will suffer.

Your example doesn't work because, as humans, we are not fully in control of all the negative outcomes of our actions. Humans are not all-powerful and all-knowing. We are subject to laws of nature. That is why we can try to do good and end up failing.

What rubbish is this? Are you not fully in control when you are eating or bleeping or playing with gas fire?

Did the gas maker make provision for the gas to explode and burn you up? Or did the hypo maker make provision for it to burn your innards?

Men this is the most bleeped up excuse I have ever heard.

CoolUsername:
The question is how can an all-loving and all-powerful god's creation fail to be good?

Now you have added another question that was never there since you see that all your former questions do not make sense at all. Especially as you call someone good just for giving you a room to stay when you were looking for accommodation like some people experienced in the university and abroad is it now God Who has given you this lovely place to stay rent free? Clearly a very ungrateful person

AngelahFlo:
I think you're right on that ground because that's the reason why Christianity has been confused and has gotten many other religions looking at us like folks that ain't serious.

Precisely.

CoolUsername:
My points are numbered and you are free to choose which one to respond to.

Your post is the point and packing it up with several issues so that opponents would find it difficult and too heavy and scattered to argue against it, is exactly why it is a fallacy and proof that you know that you are wrong. (fallacy of many questions)

CoolUsername:
Nonsensical argument that completely misses the point. No need to respond if you don't have anything to say. Why are innocent children born without limbs if evil is caused by our choices? Who chose that?

You are the one taking rubbish as you are unable to respond which is why you have now committed another fall of Changing the Post from freedom of choice by raising yet another assumptive allegation.

CoolUsername:
I specifically mentioned children in my argument. If evil befalls children, then God must have caused it to befall them.

The evils that fall on children are they not arising from the activities of their adults?

Is it that the children are living on their own and in their own world then evil just came and hit them fiam?

Please, think we'll.

CoolUsername:
Negative outcomes are only possible because God made the world so. If God created the world, then he knowingly created all evil.

You have created a negatives like hypo, battery, acids, gas cookers etc and people have used them beneficially without adverse outcomes.

So clearly adverse outcome comes from bad and wrong use of a thing eg playing with the fire and gas in the gas cooker. And even what you would call good things eg eating, having sex also give a negative outcome when abused.

So, wrong use or bad use of any thing also produces bad and evil outcomes

Earthkumy:
You actually didn't read it

You can't attack what you didn't understand

Please don't be lazy with reading

The header is enough especially as it is unnecessary and this embarrassment has been running and died down so why raise it again? Is that how much you hate God?

JustPowerApps:
Looks like Op is stuck with oldskool wheels.

I prefer something modern, and formidable not bro-ke men's paradise like the ones Op listed.

Except for the old Skool Benz the other 2 will not last

I for complain say how Peugeot 504 no go dey dia!

Also Peugeot 404 pick up still dey.

That bus wey dey always tumble for third mainland bridge also dey ehen LT-35

Where did you see God test Adam?

O LORD arise and let all your enemies be consumed.

Another thread raised to embarrass God?

O LORD, arise and let all your enemies be destroyed

Fallacy of many arguments

CoolUsername:
1. Where does freedom of choice come in when a baby is born is a genetic defect that causes them great suffering and then take their lives? Where does freedom of choice come in when natural disasters kill and displace children?

That man who was born with no arms and legs has already proved you are full of shi..

CoolUsername:
1
2. If God truly is omniscient and created the world knowing that suffering will befall children, then he knowingly doomed those children to a life suffering.

In His knowing does He not also know that you could have avoided them all if you wanted to as proven by the fact that till today you still have mistakenly drank hypo?

CoolUsername:
3. If God is an all-powerful creator, then evil cannot exist as a concept without him explicitly creating it. Hence, we MUST have been created with the capacity to do evil and just FYI, the Bible seems to agree with me.

You have since created hypo and acid, gas cookers and yet your brothers and children have the sense not to misuse them... thatis Y u kpem like the man who put hypo in the fridge and drank it.