Dtruthspeaker's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dtruthspeaker's Profile › Dtruthspeaker's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 (of 998 pages)
Is it the same America that you corrupted and destroyed the world that you are talking about? The headquarters of saytan? |
Yorimichi:Why do you break up with your girlfriend/wife when she cheats on you? And why did sack your driver who stole and tried selling your car? Why did you not simply say "i forgive you" and move on with them? |
Userr: |
TenQ:Is this not your statement insinuating so? |
TenQ:I could not attend to your questions because i already had objections to the the first part of your statement which shows that you believe polygamy is right, even though you are trying to use the N.T to kind of still say that is not allowed, which I have heard people say. But this is double speaking, plus the Truth is that we all get that you people do not really believe that polygamy is completely wrong and that is the beginning of my grouse with this issue. So, basically you are saying polygamy is allowed and not allowed and that is not right. Yes, it might appear that getting to the Truth of this issue might not take one out of Christ but however, getting it will definitely help us to understand God and Christ more and definitely increase our confidence when we are representing Him. And even more importantly, you may see like i do that it is another BIG LIE! And if you Truly love God, there is no way that if you see this Lie told that you won't rise up and wholly condemn it, the way you do against Muslims. So, to address your Bible quotes up first you do real eyes that Paul said "to me" and not that he was saying that is The Law and two, via Moses, you are moving the post to divorce whereas the issue whether polygamy is right in the Eye of God. So, i urge you to take out time to uncover the Truth as you did to Muslims so that when you are representing God on this issue, you can be sure that you are right beyond all reasonable doubt as you are against Muslims |
Vifx:It is a shift of post because the issue was whether God forgives or not and not whether there is forgiveness but it is conditional or blanket forgiveness which is another issue and therefore a shift of the goal posts |
Vifx:Now at least you have changed post and admitted that He forgave some people. And who does not know that forgiveness operates upon certain conditions? So, it is settled now |
TenQ:Brother, at least can you now say that your thoughts on this issue is wrong? At least, even if you don't want to accept my own theory on it, you should at go back and research it, for there is no way God can ever support or justify an evil act. Polygamy means a spouse has/is commiting adultery. There is no one in the world who can remove adultery from polygamy |
GravityDefier:I never heard this shi before until I joined nairaland and started seeing people saying it and I saw that they were serious. So i went check it out for if cheating aka adultery is a sin then it is impossible for God to support it. And so i raised these threads to prove that those people are lying. https://www.nairaland.com/8032594/deuteronomy-17-17-shows-god#128966884 https://www.nairaland.com/8040571/westerhof-finally-confesses-adultery-polygamy https://www.nairaland.com/8238054/polygamy-jews-stopped-polygaming-after So, you can check them out. I would like to see your well considered opinion |
Lojical1:How can you not know the ancients again? Are you not the one who raised the ancients? All, in all both your ancients and modern are still struggling against God's curs to the point now that it is even worser today that your people are stealing and buying babies for millions. Your denying it hasn't changed the real eyeity. |
Vifx:Yet, we all saw Him forgive a lot eg when the thief on the cross asked for forgiveness, he got it or is it when Isreal begged for forgiveness several times in the desert and in the promised land |
Vifx:Now you have moved post from God does not forgive at all to unconditional forgiveness. No one said anything about unconditional forgiveness |
GravityDefier:Oh! Ok . It was nice and mentally stimulating. Please, can you weigh in on the argument I'm having with TenQ. on polygamy. He thinks that God gave David, Saul's wives, meanwhile the remaining part of that passage means that God too gave him men (homose things) and their wives too. In violation of God's express Commandment , "Neither shall he multiply wives to himself," Deuteronomy 17:17 I know it has since been said that God supports polygamy but I have asked everyone if it so, how then does a person do polygamy without being guilty of adultery? And none of the polygamist supporters have been able to give a valid answer. So, i would love to see your thoughts on it Don't worry take your time to think and research about it. Its even a little difficult for me to respond because I am occupied with a little delicate work that I want to ensure that it comes out right. So, i may not be here for the next 2/3days |
TenQ:Scrutiny dictates that "By doubting we are led to question, by questioning we arrive at the truth". Peter Abelard You already appreciate that i do not believe your view is right and therefore I have asked you questions on your view in which you say God gave David Saul's wives. And now i have pointed out that by your interpretation, in the second leg of that passage God gave David, the the men of Isreal and Judah too (homose things) and their wives for him to husband/wife them all. And now that you see the second leg's interpretation contradicts you view on the first keg, you now seek to break your interpretation of that passage and depart from it, by moving post to plead different purposes. This clearly proves that you are bending the passage according to your views. For the passage is already self explanatory and it's purposes are clear, which according to your interpretation, God gave David Saul's wives. the men of Isreal and Judah too (homose things) and their wives too. So, after you have first given an interpretation to the passage, now the second leg of that passage points out that your interpretation of the first passage is wrong, you have now taken it upon yourself to divide and appropriate interpretations to them. A clear case of arbitrary selective judgement This is fraudulent and Wrong! You can't interpret Akara as from beans and then say that moi moi is not from beans. So, do you now see that you are very wrong and that the scripture does not support your view? |
Mitsurugi:Then children will grow up and say that she is the bestest mummy in the world |
TenQ:By asking me this question, do you now see and agree that your opinion here is wrong? For clearly, you are saying that God David Saul's wives, the men of Isreal and Judah too (homose things) in addition to their wives which you now find it difficult to say. If you agree that you are wrong, then i can proceed to answer the questions you asked, so that we are both sure of what is right. And right you think you are right and i am just want to make certain that you are right. But if you agree you are wrong, then we can both examine my views to see if me too I'm wrong or right |
Lojical1:Who told the ancients did not have science? Does the history of science not start with the ancients? And all these maternity things today are they not built on the science of the ancients? All, in all both your ancients and modern are still struggling against God's curs to the point now that it is even worser today. Who heard of buying babies in the 70's/80's? |
GravityDefier:See, you are using the word "related" and not the word "the same" which means that even you appreciate that all those cases are different from each other. Uzziah's case is exactly like Aaron's sons case. Saul was already rejected aka banished by God hence his resort to paganism and even though The Holy of Holies resides in the Ark of the covenant, that does not prevent God from anointing humans as He did to Moses. So, you are mixing them up because you are only looking at them superficially |
Josywhyte:Lets take it that after you are forgiven last year, 2025, is it that you did not sin since last year till today 2026? If you sinned, are those not fresh sins that you would require a fresh forgiveness for? |
TenQ:Read it again it is not only Saul's wives he was given in that passage. The passage expressly says that "I gave your master's house to you, and your master's wives into your arms. i gave you the house of Israel and Judah." So, by your understanding in the second attached leg of that passage, are you saying that even the men of Isreal and Judah too (homose) were given to David to wife or husband in addition to their wives, since God Said He even gave him their "house" also in addition to Saul's wife as you say? |
GravityDefier:With God, there is no punishing differently. That is one of the things that makes Him just. As it was with Ananias so was it to Sapphira. As it was for the Canaanites, so it was for Israel. So, there isn't anywhere, where 2 persons committing the same offences and then God punished them differently. That would not be just and God never ever did that. Their offences must have been different for the punishment to be different. Forgiveness only means a stay or cessation or reduction of a punitive effect which is deliberately delivered to an offender, which is different from the natural consequence of committing that offence. Exactly as when you bash a person's car breaking your bumper, headlights and radiator to the person's damaged boot and rear lights.. if the person forgives you by taking his vehicle away, you still have bear the effect of fixing your own damage |
Josywhyte:Yes! Deeds are either good or bad and whenever deeds are judged, their goodness or badness are also automatically assessed. So, there is nothing like "judgement will be done from the good deeds to the bad deeds". And this thread shows that i have put it to you that forgiveness means forgetting. But that the problem is that man always commits a new sin that makes him liable for punitive Judgement on the Day of Judgement. So, no whine yourself |
TenQ:And as i asked the Muslim guy who raised it, so do you say that therefore by this statement David was given everybody's wife wife in Israel and Judah? If it was so, how then did God charge him for taking Uriah's wife, since you say that God gave him everybody's wife? Wherefore hast thou despised the commandment of the Lord, to do evil in his sight? Count 1) thou hast killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword, Count 2) and hast taken his wife to be thy wife, Count 3) and hast slain him with the sword of the children of Ammon. |
Josywhyte:I said "we are going to be judged for our deeds, both the good and the bad. And even the dictionary tells you that Deeds and sins are not the same thing. |
Josywhyte:I stopped attending church since 2016 or so. But if you want to know my church history, then it is Methodist, Catholic and Rccg. After that, i made the Bible my church and Teacher |
Josywhyte:I clearly stated that "It is not correct to say "we're going to be judged according to our sins". And that it we are going to be judged for our deeds, both the good and the bad. Or do you want to tell us that deeds and sins are the same thing? Josywhyte:But you kon come the religion kon dey show say you know the religion na, since you sef read wetin dey book. Si |
Josywhyte:How? |
Expanse2020:🤣🤣🤣🤣. 3 Times i have already answered you that you have already the same scriptures i read. So if you want to say that it is not True that God only started favouring them ONLY AFTER they were into polygamy, then you have a duty and the burden of showing it. 🤣🤣🤣🤣. But, you can't because it is exactly as i said. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 |
Expanse2020:🤣🤣🤣 You are repeating yourself na so you force me to repeat what I have already answered you. A wife means "one wife" so case closed.🤣🤣🤣 Plus, i even answered that For the others i already pointed out that "All of them all got the favour of God BEFORE they went into polygamy." 🤣🤣🤣 But because you don't have any reasonable thing to say again is why you are just making noise.🤣🤣🤣 |
Josywhyte:Because we all are asking Him for Judgement since He created us and others who affected. That is when all the God bless... and God puni..... we say will be full filled |
Josywhyte:More accurately we are going to be judged for our deeds, both the good and the bad. It is not correct to say "we're going to be judged according to our sins". This is a glaucomaic view. |
This is not True. All of them is for sex. The problem is that men think that women do not like sex. Meanwhile, a woman needs you to have sex with her for her own you. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 (of 998 pages)