₦airaland Forum

Mmm! Natural Law has perfectly taken care of all these things you raised including those things you did not address.

For by virtue of Natural Law, every person can dispose his property in any way and manner He so pleases.

And no one has a right to restrict or interfere with his Natural Right, unless the good of such interference is greater than the Right granted by Natural Law.

So the 18yr old man-made instruction you stated, already falls, among all the other man-made instructions which fall against the Just and Right dictates of Natural Law

It really does not matter because you both agree to the marriage. However, if one is greater than the other and the other agrees, then the greatness and lessness shall stand and every one shall see it.

If she has perfected her right to reclaim her car, then the court would not have disposed of it!

If it was disposed, then report to the magistrate who tried the case, which may lead to the Registrar of the Court and a petition to the Chief Judge. Ther are many ways you can go about it

Bill of Rights/American Declaration of Independence.

I once believed in this doctrine, thinking it was Perfect, All-Good and All-Right, because it stated

"We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights that among these are life, liberty and pursuit of happiness."

But how Deceptive and Most Untrue this statement is hence- the most dangerous lies are those lies which contain truths in them

"We hold these truths to be self-evident.. "

"Hold?"-No one needs Anyone to hold anything. Self-evident means that it  is Conclusively Proven and the Evidence of is Final Proof which can be easily seen by Everyone, so no-one need 'hold' anything.

So Let Self-Evidence Rule!

"... that all men are created Equal, that they are endowed (blessed) by their Creator..." (True)

... endowed by their creator with certain...

"...Certain...?"

Is there any Right not given by our Creator? Or can anyone other than our Creator give us the other parts of our Rights which our Creator did not give us?

A crafty and devious (again devil-ous) misrepresentation, sleight of hand and completely diversionary from the Truth.

Did our Creator not give us All, Equally, the Right He wished to give us All?

... certain inalienable rights that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"

"Certain Inalienable?" (Not Separable).

Are there other Rights which can be separated? Did they separate some other Rights but these are the ones they were unable to separate? Why are they separating those other "Separated Rights"? and to what good purpose is the separation thereof? -Which they have Never told us even till now!

Well, we don't really care to know what they have to say about this separation but they have No Right to separate our Natural Rights for every Right one man has, another man also has the same in the same force and power as given by our Creator.

"... among these are life, liberty and pursuit of happiness"

"... pursuit of happiness" (Deception). Were we all not born happy already as Self-Evident and Proven by children? So what happiness do we require to pursue, which we do not already have?

These are the Deceptions, Misseducations, Misdirections and Misleads contained in the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights which the world eats up as whole-fish, bones and all.

Our Creator Himself and From His Hand gave us Plentiful Rights limited Only by One to Another and These Rights are Self-Evident. No man can give another man, Rights!

Therefore the True Statement goes thus;

"We See and Know These Truths to be Self-Evident, that all men are created equal and that they are endowed by their Creator with Unalienable Rights that among these are life, liberty, peace, love, mercy, goodness, prosperity, security, everything good on the earth etc

Illuminated993:
You've been able to whitewash your husband. The next step should be heeding to the advices of the useless women in the comment section, so that you can finally destroy your marriage. When you destroy the marriage, I'll be here to congratulate you for joining the club of the "liberated sisters".

As a kid, I watched my parents quarrel and argue almost all of the time. My dad would throw her boxes out, she would take it back in, my mum would throw crazy abuses at him in her bid to disgrace him publicly and destroy every shred of self-esteem in him, the man would insist on not wanting the marriage anymore, neighbors would start pleading. It was terrifying. But as time went on, they outgrew those toxic traits, they stuck together, they got used to being together in peace and harmony with no more quarrels whatsoever. Marriage is a serious long term project offering profound lessons necessary for being a better human, not the fantasy as depicted in movies.

I know that we men can be controlling and act like bastards sometimes, but no matter how big a bastard a man is, only a woman who respects him makes him act right. If you want that man to get worse with you, try to show him he's not the boss, after all, he contributes almost nothing. My point is, you can make a man be whatever you want him to be, it all depends on the mannerisms you adopt with him.

If you think your husband isn't treating you properly, you don't get him treating you properly by standing up to him. You keep talking calmly to him like a wife married to a king, and quit looking at his failings, because it subconsciously makes you loathe and have no respect for him.

Money will come, keep praying, keep hoping, things will fall in place. In this Nigeria, there are women who are the breadwinners, and they still treat their spouses like he's the one doing everything in the home, and their marriages are thriving.

Wisdom is profitable to direct.

This is all cowpiss and horseshit save the wisdom part.

If you were truly wise you would know that what you have said is 1980 chicken shit which was wicked and unsustenable.

Can you go through evil and wickedness to get good? Or is there peace and good at the end of wickedness?

Can you not advice her to go through a good way to get good? Or is good not found in good?

I know for sure that good is found in good and I know Only One Person who gives Only Goods, not just Goods alone, Perfect Goods.

His Name is Jesus Christ, the Son of God. If you go to Him and Do whatever He tells, you would come here singing!!!

Since the Lord the did not put together, I hereby put Asunder.

You are free to go.

Hold it, wait, you are hereby ordered to pay part of school fees or whole.

To further provide maintenance and support for your children.

Custody of the children shall be in 50/50 possession

Are there any other matters? I Rise

Sunsets:
Family Remedy for Entitled Adults
The spirit of entitlement is tearing the destinies’ of over-pampered children in a lot of homes apart. How would you reconcile that feeling in an adult who at 35 still blames the parents for not owning that Benz they refused to bequeath him or the men who at 40 still rues their inability to make ends meet and blames the parents because he wasn’t educated in school or to the university level.
“Just because I no finish school some people take me for a fool…” familiar lines from Tuface
That husband that blames the wife for his financial woes or that wife that curses under her breath because of her fthw (fthw = full time housewife) status or because marriage came calling. No, don’t blame marriage, blame yourself.
Let us go back to the family. It is obvious that in this few cases that I cited, those adults were not trained to relies that their destinies are in their hands, absolutely. Bar any unforeseen circumstances as such as accidents, anyone can drive their destinies to their desired destinations. Some folks have achieved success, regardless.
Check out this funny/uncommon/unconventional remedy might be the antidote to practise.
In homes, rooms should not be allotted to kids; no room should be designated as children’s room. All rooms belong to either the mum or the dad. Whether it is a 1 room apartment or more than 1 bedroom homes, every room must bear the name plate “Mum’s Room” or “Dad’s Room”. Mum and dad can have multiple rooms with the extra rooms serving as extensions.
From the outset kids are aware that they live on rent. It should, in fact, be paid rent because they can pay from their allowee. The bizarre psychology of being comfortable in your parents homes at 25 is bewildering. Demanding they sponsor your expensive life style at 30, especially when they are unwilling to so, is a taboo.
This measure still needs lots of detailing and elaboration. For not wanting to bore you with words and paragraphs, this procedure is likely to prevent the onset of entitled spirit in upcoming and legendary/veteran adults.

The effect of weak parents! Who is the boss, the parent or the child? And who is supposed to be greater?

Then what would you say about a 36 and 32yr olds who are fuelled by their parents to do nothing, Rented house, furnished, generator at will, yet none of them work neither are they looking for one, neither are the parent pressing them to get one?

Do you see the deception of one of Satan's children here? Lamb instead of Beast?

Lamb101:
As long as the heart of man remains in its natural state, it is inclined to pervert justice to suit its purposes. The system of the world is designed to favour he who has more power regardless of wrong or right.

You say this because you do not fully know and comprehend what Powers the Good Creator above already gave you which i would show you over the course of time.

There are many many things which you don't know which is all our Natural Rights and Powers and no one can defeat you or beat you unless you let them, which you will because you don't Know!

This system of the world has been Truly and Fraudulently redesigned, all because many many Truths have been buried and craftily Concealed!

I am perfecting the ones i have uncovered to present them here.

Lamb101:
Ecclesiastes 3:16 And moreover I saw under the sun the place of judgment, that wickedness was there; and the place of righteousness, that iniquity was there.

Most true, the Courts have been taught to err, both the judges and the lawyers. So imagine, i am just finding out what "Just is", is, after all these past years, how much more, my fellows at law.

In truth i have discovered more, which i would bring here in the passage of time.

jom28gy:
How do you know that Satan have deceived you? Plato,in his argument on justice,in his book, THE REPUBLIC,; Have this to say, the macrosm of a just man, is a true parttern of a just society.unquote, that everything has its spheres.

All things evil come from he who is evil, commonly called Devil which is D'evil which is 'The Evil' whose True name is Satan.

Plato's statement simply proves the multiple faces and meanings that the world "just is" has taken up over the centuries which Should Not Be.

It is clear that you are either a man or a woman. It is certainly sure confusion if you are all a man, a table, a spoon or anything at all dependent on who views you.

And who stands to benefit when there is confusion and dissarray?

We have been deceived oh men, we have been deceived!!!
In fact, we are still being deceived and being lied to.
I hate this world with my whole soul and life.
Oh ye lawyers and ye men, can you believe that the word “Justice”, the meaning of which, which was and still is very elusive, evasive and very unsettled, that it is the Hidden and Concealed word ‘Just Is’?

Which Clearly and Undebatedly means Balance (Exact/Precise)?

The True “Just is” means- “A Just weight and Balance are the Lord’s; Proverbs 16:11;
“a false balance is an abomination to the Lord: but a Just weight is his delight. Proverbs 11:1

Christ warned us, “be not deceived” (Mathew 24:4) meanwhile Satan and his children have finished deceiving us already and are going on with further and further deceits today.

“Truly brothers, be not be Deceived, I say”.

A contract with a gun pointed at some one's head is armed robbery not a contract and the Law will never support it.

Kai! See wickedness, which one here is good?

None at all

candyguyofficia:
[/b]

You said: Saying English Law does not work in Nigeria is too sharp a statement to make as Nigeria Laws are primary sources of laws, English Laws are persuasive as secondary sources of law

Is it not the Law that anything founded on an illegality shall not stand?

Isn't the British invasion unlawful and illegal?

Shall 'one million boys' invade thy house and reign there and after they are long since gone, shall you continue to implement their laws?

It is still the Law that any law, anywhere, that is Good can be taken and used in the territories known as Nigeria.

candyguyofficia:
[/b]

Marriage under the Act Vis a Vis Succession Matters
The type of marriage celebrated by an individual has a significant role to play in determining the type of law that will apply in the dissolution/distribution of the estate (property) of the deceased who dies (very true) /intestate (without a Will), (the doctrine of Oneness in marriage is not taken into account, for what is called the deceaseds' property is jointly owned) is because marriage influence personal law.

You said: For a person who during his lifetime contracted a Marriage under the Act the custom which the person was naturally subjected to by nature will not be applicable as regard how the deceased estate (property) will be shared (it depends on his Last act of marriage if under the Act, then the Act is of great consideration with great respect to the Doctrine of Oneness, but if customary law, then by customary law again with regard to the Doctrine of marriage.)

rather it will be the English Law that will govern the distribution of the estate. English Law do not generally mean the Received English Law will be what will be applicable as local legislation can/will be applied such as the Administration of Estate Law
(English Laws should remain in England, we had our "Nigerian laws" before those armed Robbers came, we still have our Nigerian laws even after the armed Robbers left

The Nigerian Courts always had and have a right to take any law anywhere that is Good, good and just only, nothing less.

In marriage and succession, property does not devolve; to the spouses because it is already (hers') or (his)

slysteel:
People like you are the reason that country have refused to make an inch of progress,always sceptical about every damn thing,even in south Africa criminal cases are being tried online without bringing the suspect to court,every correctional facility have a tele conference facility in the prison comptroller's office where this is done and the same goes for the US,Uk etc for years. You people should learn to be forward thinking.

One of the problems with the Nigerian Legal system is that they have not yet placed even very grievous consequences for lying or attempting to lie to the Court, Deceiving and attempts to deceive the Courts.

Our little Perjury law on ground is Still Born and has never seen the light of day, save when it is used to destroy a certain target personality!

Truth is the Blood-Line of Every Court, without it the Court would be Dead!

These countries you mentioned are big on protecting the purity of the Truth and the Innocency of the Court, hence the clarity and purity of their Judgements

majorbravo:
All they had to do was initiate social distancing within the court room, such that everyone sits far apart.

That's what I was expecting too

Vulcan24:
summary execution loading .......

don't get caught.

under normal circumstances NJS is wacked, technology would make it a slaughter court.

I don't know where that is done except maybe in Arab courts similar to where defendants don't appear in person or been sentenced in foreign language.

Nigeria can apply sense to nonsense

But all the Rules of Natural Justice shall still apply, which in the Arab courts already scarcely and inadequately applies

kirkwood:
Stop misleading people. There are so many ways to get around it.

Bros, share na, make we know

ccollins:
are u a lawyer? How do u know this

Aha he's a lawyer now, how else would he know these things? The ordinary man on the street does not pay attention to this things.

It's a Rebuttable presumption anyway!

crownedprinz:
Heheheh The world is adapting to technology now. This a new world created. Going to be standing up in my house when the court admin says "court rise" while watching.
meanwhile
That is commendable. Meanwhile see what some Gbagada Elites are sharing to the community
https://www.nairaland.com/5822128/gbagada-elites-share-palliatives-aged

haha! In Nigeria we say "Coourrt"!

For the Truth to be Established in Court it needs to be Seen that it is an Undiluted and Undilutabie.

Truth is the Blood of every Court!

SweetCunt97:
Mtcheeeeeew, as if our legal system is anything to write home about.

We are all supposed to make our legal system good because it is not. God made everything Good, but wicked people have changed the goodness and have rather Established the Evilness because people have not fought them off.

Well I am one who fights them and shall continue to do so till I meet my maker.

candyguyofficia:
Let me break down the analysis of court marriage.


Marriage under the Act Vis a Vis Succession Matters
The type of marriage celebrated by an individual has a significant role to play in determining the type of law that will apply in the dissolution/distribution of the estate (property) of the deceased who dies intestate (without a Will), this is because marriage influence personal law. For a person who during his lifetime contracted a Marriage under the Act the custom which the person was naturally subjected to by nature will not be applicable as regard how the deceased estate (property) will be shared rather it will be the English Law that will govern the distribution of the estate. English Law do not generally mean the Received English Law will be what will be applicable as local legislation can/will be applied such as the Administration of Estate Law


However, in Cole v Cole, Mr. Cole a native of Lagos who also died in Lagos during his lifetime got married to a Sierra Leonea and contracted Marriage under the Act/"Court Marriage", Mr. Cole died with is wife, child and his own brother surviving him. Upon Mr. Cole death, is brother went to court to be declared customary heir (i.e right to inherit ALL of his brother's property solely in accordance with the custom to which the late Mr. Cole was naturally subjected to), the court in interpreting section 14, 19 of the Supreme Court Ordinance of 1876 held that customary law is not the applicable law to the distribution of the estate/property of Late Mr. Cole (meaning Cole brother can't inherit his brother's property in line with custom of Late Mr. Cole) but the English Law this is because the Late Mr. Cole had contracted a Marriage under the Act/"Court Marriage" sometimes referred to as Christian Marriage (Note I said earlier that some Christian marriage in practice are fanfare as they do not constitute Marriage under the Act, its technical but like I said I won't bore you with it). The decision of the court in Cole v Cole is in line with Section 49 (5) of the Administration of Estate Law.

To policy

The Law of Succession and inheritance is based on Relationships and Marriage is one of the Relationships that Must be under consideration in determining who shall inherit or succeed.

And not just relationship alone, the strength of the relationship Must be in Issue Always.

And before every Just Court, A valid Marriage of Any Kind has its full powers, As it is the Law, He who bears the Burden must Bear the Benefit.

So your statement up there about a person under customary law being inapplicable is very wrong and unjust-for the Law Does No Wrong.

Also English Law always belongs to the English People not Nigerians because English Law is the. Traditional law and costum of the English People, while we Nigerians already have our own Traditional law and costum, (which requires plenty of amendments) even before and after those English Armed Robbers came.

So English law does not work in Nigeria like Nigerian laws do not work in England.

That's why the decision in Cole vs Cole was good but the ground (as stated above) was wrong, in that a marriage under the Act createes joint ownership of property and all rights must flow from there first, not on the ground of Succession Laws, because Succession Follows Relationship Always

candyguyofficia:
Let me break down the analysis of court marriage.


An overview of the nature of Customary Law Marriage.
As a general rule in Nigeria and most Africa countries most widows cannot inherit from their deceased husband property as these females are regarded as property that should be managed, "shared" and governed, as a "property" cannot manage another property. In Osilaja v Osilaja the Supreme Court stated that the customary law rule that a widow cannot inherit her husband's estate has become so notorious (kindly note that "notorious" do not mean as negative word as defined in English dictionary rather it notorious as used by the court means so popular very popular) by frequent proof in courts that it has become judicially noticed.

policy

And this is just the shit that makes fills me rage and I just can't wait to take it down and Destroy it,. What can be more repugnant and unjust than this ? (Well many, but this shit is included and must be brought down).

The Law is always fair, reasonable and just, but our human unfair/wicked/pervert judges need to be .....d

This marriage Law wahala: first, it is the principle of Law that a later (latter) event vitiated (cancels) an earlier one. That was why it is wisely recommended that you marry traditionally, then go to a Marriage Registry to marry under the Marriage Acts/law of countries, popularly and erroneously called Court Marriage.

The marriage under the Act will Cancel the Marriage under Tradition.

So the woman is even making the mistake she is trying to avoid, meaning the man can do all the things she fears ( marry other wives etc) and it is valid because she consented (agreed) to it.

Rozz, I hear you loud and clear hope maximus69 isn't encumbered already

My senses are tingling very strongly, maximus69 it, I feel Rozz likes you a lot, the way she's taking on you and won't let you be, . I know that feeling!!! This is real feminine invitation

Maximus69

Another song which taught me was "in the Lord alone- Maranatha Singers"

"In the Lord, the Lord alone
Are righteousness and strength
The height and breadth and length
Of love is found in Him
In the Lord, the Lord alone
Are righteousness and strength
In the Lord, in the Lord alone"

The Powerful word there for you is STRENGTH!

Another one is "He will come and save you-Bob Fitts".

You've got to know and remember all these!

Maximus69:
That means humans are now playing Scrabble in their brains to know how to escape from circumstances due to past experience of those who have passed through the same situation!

My guy in reality, Adam and Eve became blind (spiritually speaking) the day they chose to alienate themselves from their Creator! John 9:40-41

Observe your fellow man closely, watch his moments of decision and see the direction of his inclinations in reference to good and evil!

I think, respectably, that you are the one "scrabbling" because you desire to do the good in compliance with God's Laws But the doing of wrong is so natural and flows very easily and the doing of it is so wickedly easy, (you don't even have to think about it) very sweet and very overwhelming.
I was there and I know it very well but to the heartfelt Praise to God, I escaped and that's why I able to say confidently all I say.

To explain the weight of the doing of wrong over right let me present it this way- if you are right handed how long would it take you to change to the left hand? Would it be easy? And until you perfect it, which one would come naturally to you?

That is the work which every soul must go through, to FULLY and WILLFULLY "mount up with wings as Eagles; they shall run, and not be weary: and they shall walk, and shall not faint." Isaiah 4:31

That verse shows you another secret of God- king David again Repeated, "Wait, I say, on the Lord" Psalm 27:14.

After you've done all you can, that is call on the Lord, His Commandments and remembered His Judgements to do them, then Stand! Donnie Mcclurking song "Stand".

Maximus69:
At the bolded!

So you mean Adam and Eve never knew the good and evil that day, but we (there descendants) have learnt enough through past events as recorded in the Bible for us shey?

That means humans are now playing Scrabble in their brains to know how to escape from circumstances due to past experience of those who have passed through the same situation!

My guy in reality, Adam and Eve became blind (spiritually speaking) the day they chose to alienate themselves from their Creator! John 9:40-41

They never knew! And the proof of it is told "and the eyes of them both were opened" Genesis 3:7 an experience we his Descendants even know very well. Remember that experience when your eye opened-eg "so I can drive daddy's car or so I fit toast Rozz, this one wey Chu don toast Mari finish", so many eyes opening events.

If you take all these E.O events you would see one thing that they all have in common is that at one moment "You Knew Not" and then after E O, "You Knew".

So it was for Adam and Eve but there were also other things that played out before the E.O and what was in Adam's mind was not the same as Eve's. And this is Seen in the Judgement God meted out on them as I have seen that God took account of it and weighed it.

Based on those weights, Adam's punishment was different from Eve's.