₦airaland Forum

Missmossy: Its obvious you rank yourself inferior and you possess low self esteem,no lady would wanna get hooked with such a guy. Work on yourself asap.

Hahaha working on it, non stop.

MrsBreezy: Lol I do not oh

I am completely clueless

hmmm are u sure

Tymax: Hmmm, OP, it's like Iceberlyn is showing you how it's done.

Ride on bro.

mrsbreezy ask tymax, he knws wats goin on

MrsBreezy: Hmm lol what's going on?

i no knw, ask urself na.

Tymax: Hmmm, OP, it's like Iceberlyn is showing you how it's done.

Ride on bro.

d guy and mrsbreezy jst dey....

MrsBreezy: Hehehe

see as she dey smile

iceberylin: ..
ŃŐ ŚPŐĨĹ MŶ PÁČĶÁĞĔ Ő

Ĕ ĞÁ ÁŴÚ,ŐĞßĔŶĔ ßÚŔÚ amusu

deariz God o

iceberylin: ßÚŤ ĨŤŚ ŐĶ,ĨŤŚ ČŐŐĹ....
ŔĨĞĤŤ ĤĔrĔ ČŐÚĹĎ ßĔ ŤĤĔ ßĨŔŤĤ ŐŦ ŚŐMĔŤĤĨŃĞ new

una suppose help me out, una dey here dey play rough play.

laplace12: Good answer.

Some people think loving someone is enough for the person to love them back

i wonder how u approached ur girlfriend

MrsBreezy: Her father's wealth will.become her own soon enough.

hmmm wat makes u so sure of dat?

MrsBreezy: I don't think he's up to her standard because he only mentioned her financial status and her beauty. If he was up to her those qualities should not seem as such a big deal. Especially the whole "latest blackberry" thing

Obviously she's not going to like him like this. She's not been noticing him. The op said she's been brushing him off. So either he needs to change or he can forget it.

babe no vex o, u no see say i say na her pupsi wealth she dey live on.

3cycle: Shoe Get size

meaning?

MrsBreezy: Reach her standard. Then approach her.

e b like u b one of dem!!!

abeg i need ladies advice 4 dis thing ooo

if you come in contact with a girl who have everything, when i mean everything, she is attractive, use the latest BlackBerry phone, very intelligent and money is not a problem cause her father is rich, but you can stop thinking about her cause you like her and want her to be your girlfriend. But most of the times you approached her she just keep brushing you aside. How can you make her see that you really love her?...

Many people sees praising God as a burden, but the truth is there are reasons why we should praise God, which are:
1) we were called to praise God. (2 Peter 1 vs 9)
2) God likes praise. (psalm 23 vs 3)
3) God feeds on praise. (psalm 50 vs 11 - 15)
4) it activates his power. (psalm 57 vs 5)

and there are many more things we gain from praising God. HAPPY SUNDAY, REMAIN BLESS. JESUS IS LORD.

diluminati: Nonsense. you should ask if heaven really exist in the first place.

u jst want people to notice you, get a life dude.

the wife never know wetin she dey do her husband

Sarimah: Why not?

no reasons?

Kunleskey: Yeske if i have feeling 4 her

hmmm

obainojazz: I will bite u..o

u b suarez?

obainojazz: so
ur childhood friend luv u

wetin happen na everything i go tell u

obainojazz: u dey confused son

u dey find me 4 nairaland?

obainojazz: buhaha....I don catch u.
.mallam

hmmmm wetin happen?

How can i join or play?

up Liverpool fc, we are no champions league tourist, we are here for the title

Mikel though is a problem to that team

President Obama says he has the authority to
pursue Islamic State in the way he wants. Not
everyone agrees.
Mr Obama is now going after Islamic State or Isil,
as he calls the group, with a vengeance.
"We will degrade and ultimately destroy Isil," he
said in an address at the White House on
Wednesday. He said US forces would pursue the
militants in Iraq - and now in Syria, too.
He asserts he has the authority to use US force in
this way and does not need the approval of the US
Congress. His advisers say they already have
authorisation.
Several days after al-Qaeda struck the US in 2001,
lawmakers passed an authorisation for use of
military force (AUMF). It does not specifically name
al-Qaeda - but is directed at the organisation.

Hunting down al-Qaeda:

The resolution states: "The president is authorised
to use all necessary and appropriate force against
those nations, organisations or persons he
determines planned, authorised, committed, or
aided the terrorist attacks."
With this resolution, President George W Bush felt
he could pursue the people who carried out the
attacks, whether they were in Afghanistan or in
other parts of the world. Before Mr Obama's speech, a senior administration
official told reporters the president could rely on the
2001 resolution "as statutory authority for the
military air strike operations he is directing against
Isil".
The 2001 resolution was part of the "security
apparatus", as former Vice-President Dick Cheney
described it, created in an effort to combat al-
Qaeda and allied groups. ("I was one of its
architects," said Mr Cheney in a speech at the
American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think
tank, on Wednesday.)
Marc Thiessen, a former speechwriter for Mr Bush,
said Mr Obama can - and should - use the work of
Bush administration officials in his campaign
against Islamic State.
"There was a legal architecture that allowed the US
to fight al-Qaeda in Iraq," Mr Thiessen said. "The
president is fighting the same group with a different
name."
Mr Thiessen added: "If you're fighting an enemy in
Iraq and they run across the border into Syria, you
don't need additional authorisation to go after them
- just like we didn't need additional authorisation
when the Germans went into France."

Shocked by grisly killings:

Last year Mr Obama planned to ask lawmakers to
authorise military action in Syria. He wanted to
retaliate against President Bashar al-Assad for the
alleged use of chemical weapons.
But it seemed unlikely Congress would support the
president, and Mr Obama dropped his plans.
Today things are different.
Mr Obama is not asking Congress for direct
approval for military action. Instead he wants
lawmakers to approve $500m (£386m) for rebels in
Syria combating Islamic State.
Mr Obama has a sympathetic audience on Capitol
Hill. The Republican Speaker of the House, John
Boehner, has offered his support. "We ought to give
the president what he's asking for," he told
reporters.
Like other Americans, lawmakers were shocked by
the videos released by Islamic State, showing the
brutal executions of journalists James Foley and
Steven Sotloff.
Most Americans now say using military force
against Islamic State is in the nation's interest,
according to an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll .
Going it alone:

US presidents have frequently used military force
without congressional approval
1983: President Ronald Reagan sent troops to
Grenada
1986: Mr Reagan authorised air strikes in Libya
1998: President Bill Clinton shot missiles to Sudan
and Afghanistan
1999: Mr Clinton sent forces to Kosovo on a NATO
mission
2011: Mr Obama authorised air strikes in Libya
Some legal experts believe the president is wrong
in their assessment of the AUMF.
Deborah Pearlstein, a professor at Cardozo School
of Law in New York, said Islamic State is no longer
part of al-Qaeda. "They're enemies," she said. "By
attacking today's [IS] we are in no sense attacking
al-Qaeda."

The use of presidential power:

When experts weigh in on this issue, they sound
authoritative. That is how the president sounds this
week. So do the people who support his decision -
and those who oppose him.
Yet Mr Obama's decision to use air strikes in Syria
is controversial. The laws that govern his
deployment of force are murky.
"It's not so clearly, neatly and authoritatively
defined - and tends to be decided through a
wrestling match between Congress and the
president," said Matthew Waxman, who was a
senior official in the defence and state departments
during the Bush administration.
Still, presidents hardly ever get in trouble for using
the military. Chances are Mr Obama will face little if
any, repercussions for authorising the strikes.
Right or wrong, he is acting presidential?

Two Super Eagles stars in Wednesday night’s
African Nations Cup qualifying match against South
Africa in Cape Town, Ogenyi Onazi and Efe
Ambrose have promised to win their remaining four
matches, so as to qualify for the next year’s Africa
Cup of Nations in Morocco.
The Super Eagles are now walking a tight rope, as
they only recorded a point after two rounds of
matches.
Congo lead Group A with six points, while South
Africa is second on four points.
Next month, Nigeria faces Sudan both home and
away, before they take on Congo away from home
in Pointe Noire and round up the qualifiers with a
home game against Bafana Bafana in November.
Midfielder Ogenyi Onazi said the Eagles are
determined to win their remaining four matches so
as to defend their crown in Morocco in January.
“We did not plan for a draw (in South Africa). We
now have to win all remaining games if we are to
qualify for the Nations Cup,” said the Lazio ace.
“We are determined to meet our target.”
Celtic centre-half Efe Ambrose said they still have
the hope of advancing to Morocco 2015.
“It was a difficult game against South Africa. They
gave us a good fight, but we will still make sure we
qualify for the Nations Cup,” assured the defender.
Nigeria failed to qualify for the 2012 Nations Cup
hosted by Gabon and Equatorial Guinea.

OP u 4 drop her fone number

Omexonomy: 13. Living in ajegunle or amukoko instead of living in banana island that is too cheap.

what's wrong with AJEGUNLE or AMUKOKO?

BRAV0O: How this cum take concern us ?

help me ask dem o, we don't have d right to judge dem, GOD is seeing everything let him be the judge

damosky12: You dont speak against the annointing and not struggle through life.. Mind your mouths folks!

BRAV0O: How this cum take concern us ?

help me ask dem o, we don't have d right to judge dem, GOD is seeing everything