₦airaland Forum

Only 42 caps?

What's big brother? What value can BB add to one's life? It's a crazy generation. Youths deriving joy watching young men and women having sex.Once again,I say it's crazy.The only ones who benefit from this: DSTV and the participants .Spectators are losers. A home video could serve a better purpose.
It's just my humble opinion oh.Before some people will come for my head.
Buhari may not be wrong to tag us lazy youths.

Top class quality. The guy is so full of confidence even at his age. Expecting him to dominate French league

Going by what I heard last time I was in otukpo.The Idoma people did well. How can a governor fail to pay salary for one year and still expect votes. Is it Buhari that's also responsible for such inhumanity?

I am from Benue but not living there. Based on what I heard about not paying salaries,Ortom doesn't deserve second term.Party politics and sentiments apart.

PDP cannot accuse APC of rigging. They're grand masters. He who goes to equity must go with clean hands.

Even their elections was rigged.They lack moral guts to talk about our own. They're interested in Violence in Nigeria. Rubbish.

[quote or=berrystunn post=75942570]But why did you add Mininum wage 27k in your post?
I am not a politician Oga

Next level loading:

International passport =70k!

Number plate = 75k!

Drivers' license 35k!

Minimum wage 27k!

And you are shouting Next Level
are you normal?

THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE!!!!
For the records.
When Buhari took over from Jonathan,;
1. Fuel was #87 now 145
2. Rice was #6,200 now 15,000
3. Spaghetti #55 now 200.
4. Maize #5000 now 12,000
5. Cement #1200 now 2200
6. Dollar #160 now #360
7. Palm Oil #180 now 380
8. Kero #450 gollon now 1200
9. Local rice #350 now 950
10. Normal shadda #250 now 8,000

Please share this to all your families and friends[/quote]

Very soon now,PDP will release press statement condemning the holiday . I am waiting.

I have followed the live broadcast. The INEC Chairman is doing the most complex job because politicians are not aspiring to go and serve but for selfish interests. Let's think and plan to vote same way we use our ATMS.All the parties are riggers and want to get there by all means.When they go in, stories will change.

This man is talking nice these days.I fear Atiku the more.

It's okay. We're waiting Patiently. But individual plans are really affected.

Should be quickly reproduced as comedy skit.Person chop Atiku well but he can't talk because It's KARMA

Very sweet. Too sweet to behold.

You're welcome back Bro.

Atiku is not telling us what he plans to do.Instead, he is attacking on every side.I am tired abeg

You'll be shocked when you hear the money spent on needless big flag.TERRIBLE!!!Why would someone even count it worthy of publicity and with so much pride to talk about big flag.
Once again, TERRIBLE.

With all the money, these guys still don't sleep.Big up to bill gate.Shit processing machine.How many days does the processing take?Fertilizer hotly available after a few minutes of hot Shiite. It's well.

Better thing sweet abeg.Na number 2 sweet me die.One day one day,I go buy am.
Them no chop bottle.Oluwa is on my matter.

Fair just that I don't want to see Ighalo the goal misser in any match.He should be the chairman of the bench warmers as compensation for club form.
Akpeyi again!!I tire oh.Signs of forceful retirement: ECHIEJILE.I love that.I don't know about the JAMIU guy and AJAYI.
God bless FRN

Donald Duke.He's smart,courageous and full of vision. I live in Calabar. I know what he did here.But PDP won't give him the ticket. So,Buhari must continue. No better candidate outside Duke.

To drag is here,matias was not mentioned. It's well.I wouldn't have been here if the full name was posted.

09082334697 please add

That first picture is Iconic.Imagine if those black players played for their fatherland. Fifteen players.France wouldn't have qualified for the world cup let alone dream of winning it.
Do they really feel French?I would have felt a little inferior if I was in that team.
Anyways,Congratulations to France for also embracing Africans to play for them.

[You really tried.Africans killing themselves.Can they force the whites to use hair ties and cover everywhere including their ears and neck as if only them are holy.HOLY HOLY PEOPLE.All ignorance.Let them open their churches abroad and test the doctrines of hairties and trousers.quote author=kobobay post=69229195]Freeze is just a joke that knows nothing about this subject. If you want to know the truth, take your time and study the Bible yourself. And Don’t let Freeze foul you.

Why Women Should Not Wear Head-Coverings

1Cor 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
1Cor 11:4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
1Cor 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
1Cor 11:6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
1Cor 11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
1Cor 11:8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
1Cor 11:9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
1Cor 11:10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.
1Cor 11:11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.
1Cor 11:12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God.
1Cor 11:13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
1Cor 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
1Cor 11:15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
1Cor 11:16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.

Some people have misinterpreted 1 Corinthians 11 and believe that it is commanding women to wear hats or "head-coverings" of some kind. In this chapter, God is dealing with gender roles and the authority that a man has over his wife. In verse 3, the authority that a man has over his wife is likened unto the authority that God has over a man. God is the "head" (authority figure) of the man, and the man is the "head" (authority figure) of the woman. This matches perfectly with what the Bible says in Ephesians 5:

Eph 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
Eph 5:24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

As we continue in 1 Corinthians 11, verses 4-6 state:

1Cor 11:4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
1Cor 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
1Cor 11:6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.

According to these verses women should have their heads "covered," and men should not. In fact, if a woman's head is not covered, that is just as bad as if she were "shorn" or "shaven." Notice that the Bible says that it is a "shame" for a woman to be shorn or shaven. We all know what "shaven" means, but what does the word "shorn" mean? The Bible uses the word "shorn" one other time in the New Testament:

Acts 18:18 And Paul after this tarried there yet a good while, and then took his leave of the brethren, and sailed thence into Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila; having shorn his head in Cenchrea: for he had a vow.

The vow that the Bible is referring to here is a Nazarite vow from the Old Testament. Notice what the Bible commands about the Nazarite vow in Numbers 6:

Num 6:5 All the days of the vow of his separation there shall no razor come upon his head: until the days be fulfilled, in the which he separateth himself unto the LORD, he shall be holy, and shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow.

Num 6:18 And the Nazarite shall shave the head of his separation at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and shall take the hair of the head of his separation, and put it in the fire which is under the sacrifice of the peace offerings.

Once again, the Bible is its own dictionary. Being "shorn" is another word for being "shaven." Paul having his head shaved with a razor is referred to as him being "shorn." Therefore God is saying that a woman being "uncovered" is just as shameful as her shaving her head completely bald as Paul did in Acts 18.

So, what is this "covering"?

1Cor 11:13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
1Cor 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
1Cor 11:15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.

According to verses 13-15, a woman is "uncovered" if she does not have "long hair." A woman is therefore commanded to have long hair, and a man is commanded not to have long hair.

Those who believe in women wearing external "head-coverings" or bonnets on their heads will argue that even though long hair is a covering (indefinite article), women still need to wear an additional covering or bonnet on their heads. This is easily disproved with the Bible. The same passage that tells women to be covered tells men not to be covered. Therefore, if this were talking about something other than long hair (i.e. a "head-covering" or bonnet), it would be a sin for a man to wear it while praying or prophesying. This is directly in contradiction with many Old Testament passages that command the Old Testament priests to wear bonnets and mitres while ministering in the priests office:

Exo 28:40 And for Aaron's sons thou shalt make coats, and thou shalt make for them girdles, and bonnets shalt thou make for them, for glory and for beauty.
Exo 28:41 And thou shalt put them upon Aaron thy brother, and his sons with him; and shalt anoint them, and consecrate them, and sanctify them, that they may minister unto me in the priest's office.

Exo 29:9 And thou shalt gird them with girdles, Aaron and his sons, and put the bonnets on them: and the priest's office shall be theirs for a perpetual statute: and thou shalt consecrate Aaron and his sons.

Exo 39:27 And they made coats of fine linen of woven work for Aaron, and for his sons,
Exo 39:28 And a mitre of fine linen, and goodly bonnets of fine linen, and linen breeches of fine twined linen,

Lev 8:13 And Moses brought Aaron's sons, and put coats upon them, and girded them with girdles, and put bonnets upon them; as the LORD commanded Moses.

Eze 44:17 And it shall come to pass, that when they enter in at the gates of the inner court, they shall be clothed with linen garments; and no wool shall come upon them, whiles they minister in the gates of the inner court, and within.
Eze 44:18 They shall have linen bonnets upon their heads, and shall have linen breeches upon their loins; they shall not gird themselves with any thing that causeth sweat.

Notice that the priest's clothing consisted of coats, britches (pants), and bonnets. Why would God tell us that "nature itself" teaches us that a woman should wear a head-covering, and that men should not, when he commanded over and over again that the priests (who were men of course) were required to wear bonnets when they prayed and prophesied in the priests office! The covering referred to in 1 Corinthians 11 is long hair, as defined in the passage itself; it is not a bonnet or head-covering.

This is consistent with the Old Testament, which commanded the priests not to have long hair:

Eze 44:20 Neither shall they shave their heads, nor suffer their locks to grow long; they shall only poll their heads.

They were commanded to be neither completely bald nor long-haired, but rather to "poll" (i.e. cut short the hair on) their heads.

Other proponents of "head-coverings" on women will say that if you "go back to the Greek," you'll see that the word for "covering" in verse 15 is different than the other words used for "covering" in the passage. Of course, they are not fluent in Greek, but because the words look a lot different, they assume that they must be talking about completely different things. However, there are many examples in our language of words that look completely different as different parts of speech, but that are actually the same. Here are a few examples:

- having faith (noun) means that you believe (verb).
- being undressed (adjective) means you aren't wearing any clothes (noun).
- doing something manually (adverb) means that you did it by hand (noun).
- thing that are lunar (adjective) have to do with the moon (noun).

You see how identical words can look completely different as different parts of speech. Therefore a woman can be uncovered (adjective - "akatakalypto" because she is not wearing a covering (noun - "peribolaion". Just because the words look the same in English does not mean that they will look the same in Greek. Apparently these head-covering advocates who couldn't even order a meal in a Greek restaurant think they know more than the KJV translators. This is why one should always beware when anyone has to "go back to the Greek" to prove their doctrine.

Now that we understand what "covering" is referring to in 1 Corinthians 11 (i.e. long hair), let's go back and look at the passage with this definition in mind:

1Cor 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
1Cor 11:4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered (i.e. having long hair), dishonoureth his head (i.e. dishonours Jesus Christ - see previous verse).
1Cor 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered (i.e. with short hair) dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. (i.e. if a woman doesn't have long hair, she might as well be bald!)
1Cor 11:6 For if the woman be not covered (i.e. she has short hair), let her also be shorn : but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. (i.e. in God's eyes, it is just as much of a shame for a woman to have short hair, as it is for her to be completely shaved bald).

Ladies are commanded by the Bible to have long hair. They are not commanded to wear an external head covering of any kind. If they do wear one, people will probably associate them with religions that preach a false Gospel.[/quote]

I anticipated a very explosive match but I have been disappointed so far.Quite a boring match.Hope they will raise the level of the game after the break.It's not living up to the hype.

They will tell us it's ball to hand.But foul is given here.BIG INCONSISTENCIES. It's too late though.

ubox:
Isn't that handball similar to Nigeria's own

opera1:
Na wha oooo. So no African players has ever scored 3 goals @ d World Up. Ó ga ooo.

Very funny. Lol

kstyle2:
Just saw England goalkeeper, Jordan Pickford inscribe his initial, JP on his gloves. Just got me thinking that that of Francis Uzoho may seem wierd

FU.Na you know oh.

[/quote]I disagree with you.Only if they had played Croatia and Argentina.Senegal had an easier group.But Morocco really tried.Morocco is best African team,Nigeria,Senegal,Egypt and Tunisia in that order.