₦airaland Forum

Kingray10:
I still can't find a reason why US voted No

The only reason US is great is because they've invested so much over the centuries to create an illusion to make other countries believe they are small. That illusion breaking apart threatens the perception of USA itself and once perception changes to an extent, threats arise.

Dtruthspeaker:
First, this violates The Law of Logic for it is first OFF POINT!

And secondly commits the Fallacy of False Dilemma!

So, it's an invalid argument and therefore illogical and untrue.

Thus, the Creator theory stands as Truth as no atheists has any valid argument against it.

And that is why it is The Law "There is no valid against the Truth".

Lol... Dude, ease on the antipsychotics.

Dtruthspeaker:
In other words atheists became atheists because they found the atheists things which they made their minds search for in support of their minds even though they are not right.

For right and wrong clearly exists and the difference between them are very clear and distinct

Yes, for people who come from homes that see their religion as a policy.

yeshuasfootstep:
Science studies reality through observation, testing and evidence. It discovers how natural processes work. The fact that science studies a universe that exists does not logically establish who, if anyone, caused that universe to exist.

Saying "without a Creator there would be no creation for science to study" simply assumes the conclusion it is supposed to prove. It is essentially:

The universe exists → therefore someone created it → therefore God exists.

The first step is an observation. The second is an additional philosophical claim. The third still requires an argument identifying that creator as God.

Science also does not require belief in a Creator. Its working method seeks explanations that can be tested against observation. Creationism and intelligent-design claims based on supernatural intervention are not scientific explanations because they are not independently testable in the required way.

And the fact that some great scientists believed in God proves only that great scientists can believe in God. It does not make their belief scientific evidence for God.

Isaac Newton's belief, Einstein's views, or any other scientist's personal conviction cannot substitute for evidence. Authority does not become evidence simply because the authority is brilliant.

There is also an important point in the opposite direction: science has not proved that God does not exist either. The National Academies explicitly notes that science cannot prove or disprove religion as a whole.

So the intellectually honest conclusion is:

Science reveals an extraordinary reality.

It does not, by itself, identify a supernatural Creator.

You may believe a Creator exists. That is a philosophical or religious conclusion. But calling science itself proof of that Creator is claiming more than the evidence establishes.

Wonder is not proof. Complexity is not proof. Ignorance is not proof. And "we do not yet know" is not evidence for a particular God.

UWAKIN: Before we explain reality, we must first be honest about what reality has actually shown us.

Join us on Facebook .

One of the tricky things about the creator theory that most religious people will never accept is that it is a never-ending loop.

If you insist the world and how it works is so beautiful and intricate and therefore must have been created by a creator... You also have to be willing to welcome the idea that that creator didn't just appear one day and must have been created by another creator... And that creator by another creator... At what point does the loop end?

This is the mistake people keep making. Atheism just like theism is not something to inherit, it's something brought about by experience and knowledge.

He was never an atheist, he was just following family policy and one thing about such policies, the mind will always explore and will eventually find something, does not make that thing right or wrong, but it's an option.

Person die since August 25, nah now una own day break. Smh!

ManirBK:
164 nations voted yes. The UK, France, Germany – all yes. Even former colonial powers said it's time to correct the map.

The United States? No. They called it "superfluous."



| The hypocrisy is breathtaking. A nation that claims to lead the world on human rights and equality – but when it comes to showing Africa at its true size, they vote no.

They say it's not necessary. But why? Because an accurate map doesn't serve their narrative?

Africa is 14 times larger than Greenland. That's not politics – that's science. And the US just voted against science.

The map is corrected. The US can stay on the wrong side of history. 🌍🇳🇬

You're going far...

A nation whose president has made it a hobby to rename straits, lakes and rivers that don't even concern him saying someone else's correction on a map is superfluous. Remind me again what shameless hypocrisy is.

ajebuter:
Imagine two First Ladies gave birth in Nigeria because they had absolute believe in the healthcare

We really had a country once...

May God grant the Legend physician eternal rest

Why didn't they give birth in government hospitals?

freeborn02:
Imagine a Musslim calling someone a retttard! Can you be a Mussliim without being a retttard?!


Iran atackked Israel first in the direct, open military confrontation.

On 13th to 14th April 2024, Iran launched hundreds of drones and missiles directly at Israel. This was the first Iranian military attack on Israel since the Islamic Republic was established in 1979 and this was the first atacck between the two countries!

You Mussliims always liie to defend your demmonnic reliiigion.



Stop lyying. You Mussliims have been atackking Jeews since the time of your founder. He beihheaded up to 700 Jews in a day and also comanded you Meusslims to hatte and kiiil Jews. This is the origin of your hattred for Jeews

Lol... Oponu!

Everything can increase the risk of cancer. Trying to make alcohol sound like it's one huge contributing factor compared to chemicals in processed food and other artificial food additives is just plain misinformation and fear mongering.

Infact, you can eat all natural all your life and avoid every vices known to man and still have cancer.

Nigerians really need to pay more attention to their Grammar. Which one is unkept?

It's UNKEMPT!

Atiku is now sounding very foolish and annoying.

Every sane Nigerian knows IPMAN's appeal is not for the sake of Nigerians, it's to protect their own profit margin.

LaIabobo:
That was bolt

Alright. Thanks.

Is it not the same Uber Murtala Mohammed international Airport just had a deal with?

Lol... You left the cancer to fester and grow for so long. Now it has grown beyond your control. Deal with it.

Lol...

Writing letter to war crime enablers about a war criminal... Waste of time.

WRLDBEATERZ:
WTF WHAT KIND OF COMPARISON IS THIS
NIGERIA WAY DEY PROMOTE TERRORISTS AND BANDITS.

Lol...

The US government is the terrorist and bandits.

GOOOGLE504:
They should not stop at banning AI for ad creation.

They should also ban it's use in graphic creation and coding so graphic designers and junior frontend devs can find job.

Bro technology is moving faster than anything nowadays, find a way to adapt and grow .

The industry is growing at such an alarming rate, you have to run just to stay in the same place. If you want to get ahead, you have to run twice as fast.

Join the wagon before it rolls over you.

As a nation, you have a very unhealthy population to employment disparity and you believe creating more unemployment is the solution all in the name of adapting? Serious countries with employment problems like Nigeria's does not just allow innovation run unchecked especially those that will guarantee massive loss of jobs. Like I said, it's not about discarding Ai, it's about limiting its use in projects that will deprive too many people of their livelihood.

Let me go by your logic and why such thought process is faulty.

Let's assume I'm a project manager that's supposed to bring an advert to life. Naturally I'll employ a script writer for the ad, then a location manager, costumier, videographer, jingle writer, crew, photographer, editor, etc. These are tens of jobs for just a single project. The payments they get will ensure they can feed their families and train their children in school, that's a few less criminals in the society.

Now I decide to 'innovate and adapt' as the project manager... I take the project and give it to one Ai guy in India, I get a voice over guy/girl over here for the Nigerian accent and that's all. How is that of any benefit to the society, a society on the brink of collapse like Nigeria's?

I never said Ai should not be adopted, but it should never be allowed to massively replace jobs. It should be used to complement the workforce, not to replace it entirely.

UrVillageChief:
Unless you mean a kamikaze, a drone that is meant to harm you doesn’t necessarily need to get close to you🤣 In fact, getting that close to them was enough to show that it meant no harm and it’s just for mere reconnaissance (evidence gathering)
They were obviously not running because they thought it wanted to harm them but because they didn’t want to their faces to be captured.
So, you are wrong my bro.

Your first line already negated your own conclusion.

A drone is flying towards you, so your first instinct will be to check if it's a kamikaze drone or not?

overdrive:
OGA calm down before you burst an artery. Drop your comments and keep on moving.

Incase your brain was unable to process it, that's exactly what I did.

overdrive:
The question is if we had a working economy would they have been tempted to sell their kidney

All this stupid working economy nonsense...

USA has a working economy and people donate organs for money every other day. Working economy does not mean all fingers will be equal. Infact, if the economy wasn't working, it will be pointless selling their organs because whatever they get from it will still be useless.

Trying to always talk down on Nigeria over things that happen everywhere but you're too uninformed to read about is just annoying at this point.

While this looks like all fun and games, it's a very stupid thing to do especially this period with insurgents having access to drones as well. You could have flown the thing at a distance and still record what you wanted to record, moving it that close shows harmful intent and you're already using it as a weapon.

I know I'll get a lot of insults for this, but just because you hate the police does not make everything against them right.

Dalohad:
You wey be Tinubu supporter, you sef dey lament.

Better go and find another skill. This one is gone..
AI don chopulate am..

Omo... People wey get sense for this country no too plenty again. My design jobs still come in steady, infact the Ai boom is an advantage to people like me.

Sometimes, you look beyond your own selfish interest and see how certain things affect others as well. Besides, how did you reach that conclusion that I support Tinubu?

Irony1:
You know you are lying to yourself that PO is unaccountable. Of all the candidates he is the most audited candidate.

Lol... You are literally on a thread that demonstrates his unaccountable nature. He was asked a simple question and chose to deflect rather than respond directly.

Accountability is not only about money.

Hismajesty44:
Your own perspective is worst, sometimes learn to keep your opinions to yourself, cos that'll prevent us seeing how ridiculous you can be.

Lol... Who are you to police my opinion? If he's feeding your family and you worship him, that's your business. I've said what I feel about him, prove me wrong. But what you'll never do is shut me up.

Irony1:
He made a comment but you pushed his supporters in the equation.

Yes, because his supporters are the ones defending his obvious lack of accountability in the replies.

Mindlog:
I personally prefer working here in London than doing the same job, remotely from Nigeria.

Understandable and very valid.

1Alex:
honestly, the bold Is retrogressive.

It is like asking the Federal Government to ban emails, text messages and instant messaging simply because people no longer visit post offices as often as they used to.

Technology changes the way we live and work. When a better, faster and more efficient system emerges, people naturally begin to move away from older methods. The answer is not to fight or ban innovation in order to protect outdated systems. The answer is to adapt.

I say this as a creator myself. Technology is constantly changing the creative industry, and those of us working in it have only two realistic choices: upskill and learn how to use the new tools to become better and more productive, or refuse to adapt and gradually become less competitive.

No profession, industry or institution can remain exactly the same forever. Change is inevitable. The people and organisations that survive are usually those that recognise change early, learn new skills and find ways to remain relevant.

You either upskill and adapt to technological change, or remain old-school and risk becoming less productive and less relevant in a rapidly changing world.

My first question, what aspect of the creative industry are you into? What do you do?

This one should rest Jare.

This dude is one of the most selfish and senseless people I've ever known. People just don't know because he doesn't talk often. He literary hates Nigeria and Nigerians except he's profiting from them. Very useless opportunist masking his hate as comedy.

Dogalmighty17:
Oga, AI controlled ash(a)wo don dey now. Last last e go touch everybody.

This is the problem, y'all always look for a way to turn serious issues to cruise. It's always jokes.

Do prostitutes train in school to be prostitutes? Do they invest in tools and equipments? Is there creativity to what they do? Is what they do even legal?

Tjra:
It's just like saying FG should ban Planes so that NURTW members can continue to be in business.

AI is yet to stay. Creators should use it to their advantage and evolve. You can't kill innovation because you want to protect old jobs.

What sort of senseless comparison is this? Do planes do the same job cars do with less manpower? If anything, air transport provides more jobs compared to road transport.

Some of you really need to start thinking before responding.