₦airaland Forum

KevinDein:
LMAO

What is it, 6-7 mentions and none of the Man Utd trolls could actually address my earlier point.

So I went through few pages on here and I find some comments trolling Arsenal. This I find amusing because it's coming from the fans of a club that haven't exactly bettered Arsenal in the last five years or so. Yep, not in trophy haul, not in better league position, not in better quality of football play, OK I give it to you guys, you've spent at least five times what Arsenal spent in that period, so credit where it's due .

Point stands though; rubbish Arsenal (I'm not arguing this, I accept we are rubbish ) have been finishing ahead of your team for five years now (no, I'm not celebrating this like some of you were mischievously implying in your comments, just stating facts), with same number of trophies having spent a fraction of your budget.

You all, just like me, should do the honorable thing and accept your club is super rubbish.

phaamsaam:
The whole world knows Gary Neville is a joke, let him continue to sit in front of the camera spewing thrash

phaamsaam:
With time all would be leaked in the media, the Internet never forgets dude

Roland17:
Why didn't Pep bring 6 subs when Liverpool hammered his side? He is lucky he got a result yesterday else the argument would be different today. He would be meeting the rest of the top 6 in the coming weeks, I dare Pep to show up with 6 subs in each game.

These are some of the issues other coaches have with Pep. It almost feels like an entitled arrogance of some sorts. He has been allowed to wear the yellow ribbon in support of Catalonia but if Mou wore that or any other coach, they would have heard it from the FA by now. No one is bigger than the league, the EPL is a very physical league and every team especially ball playing teams suffer the brunt. Ramsey, Reyes, RVP, Diaby to mention a few from my team have suffered horrific injuries from tackles during games. The same goes for other players from other teams.

Pep must be very careful not to get into a head on with the British media because they would ruin his stay in the EPL and force him out irrespective of result.

DevdanSanguine:
Yeah man. I hate these refs. These refs wear black and gray uniforms because everyone knows it destabilises the warriors team rhythm. They also blow into the ears of warriors players to make them miss shots. It's sad man. The NBA needs to do something about how these refs treat the warriors. Everyone knows the warriors are so good only refs can make them lose.

SmooshCHN:
Draymond cost us this game with his stellar clutch turnovers. Curry did it better and turned it over throughout the game. I thought Ayesha was the one pregnant not Curry with baby number 3. Klay Thompson should just let us know he's building a mansion with hard bricks.


The team is truly mentally fried right now. They need a break.

sinizia:
The main reason I hate engaging in debates with you is that when it comes to Pep, your hypocrisy is so nauseating - not even because of your long epistles.

In the first paragraph you're mocking United for not being like City and other clubs and walking away from deals deemed too expensive, in the second paragraph, your amnesia kicked in because within few seconds you also listed a case of Perisic where we walked away. This is what hypocrisy causes.

Other clubs walks away, you say? After Chelsea had almost signed Robinho, which club swooped in at the last minute, offer Robinho more riches and snatched him from Chelsea? I guess that club is Shooting Stars of Ibadan. Your hypocrisy stinks!!

From the beginning of time, clubs have always been hijacking deal by offering more incentives to a player. It's not a bad thing. Even your beloved Barca have done it in the past, but because United are involved, suddenly OTHER clubs walks away not us. Did Chelsea walk away even after it's clear that Tottenham had already agreed deal with Willian? You're here trying to make a normal occurance that's been happening since time immemorial to look bad because we got Sanchez. Your hypocrisy stinks!!

Your post is just a skyscraper of hypocrisy. Man City have been chasing Messi for years, with rumors even saying they offered him a blank cheque. Even when it's clear that Barca have made it clear that they're not selling their prized possession, but yet your saintly City didn't walked away. It boils down to who wants it more and who's ready to pay to get a player which is not a bad thing as most clubs do it depending on their financial strength. When PSG snatched Dani Alves from City even though he'd already agreed to join City, I didn't see your wailing calling them out for being desperate enough to offer Dani Alvez more money to take him from City. Even Loserfool had to hasten up to sign Van Dijk and flew their medical personnels down to Bournemouth Airport to conduct medicals on VVD before Man City snatched him from them. I repeat, your hypocrisy stinks!!

Last season City finished trophyless. Pep was in a "desperate" mood to overhaul his squad, so he's willing to meet the huge amount clubs were asking for his targets, even when many people were complaining he didn't care. City were so desperate that they're ready to pay a whooping £70m for the services of Sanchez but Mourinho no send Sanchez then. We used to complain back then that Mourinho should be rivaling Pep for Sanchez's signature and that United were dulling in letting City being the only competitor for his signature. . Note that this hypocrisy you're projecting now is seriously irritating because City would've spent more than United in the total cost of signing Sanchez if they had landed him last year because:

1. Man City would've forked out £70m Assanal valuation of him.
2. City would've paid agent fees.
3. City would've paid Sanchez's signing-on fees.
4. City would've paid Sanchez a weekly fee of 300-350k, especially with how desperate other clubs wanted him after a fantastic season.
5. City would've also negotiated and paid Sanchez other bonuses that comes with contract signing including the image rights.

When you add the above expenses to the fact that it'd be paid over a 4 years contract, if United are spending the purported £170m through out his contract, City would've paid within or even above the range of £200-300m for 4 years contract. Facts!!

None of us have the real figures in his contract

if consider we're getting him for free via a swap, and the fact that we just increased signing-on and agent fees and offered a bit more image right fees

Then City would have still out-spent us if they had landed Sanchez on 4 years deal. That £70m alone for a player with a year contract remaining shows the zenith of desperation. Don't come here yapping about United being the only desperate club.

Now as I was typing, when City couldn't land him, they went ahead without him and started having an absolutely fantastic season. Not even Pep had seen it coming.

Now, they no longer needed Sanchez that much. Sane is on fire. City are obliterating oppositions like it's nothing. The rumors were that City will come back at the end of the season to take him away, but then Jesus got injured, and City wanted to bolster their squad so they went back in January and heard that United had offered Sanchez more money in signing-on fees, agent fees and image rights. City knowing they don't need Sanchez that much, backed away. This is just the fùcking truth. If City was in United's position, they would've done all it took to get him.

This excuse of Pep is balderdash if City could afford to spend more than 200m on Sanchez over a 4 years contract last season. It's balderdash if City have been chasing Messi for years who would cost up to 300m (before his new contract) with shocking wages. It's balderdash coz City were in the race of Mbappe who would've cost them not less than 120m not even including the agent fees, weekly wages et al. So, yes, United were the ones in desperate need of him now so they offered more. Last season City were in desperate need of him and offered more than Bayern and PSG.

City wanted Laporte, even though he broke Pep's heart by going back on his agreement with him to sign a new contract, Pep who the dumb columnists reported never forgives or goes back to his targets that betrays him, still went back out of his desperation to solve his defensive issues and broke the club's record to sign him. If City were as desperate as they were last season when they had a bad season, they'd pay the same amount for Sanchez!!

raumdeuter:
Jose Mourinho concedes Premier League title to Manchester City

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/11233393/jose-mourinho-concedes-premier-league-title-to-manchester-city

Pep wins the league by January ending

What a disgrace of a league

ChristineC:
except you have a detailed manuscript of transfer timelines from the Manchester United board then I'm not too sure what you are implying.

So there's also need for some club to "scout" an unknown player like Riyad Mahrez before a bid can be submitted?
Was it also because Manchester United "jumped" on the Dembelé bidding that made him cost more than Zimbambwe? So with all those UK defence budget spent on Manchester City's defense, United was behind the scenes throwing in cheeky bids for players they didn't need just to inflate prices for City?

Quote where you dropped these "desperado" sermons on this platform after the Neymar deal, the Mbappe deal, the Coutinho deal, the Dembelé deal, the Aubameyang deal, the Stones' deal or the Sterling deal.

Melvyn11:
So apparently mahrez has not still returned to training with Leicester. They could have taken the 65m city offered rather than being greedy. I don't understand why clubs keep unhappy players?

eph12:
There's a shopping list, back up list etc

eph12:
Nah! They train not to rule anything out until properly checked

eph12:
You don't think it's possible two or more clubs track same player at same time?

ChristineC:
The transfer market is a bazaar, an auction. That's why clubs BID. It does not matter what you tabled, if you can't offer the highest cash you move aside. It's not beef, just business.

ChristineC:
since when do you determine who's worth what?

ctuagent007:
Sanchez agreed terms with City before he increased his wages & they backed out & as for Delph, he is not a DM, he is short & can't debut for Fernandinho as a DM. Even as a left back, he has been found wanting every time infact I rate Zinchenko ahead of Delph, whether as a midfielder or LB

ctuagent007:
Mehn rumour say we dey likely to hijack the Fred deal than City & funny enough I don't see Fernandinho or Matic lasting 2 more years meaning Fred's coming to either of the Manchesters go be fight to finish

DevdanSanguine:
Well whatever history is, that's all it is, history. OKC holds the bragging rights so far this season so put up or shut up when you meet them in one week.

DevdanSanguine:
Just because Savannah isn't an attention seeking ho doesn't mean the other Quasimodo look alike thot has the upper hand. It's not even a contest.

DevdanSanguine:
Only an im becile will truly believe that was weed LOL

Besides I'd take weed smoking over the bitching and straight up ugliness of that ho wardell is married to.

DevdanSanguine:
Executed by the best craftsmen in Ohio?

DevdanSanguine:
Do you not know that every god has at least one flaw. In LeBrons case that's his one and only.