₦airaland Forum

mzilakazi:
@Evarn- why is it that your soldiers never learn a lesson. They do the same mistake over and over again despite being armed with a sophisticated weapons bought with a loan. Can you see that no amount of a sophisticated weapons can change a coward into a valiant. Once a coward always a coward.

our troops arent cowards,m'boy,cowards would have refused to engage the islamic terrorists in the first place,dont you see; baga is a remote village on the chadian border,only a small unit of soldiers{not even up to 20},were stationed there,and they still withstood hundreds of armed islamic terrorists for over 17 hours!....how many SANDF platoon can do that?

mzilakazi:
So embarrassing indeed!!

love,those men didnt 'run away',they made a tactical retreat.soon,a ferocious advance will commence,legions of troops and iron donkeys{tanks} will march in force against the islamic infidels of the north east.boko haram shall gnash its teeth like wailing dogs,and ask allah for mercy,yet they will recieve non,not from their precious allah,and certainly not from the NA.

mzilakazi:
Bwahahaha… are you desperately trying to settle the score?
You will recapture your base, but unfortunately not weapons that fell in the arms of BH.

my dear sweet boy,in your naive innocence,you forgot that when hong,uba,pelia,mubi,mabaraka,vimtim,and chigunkun were alledgedly 'captured',the NA came in force and freed the whole of adamawa{where those towns are located} in two days!.so what is a measly town compared to the mighty NA?

saengine:
Running away from your own base in your own country....how embarrassing

glorified sons of wh0res.

GreenandGold:
Boko Haram captured another military base in Borno, pathetic losers

and poachers have captured kruger park.
the military base is gonna be recaptured in a couple of days,so it ain't a loss.

MikeCZAR:
That's your opinion.If that was the case, where does the Apache and Hind stand?

opinion indeed.the silky truth is that the world has a limited number of attack-helicopter brands,the Apache is currently world best,the Hind comes second along with the cobra etc....but a glaring fact is that the rooivalk is an old man's retirement cruise-wagon.

MikeCZAR:
They never experienced slavery.That's the purpose.Without outside help defeat for the South African republic boers, bantu tribes like the Zulus, Xhosas, Pedi etc was inevitable. Even the US received help from France.

then why did you rebel?,if you didnt experience slavery,why was the apartheid rebellion orchestrated?.you guys were oppressed!,treated like earthworm and scum....you werent allowed to make opinions,fester ambitions or even govern yourselves.their is no use denying a known fact,my friend,not all african tribes were as couragous and fearsome as the ethiopians.
NB: wear what you are like a badge of honour,so that nobody can hurt you with it.

GreenandGold:
Low-IQ loser, go find first-graders maybe they could find you worthy.

typical bantu penchant for violence.

GreenandGold:
You're wasting our time.

what,no smart comment for me this time?,no witty remark?.you've finally realised that you are speaking to a bantu-slayer,you must now realised that i will alway defeat your brazen stupidity on nairaland.i must commend you for accepting defeat before you got too embarrassed to sleep at night.now run-away and do some research.pip pip.

GreenandGold:
Military-Today is a blog?
LOSER

too much pap can dement the mind,pap contains fermented ethanol{otherwise known as 'crude alcohol'},so it isnt surprising what excess injestion of 'crude alcohol' in form of pap has done to your reading capacity.where in my post did i claim that military-today is a blog?.my words were "enthusiastic know-it-all blogger",who is a blogger?

GreenandGold:
Buhahahaha
The Rooivalk is in the top 7 of the world's attack helicopters
www.military-today.com/helicopters/top_9_attack_helicopters.htm

your link isnt worth my treasured time.that article is the opinion of an enthusiatic know-it-all blogger,therefore,it barely carries any weight.but objectively speaking,even the writer was enlightened enough to expose the fact that:"this aircraft{rooivalk} was designed to operate without sophisticated support",it also went ahead to reveal the juicy 'gossip' that: "only 11 of this aircraft{rooivalk} are operational due to lack of funds".the article even hinted that the rooivalk was an old,overpriced but fairly manageable attack helicopter,with inferior capacity to any modern day helo.so i guess its "lol"
NB: even according to the presumptious article,the rooivalk isnt "in the top 7",it is the 7th.

MikeCZAR:
Fixed for you.

why fix what was never broken,mon chêr?.all my facts still stand,the rooivalks are archaic relics of the roman ages.

GreenandGold:
What are you talking about

what you saw me type.

MikeCZAR:
SA Bantu tribes never really experienced slavery, as they fought magnificently often defeating colonial forces with spears and limited rifles.

But all SA kingdoms including the South African republic(ZAR) were conquered by the British at the end, whom layered the foundation for apartheid.

White English speaking South Africans were lumped into that "boer" narrative.

and what is the purpose of the epistle you wrote?.the bantu were conquered,chained,branded,ra_ped and whipped like common dogs.its a known fact.

MikeCZAR:
Yes, it is stealthy.It can be armed and fueled in the field. Meaning it will never leave soldiers without close air support for long. Increasing its availability.It has an unbelievable flight performance cause of reduced vibrations.

old piece of battered junk that belongs in the museum.
*its slow
*it has limited firearm capabilities
*it is a low altitude aircraft{only slightly different a common alpha jet}
*it has a restricted flight range
*it has a very low infantry lifting capacity

MduZA:
your tribalism behavior is annoying....why can't you play it with your igbo and Yoruba brothers...

forgive me....perhaps i went too far in my enthusiasm.

MikeCZAR:
SA colonised Namibia not America.

colonized?,when was black SA released from the brutal chains of slavery?.you didnt colonize anyone,my friend,you were being whipped and branded like cattle,while the boers fought all the wars.

agaugust:
It's a Russian helicopter branch in South Africa, Brazil has the same thing....http://rostec.ru/en/news/4514251
.

these zulu barbarian savages would have claimed that they colonized america if they could.imagine,stealing the hard-work of honest russian folks!,embarrassing indeed.

mzilakazi:
Fact!! remains, SA has made upgrades on NAF MI-35 and that hurts @agaugust big time.

it is indeed shocking how the heat of the khalahari warps the common bantu mind.tell me,my esteemed friend,how does a private FOREIGN defence company{operating in SA},carrying out the mundane duty of upgrading nigeria's new MI35,translates into the whole of SA helping us make upgrades to the helo?

mzilakazi:
That's what American war experts also say, that BH is either equal in strength or if not more powerful than Nigerian military. The whole world agrees that Nigerian military is weak.

can you truly swear by zuma's shrivelled c0ck that "american experts" declared the NA incompetent?.how can BH be remotely equal to the NA?,BH may be trained,but they certainly do not possess the level of sophistication that the NA squanders like warm mead in a pub.the russians soldiers,in all their might,were totted out of afghanistan with the tip of their ears by "sophisticated bandits".

mzilakazi:
Experience does not count for everything, you might have it yet still being chased around by a well equipped bandits with a sophisticated weapons as in the case with Nigerian forces and BH. As a results it forced the president of Nigeria to make a loan f $1 billion in order to equip his dying Army.
Nigeria with their well experienced soldiers lost many Police Stations, Army barracks and Schools right before their noses.
Experience does not count without better equipment

do you mean to say that the gallant NA is being defeated by "well equipped bandits with sophisticated weapons"?.why,m'boy,one does shiver at the thought of such silky lies.experience gives more skills and knowledge,contrary to your ill-concieved doctrines.and let me assuage your misguided belief that "experience doesnt count for everything",experience does count,infact,experience is what channels the innate ability that has been propagated through intense trainning.

overhypedsteve:
well Egypt need a very buoyant army not because of any subSaharan African nation,but because of the neighbourhood in which she finds herself.Mohammed Ali started determining the role of the Egyptian military by her geographical position since the 19th century when he built an army of about 90,000 men,even the Turkish sultan had to call on Egypt to free mecca from the onslaught of the Wahabis.By 1826 Egypt already had an army of 90.000 men.The eastern question was beginning to have its answer.The Europeans began to regard Egypt as the next Arabian power.As at then though some of the men that made up the Egyptian army were farmers and slaves(falahan) they were whiped into subjection and trained to obey and execute military commands.This men were trained by French mercenaries.With that said i will like to let you all know that the Egyptian military have recorded more war than any state that exist or have ever existed in Africa.

egypt has always been a military giant.

overhypedsteve:
all those things are products of experience. Do not be carried away by mzilakazi's theory of training overshadows experience. In a true combat situation every little advantage no matter how little it seems to be will aid you in mapping out your moves. And it is experience that gives you a hint into possible outcomes. It is experience that let you know that this is how your enemy may or may not behave in a situation were the doctrine on which you were trained do not apply. It is experience that fires ingenuity, innovation, cunninness and strategy.

a superb analysis on your part.but i beg to differ,experience does not necessarily grant an average soldier the unique skill of ingenuity,subtle art of cunningness and ponderous ability of strategy.yes,the more the experience,the more the knowledge and skills gained,but i do not believe that a brilliant mind and perspective can be gained through experience,it can only be gained through ardous training of the mind and body.

charlos14:
Personally, I think that Egypt would win. Does Algeria have any war experience?

no.algeria does not have much experience in "these matters"{well,no modern experience}.but experience isnt everything,experience can be countered with ingenuity,cunningness and strategy.

agaugust:
In war, surrounding your enemy is not really surrounding his country, your target is his military force.
All Egypt has to do is to surround every battalion, brigade, division/corp of Algerian forces that they meet on land, sea and air.
1.5 million soldiers, 30,000 tanks/IFV/LAV/missiles/ICBMs/artillery, 250 F-16 jets, 50 Apache Helicopter gunships, 50 fast missile crafts/corvettes/frigates/submarines, Egypt can surround any African military force from any African country.
If Egypt wants war with me, I will ask for peace negotiations, why should I die before my time?
.

LOL.facing egypt=committing suicide,genocide,patricide,matricide,homicide,and every other 'cide' that exist.but viewing it objectively,from a military angle;it is almost impossible for egypt to use or have control of all its arsenal during a war,neither will all of egypt's soldiers be fit to fight a war at any given time.in a war of proxy,much would depend on the countries between egypt and algeria.

AugustineAgain:
Overwhelming force of 1.5 million soldiers and 30,000 tanks, armoured vehicles, missiles, ICBMs, artillery of Egypt.......they will pound any African country into submission, the enemy will be completely surrounded by Egypt and cut off from supplies/reinforcements.
.

indeed.but i doubt that egypt can ever effectively surround algeria,since they'd have to confront algeria on the mediterrenean sea;and we all know who and who govern that turf.as we know,algeria has the most sophisticated naval force in africa.

Henry120:
I agree with some points, but I doubt Egypt can win a war against Algeria. The Algerians have a bigger budget and a more modern military.

algeria has more war machines than personnels to operate them,that alone is a big disqualifier.egypt has more military numbers than algeria,with an overwhelming number of MBTs to boot.

DieVluit:
Frustrated to the point of pidgin. Give is the awards and numbers brother

why dont dont you do it yourself,or is SA's internet under cyber attack like north korea's?

DieVluit:
Because you can't. I told you.

sing after me....
one boy carry water,he no know ehn!..
one boy carry water,he no know ehn..

DieVluit:
Then give us the numbers and list the awards my man.

Prove that your minuscule tourism industry is not miniscule. Hollywood on-location scenes are business. Work. Not Tourism. SA also has those.

We want your tourism awards and numbers, mate.

Can we have them.

one boy carry water,he no know.

DieVluit:
It's simple, you cut it from a source or copy it, whichever you choose and then you paste it here.

Hope this helps. Now get on with it. Your awards and tourism numbers - produce them.

You CANNOT.

story for the japanese gods.do it yourself.

DieVluit:
Lol hahaha!

"Best plateau resort" meaning plateau resorts were competing against each other. Clown.

Give us global awards my man. No one cares about intra plateau awards. Now out with it.

my friend,google is your friend,i dont have data to waste frolicking around cyberspace,looking for awards to soothe your perverted ego.