₦airaland Forum

Maximip:
All this experimentation has already being done by the people that created the engine. For Example when you create your objects in an enging, you can just assign any physics property you want it to have without necessarily knowing how it works.

How a metal/ball/wood/human being should react when it hits another object has already been integrated, you just have to choose.

it's just like saying "why use c++ when you don't understand how it's being compiled to machine language". Sm1 has already done that work so you can spend your own time on greater things.

<input type = 'checkbox' name = 'foods[]' value = 'chicken' />Chicken

<input type = 'checkbox' name = 'foods[]' value = 'beef' />Beef

<input type = 'checkbox' name = 'foods[]' value = 'pork' />Pork

<input type = 'checkbox' name = 'foods[chicken]' value = 'chicken' />Chicken

<input type = 'checkbox' name = 'foods[beef]' value = 'beef' />Beef

<input type = 'checkbox' name = 'foods[pork]' value = 'pork' />Pork

Mobinga:
PHP > Ruby.
Everything Ruby can do. . . . PHP can do better

iGravity:
I am working on a Rails site - the idea is classified else I would have ran my mouth here. I am also working on a Ruby gem - English Numbers (not yet on Github). This should make coding read more like English. Basucally it's an extension of the Fixnum and Bignum classes to add methods that make declarations sound more like English. Ruby is pretty awesome but it can be made better. Once I have the gem up on Github, I will post the link here and anyone who wishes to help is welcome.

webdezzi:
1. please checkout bucky on youtube, he has kicka55  videos that will not only get you up and running but make you love Java.