₦airaland Forum

Borntosmoke:
And so?? Still not close to sir Bobby Charlton and George best level. Have your academy produce any player that win baloon dor??. Therefore Carrington is better than Cobham. Base on stats and facts. Do you agree?? No need to dey prolong arguments

No. I agree and surrender.....for now.

However, 3 Chelsea players will make top 5 best between the two.

Borntosmoke:
. So all this one also play for Chelsea. Not better than our academy graduates sir. None of them come to d level of sir Bobby Charlton and George best. so case closed

But you were ignorant about these players.

Jimmy Greaves will follow behind the aforementioned players. 6 times top scorer of first division equivalent of epl.

Borntosmoke:
Ha rashford, pogba, giggs, Gary Neville George best, Bobby Charlton. What have your dead Cobham produce except. Terry, odoi and mount.

Jimmy Greaves, Graeme Le Saux, Ray Wilkins, Terry Venables, Peter Bonetti, Ron Harris, Peter Osgood, John Terry, etc

Ballzproblemm:
it's not serious zi was just imagining

Okay thanks

BlueAngel444:
Mbappe,24, plays SS/wing in a lesser league
Nkunku,25, plays SS/wing in a lesser league

Who would you sign , then there is R. Leao

I feel Mbappe was the reason Neymar wanted to leave last summer, why did PSG force these two players to stay

Mbappe is the best player in the world right now. Unfortunately, he is playing in farmer's league.

Him over Nkunku.

DumaEmpire:
That was his prime years. Kante right now is at the twilight of his career. Hence why he's insisting on a 4 year deal just for the basics of having some good form of leverage(like a retirement plan, Pension)
Hence why the club aren't dancing to his tone

Last season too was his prime years with 40+ games, abi?

DumaEmpire:
Hahaha. You got nothing to say man.

Man came hitting up on me like he got alot to say and lecture on football politics. Turns out he's got nothing

Self gratification or it is self appraisal. It's allowed.

DumaEmpire:
i still wonder if maybe what i type is too difficult to understand or do you read it with a translator cos what's all this Shalaye about.

Since you can't tell me which over 30s player over the years has been given a 4 and above years contract at Chelsea. I have another assignment for you. A simpler one

Just show me where i ever said it was Chelsea's policy in the pre Abramovich era or not

This simple sentence is why you're busy hopping up nd down since morning

Respond to the context of the bolded. There was no such policy in pre Abramovich era. Eod.

Ballzproblemm:
leao x mbappe x nkunku

Todd boehly and Chelsea fans

If we get these players, Guardiola do run commot for EPL.

How serious is Mbappe?

Ballzproblemm:
leao x mbappe x nkunku

Todd boehly and Chelsea fans

Bros, can you please drop the link? Thanks

DumaEmpire:
that's also going to be extended cos obviously he might not play a game till earliest November.
Emphasis on the bolded. Meaning this season is even worst than his previous cases where ge just misses about a month plus due to injuries... Now it's heading to missing over 3 months.
Same person who was battling injuries before and during preseason as well

And that's who is clamouring for a 4 year deal. Lol

Shiit happens. This season might be worst but you can't judge by this season only. Just 3 seasons ago, he was fit throughout the season. I mean the season we won the UEFA champions league.

BlueAngel444:
this season? Abeg we don play reach 14 matches already

In regards to the stats ballzproblemm drop, it's 13. Today game against Milan was counted.

DumaEmpire:
Over the years Chelsea "Hardly" gives players more than a year contract.

Is it the English that's the problem for you? You should have said so. "Hardly" in that context means they don't give players more than a year contract that easily. I still went ahead to say Kante getting upto 3 years wasn't bad at all. But Kante is asking for a 4 years deal.

You said Vialli nd Zola were exceptions but how is their contract compared to the 4 years Kante is asking of more than 300k a week?

I still asked you to point out anywhere Chelsea has ever given a player in his 30s a 4 years and above contract. Something you still haven't and can't answer. Hence all this panelbeater job you have been doing here.

You can keep deceiving yourself. There was no such policy in pre Abramovich era but in post Abramovich.

The point is, there are exceptions. Take it or leave it.

youngZee23:
Have we played above 14 games this season

Yes! In all competitions.

BlueAngel444:
this season? Abeg we don play reach 14 matches already

In all competition, yes.

Wawu

DumaEmpire:
I wait to see where i said the policy was restricted to "Only" existing players. All this your "Fire on the Mountain" movement around the topic of discussion is just too funny

I said show me where in the entire history of Chelsea both during the Pre-Abramovich era and Post-Abramovich era in which a player in his 30s was ever given a contract of over 4 years and above since you clearly pointed using Zola and Vialli as exemptions to getting such contracts which was a big fat bang of lies

You're coming here to give me an iberiberistic and efulefulistic answer that can be likened to the lyrics below

DumaEmpire:
if you actually know Chelsea as well as you claim you do. Then you would have been smart enough to know Chelsea over the years hardly gives players above 30 more than a year contract. No matter who that player is. It's always been a year contract. If he does well then it's extended if he doesn't he leaves.

Kante getting more than 2 years contract with an option of a third is the new board being generous and trying to make some changes.

Who wrote the bolded? It's still haunting you.

No correlation. Stop

Ballzproblemm:
we need to build a Midfield without Kante , for how long are we going to be doing this? he gains form. ,we rely on him ,he drops for ,we back slide ,the cycle repeats all over again , accept it,he is a goner ,EOD.

So, you would change all the midfielders and bring fresh ones, huh!?

I am saying, you can change the rest but not Kante for now. Maybe after 3 or 4 years.

The guy is still good.

Ballzproblemm:
portable ,the cliched term many people here use when dey have know Valid argument. jorginho,Kante , azplicueta will all leave , nothing you can do about it.

notice I haven't utter a word about Silva? man maintains form and class .

So, Kante no maintain class?

I don't have problem with Jorginho and Apzi leaving though.

StarchAndBanga:
Las las u be Portable way no come get retentive memory..

U post news of Mbappe to Chelsea when everyone with half a working brain know it's just clickbait, and Tim asked u to reduce the screenshots.

Now u don turn am to, u post Jorginho to Barca..

Mbappe to Chelsea!?

Ballzproblemm:
quoting me with all sorts of nonsense,ya favorite Midfielders. are leaving and there's nothing you will do about it

Pure undiluted facts. 14 games at stretch is the highest Kante has ever missed in his football career in a season, and it's this season.

Ebukacute:
Your expectations from these portables are high
Lower them because a portable must always port

Hahahahahahaha!

I tire for some fare weather fans.

Ballzproblemm:
I don't know how some people view Chelsea , player come player goal we go still stand, nothing like moral will drop ,those set up players time is up , keeping them around will do no good.

Psychologically speaking, once they go, moral and motivational level drops.

Winning mentality gone.

We must raise a one with champion and winning mentality before you let these go.

We don't want to be Manu and Arsenal.

Ballzproblemm:
a Chelsea fan thinking without emotions? shocking!

One out of million doesn't count.

Besides, you are thinking you are not emotional.

Ballzproblemm:
64 fuqing games , anybody still supporting Kante contract renewal is sick in the head ,no apologies , please he is a legend but it's time

Missed 64 games out of 205 games, right?

In fact, he missed 14 more games this season than the other 2 previous seasons.

Substrate 14 from 64, you will get 50 games. 50 games out of 185 games without counting this season.

Dem no tell you he won us trophies during those periods.

DumaEmpire:
Oh. I see you had to do your homework by googling about the Zola deal for your comeback

Even went as far as giving a good and detailed summary of how much he was given. Lol some of us don't have to go into google archives to dig out things. Hence why i neglected adding the half into the 3 But kudos on your articulated project research.

Still on still 3 nd half years for a new signing who was younger than Kante isn't still equivalent to 31 year old injury prone player player asking for a 4 year deal.

The amazing thing is you dwelling on Zola deal of over 26 years ago just to back Kante but still yet it doesn't adequately fit your narrative.

There's nothing like 1 year policy for 30 years and above player pre Abramovich era. That's a fat lie or simply being ignorant.

There's nothing like 1 year policy for 30 years and above for ONLY EXISTING PLAYERS in Abramovich era. The policy is for either existing or new players. Stop this already.

Continuously, you have demonstrated your ignorance on this subject.

Futile attempt to argue on the subject matter you totally have zero knowledge about pre Abramovich era. Rest.

Summarily, there are exemption during Abramovich era. Even this era don't mind.

DumaEmpire:
Lol. Zola was signed on about a 3 year deal in 96(or even less can't really recall but i definitely know it wasn't more than a 3 year deal). Vialli was signed on a 2 year deal nd left the club in 99(as a manager).
None of them were offered a deal worth more than 3 years and they were new players signed into the club for that matter and not already existing players. So how's that an exemption. Lol

Its Just like Silva getting signed in 2020 and still playing at 38 years old. Probably his contract would be extended. And then after 25 years someone starts using him as a reference cos he checked on google and saw him playing for Chelsea at such an age for some amount of years or time. Not knowing it was based on contract extension.

Back to my point as you pointed out Chelsea "Hardly" gives players more than a year or 2 years contract to players. Kante an existing player who's 31 getting up to 3 years is even fairer than Zola nd Vialli you mentioned who were new players signed on 3 nd 2 contract deals respectively.
The real exception should be Koulibaly as he's the first player getting 4years in a very long time as a Chelsea player who's in his 30s. However he's fit enough to play and not romancing injuries every now and then.

There's nothing like existing player policy. The policy is for any player that is more than 30 years. And it's a one year contract. Nothing like 2 years.

Stop trying to play smart.

But there's an exception. The reason Chelsea gave few above 30 more than 1 year.

Zola was 3½ years. So, stop trying to deceive the gullible.


Chelsea last night completed the pounds 4.5m signing of Gianfranco Zola from the Serie A side Parma. The Italian international attacking midfielder will arrive in London next week, and the Stamford Bridge club have not denied reports that he has been offered wages of about pounds 25,000 per week as part his three-and-a-half-year deal.

FBS:
How did he come up with those injuries? was it by playing FIFA 44 on PS10?

half fit Kante still better pass all our current midfielders combined.

Nothing emotional here at all.

You dey mind dem. Put Kante with a mobile midfielder and see how he will perform with less injury risk.

Ebukacute:
Funny how portables think and all believe that Chelsea will let kante and jorginho go to Barcelona for free by January. .then, sign midfielders that never gets injured throughout their history of playing football. Which DM will they sign that can cover what kante covers in Chelsea. No patience at all.
I used to think it's for bants sake untill recently. Like, when did this place reduce to this level?

Na d thing wey I still dey reason be that. Which player? Make we see first.

DumaEmpire:
Zola was 30(3 years deal), Vialli was 32.(2 years deal) Then Kante is 31(asking for 4 years deal)

DumaEmpire:
if you actually know Chelsea as well as you claim you do. Then you would have been smart enough to know Chelsea over the years hardly gives players above 30 more than a year contract. No matter who that player is. It's always been a year contract. If he does well then it's extended if he doesn't he leaves.

Kante getting more than 2 years contract with an option of a third is the new board being generous and trying to make some changes.

No longer 1 year contract for players above 30 na 2 years contract.

Those aforementioned players were not even Chelsea's legend as at the time they were bought oooo. But Kante who is a Legend on his own right should not be offered.

Abeg, quit already.

DumaEmpire:
Lol. Zola was signed on about a 3 year deal in 96(or even less can't really recall but i definitely know it wasn't more than a 3 year deal). Vialli was signed on a 2 year deal nd left the club in 99(as a manager).
None of them were offered a deal worth more than 3 years and they were new players signed into the club for that matter and not already existing players. So how's that an exemption. Lol

Its Just like Silva getting signed in 2020 and still playing at 38 years old. Probably his contract would be extended. And then after 25 years someone starts using him as a reference cos he checked on google and saw him playing for Chelsea at such an age for some amount of years or time. Not knowing it was based on contract extension.

Back to my point as you pointed out Chelsea "Hardly" gives players more than a year or 2 years contract to players. Kante an existing player who's 31 getting up to 3 years is even fairer than Zola nd Vialli you mentioned who were new players signed on 3 nd 2 contract deals respectively.
The real exception should be Koulibaly as he's the first player getting 4years in a very long time as a Chelsea player who's in his 30s. However he's fit enough to play and not romancing injuries every now and then.

How old were they?

stevnwigw1:
*NOTICE OF SUSPENSION OF ASUU IDENFINATE STRIKE OF ALL MEMBERS UNIVERSITIES ACROSS NIGERIA*

The Academic staff Union of Universities, following an order by industrial court and court of Appeal on 7th October,2022 sequel to memorandum agreed sign by Federal government.
Has on Tuesday 11th October,2022, The Strike which embarked starting from 14th of February,2022 Temporary suspended.
Hence, All schools are urge to resume full activities from Monday 17th October,2022.
While announcing the suspension of strike,our Union will not hesitate to review its position should government reneged on the signed Memorandum of action.
The union apologize for all inconvenience caused to students and parents alike.

*ASUU President*

Gbamsolutely