Freksy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Freksy's Profile › Freksy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 32 pages)
Pedagogue:You profess to be a Christian, but have also meddled self in politics - a think Jesus and his disciples never did. Your post shows you are also in good romance with politics... yes, your role and those of other religious folks in politics prove we are in the end times. |
EUGENE4GOO:EUGENE, please note that the iPad does not have slot for 3G sim. The only means of internet connectivity is by WiFi. You don't need to unlock anything in order to use the WiFi function. THERE IS NO SLOT FOR GSM SIM. |
o9999:Your grandma chose a date, and you celebrated with her.... she consented. Conversely, if your grandma lives in an era when birthday celebration is popular, but never celebrated hers and never told you to do so for her when she is dead, would you consider it wise to choose a date and be celebrating her birthday yearly when she is dead? Jesus is not your grandma, so, did not choose a date for his family members, friends and fellowship members for his birthday celebration. Birthday celebration was popular in his time, but neither celebrated nor told us to do so. To him, what was of profound importance was the day of his death... Luke 22:19 "A good name is better than precious ointment; and the day of death than the day of one’s birth''. Eccl. 7:8 - KJV |
Ubenedictus:Pls where does d bible say Jesus was born exactly on 25th December? To justify your claim of 25th December, can you please tell us how long you think Jesus lived on earth? |
ogawisdom:Where in the bible is it written that you should not watch pon on TV or internet with your parents, or with your children? You think apart from laws that are expressly stated, there are no principles in the bible by which all we do must be based? |
emjoe1:You seem to be a troublemaker! We keep ignoring, you keep bringing this question up...LOL If Jesus lived for 33yrs + 6months, then his 34th birthday would have been on (33yrs+6months) + another 6months. He died in the month of Nissan (which corresponds to March/April in today's calendar) His 34th birthday would therefore have been on March/April + 6months = September/October. For the 25th December to be true as the birthday of Christ, then, one of the following MUST be false: 1. Jesus lived for just 33yrs + 6months on earth. 2. He died in the month of Nissan 3. The date he died in the month of Nissan often falls on March/April in our today's calendar. CONCLUSION: If none of the above is false, then it's obvious the 25th December speculated to be the birthday of Jesus Christ, is FALSE. |
checkdate:This is done to please who? God and his son? |
sukkot:Tell us the pattern, if you know. |
[size=14pt]NONE![/size] |
emusmith:The fruit of the spirit is ONE, not NINE. 22 "But the [size=14pt]fruit[/size] of the Spirit [size=14pt]is[/size] love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, 23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law". Gal. 5:22-23 - KJV It is 'fruit or fruitage' but not 'fruits or fruitages'. Also, it carries a singular auxiliary verb, 'is', not 'are'. In view of this, as Christians, we have no choice but to cultivate this composite fruit completely (with all its spiritual components/ingredients) in ourselves. A truly spiritual person is expected to have ALL, but not SOME of the afore-mentioned spiritual attributes.... hence, its singularity. We have nothing to choose from. |
Givemejoy:There are 10 human faces in all. |
Dapo777:What is freewill? Is freewill the same as wish/desire? The man exercised his freewill by beating up the woman. How did the woman exercise her freewill in connection to the beating? |
zyzxx:This method will not work for you. Answer the question you said you will. But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 1Cor 11:3 KJV The almighty God existed before his son, Jesus; Jesus existed before the man; and man existed before the woman. [size=16pt]QUESTION[/size]: In the above hierarchy of headship provided by apostle Paul, tell me the part that is true and the part YOU THINK is false? bible stated it clearly dat " jesus is d way truth and life, and no 1 comes to the father except through me... jesus said againIn line with the scripture, you have fittingly placed the son between man and the father. ………….MAN……….THE SON……….THE FATHER………. Can you also put the father between man and the son? In other words, can you also pass through the father in order to meet the son? ………….MAN……….THE FATHER……….THE SON……. "Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works’ sake. " (John 14:11).‘At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you’. John 14:20 KJV. From your understanding and interpretation of Jesus' statement, you are also a part of the trinity, true or false? note dis, jesus said God as choice to reveal dis to d children and d illiterate and he leave does dat are too wise on there own. Do u knw Y? Is because of dey knw d truth but think it impossible and dat thru wit human reason it impossible( we are no different from dem if we interpret thing sprit wit human wisdom ) but wit God all things are possible,But you wrongly interpreted John 14:11 1.The father is a distinct person and he is a God; 2. The son is a distinct person he is also a God. 3. And the holy spirit is a distinct person and a God too, according to the trinity. Please, by using Godly wisdom, and not human’s, kindly explain how the 3 distinct persons, each being a God, are one. |
Syncan:What do you know about heaven and earth? If he was outside of God, ie a god, then something was made before him, on which he mas made. Is this so? When you guys calm down and listen I will teach you.STOP MAKING NOISE, YOU HAVE NOTHING TO OFFER. Jesus subordinate position to the father...I agree with this as long as it is in relation to their persons (ie the father begat the son), but they are one God and hence equal. Jesus did not hold on that equality, he humbled himself to save man...Phil 2:6.After saving man he went back to heaven and was highly rewarded by someone greater than him for mission well accomplished. In the heaven he is still in a subordinate position to his father. Where do you think he was when apostle Paul was inspired to write the following: But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 1Cor 11:3 KJV The almighty God existed before his son, Jesus; Jesus existed before the man; and man existed before the woman. [size=16pt]QUESTION[/size]: In the above hierarchy of headship provided by apostle Paul, tell me the part that is true and the part YOU THINK is false? |
Bmart:Why? |
Syncan:So your almighty God is a possession. How then would you describe his possessor, as a mighty God? but you who claimed that psalm 45 was talking about Solomon, must have read in vs 8 this: I wisdom dwell with prudence, and find out knowledge of witty inventions. That proverb was talking about Wisdom, why do you say it is Jesus?The verses you quoted excitedly in your previous post as proof of Jesus’ almightiness were talking about who? And for this firstborn that you're throwing around everywhere, see:…. These passages declare the preexistence … yes, he preexisted even the mountains and hills 25 before the mountains were set in place—before the hills—I was born, Pr. 8:22 NET If you want to use firstborn really,then Firstborn of God is God, since firstborn of man is man.Jesus is God.There is no big deal about that, but you accepting the facts that go with it. For example: If a man begets another man, who’ll be the head? Similarly, if a God begets another God, who’ll be the head? But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 1Cor 11:3 KJV The almighty God existed before Jesus; Jesus existed before the man; and man existed before the woman. QUESTION: In the above hierarchy of headship provided by apostle Paul, tell me the part that is true and the part YOU THINK is false? I am sure I have explained this before here, but no, you have hardened your heart.Who made the following statements and what other words could have been used for you to accept that Jesus was created? 22 The LORD created me as the beginning of his works, before his deeds of long ago. Pr. 8:22 NET 25 before the mountains were set in place—before the hills—I was born, Pr. 8:22 NET Truly, whose heart is hardened against overwhelming evidences of Jesus’ subordinate position to his father? |
Syncan:I hope you have not forgotten what you were trying to proof. Now you have accepted that whatever God accomplishes THROUGH the things he created, is attributed to him as THE MAKER. Scriptures tell us that God created everything THROUGH his son. In view of this, the almighty God, the father of Jesus Christ, is the maker of all things. |
Syncan:You expected his son to have said: "I did this, I did that"? Look at you! He has said it all in verse 30 '...I was beside him like a master workman,...' He knows all that were accomplished through him, were his father's accomplishment. Since you believe what you read from verse 27-30, do you also believe the following verses? 22 [size=16pt]The LORD created me as the beginning of his works[/size], before his deeds of long ago. 25 before the mountains were set in place—before the hills—[size=16pt]I was born[/size], Pr. 8:22,25 NET QUESTION: 1. WAS JESUS CREATED? 2. DOES PROVERBS 8:22 & 25 AGREE WITH COL. 1:15? 15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: Col. 1:15 KJV |
Syncan:In other words, if God uses what he created to accomplish his purpose, he has no right to say he is the maker? He is the maker of all that he did through his son whom he created. [size=14pt]QUESTION: According to that Gen 1:6-7, the firmament divided the waters, but why did God say he divided it? [/size] |
Syncan:Has he told you it's not the father of Jesus that created all things? It appears you are subtly looking for a comfort zone. I responded to it already, am still awaiting your response, and don't ignore the question I raised therein. |
Syncan:1. You accuse me of quoting Ph 2:5-9 and removed the word, ‘not’. Can you please mention the page where the post can be found? 2. Col 1:15 was quoted to support the statement in parenthesis. See how it was below: His father created him first (he is the firstborn of every creature, Col 1:15 KJV) and thereafter used him to create other things. Why did you make it appear Col 1:15 KJV was at the end of my statement, to imply everything was taken from Col 1:15? 3. Again, you removed Pr8:30 I quoted to support the following: ‘….. I was master-workman at his side…’ You did not only remove it, but introduced Gen.1:3 that I never cited, but only paraphrased. You ignore questions crying for answers in those posts, but are busy editing and misrepresenting my posts to deceive readers. |
Syncan:Mine, is to show you what the bible REALLY teach; how you decide to take it, is yours. |
Syncan: Freksy:God created all things BY USING or THROUGH his son. |
Syncan:Scriptures plainly show that the Word was God’s agent through whom all other things came into existence. “This one was in the beginning with God. All things came into existence [size=14pt]through[/size] him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence.”—Joh 1:2, 3 There is “one God the Father, out of whom all things are, . . . and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, [size=14pt]through[/size] whom all things are.” (1Co 8:6) God spoke, and the son acted on each WORD from his father. In other words, God created THROUGH his son, ‘the word’. Who said in Gen 1:3 "let there be light". Who rested on the seventh day after creating man on the sixth?THE FATHER SPOKE, THE SON ACTED ON EACH WORD SPOKEN BY HIS FATHER God said: ‘let there be light.’ ‘The son, (the master-worker) moved to action, and there was light‘….. I was master-workman at his side…’ Pr8:30 God rested after creating man, and of course we need not be told that his son, through whom God created man rested too. In the heaven, the son was/is known by the tittle: ‘the word’. A title often describes the function served or the duty performed by the bearer. [size=14pt]QUESTION: Why is God’s Son called “the Word.”? [/size] |
Syncan:Ok, I will try to be quiet. Sir, but here you’re basically saying nothing, for even you, are also a God. Even Demons too, are Gods. Please, IS JESUS THE ALMIGHTY GOD? IS JESUS THE FATHER OF JESUS? |
Syncan:Point of correction: Genesis account of creation, divided into epoch of days deals majorly on the preparation of earth for life. Nothing is said about creation of spirit beings, so you don’t have to know WHEN he was created before you believe he was created. Angels were created, but WHEN? Your mistake is of concluding that Jesus was created because he is called "first-born of every creature." One obvious problem here is born and created have very different definitions. Even when considering natural childbirth, we know a child does not come into being when he is born, but nine months earlier. Neither would Christ have "come into being" when he was begotten of the Father. Indeed, when Jesus is called first-born in Colossians as you pointed out, he is referred to as such before creation and time even existed. He was begotten from all eternity. As such, he would have never "come into being."Sorry, you are not any close to addressing this. The expression is self-explanatory. Simply put; Jesus was the first among what were created. He is a CREATURE. Syncan is the firstborn of every NAIRALANDER. = it’s either you are the eldest among us (NAIRALANDERS) or the first to have registered on NAIRALAND. Whatever is the case, you are a NAIRALANDER. ‘The firstborn of every CREATURE’ implies Jesus is a CREATURE. A second, related problem arises when one considers the title first-born. Even in its Old Testament usage, this title was not restricted to a sense of time. The emphasis was on a place of pre-eminence given by a father to his son. Isaac, Jacob, and Ephraim received the blessing of the first-born though they were not first-born in time.Ok, I will stop talking what I do not know. JESUS WAS CREATED, that, I know. |
Syncan:Good! This is a step in the right direction. At least for once, you have recognized Solomon as one who had also being on ‘the throne of David’ that God promised would last forever. ‘God is your throne forever and evermore; the scepter of your kingdom is a scepter of equity.’ If anyone on the throne is/was addressed as a God, then Solomon that had being on that throne was a God. |
Syncan:The 1st distinct person Syncan:The 2nd distinct person Syncan:and the 3rd distinct ‘person’ Syncan:Confirmation of the distinction between the father and the son Syncan:Confirmation of the distinction between the son and the spirit Syncan:The 1st distinct person is a God Syncan:The 2nd distinct person is also a God Syncan:And the 3rd distinct ‘person’ is a God too. In view of the above, is it hard to see that the 3 distinct persons are Gods? See his conclusion below and judge for yourself what Satan is using the trinity to promote. Syncan:The father, the son and the Holy Spirit are three distinct persons, and each is a God, according to 3nity dogma, yet you WILLFULLY REFUSE to accept that 3nity is nothing, but the worship of [size=14pt]3 Gods[/size]. Keep being a tool in the devil’s hand used as his harbinger of falsehood! Syncan:Ok, clap for yourself. Syncan:ok, I am waiting to see your response. |
Syncan:It is false, even as obvious as it is that John1 is talking about two separate persons in the same sense that we know? The word was a God. You are a God. Even Satan is a God. ...We are talking about the God without which nothing was created(Gen1:1), we are talking about the God who was at the Beginning(Gen1:1), We are talking about the God who owns the angels(Rev22:6, Lk12:8-9), we are talking about the God who is the alpha and Omega(Rev21:6-7)Jesus’ authority over the angels was given-a strong proof of his subordination to the giver, his father. Jn1:3,Col 1:16... Jesus created all things, without Jesus nothing was createdHis father created him first (he is the firstborn of every creature, Col 1:15 KJV) and thereafter used him to create other things. Rev 22:16...Jesus sends His angels on errandAre you not aware that the one who is the almighty rewarded him with the authority over the angels? The above is too flimsy as proof of his almightiness. Rev 22:13 Jesus calls himself, the alpha and the OmegaMere assertion without substance. Show how that refers to Jesus, for it is evident that a number of persons are represented as speaking in this chapter of Revelation. Mention who was speaking at that point. |
Lo he says: "God is a spirit, Jesus is a spirit – all angels are spirit. Behold so great a folly,‘God is a spirit: …’ John4:24 KJV Jesus is a spirit: ‘Because Christ…being put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit;’ 1Pet.3:18 ASV ‘So also it is written, The first man Adam became a living soul. The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.’ 1Cor 15:45 ASV Angels are spirit: ‘And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire.’ Heb 1:7 KJV All heavenly beings are spirit. Debunk the above scriptures let see. that someone should equate God with angels, the creator with the created, the eternal with the finite, even in the guise of form. They are equal in form." Never did scripture talk about equality of an angel with God, never.All mankind - young and old, male and female, rich and poor, righteous and unrighteous, wise and unwise etc. are in FLESHLY FORM. That is our natural form of existence. You and a day old baby are flesh, but you are superior in age, knowledge, experience, wisdom, power etc. Oxygen, Hydrogen, Nitrogen etc. are different elements but naturally exist in the same form – GASEOUS FORM. All heavenly beings – God and angels are naturally in SPIRIT FORM. Though exist in the same form, God is the greatest – in age, knowledge, experience, wisdom, power etc. What do you mean by "Spirit"? Spirit could signify: (1) a living, intelligent, incorporeal being, such as angels, demons, or spirit could be seenSpirit means much more than what you claim you know. If spirit means A, B, C, D,… it does not necessarily mean where meaning A is implied, meaning B must be applied. Its usage is contextual. Even the angels, are not perfect spirits, how dare you suggest equality with God?Perfection or imperfection has nothing to do with the form in which they exist. A perfect being in the heaven exists in spirit form, imperfect being in the heaven equally exists in the form of spirit. This has nothing to do with moral uprightness. If you are ‘perfect’, or morally upright and I am not, it does not stop us from being men of fleshly form. But Jesus before he took flesh was God, for every attribute of God was in him, He is in eternity, He created all things. Jn1:1-3, Col 1:16.God’s “only-begotten son,” the Word, was a spirit person like his Father, hence “existing in God’s form” (Php 2:5- , but later “became flesh,” residing among mankind as the man Jesus. (Joh 1:1, 14) Completing his earthly course, he was “put to death in the flesh, but [was] made alive in the spirit.” (1Pe 3:18) His Father resurrected him, granted his Son’s request to be glorified alongside the Father with the glory he had had in his prehuman state (Joh 17:4, 5), and God made him “a life-giving [size=14pt]spirit[/size].” (1Co 15:45) 3.Point to where I lied (about "I am" ). It’s just your subtle way of introducing what you want to say. Are you not the one who wrote this Yet let anyone who cares open Ex3:14 in any translation and see, if there is something different from this Yet let anyone who cares open Ex3:14 in any translation and see, if there is something different from this "...Say this to the people of Israel: [b]I Am has sent me to you." Ex3:14‘And God said to Moses “I will be what I will be”; and he said “You are to say to the sons of Israel ‘Will Be has sent me to you.’” Ex.3:14 Byington There is neither 'I AM' nor 'I AM THAT I AM' in Byington. Tell me, who truly is a liar? |
Syncan:Which of the Gods are you referring to? 1. Reasons Ps45 was not talking of Solomon.The throne in question, is the throne of David. Several kings in David’s line were heir to that throne. Note that Jesus only became heir to a throne..., whose throne? The throne of his father, David. Refer to Luke 1:33 you just quoted. God made this covenant with King David at some time during David’s reign in Jerusalem, the parties being God and David as representative of his family. (2Sa 7:11-18) 11 And as since the time that I commanded judges to be over my people Israel, and have caused thee to rest from all thine enemies. Also the LORD telleth thee that he will make thee an house. 12 And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. 13 He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever. 14 I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men: 15 But my mercy shall not depart away from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I put away before thee. 16 And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever. 17 According to all these words, and according to all this vision, so did Nathan speak unto David. 18 Then went king David in, and sat before the LORD, and he said, Who am I, O Lord GOD? and what is my house, that thou hast brought me hitherto? 2Sa 7:11-18 The terms of this covenant were that a son from David’s line would possess the throne forever, and that this son would build a house for God’s name. God’s purpose in this covenant was to provide a kingly dynasty for the Jews; to give Jesus, as David’s heir, the legal right to the throne of David, “the LORD’s throne” (1Ch 29:23; Lu 1:32); and to provide identification for Jesus as the Messiah. The first person to inherit this Davidic covenant with God and sit on the throne of the LORD was king Solomon of Israel. 23 Then Solomon sat on the throne of the LORD as king instead of David his father, and prospered; and all Israel obeyed him. 24 And all the princes, and the mighty men, and all the sons likewise of king David, submitted themselves unto Solomon the king. 25 And the LORD magnified Solomon exceedingly in the sight of all Israel, and bestowed upon him such royal majesty as had not been on any king before him in Israel. 1Ch 29:23-25 KJV Vs 7:You have loved righteousness, and hated iniquity: Therefore, God, Your God, has anointed You. Did Solomon love righteousness and hate Iniquity? Isn't solomon the one that brought back Idolatory in Israel via his foreign wives? and what is that anointing all about with respect to solomon? Nothing!!!.Here, you are sounding very judgmental like the supreme judge of mankind. None Israelite king/prophet was without error/sin in the sight of the LORD. Judgment is God’s, not yours. Did you take note of what is said about him in the scripture I quoted above (1Ch 29:23-25)? Can same be said of you? But in Jesus Christ we see the one who loved righteousness, and hated sin, scripture is filled with this to the extent that the righteousness of Christ is shared to those who believe and walk in his ways. What about the anointed part, you may ask And I will answer, "What does "Christ" mean? Ah yes, it means anointed. Psalm 45 was talking about Christ not solomonSolomon was also an anointed king, in case you don’t know. Though Solomon sat on that LORD’S throne of Davidic covenant before Jesus, however, it's worth mentioning again that God’s purpose in this covenant was to provide a kingly dynasty for the Jews; to give Jesus, as David’s heir, the legal right to the throne of David, “the LORD’s throne” (1Ch 29:23; Lu 1:32); and to provide identification for Jesus as the Messiah. ‘He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Most High: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:’ Lu 1:32 KJV Solomon had been an heir to this same Davidic throne of covenant – the throne of the LORD. ‘Then Solomon sat on the throne of the LORD as king instead of David his father, and prospered; and all Israel obeyed him.’ 1Ch 29:23 KJV How would you explain the following? 14 I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men: 1Ch 29:14 KJV Is it Jesus that God was to chasten with the rod of men if he commit iniquity? Many kings in line of David sat on that throne. PS 45:6 FIRST APPLIED TO SOLOMON. It's not the one that sat on the throne that was to last forever, but the throne itself. 'Then Solomon sat on the throne of the LORD as king instead of David his father, and prospered; and all Israel obeyed him.’ 1Ch 29:23 KJV |
zyzxx:[size=16pt]YES![/size] Gud morningThanks, good afternoon! |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 32 pages)


2)as the active essence or breath which was supposed to be the universal vital force...are the angels this one too?
, but later “became flesh,” residing among mankind as the man Jesus. (Joh 1:1, 14) Completing his earthly course, he was “put to death in the flesh, but [was] made alive in the spirit.” (1Pe 3:18)