₦airaland Forum

^^^

Sarcasm : a sharp, bitter, or cutting expression or remark

44 boys, 44 girls = Very nice

Lets see, how many will end up as kidnappers = 22 boys; Yahoo-yahoo = 22 boys; prostitutes = 44 girls.

The God of Adeboye has done it again. He has blessed Nigeria with 88 potential crooks.

God bless the Niger Delta
God bless 'oyel' money
God Bless Nigeria

jay bee: Shouldn't[b] provocative[/b] dressing be discouraged especially among the youth?

Define provocative?

Agbaya! Wey wan spoil show for people like me.

That said, if by provocative you mean dressings that make women more vulnerable to vices like r/a/p/e, then you are simply getting it wrong. We shouldnt be discouraging women from dressing in 'miniskirts' because there is no evidence that women in mini-skirts are more likely to be raped than women in dirndls or burqas? Women were raped by the thousands in Somalia, Bosnia, Rwanda and the Congos, for example, and few if any of them were wearing bikinis or bustiers.

queensmith: next we will be hearing 'spaghetti tops lead to rape'. A national cleansing is needed. . . . . national cleansing.

Am I the only one seeing this? I can't be the only one. . . . .it just can't. . . . .

You are arguing with unexposed dunderheads. Goodluck.

onila: lie

In my head, I picture you as this very hot madame. Hey, can we be smashing lovers?

naijababe: I would take the BQ of a face me I face over living with my/his parents, my sanity is too expensive to be toyed with abeg.

Hmm, awon aunti to n nawo deeee. I feel you.

Onila, I love you. I want to smash you.

Sagamite: The first bunch of kids I knew that were being raised using this youthful, niche, funkadelic parenthood were Queen's College girls.

In my time, they love to speak funky and were posh.

If you think QC girls speak funky and posh, then I am afraid you didnt know what being posh is. You must have had a rough background in Sagamu if your idea of posh back then was Queen's college girls.


I wonder how your first few years in London was really like . . . did you think well brought up White girls were angels?

Ola one: BTW, Stranger, when did your Stranger series reached NO.9?

Ask Seun. He alone has the answer. Me, I just react to his whims

Ola one: And, the main reason for this trend isn't poverty. They just lack the cognitive ability to determine what should form the basis of man-woman relationships. Imagine being freaked out by the mere sight of BBs, designer gear, some wads of hard currency, foreign accent, visits to eateries, etc.
Shocking!

You sound like someone who has been out-competed? lol

y me: Oh well who would blame them
when there are senseless men out there who are ready to lay it all down for some lazy as* brat just because they want to hit that

You are making it sound like its no big deal. The most important thing in life itself is s/e/x. Wars have been won and lost because of it and the most important scientific discovery of our time was motivated by the pursuit of s/e/x. So lets not act like its no big deal. It is the only deal.

JOXY: yes she is free in the sight of men but in the sight of God nko?

Come to think of it, this is what the government is trying to guide against in the first place. Had she not taking one way the man would have being alive today. Although she did not kill the man directly she killed him indirectly. My advise to her is to ask God for forgiveness and also do what she can for the decessed family. MARK MY WORD THE DEVIL USED HER INDIRECTLY.[b]yes she is free in the sight of men but in the sight of God nko?

Come to think of it, this is what the government is trying to guide against in the first place. Had she not taking one way the man would have being alive today. Although she did not kill the man directly she killed him indirectly. My advise to her is to ask God for forgiveness and also do what she can for the decessed family. MARK MY WORD THE DEVIL USED HER INDIRECTLY.[/b]yes she is free in the sight of men but in the sight of God nko?

Come to think of it, this is what the government is trying to guide against in the first place. Had she not taking one way the man would have being alive today. Although she did not kill the man directly she killed him indirectly. My advise to her is to ask God for forgiveness and also do what she can for the decessed family. MARK MY WORD THE DEVIL USED HER INDIRECTLY.

I pray the devil use me to kill you. person!

Sisi_Kill: You didn't finish reading my post did ya?

If she took it, [b]why didn't she provide it as soon as she was arrested? [/b]Why did we get bombarded with BB Broadcasts asking for witnesses to come forward?

You want her to give her phone to those guys who were desperately looking for someone to hang Hammed's death on? They'd simply destroy whatever evidence she gives them. I wouldnt do as you suggested at all.


I'd make sure I made copies and release it to the public before handing any evidence to those corrupt and irrational folks. I really commend her calmness.

Sisi_Kill: There is a possibility she took the pictures but we know that she didn't because she woulda provided it as evidence as soon as she was arrested and there would be no need to send an SOS call for witnesses to come forward.

Which brings us back to the question - Who took the picture and the video and how did they just happen to be there to capture the moment? Surely no one goes around taking random pictures. . .I mean for what? To make an Album of Soon to be dead LASTMA officers arresting female Bankers in Range Rovers??!!

She probably did. The driver's seat looks unoccupied. maybe she was out on the pavement, as she should be, taking pictures. She seems way smarter than that dolt called Hammed.

What is that ediot Hammed LASTMA doing on that side of the road. Shouldnt he be on the pavement side, away from the main road? He got himself killed! Hope his fellow ediots learn from his stupidity.

^^^

I didnt expect you to get the point. My posts arent for dolts like you. Maybe after you graduate from college you just might be able to understand some of what I write. That said, lets talk about your p/u/s/s/y. . . thats something you should be able to wrap your head around.

bebe4u: @TWY thank you for your advice. I am not hung up on money. the basic things/ comforts / luxury i can provide for myself.

You are a lying biatch lying through her lying little Oil and gas teeth. The thread was all about how he doesnt see it fit to give you money for wash and set. The thread started off with him working in a bank because you wanted us to know he has money, no? Then you said you are doing better than him financially. What is that supposed to mean? Keep lying to yourself. You know what's worse than clueless? Clueless and oblivious. Anyway, the good thing is: The most successful marriages are based on lies. You are well on your way.

i only used the salon money to typify a situation of his perceptible lack of giving.

There's an evolutionary imperative why we give money to our family and friends. And there's an evolutionary imperative why we don't give a crap about anybody else. If he gave every woman that comes into his life 'salon money' indiscriminately, he couldn't function.

While we were friends yes, it wasnt a bother to me, we have moved to a different phase he should see some of my needs as his. its the thoughts behind that im bothered about.not necessary the amount he has to offer. It's long term situation of taking care of myself , my kids and home all by myself while he sees nothing wrong in championing that just because i can afford it that im concern about.

So this is the only guy in your life, at the ripe age of 30, the big 3-0, and you are acting like there is a mile long of men waiting to kiss your golden feet? smh!

PS: That said, I sense a deep psychological issue here; the feeling of wanting to be taken care of. Two things; Either your father was AWOL while you were growing up and you never had a man in your life to make your little, tiny, unlovable self feel loved or you envy your more beautiful friends who get treated like queens and you wish you could be treated like them.


The first situation: I am sorry I cant help you. The damage is done, you need to see a shrink. It is not the banker's job to heal your psychological trauma

The Second situation: Well, like the philosopher Jagger once said, 'You can't always get what you want.' It is time to grow up and face reality. You will be 31 next year, not 29.

Ivynwa:
I am friendly with a certain couple that had a baby some weeks back only for the Baby to develop some complications from the use of insulin by the mother. It saddened me greatly to learn this morning that the baby did not survive that complication.

I followed Blazay here but I coud not let this slide for any reason.

First of all what do you mean by bolded?

When you say the baby died from the complications of insulin use by the baby. is that what the doctor told the mother-to be? I wouldnt want you to unnecessarily scare undiscerning readers with baseless assertions like this. By and large, Insulin is a very safe drug, even to the unborn baby and many pregnant women are on it and have delivered safely with no complications whatsoever.

So first, why is the mother to be on Insulin? I make bold to say that she is most likely diabetic, No?
The next question is what kind of Diabetic is she? Type 1 or 2

Again, I make a guess that she is a type i and if she were type II, it is obviously a badly controlled Diabetes.

So the danger here is not the Insulin per se, the danger here lies in the fact that she woman has a poorly controlled Diabetes. I stand to be corrected. Approximately 2% of pregnancies are complicated by diabetes that either develops through pregnancy (gestational diabetes) or was antecedent to pregnancy (pregestational diabetes mellitus). In either case, diabetes has significant implications for mother and fetus during pregnancy, and conversely, pregnancy significantly affects diabetes.