FXKing2012's Posts
Nairaland Forum › FXKing2012's Profile › FXKing2012's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 (of 146 pages)
Joagbaje: It's non consequential what decoration you put on your body. The bible didn't condemn tattooing. Certain things may not be decent . But not all indecency is sin.Keep deceiving urselves by determining for urselves wat is sin and wat isnt instead of letting the Word determine it for u. God forbid but if u find urself at the gate of hell u will realize every indecency is sin before God. |
jennykadry: Johnny depp did not have to pay Vanessa paradis 100million, he chose to. They were not married after all.Now that's a real man; he chose to pay her $100million even though he was not legally bound to do so. As the mother of his kids and as someone he was once in love with and still friends with, he was sensible, kind, intelligent and nice enough to know he morally ought to pay her off - and he did it big time. Now that's a man with a big heart. Again rich folks dont go crying over divorce settlements, only poor and average dudes do. PS: Poverty and wealth are states of mind. |
Sagamite: You are a person!I've lost count of the number of times you have used the terms person and cretin in your comments. And going through your posts in other threads, person and cretin appear over 95% of the time. Because you lack the capacity to engage in an intellectual argument in a civilized manner, so all you do is jump from thread to thread insulting folks. I have thus come to the conclusion that you are too uncivilized for my kind, too shallow for me to engage with, intellectually bankrupt, and even short on vocabularies which is why person and cretin appear in everyone of your crude posts. You have a lot of growing up to do, so until then you have a front row seat in my infamous ignore list - please enjoy it. |
biolabee: DAYO DAYO DAYOGBAM! |
2good: Another post to confirm you have a negative figure IQ. Your brain is a waste to mankind because your kind will contribute nothing to societal developmentWhen completely empty folks have nothing reasonable to say they resort to insults. I knew u were moronic the very moment you opined God does not exist. I know your type of nitwit. |
Yvete: FXKing2012: I've noticed your interesting posts/comments lately. Nice one!Thanks dear. |
brainpulse: Then the next thing is for us to provide Scriptural backing for watching Pono films, indecent habits,cocaine sniffing and hard drugs etc. In as much a believer knows so well that a certain behavior and habit are known with unbelievers. He should desist from those behavior so that he will stand distinct from them. You dont have to look into the bible for backing before you know what you are doing his wrong if TRUELY YOU ARE INDEED SAVED AND REGENERATED.Thank you very much jare, wonder why all these end-time pastors such as Mr Anony cant just stick strictly to the Bible. Must they always try to adapt to changing times? The Word of God is the same yesterday, today and forever so we must not twist it to suit changing times. Personally I will doubt the spirituality of any pastor who says tatooing is ok. Going into the scriptures: 1Thes. 5: 22 - Abstain from all appearance of evil. So pls flee from it if it looks/sounds like evil; u need not be absolutely certain it's evil before fleeing. Besides the following scripture should guide us: 1 Cor. 8:13 - Why, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world stands, lest I make my brother to offend. |
I think it's only right we get to know who the 1millionth (1,000,000th) member is. So who is he/she? |
2good: You did not answer my question on whether U are married at all. Also I am pretty sure you don't work else you will that pregnant women work till month 6 in most places and get a career break with or without pay for sometime after delivery. You seem to be very inexperience in life from all what you're typing here. Mothers with careers don't have 5 heads.You say I dont work yet I can employ you. Come to think of it, maybe that's why I dont have any qualms giving a woman something substantial if need be. It's only a man who hasnt handled REAL money that is willing to die for the little he has. Little wonder the likes of Michael Jordan, Johnny Depp, Bernie Ecclestone, Rupert Murdoch, Mel Gibson, Harrison Ford, Steven Spielberg, Tiger Woods, Madonna, James Cameron, Paul McCartney, Kevin Costner, Kenny Rogers, Lionel Richie, Donald Trump, Michael Douglas, Mick Jagger, etc etc didnt find it outrageous to settle their exes big time and didnt go about calling them thieves after the settlement. Only poor and average people go on ranting about divorce settlements. If you are truly rich you will not even lose sleep over it because what you will still have left after the settlement is way over and beyond what you can spend in your lifetime. Now I know why my thinking is very different - like minds think alike. |
Stress tripples the risk of miscarriage (https://sites.google.com/site/miscarriageresearch/stress-and-miscrr) which is why miscarriage is very common amongst ladies who work while heavily pregnant. Not everybody values money over kids so not everyone is willing to risk it. Personally, I will not. |
End-time signs. |
@dayokanu & 2good, yes the man takes care of the woman while pregnant but you still havent addressed how you expect the woman to make any real contribution after carrying pregnancy and nursing kids for 13yrs out of the 15yrs she was married. Or would u suggest she risk losing the pregnancy by working while heavily pregnant? Or she should abandon the babies at home and go chasing after money? Pls put yourselves in her shoe and tell me how you are going to make any reasonable income to contribute based on the analogy I gave about a woman being pregnant and nursing kids for 13yrs out of the 15yrs she was married. |
@thehomer, only an unbeliever who genuinely wanna learn deserves my time and effort to explain, not one who is full of blasphemies and just out to mock my belief and my God. God forbid I waste my time on such. |
Reski: are u blind if the bible is inspired by God how come your God couldnt give accurate dates and numbersode! |
boborosky: with regards to child birth "delivered of a baby" is d correct statement. Check your dictionary, and i bet you wouldn't stick to your point.That is only becos it is extremely rare for a lady to deliver a baby by herself. But that is not to say it is impossible, so the right term must be used based on what really happened. |
thehomer: The contradictions aren't quarrels about the law, but about the contents of the Bible itself from which you claim to derive your knowledge of God.And what is the difference between the Law and the Word of God? The Word of God (the Bible) is the Law we live by. Arguing with unbelievers is forming a union/relationship/marriage with them so MUST be avoided. There is a website where all those cooked-up contradictions has been refuted, if you are jobless or keen enough to search for the so called contradictions then you should also be jobless or keen enough to search for where the so-called contradictions were refuted. But that is if you truly wanna learn and not just up to mischief. |
boborosky: a smart person should be able to know what context i meant.Point is it is possible for a woman to be "delivered of a baby" or "deliver a baby" depending on the context (or what actually happened). |
Now how easy/possible is it for a woman who carried pregnancy for 9months and then nursed the baby for 2-3yrs to work and make money to contribute to buying assets? Assuming she was married for 15yrs and had 4 children in the process, then she must have spent 9months * 4 equals 36months (3yrs) being pregnant and 2.5yrs * 4 equals 10yrs nursing the kids. So in all she spent 13yrs out of the 15yrs she was married being pregnant and nursing the children while the man was working and making money all along. Now when it's time to share assets you say to share according to financial contribution? Does that sound even remotely fair? If it sounds fair to you then it's only fair for the woman to keep the kids, with the man having no access to them because bringing them (the kids) into the world and raising/nursing them is what she has been busy doing ( or contributing). Remember you said to go with what you contributed. Pls do away with the bias and be objective. |
The laws we have in Nigeria is fundamentally flawed; it is way too biased towards men. Our laws enslave women who are forced to stay in a relationship/union even when they are not happy in it. Why should such continue? Some say the divorce settlement law will encourage divorce therefore we should not implement it. I think that notion is very selfish and only meant to protect men even while enslaving and mistreating women. We've seen cases where the man beats the wife daily, leaves her with permanent disabilities or even beat her to death. The women stay in such unions because our law does not protect them - doesnt necessarily mean they are happy in the marriage. So the fact that divorce rate is lower in Nigeria compared to the west does not mean we are happier in our relationships/marriages. And when you try to defend the defenceless (women) you are termed a sissy. This shows how patriarchal our society really is. |
dayokanu: One party in addition to the emotion and body saved up money to buy asset and the other without contributing financially wants to split it? Is that not greed and daylight robbery?Now how easy/possible is it for a woman who carried pregnancy for 9months and then nursed the baby for 2-3yrs to work and make money to contribute to buying assets? Assuming she was married for 15yrs and had 4 children in the process, then she must have spent 9months * 4 equals 36months (3yrs) being pregnant and 2.5yrs * 4 equals 10yrs nursing the kids. So in all she spent 13yrs out of the 15yrs she was married being pregnant and nursing the children while the man was working and making money all along. Now when it's time to share assets you say to share according to financial contribution? Does that sound even remotely fair? If it sounds fair to you then it's only fair for the woman to keep the kids, with the man having no access to them because bringing them (the kids) into the world and raising/nursing them is what she has been busy doing ( or contributing). Remember you said to go with what you contributed. Pls do away with the bias and be objective. |
Now how easy/possible is it for a woman who carried pregnancy for 9months and then nursed the baby for 2-3yrs to work and make money to contribute to buying assets? Assuming she was married for 15yrs and had 4 children in the process, then she must have spent 9months * 4 equals 36months (3yrs) being pregnant and 2.5yrs * 4 equals 10yrs nursing the kids. So in all she spent 13yrs out of the 15yrs she was married being pregnant and nursing the children while the man was working and making money all along. Now when it's time to share assets you say to share according to financial contribution? Does that sound even remotely fair? If it sounds fair to you then it's only fair for the woman to keep the kids, with the man having no access to them because bringing them (the kids) into the world and raising/nursing them is what she has been busy doing ( or contributing). Remember you said to go with what you contributed. Pls do away with the bias and be objective. |
Divorce settlement law is needed in Nigeria and the reason can be found here: www.nairaland.com/1159898/divorce-settlement-child-support-introduced-nigeria |
thehomer: You should be ready to defend your faith according to your Bible.Definitely not when the intent is to ridicule my God, I forbid that. Titus 3:9 New International Version (NIV) 9 But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrels about the law, because these are unprofitable and useless. 2 Cor. 6 14 Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? 15 What harmony is there between Christ and Belialb? What does a believer have in common with an unbeliever? 16 What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols? For we are the temple of the living God... |
boborosky: let me teach you something. In life, nothing is devoid of exception. Besides, it was only a movie. I do not mean that weird things don't happen. They really do. Answer dis question: Is 1 1=2 in all cases? At least not in marriage. Apart from the above, the expression: delivered of a baby, has been approved by the owners of the language. You just do not have any choice but to accept it that way. Simple!And let me teach you something else, the context in which a term is used is what really determines whether it is right or wrong. You dont just throw terms around as if they are universally right. Hope you've learned something simple. |
dayokanu: If she contributes financially to acquiring the asset then i support her getting the percentage of her contributionShe should get a percentage because she contributed a piece of her life by contributing her emotion and her body. She carried every one of your kids for 9months and went through the very severe pain of being delivered of your babies. All these take a very big toll on her body and she should be compensated if the relationship does not work out. Contribution should not be by cash alone, there are different ways of contributing in a relationship. Because those other ways can not be easily quantified in monetary terms does not make them worthless. |
boborosky: nAfter this explantion, I expect you to keep quite. A woman can not deliver herself of a baby. You will understand it better if you know the rigorous activities attached to delivering a baby from its mother. I do not need to explain further, just consult a good English language dictionary or an English dictionary of idioms. This might help you eradicate those bits and pieces of ignorance and babarism in you. Just an advice.In the movie "Apocalypse", a woman delivered a baby all by herself while hiding from the invaders in the well. We have seen cases where women delivered babies all by themselves while home alone. So it is not completely unheard of or impossible for a woman to deliver a baby all by herself. Dude, women are stronger than they seem. |
willarrie: Couples tend to look alike with time if they make love consistently in a position that enables them look into each other eyes while at it.....for couples who dont look alike probably enjoy the Doggy style....just my opinion sha.Very interesting theory, I may write a thesis on this most interesting theory. |
@jidewin, you raised very good points but pls dont get me wrong. I never said the woman should get most of the assets like the examples you stated, my position is women should not be kicked out of the house empty handed like is widely practised in Nigeria. Of course why should the woman get the house and pension thereby ruining the man? That's just plain crazy! I think the assets should be shared with something meaningful (not even necessarily up to half) going to the woman. |
babkazy: stop blah blah defend ur bible if u can.......I dont owe it to u or anybody for that matter to defend the Bible. In fact, the Word of God does not need defending. |
Logicboy03: liesprove it. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 (of 146 pages)

??