Happiness32's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Happiness32's Profile › Happiness32's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (of 9 pages)
 Politics › Re: The Natasha’s Shadows Will Soon Be Revealed - Prof Sandra Duru by happiness32: 7:15am On Oct 15, 2025 |
hotseat:Exactly my thoughts and concerns After all the talk and talk, nothing. She even promised us evidence. |
| Politics › Re: The Natasha’s Shadows Will Soon Be Revealed - Prof Sandra Duru by happiness32: 9:57am On Oct 14, 2025 |
Oluboh:I believe there's more to this woman than the eyes meet 1 Like |
| Politics › Re: The Natasha’s Shadows Will Soon Be Revealed - Prof Sandra Duru by happiness32: 5:55pm On Oct 13, 2025 |
Over 7months after Senator Natasha promised us evidence for sexual harassment, we no see shi shi. Kai Natasha fooled Nigerians 35 Likes 2 Shares |
| Politics › Akpabio Triumphs At IPU, Natasha Akpoti’s Unsubstantiated Allegations Collapse? by happiness32(op): 3:05pm On Jul 30, 2025 |
Senate President Akpabio Triumphs at IPU, Natasha Akpoti’s Unsubstantiated Allegations Collapse? Nigeria’s Senate President, H.E. Godswill Akpabio, continues to make the nation proud on the global stage. His recent participation at the Sixth World Conference of Speakers of Parliaments in Geneva, Switzerland, under the auspices of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), was nothing short of remarkable. Akpabio’s address, “Courage to Legislate, Will to Lead”, captured the attention of world leaders, parliamentarians, and diplomats. His eloquence, vision, and firm commitment to peace, justice, and multilateralism reflect the image of a Nigeria that is resilient, reform-driven, and ready to lead in a world in turmoil. What is even more striking is how warmly and excitedly Akpabio was received by the IPU. Despite weeks of politically motivated noise and distractions back home, the Senate President stood tall, his presence reinforcing that integrity speaks louder than falsehood. It should be recalled that suspended Senator Natashaj Akpoti-Uduaghan had earlier rushed to the IPU with unsubstantiated allegations of sexual harassment against Akpabio, she even shed tears at the global stage while making complaints. Yet, the IPU, renowned for its independent and thorough investigative processes, halted these claims after finding no credible evidence. In their earlier response to Natasha Akpoti, the IPU President Tulia Ackson acknowledged Natasha's concerns, stating, “we have heard you”, and assured delegates that the organization would take her claims seriously . She emphasized IPU’s commitment to fairness by confirming that the Nigerian Senate and Akpabio would also be given an opportunity to present their side before any decisions were taken, stressing that the Union follows established procedures in such cases. With the IPU yet to make formal public statements following Natasha’s unsubstantiated allegations, emerging details point to conclusion as the likelihood of false accusations engineered for political mischief. By boldly appearing before the IPU, engaging with global peers, and delivering a visionary address, Akpabio turned attempts to discredit him into a moment of national pride. His speech not only positioned Nigeria as a responsible voice in the global legislative community but also sent a clear message: weaponized falsehood cannot overshadow character, leadership, and results. In the end, Akpabio’s Geneva outing is a victory for Nigeria’s democracy and a sharp rebuke to those who attempt to exploit international platforms for baseless character assassination. 1 Like |
| Politics › Femi Falana’s Misguided Commentary On Sen. Natasha’s Case: A Distortion Of Law by happiness32(op): 10:00am On Jul 24, 2025 |
FEMI FALANA’S CONTINOUS MISGUIDED COMMENTARY ON SENATOR NATASHA’S CASE: A DISTORTION OF FACTS AND LAW Since the Federal High Court delivered its judgment on July 4, 2025, in the case between Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate and others, it has been disheartening to watch respected legal luminary, Mr. Femi Falana, SAN, consistently mischaracterized the decision of Hon. Justice Binta Nyako. Even before the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the enrolled order was released, Mr. Falana was all over the media making assertions without the benefit of the full judgment or a clear understanding of the facts and processes before the court. Many had hoped that upon the release of the judgment, he would retrace his steps. Unfortunately, he has persisted in his erroneous narrative, disregarding the explicit findings of the court. Mr. Falana has erroneously asserted that legislative houses lack the power to discipline their members and that the Senate’s suspension of Senator Natasha for six months was invalid. However, a plain reading of the judgment reveals the following: 1. The Senate acted lawfully in referring Senator Natasha’s conduct to the Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions Committee. 2. The Senate’s decision to suspend her based on the Committee’s recommendation was upheld. 3. The Senate President did not err in denying her audience, as she failed to comply with procedural standing orders by refusing to sit in her designated seat before invoking Order 10. It is important to note that Senator Natasha filed her case prematurely, challenging alleged violations of her rights before the Senate concluded its internal disciplinary process. Her originating summons did not include any prayer for the setting aside from her subsequent suspension. Nor was there any amendment to the Originating Summons seeking such relief. The Court, therefore, could not have ruled on a relief that was never sought, as courts are not Father Christmas. Contrary to Mr. Falana’s public commentary, the court did not nullify the six-month suspension. At best, Justice Nyako offered an obiter dictum, suggesting that the Senate might consider reviewing its rules and potentially recalling the Senator to avoid overreach. This was not a binding directive, and it certainly did not amount to a mandatory order enforceable by law. Mr. Falana’s silence on the binding aspect of the judgment, which ordered Senator Natasha to tender a public apology, pay a fine of ₦5 million, and admit liability for civil contempt is telling. Instead, he insists on obedience to what is clearly a non-existent or, at best, non-binding order. Legal practitioners owe the public a duty of candour and fidelity to the facts. Misleading commentary, especially those who bear the rank of Senior Advocate, erodes public confidence in the legal process and undermines the integrity of judicial pronouncements. It is essential to state clearly: there is no relief in the court’s record seeking to declare the suspension unconstitutional; nor is there any express order from the court compelling the Senate to recall Senator Natasha before the expiration of her suspension. As the matter is now on appeal, it is best to allow the judicial process to run its course without unnecessary media drama and legal misrepresentations. The time has come to end the misinformation. Let the courts decide, not the court of public opinion. It is a plea! Concerned Nigerian.
|
| Politics › Natasha’s Show Of Shame At The National Assembly by happiness32(op): 5:04am On Jul 23, 2025 |
Natasha’s Show of Shame at the National Assembly It is regrettable that Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan was ever elected to represent any constituency in Nigeria. Her today's conduct at the National Assembly, where she arrived with a band of unruly youths, laid bare her lack of decorum and capacity for public office. Despite losing her case in court, she filed an appeal and a motion for stay, yet blatantly disregarded the judgment's binding orders. Her dramatic appearance at the Assembly, reportedly staged for a paid Arise TV coverage, was a calculated attempt to stir public sentiment rather than seek genuine redress. In her media interview, she further displayed a glaring ignorance of the law. If she truly believes in her case, why not argue it in court instead of orchestrating spectacles for television and social media? It is a sad reflection of our times that one individual seeks to undermine institutions for personal gain. Nigeria is watching. - A Concerned Nigerian Observer. 5 Likes 1 Share
|
| Politics › Sen. Natasha: Full Court Judgement Released, No Mandatory Order For Recall by happiness32(op): 12:08pm On Jul 19, 2025 |
Title: Again, the full judgement now out confirms that there was no mandatory order for recall. Over this Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate case, certain media commentaries and legal punditry have suggested, rather inaccurately, that the Federal High Court, Abuja, per Hon. Justice Binta Nyako, made a binding order mandating the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to recall Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan following her suspension. Having obtained the full judgement from the court yesterday, nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the court made more profound statements over the matter than we initially thought. As a continuation of my earlier publication on this matter having obtained the full judgement, I find it necessary, indeed imperative, to revisit the actual words and reasoning of Justice Nyako in her judgment delivered on July 4, 2025, in Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan v. Clerk of the National Assembly & 3 Ors, to lay to rest these persistent misconceptions. The first and perhaps most important point that must be reiterated is that Justice Binta Nyako made no binding order mandating the recall of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan to the Senate chamber before the expiration of the six month's suspension. At no point in the judgment did the court issue a declaratory or injunctive order nullifying the suspension or compelling the Senate to reinstate the Senator before the six month's expiration. Rather, the court made an obiter observation, a judicial aside - that called attention to the proportionality of the suspension vis-à-vis the number of legislative sitting days in a calendar year. The learned judge opined that if a legislative year spans 181 days, a six-month suspension covering 180 days may be excessive and possibly contrary to the spirit of legislative representation. However, such commentary, however persuasive, does not amount to a binding pronouncement or mandatory directive. What truly constitutes the ratio decidendi, the legal reasoning that binds - of the judgment is the court’s resounding affirmation of the Senate’s constitutional authority to regulate its internal affairs, including disciplining its members, pursuant to Section 60 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended). The court rightly observed that Senator Natasha was referred to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions for alleged unparliamentary conduct on the floor of the Senate on 20th February, 2025. This referral was made in accordance with the Senate Standing Orders 2023, particularly Orders 13 and 14. Notably, despite being formally invited to defend herself before the Committee, the Senator chose to file a suit in court instead. The court then reaffirmed the long-standing principle of separation of powers, citing the authoritative decisions in AG of Bendel v. AG Federation & 22 Ors and Unongo v. Aku, to underscore that courts will not interfere in the internal workings of the legislature unless there is a clear constitutional breach or violation of fundamental rights. The court emphasized that such interference would amount to judicial overreach. Moreover, the judgment referenced the case of Senator Ali Ndume v. President of the Senate & Ors, where the Federal High Court held that the Senate has the power to discipline its members, provided due process and fair hearing are observed. Justice Nyako concluded that the Senate’s invitation to the Plaintiff to appear before its Ethics Committee was a manifestation of procedural fairness, not a breach of it. Perhaps the most striking pronouncement of the court, which many conveniently ignore, is the declaration that “there exists no allegation whatsoever to the effect that the Defendants contravened a statutory or constitutional provision.” The Senator’s suit was found to be purely an attempt to shield herself from the consequences of parliamentary disciplinary processes under the guise of judicial protection. In a powerful statement, Justice Nyako concluded that Section 36(1) of the Constitution does not envisage judicial review of every utterance or internal deliberation made during legislative plenary. If courts were to wade into every such matter, "this Honourable Court would know no rest," she rightly remarked. In light of the above, the public must disregard narratives that portray the judgment as a judicial indictment of the Senate’s disciplinary powers. There was no order of recall, no declaration of the unconstitutionality of the suspension, and certainly no finding that the Senate violated any law. Justice Binta Nyako did not nullify the suspension. If anything, she reaffirmed the Senate’s authority and the judiciary’s constitutional restraint in matters of internal legislative regulation. Those who argue otherwise do so either out of ignorance or mischief. The judgment is a powerful testament to constitutionalism, the doctrine of separation of powers, and the sanctity of legislative independence. I rest my case. Dayo Fadugba is a lawyer analyst based in Abuja.
|
| Politics › Sen. Natasha Appeals Lost Judgement, Tries To Enforce Non-existent Recall Order by happiness32(op): 11:11am On Jul 15, 2025 |
14th July, 2025 SENATOR NATASHA AKPOTI-UDUAGHAN APPEALS A JUDGMENT SHE LOST WHILE ATTEMPTING TO ENFORCE A NON-EXISTENT ORDER OF RECALL I consider it a duty to draw the attention of the general public to the ongoing legal developments surrounding the judgment delivered by Hon. Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court, Abuja, on July 4, 2025, in the case instituted by the suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan. Contrary to misleading public narratives, it is imperative to clarify that Senator Natasha lost all the reliefs she sought before the court. Specifically, the Federal High Court dismissed the following claims made by her: 1. Her challenge to the Senate’s decision to invite her to appear before the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions; 2. Her objection to the reassignment of her seat in the Senate chamber; and 3. Her claim in seeking to speak from an unauthorised seat on the Senate floor. In dismissing this claim, the court held that she was in breach of the Senate Standing Orders when she attempted to invoke Order 10 (which is an order of privilege), whereas she had violated Order 6(1) and (2) by refusing to speak from her newly assigned seat. This conduct was rightly held to be unparliamentary. 4. Her argument that she cannot be disciplined by the Senate. All of these claims were resolved against her. Most importantly, no positive or mandatory orders were issued by the court for her recall to the Senate. Despite this judicial defeat, Senator Natasha was seen celebrating with her supporters, falsely suggesting that the court had ordered her recall. When the reality of the judgment became clear, she filed a Notice of Appeal against aspects of the decision she found unfavourable, particularly the direct orders of the court that found her guilty of contempt and imposed specific sanctions. The court ordered her to: Pay the sum of ₦5 million to the Federal Government; Pull down from her Facebook page a satirical and mocking post purporting to be an "apology"; and Publish a sincere apology in two national newspapers and on her Facebook page. To date, she has not complied with any of these clear and unequivocal orders. Instead, she now seeks to return to the Senate under the guise of enforcing a non-existent court order, falsely claiming that the obiter dicta of the Honourable Judge, mere judicial observations, constitute binding and enforceable directives. This distortion is legally flawed and grossly misrepresents the true state of the law and the facts. Even more troubling is the emerging pattern of converting serious judicial proceedings into social media content, prioritizing optics over substance and trivializing the gravity of legal accountability. In response to this self-induced legal confusion, a cross-appeal and an interlocutory application have been filed. These are aimed at preserving the dignity and independence of the Senate and preventing any disruptive consequences arising from the deliberate mischaracterisation of the court’s decision. It must be emphasised that this cross-appeal is not political. It is a constitutional safeguard, filed to affirm that Justice Nyako’s remarks suggesting a review of Senate Standing Orders or the recall of the Senator were merely advisory opinions (obiter dicta). They were not binding judicial orders, as they did not emanate from any of the reliefs sought by the Plaintiff and cannot, in law, be enforced. The public is hereby reminded that the Nigerian Senate remains committed to order, decorum, and the rule of law. It will not be railroaded or destabilised by media stunts or sensationalist narratives. Governance must proceed with focus and seriousness, unmarred by distractions. The Senate remains firmly focused on its legislative responsibilities and wholly supports President Bola Tinubu’s administration in its commitment to democratic governance and national development. SIGNED Mr. Dayo Fadugba, Esq. Legal Analyst |
| Celebrities › Video Of Verydarkman Shooting Rifles, Declares Support For Ned’s Gun Ownership by happiness32(op): 7:16pm On Jun 02, 2025 |
See video below https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V_hBW5eyeA?si=4BTOAYR4iBZ2ug8g Verydarkman while exploring turkey advocated for licensing of guns to Nigerians to curb terrorism. He declared support for Senator Ned Nwoko’s gun ownership bill for Nigerian citizens. |
| Politics › Freedom Of Speech Is Not A License To Defame: A Rebuttal To Femi Falana by happiness32(op): 2:14pm On May 28, 2025 |
Freedom of Speech Is Not a License to Defame: A Rebuttal to Femi Falana’s Misplaced Reliance on Nwankwo v. State By Nnamdi Ikechi In the wake of the criminal defamation charges filed against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, human rights lawyer Femi Falana, SAN, offered a spirited defence rooted in constitutional liberty. Citing the Court of Appeal’s decision in Arthur Nwankwo v. The State (1985) 6 NCLR 228, Falana urged the Attorney-General of the Federation to withdraw the charges, suggesting that they amount to a violation of the right to freedom of expression. While the intentions behind his intervention may be noble, the legal reasoning is flawed, outdated, and ultimately unconvincing in the context of the current case. 1. Falana’s Misapplication of Nwankwo v. State In Nwankwo v. State, the Court of Appeal declared certain provisions of the Criminal Code relating to sedition as unconstitutional for infringing upon the right to freedom of expression under the 1979 Constitution. The court emphasized that public officers must tolerate criticism, even if it is harsh or unflattering. However, the charges preferred against Senator Natasha are not for sedition. Rather, they are for criminal defamation under Sections 391 and 392 of the Penal Code, applicable in the Federal Capital Territory. Section 391 criminalizes the making of false imputations intended to harm another’s reputation, while Section 392 prescribes punishment of up to two years' imprisonment or a fine, or both. The Nwankwo judgment never invalidated these defamation provisions, and Falana’s reliance on that case is a clear misapplication. Criminal defamation remains valid and enforceable law in Nigeria, distinct from the sedition laws that were struck down decades ago. 2. Ignoring the Modern Legal Context: Cybercrime and Media Transmission Falana’s position overlooks the evolution of criminal jurisprudence in Nigeria. Today’s legal ecosystem includes the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2015, which explicitly addresses offences committed through electronic and digital platforms. The defamatory allegations made by Senator Natasha concerning assassination plots and organ trafficking allegedly involving Senate President Akpabio and former Governor Yahaya Bello, were not whispered in private. They were made during a live broadcast on Channels Television and repeated in digital correspondence, amplifying their impact and legal ramifications. Digital publication introduces additional layers of liability and wider jurisdictional reach. These are not mere political criticisms; they are allegations of grave criminal conduct made without substantiated evidence, well within the scope of criminal defamation under extant Nigerian laws. 3. Free Speech is Not Absolute Under Nigerian Law It is important to affirm that freedom of speech is a cornerstone of democracy. But, as with all rights, it has boundaries. Section 39(3) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) provides that freedom of expression may be restricted “in the interest of defence, public safety, public order, public morality or for the purpose of protecting the rights and freedom of other persons.” The right to protect one’s reputation is a legitimate legal interest recognized globally. In the United Kingdom, the United States, and other democracies, defamation laws - civil and criminal - coexist with freedom of expression to create a balanced legal framework. In this case, Senator Natasha is not being prosecuted for critiquing government policy or challenging official actions. She is being prosecuted for making specific, defamatory, and criminal accusations against named individuals, which, if proven to be false and malicious, clearly breach the law. 4. The Attorney-General’s Actions Are Lawful and Justifiable The prosecution initiated by the Attorney-General of the Federation is backed by a police investigation that reportedly found prima facie evidence suggesting that Senator Natasha's statements were not only false but made with reckless disregard for the truth. This is not akin to the Nwankwo scenario, where no investigation established malice or falsehood. Here, the law has taken its course, starting from a petition to police investigation, to prosecutorial review, consistent with due process. The idea that this prosecution is an attempt to gag dissent is speculative at best and deceptive at worst. The focus should be on the truthfulness and intent behind Senator Natasha’s statements, not an abstract invocation of constitutional rights divorced from factual realities. Conclusion Femi Falana, SAN, deserves respect for his longstanding contributions to constitutional law and human rights in Nigeria. However, on this matter, his interpretation is both legally and contextually misplaced. The charges against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan are not about silencing criticism or dissent. They concern the responsible use of free speech, especially in an era where reputations can be destroyed in minutes through digital platforms. The law cannot and should not- stand idly by when false and injurious allegations are made against citizens, public figures, or not. Falana’s invocation of Nwankwo v. State may serve as a powerful soundbite, but it does little to shield defamatory speech from lawful accountability. The courtroom, not the court of public opinion is the proper forum for Senator Natasha to defend her statements. Let the law take its course. Mr. Nnamdi Ikechi writes from Lagos. He is a public affairs analyst and Political commentator. |
| Politics › Court Berates Natasha For Lying Against Gov Ododo's Chief Of Staff On Media by happiness32(op): 10:31pm On May 13, 2025 |
Court Berates Natasha For Lying Against Gov Ododo's Chief of Staff On Social Media A Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court sitting in Maitama, on Tuesday, berated the suspended Senator representing Kogi Central, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, for wrongful usage of her X-handle (Twitter).https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CjsBDEuuq/?mibextid=WC7FNe 4 Likes 1 Share
|
| Business › Drama As Journalists Defending Sen. Natasha Clash On Air, Decline Investigations by happiness32(op): 1:00pm On May 11, 2025 |
5 Likes
|
| Politics › Sen Natasha's Team Confirm She Spoke To Sandra Duru Despite Denial by happiness32(op): 10:51pm On May 10, 2025 |
Media Agents Defending Senator Natasha Accidentally Confirm Natasha Akpoti Spoke to Sandra Duru Despite the Senator's Public Denialhttps://www.facebook.com/share/v/1WPeY6vNhW/ 7 Likes
|
| Politics › Sandra Duru Posts Video Of Natasha’s Alleged Hired Influencers Thanking Her by happiness32(op): 10:08pm On May 10, 2025 |
Watch Adeola’s guest, one of my charitable beneficiaries from the South Eastern region of Nigeria. Like many others I have helped over the years, both those who come to me for support and those I assist quietly out of love and duty, and I never publicize such acts. My holy book teaches me that what the right hand gives, the left should not know. This same girl was desperate to be featured in my upcoming LIFE AND TIMES: GOLDEN CIRCLE DOCUMENTARY scheduled for August 2026, in anticipation of my Soul Tonic and Voice of Nature Vol. 1 & 2 book launches, with forewords by Dr. Mohan Kaul and Dr. Ibietan Omoniyi. The documentary also includes video contributions from respected world leaders who voluntarily shared their experiences and encounters with me throughout my life journey. She approached me, claiming her husband had abandoned her and was stranded somewhere. Out of compassion, I instructed my team to give her a chance by assigning her a voiceover role in the already viral LIE-TASHA documentary. Unfortunately, her voice was not only completely unsuitable, it sounded like a parrot with diarrhea. We had no choice but to reject the recording and demand a refund. Rather than accept this with dignity, she ran off to another desperate, unprincipled “runs girl” and the confused, loud-mouthed Adeola to spread foolish and baseless stories. What came out of her mouth was not only idiotic but a reflection of a disturbed and senseless character, a true NATASHAWO in every sense. Let it be known: I will address Adeola, Adanna Chinyere, Iluo Oghene, and the senseless, stray mouthpiece known as Maama Weewee or Pee Pee. They will face the consequences once the full truth about NATASHA is exposed and justice is served. These useful idiots will serve as a warning to all the upcoming NATASHAS, the LIE-TASHAS of this world. I am not here for social media drama or content creation. I am here for real, life-altering, justice-driven cases. Before bringing anything online, I had already reported this matter to the relevant security agencies and submitted my evidence. Only after that did I bring a small portion to the public domain, and not for entertainment, but to expose a serious criminal matter under active investigation. No distractions allowed in my quarters! But, I will try as much as possible to keep you all updated with receipts! Natasha, you have failed because, I am in town with everything forensically investigated and verified! Useless runsgirls! Prof. Mgbeke https://www.facebook.com/share/v/199gd8cGop/ |
| Politics › Natasha Akpoti’s Global Media Accusation Series Without Any Legal Action by happiness32(op): 11:38am On May 10, 2025 |
How Natasha Akpoti Took Sexual Harassment Allegations to Global Media Without Ever Going to Court — And the Pattern of 5 Accusations Against Prominent Men Despite the grave nature of her repeated sexual harassment allegations, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has yet to take a single one to court — opting instead for emotionally charged interviews and high-profile media appearances on international platforms like the BBC, Sky News, and Deutsche Welle. This media strategy, critics say, has painted a one-sided picture, raising concerns about trial-by-press and a troubling pattern of weaponized allegations — many of which have either been retracted, unproven, or quietly faded away without legal pursuit. In a now widely circulated letter, former presidential aide Reno Omokri called out this media-centric approach. He accused Senator Akpoti of falsely accusing him of sexual harassment in 2021, only to quietly retract her claims and offer an out-of-court "settlement" after he presented conclusive evidence that he was not even in Nigeria at the time of the alleged incident. Omokri said the money paid to him was styled as a religious “offering,” following a three-way call involving Akpoti’s then-fiancé, now husband, and a prominent Christian clergyman. Yet this isn’t the only time Akpoti’s tactics have come under scrutiny. In fact, Senator Akpoti has accused no fewer than five high-profile Nigerian men of serious misconduct, including: 1. Reno Omokri – accused of sexual harassment; allegation later retracted after he provided irrefutable alibi. 2. A sitting Cabinet Minister – also accused on video of sexual harassment. 3. Senate President Godswill Akpabio – currently facing allegations from Akpoti, which have gained widespread media attention. 4. A former Kogi State Governor – whom she accused of threats and corruption. 5. A former NNPC executive – whom she linked to illicit contracts and abuse of office. So far, none of these cases have seen the inside of a courtroom — nor has the senator produced forensic or independent legal evidence to back any of her claims. Instead, they have followed a similar trajectory: sensational rollout, media amplification, then silence or retraction. “It appears she prefers media courts to real courts,” one analyst observed. “But justice — whether for victims or the accused — cannot be served on TV alone.” Senator Akpoti has yet to publicly respond to Omokri’s detailed allegations made over two months ago — including claims of financial settlement, false statements, and coordinated online entrapment. Her silence has raised eyebrows among observers and media ethicists who now question the motive, timing, and strategy behind her string of public accusations. As global media houses continue to cover her current claims against the Senate President, calls are growing louder for balance, context, and — above all — verification before amplifying voices that may not be rooted in truth or due process. 1 Like |
| Politics › Re: Deleted Video Of Natasha Akpoti Falsely Accusing Reno Of Sexual Harassment by happiness32(op): 8:25am On May 10, 2025 |
Reno’s post below Dear British Broadcasting Corporation, Sky News, and Deutsche Welle, In The Interest of Transparency, Please Balance Your Coverage Senator Natasha Akpoti, whom you have repeatedly given a platform, falsely accused me of the same offence for which she now accuses Senator Godswill Akpabio in 2021, after an altercation with me involving a lady, suspected (but not proven) of being a catfish account controlled by Senator Natasha Akpoti, offering me unsolicited sexual favours via Facebook, and me telling the woman in question that I was happily married and not interested in a relationship with her or any other woman besides my wife. When I brought this to the attention of security experts, I was informed that this was a common practice in Abuja, where some unscrupulous persons make such offers to politically exposed persons, such as myself, using beautiful women as fronts to entrap men with compromising photographs. I do not know if this was Miss Natasha Akpoti's ultimate aim then. Miss Akpoti, as she then was, only retracted, then deleted her accusations when I proved with unimpeachable evidence, including my passport stamp and a First Class British Airways ticket, that I was not in Nigeria during a May 6, 2014 state banquet for Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, which was the date and time when she falsely claimed I sexually harassed her. On the contrary, my boss, then President Goodluck Jonathan, had sent me as a Special Envoy to the United States in the heat of the Chibok Girls' abduction and the ensuing #BringBackOurGirls campaign, which involved then-U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama. From there, flew to see my children in California. After retracting her lies and deleting the video she had made levelling her accusations against me and peddling sundry other untruths, her then fiance, Mr. Emmanuel Oritsejolomi Uduaghan, now her husband, called me on a three-way call with a major Christian clergyman and appealed to me, as a Pastor, to accept an out-of-court settlement, which I did. I was subsequently paid a considerable amount of money, which was styled as an "offering." I am not sure that it serves the public interest of justice to publish Senator Natasha Akpoti's current allegations against Nigeria's Senate President without also informing your viewers that this woman has a history of making false and unfounded allegations after altercations with men. She hates losing an argument and has been known for using everything at her disposal, including lies, to get even. I do not know if her current accusations are true. But you may want to note that besides me, Senator Natasha Akpoti has also accused on video a cabinet Minister of sexual harassment. I am not a statistician. However, if you ask me, I would suspect that the chances that a former Presidential spokesman, Cabinet Minister, and Senate President all sexually harassed the same woman are slim to none. The best predictor of future behaviour is past character. Senator Natasha Akpoti is a skilled actor who knows how to cry at will. She has used powerfully convincing tears to gaslight the public as she tried to frame me in the past. She is articulate and lies effortlessly and persuasively. Natasha Akpoti almost destroyed my life, but for the fact that I am a meticulous record keeper who kept every record from that episode, including meta date records of the call by her husband and the subsequent credit alert (so-called 'offering'), with the date matching the day of the call. Consequently, I urge you to be conscious that getting the facts right is the cardinal principle of journalism. In this instance, you appear to have gotten the propaganda right. Reno Omokri 60 Likes 3 Shares |
| Politics › Deleted Video Of Natasha Akpoti Falsely Accusing Reno Of Sexual Harassment by happiness32(op): 8:24am On May 10, 2025 |
17 Likes 3 Shares
|
| Politics › Natasha Has Filed Nothing In Court Related To Sexual Harassment - Sandra Duru by happiness32(op): 2:51pm On May 09, 2025 |
EXPOSING LIE-TASHA: A Symphony of Deceit Unraveling Before Our Eyes! Let me say this loud and clear as a village Prof. Mgbeke, the voice of truth that refuses to be silenced!https://www.facebook.com/share/p/15sSMfyAka/?mibextid=WC7FNe 26 Likes 2 Shares
|
| Politics › Dash Them 50 - Video Of Natasha Akpoti During Senatoria Elections - Sandra Mgeke by happiness32(op): 6:48am On May 08, 2025 |
Video belowhttps://www.facebook.com/share/v/1LFrWm7DLz/?mibextid=WC7FNe 7 Likes
|
| Politics › Re: Arise TV Comments On Prof Mbeke's Financial Inducement Accusation (Video) by happiness32: 8:52am On May 07, 2025 |
Arise tv should play the audio leaks. They are just dancing around. Bribed station! 16 Likes 1 Share |
| Politics › I Paid The Rent - Sen Natasha On Leaving Her Marriage - Sandra Duru Leaks Audio by happiness32(op): 1:53pm On May 06, 2025 |
The Era of “LIE-TASHALIZATION” Is Over!https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19g4aLe79N/?mibextid=KsPBc6 27 Likes 5 Shares
|
| Romance › False Sexual Accusations Is Best Way To Teach Men A Life Lesson - Lady On X by happiness32(op): 9:48pm On May 05, 2025 |
As seen below on X! Post deleted‼️‼️ I just did delected the post because, i felt the need to, and it was very necessary. The truthful reason into making such tweet is particularly about women being sex shamed after they give the same men the sex they want.https://x.com/vivan_okeke/status/1917228124682780707?t=zIclLK8A9tEJc0X4Ose8tg&s=19 1 Like
|
| Politics › My Father Was Wrongly Accused Too: Nigerian Man Asks Sen. Natasha 7 Questions by happiness32(op): 10:04am On May 05, 2025 |
Dear Natasha H Akpoti , I hope this meets you well. When the whole issue between you and the SP started, all I stood for was that you should be given the opportunity to prove your allegations against him and not be shut down, as the case of sexual harassment is very serious and should not be swept under the carpet. I just finished watching the live broadcast of Prof. Mgbeke, and I am not understanding what I heard from her. Kindly answer the following questions: *Is it true that you told Prof. Mgbeke that there was no case of sexual harassment, that it didn't happen? Because if it's true, it means you've messed up any such case in the future for us women and the girl child. * Is it true that you said you paid Aunty Oby to lie for you and that she knows the truth? * Is it true that you called us Nigerians, who felt you should be listened to "gullible and hungry" ? I really need answers to the above questions as all other gossip Prof. Mgbeke claims you had with her is non of my business. I am only wondering how a grown woman in her 40s will be so quick to spill out all we're told you said to a woman you were just talking to for the 1st time in this age of technology. It'll be a serious disservice to some of us who stood by you, believing that your allegation of sexual harassment should be investigated and not trashed, if you don't come out to clear the air. I do not support anything that is not right no matter who is involved, so please come and defend yourself because Prof. Mgbeke seems to have plenty evidence against you. I stand for the truth. Never come out to accuse ppl wrongly for what you know too well is not the truth. I feel very disappointed, to say the least. In another comment, he stated below I've seen both sides of the coin over and over. I stand not for her but I can't be against her unless she messes up. My father has been falsely accused by her type twice in his life. So I have every reason to be wary of such cases. Nonetheless, harassment is real. It happens and she may have been harassed. I have seen wives who have been harassed in the most embarrassing ways by some custodians of leadership in our society. I can't support the SP beyond wishing this whole thing dies off because that seat he is on is valuable to us. I won't be surprised if he is guilty either but I don't even care at this point. I would rather he retreats for decent attornment of the faceoff. I want a speedy secret reconciliation and forward movement. We need refineries and ajakuta steel plant. If they can't think of this I still believe that this whole thing is to beat about the bush to avoid achieving anything for this country. From how evil the world is this is beyond anyone. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14EukLbXCJD/?mibextid=WC7FNe
|
| Politics › Provide Evidence: Nigerians React To Oby Ezekwesili’s Support For Sen. Natasha by happiness32(op): 8:16am On May 04, 2025*. Modified: 8:32am On May 04, 2025 |
In response to Dr Sandra Duru’s call out and revelations about Senator Natasha’s alleged blackmail and false sexual harassment accusations , Oby Ezekwesili has responded via her official Facebook handle with the below: Summary of Dr. Oby Ezekwesili’s Memo to Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and Fellow Nigerians: Dr. Oby Ezekwesili affirms her unwavering support for Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan in her pursuit of justice, particularly regarding her petition against Senate President Godswill Akpabio for alleged sexual harassment. She denounces the false accusations and smear campaigns being circulated by political opponents as desperate distractions. Emphasizing her incorruptible track record, Dr. Ezekwesili insists that no amount of money can sway her convictions or silence her advocacy for justice. Alongside the women of FIDA and other principled Nigerians, she calls for a fair and independent investigation, condemns the abuse of power in public institutions, and encourages all citizens to remain committed to the fight for a just and accountable Nigeria. Nigerians are however not pleased with the response of Oby Ezekwesili, they have begun to demand for evidence. Below are comments on her wall demanding evidence for the sexual harassment ploy against the senate president and many Nigerians https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02mpRoCfgH7acd7Sz62Zjc2zMZnd9RuVV8TzLmrCyFzAj7VUynEJSwmxmhiK4R5iV2l&id=1311404820&mibextid=WC7FNe
|
| Politics › After Initial Denial, Sen Natasha Confirms Phone Number, Chats Belongs To Her by happiness32(op): 12:01pm On May 03, 2025 |
Recall Senator Natasha initially denied knowledge of Dr Sandra Duru and the details she published. 8 Likes
|
| Politics › Re: Sen. Natasha Caught In A Lie? Leaked Clips Contradict Her Facebook Denial - Duru by happiness32: 6:51am On May 03, 2025 |
Double standards is asking Dr Sandra duru for evidence while supporting Natasha's numerous allegations without evidence. Must be ment  38 Likes 4 Shares |
| Politics › Re: Sandra Duru Is Playing Akpabio's Script, Her Allegations Are False - Natasha by happiness32: 10:13pm On May 02, 2025 |
I always knew Natasha to be a manipulator..plenty allegations, zero evidences 28 Likes 2 Shares |
| Politics › Re: Blackmail: Reactions As Dr Duru Releases Evidences Against Sen. Natasha- Photos by happiness32(op): 11:34am On May 02, 2025 |
More |
| Politics › Blackmail: Reactions As Dr Duru Releases Evidences Against Sen. Natasha- Photos by happiness32(op): 11:33am On May 02, 2025 |
Attached 1 Like
|
| Politics › Natasha Said Akpabio Is Shielding Tinubu, Promised Governor - Sandra Duru by happiness32(op): 11:16am On May 02, 2025 |
"Akpabio is shielding President tinubu, all I want is for Akapbio to step down, Senator Natasha Akpoti Told Me. She tried to make me form an allegation of organ harvesting relating to late Umoren against Akpabio "- Dr Sandra Duru Exposes Natasha 10 Likes 1 Share
|
| Politics › Re: Emotional Blackmail, Go Apologize: Nigerians Blast Natasha Akpoti For Suit by happiness32: 8:09am On Feb 26, 2025 |
She is losing it She spoke like a market woman at the Chambers |
| Politics › Re: Yahaya Bello's Okene Arrival Draws Supporters To The Streets by happiness32: 5:13am On Jan 07, 2025 |
No matter what you think, I think this man his loved by his people. Makes me wonder why they cooked all those stories against him. Before arresting Bello for corruption, the likes of Akpabio, Wike, should all be in jail 8 Likes 1 Share |
