₦airaland Forum

ibisko04:
Small pikin de worry you. Except you are among the very few that are stealing from the commonwealth of the nation, those who denied Nigeria her potentiality to match country like Singapore and Malaysia. I command you to start preaching change to everybody around you now.
VOTE FOR CHANGE , VOTE FOR BUHARI.

Having watched the presidential standard-bearer of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Major-General Muhammadu Buhari, campaign around the country in the last couple of weeks, noted the emptiness and the near hollowness of the whole exercise, and having watched him garner some endorsements both from within and outside the country, I have come to the inescapable conclusion that those promoting the Buhari candidacy must have other reasons for backing him than the advertised prospect of saving Nigeria and setting it on the path of rebirth. Except we have all agreed that, it is better to settle for less, I see no plausible reason to present such shallowness as change and then proceed to premise the hope of a country’s rebirth on such disjointed motley assemblage of promises.

I however do not share the views of the change mob hysteria about Buhari because we have not been presented with the sheerest evidence to support those prepositions other than hope. Rather, my position is heavily supported by the evidence already in the public domain and further buttressed by the news last week that Candidate Buhari failed to apologise 31 years after he jailed two journalists under the jackboot of his obnoxious Decree No.4 which he used to gag and cow the press, despite claims by Professor Wole Soyinka that he had shown signs of “plausible transformation” and Buhari’s claim at Chatham House that he is a reformed dictator who has fully embraced democracy. Both claims in my view cannot pass the sniff test. Rather, what I see here is obvious deniability of the reality of who Buhari really is.

It appears the blitzkrieg rebranding of Candidate Buhari by the South-west (APC) apparatchik has only succeeded at the superficial level of creating a perception rather than reality, and that perception is what has driven the campaign thus far. But the reality is that the man being bandied around as the face of change has not changed from who he is to who or what he is not despite wearing different robes to give the veneer of “change” and “plausible transformation”. His refusal to show some atonement for sins of the past sets him apart from Mathieu Kerekou of Benin Republic who was reported to have apologised for his actions in a church. Has Buhari ever apologised for any of his actions? Not that I recall.

In the March 18, 2015 edition of THISDAY Newspaper, which reported the news of Buhari’s failure to apologise, there was another news story that caught my attention, titled: “Switzerland to return $380m Abacha loot”. The timing of the action of the Swiss authorities was particularly instructive as we go into the election. Buhari whose twin campaign sloganeering messages have been that he will fight corruption and end Boko Haram has consistently denied that Abacha stole Nigeria’s money. According to him, Abacha neither stole nor looted the country’s treasury. He described the allegations of looting against Abacha as “baseless”, because according to him, “ten years after Abacha, those allegations remain unproven because of lack of facts”. This was despite the fact that hundreds of millions of dollars had in well publicised reports been returned to Nigeria as part of the Abacha loot. Now that Switzerland is set to return another tranche of $380m, does Buhari still stand by his statement that the allegations or accusations against Abacha are “baseless” and not supported by “facts”? Here are three countries that have returned money stolen by Abacha to Nigeria.

Switzerland: Switzerland had earlier returned more than $700m that the late Abacha hid in Swiss accounts and is now set to return another $380 million stolen by the dictator.

Liechtenstein: The Government of the Principality of Liechtenstein returned $227m stolen by Abacha in 2014.

Channels Island: The State of Jersey in the Channels Island is set to return £315 million (N90,040,634,775.00) to Nigeria as part of funds recovered from the late dictator, Sani Abacha. The Island had earlier returned the sum of £140m (N40,018,059,900.00) to Nigeria in two batches. But the man who has been rebranded as the face of change; the man “destined” to save Nigeria and fight corruption denies it ever happened in the face of overwhelming evidence - and stated sternly that - Abacha never stole Nigeria’s money.

Anyone who has a long memory will recall that former President Olusegun Obasanjo earned many flight miles in pursuit of Abacha’s loot. He hired international lawyers to chase those monies anywhere they may be located on planet Earth and recover them for Nigeria. Buhari was fully aware of all those efforts and yet denied Abacha ever looted the country’s coffers. The irony today is that the same Obasanjo is one of the front row supporters of Buhari-for-President in the coming election. It is most probable that Obasanjo will even deny his efforts to recover the loot considering the manner he recently dismissed the PTF report. What does this say about our leaders?

On Thursday last week, newspapers lavishly reported Buhari as saying “a corrupt government is worse than armed robbery.” Really? I chuckled - Was he kidding? I am sure his definition of a corrupt government does not include Abacha’s thieving government. Otherwise, he won’t have said the clear evidence was “baseless …unproven because of lack of facts.”

Meanwhile, the Swiss prosecutor’s office said overall, the Abacha clan was thought to have diverted about $5bn from the Nigerian treasury, adding that much of it ended up abroad.

Now the question is: should Buhari go on to win Saturday’s presidential election, it would therefore mean that, he will be the one to manage the $380m about to be returned by Switzerland. Will he hand over the money to Abacha’s family since he believes they were being wrongly hounded to return money they never stole in the first place? Will he tell the Swiss authorities to keep the money as no money was ever looted and insist on being an accessory to the fact of a conspiracy of lies and falsehood told against Abacha family? Will he demand Switzerland must apologise to the family?

This is the man now being advertised as the one who will fight corruption and “restore hope.” Anyone who denies that Abacha looted the nation’s treasury not only holds our values in contempt but does pure violence to those values.
And for the first time, and strangely so, the interests of the activists, pro-democracy groups, career critics, seasoned lawyers, ex-dictators, flawed progressives, ably supported by a vocal section of the intelligentsia have converged on a candidate - Candidate Buhari - irrespective of the records of history against him. What an irony!

As our highly revered Professor Soyinka in 2007 said when Buhari wanted to contest: “This intervention has been provoked, not so much by the ambitions of General Buhari to return to power as the head of a democratic Nigeria, as by declarations of support from directions that leave one totally dumbfounded. It would appear that some, myself among them, had been over-complacent about the magnitude of an ambition that seemed as preposterous as the late effort of General Ibrahim Babangida to aspire yet again to the honour of presiding over a society that truly seeks a democratic future. What one had dismissed was a rash of illusions, brought about by other political improbabilities that surround us, however, is being given an air of plausibility by individuals and groupings to which one had earlier attributed a sense of relevance of historic actualities.” Unfortunately today, our respected professor and wordsmith is now one of the individuals championing the crusade of the “plausible transformation” of Buhari without “rigorous inspection of the evidence”. What a turnaround!

By Shaka Momodu
E-mail: shaka.momodu@thisdaylive.com, 08112661654

TRUTHTELA:
NL, you guys should brace up for the shocker. Buhari, will be disqualified, people's reaction and the uncertainty will necessitate the long awaited INTERIM GOVERNMENT. Do not underrate the power of Nigeria's president. The whole idea is to make sure Buhari, doesn't step into Aso rock and Jonathan, gets a soft landing. The same FORCES that kicked Buhari, out and stopped MKO Abiola, from being the president, are still much ACTIVE and they're out again. Watch out for this space...

viczing:
E go shock you, cos I belive he's not above the law, and if he's supporters cause violence we will match them equal to equal, cos no one has monopoly for violence, we all have beast in our selves but don't bring it out like touts in the north

Gbawe:
@OP

No need for this wailing and gnashing of teeth. Nigerians have decided. Go and cast your vote . Your bitter, prejudiced and religiously intolerant tirade against Buhari changes nothing for an electorate that has decided to opt for change. Go and vote for your GEJ. let us see if the votes of ethnocentric and religiously prejudiced neanderthals like you will be enough to secure victory for GEJ.

exxell:
So today, Buhari came to Owerri peacefully and went without any hitch. When he left, nobody used water to wash the road. He was respected as an official contender for the post of the presidency. Rewind back to last week. President Jonathan was in Daura, Kastina state and when he left, the youths and elders were washing the road as if an evil came to visit them. They spited the office of the presidency! All these while, I have always been skeptical of voting Jonathan again because he was too "gentle" for me. But I also know that Buhari is not a better option for Nigeria. My reasons are these;

#1 He is retarrded
#2 He is a Muslim and an extremist for that one
#3 He is too old to rule Nigeria in the 21st century... All these his packagings are hogwash by those who want to hijack Nigeria
#4 He said that the full meaning of APC is All Progressive Confident
#5 He has no certificate (Proven)... How can he rule Nigeria with so many professors around?
#6 He called INEC the Independent Nigeria Electoral Commission
#7 He is surrounded by crooks who wants nothing but their own selfish gains e.g Rochas Okorocha, Tinubu and Co, Amaechi
#8 He said that the name of his VP is Yemi Osunbade
#9 He said that he will stabilise oil prices in the world ( Confirm Madness)
#10 He just said today that he will make the naira equal to dollars Who does this man take us for? Magas?

Because of the above listed reasons and because Jonathan didn't perform as I expected, I decided to void my vote. But today in the evning as I was discussing with a Mallam that came to repair my shoe, guess what this man told me? That Allah has decreed that Buhari will win. He said that Jonathan won the 2011 elections because the Nothern people sinned against Allah and that Allah said in the Qur'an that anytime they sin, foreigners will rule them! I was like the Fucckk? He said that this was what has been preached to them all these while in their mosques .
The one that annoyed me most was that he told me that the Northerners don't need any education in order to hold any political post because they have a divine mandate to rule the world.

At this point, I wanted to go inside my house, boil hot oil and barbecue this illiterate fool... But the love of God made me not to.

So finally, I have decided to go and dust up my PVC again and VOTE DR GOODLUCK EBELE JONATHAN! This man is an Angel.... Believe me when I tell you so.... You need to listen to a Northerner and believe me.

donald1010:
Just last week Monday,I went for an interview somewhere around surulere.we were 6guys that went for the interview.and the woman said she needed just one person for the position. She called me on that same Monday night to resume tomorrow for the job,but unfortunately I had an urgent travel the next day being Tuesday.I told her that I was actually on my way travelling. I begged her to give me till Friday so I'd return and resume,she accepted. I was keeping her updated with calls and sms.Then when I returned on Friday,i called her, she asked me to leave it till Monday to resume.on Saturday i sent her a happy weekend msg and asked after her family?then she called me back and said to me "don't you think u re bigger than this job u applied for"? I want to give u something more befitting than that position u applied for, she asked,"can u work as my personal assistant and also be the coordinator of my company"? Wow! My head swells. Immediately I grabbed it and started thanking her and God..she said she wanted to advertise it on Nairaland for the position of her personal assistant and coordinator,but her spirit accepted me and with the rate at which i usually communicate with her always and with respect made her to see me as an idle person for the position...because she believe in communication... That just how I got the job o and I have resumed today..she also promised that in four-five months time she'll make sure I get a company car.
So my fellow nairalanders, believe in ur dreams,be prayerful,be communicative and be respectful to people..it has worked for me,so I strongly believe that it will surely work for everyone of us IJN!

This piece will examine the legal angles of a sudden
end of tenure for Prof. Attahiru Jega, the Chairman
of the Independent National Electoral Commission.
Constitutional removal from office for misconduct
will be excluded because, since President Goodluck
Jonathan has ruled that out, any further discussion
of it will be academic. Resignation will also be
excluded because Jega has said that he won’t
resign. Ditto for terminal leave because that has
been discussed enough by my humble self and
others and it is all there in the public domain.
That leaves us with ‘suspension’ – the next
plausible avenue Jega can go, but which has been
hardly debated. If anybody is wondering why I am
writing this, then hear this: I have nothing personal
against Jega. I am merely flagging the other means,
even though latent and unpleasant, through which
his tenure might end suddenly before his date with
March 28. But as many folks don’t know, or won’t
admit, it is squarely within the powers of the
president, not the Senate, to suspend Jega and it
can happen at any time of the president’s choosing.
Below are the points and authorities:
First, under the Interpretation Act, the President has
the authority to suspend any public officer appointed
by him, regardless of whether they were subject to
Senate confirmation or not; or appointed for a fixed
tenure. Here is the black letter provisions, as
enacted at Section 11(1): ‘Where an enactment
confers a power to appoint a person either to an
office or to exercise any functions, whether for a
specified period or not, the power includes power to
remove or suspend him’.
So, there you have it in plain letters – that the
President, as the ‘appointing’ power is, ipso facto,
the ‘suspending’ power as well. And most tellingly,
while the Constitution expressly requires the
consent of the Senate before the President can
remove (not suspend) Jega, there is no similar
legislative check on the President’s power to
suspend him. Plus, pertinent laws made a clear
distinction between removal and suspension; so
there is no room for ever confusing or commingling
the two. And now this: the law clearly says that
such public officer can still be suspended despite
being appointed for a ‘specified period’. Jega was
appointed for a specified period of 5 years.
Second, if you are amongst those who argue that to
hold elections legally requires a substantive (or
Senate-confirmed) INEC chairman, you now must
know that the Constitution envisaged and took care
of that. This is found at Section 318(2), which says
that ‘Wherever it is provided that any authority or
person has power to make an appointment to an
office, such power shall be construed as including
the power to make such appointment, whether on
promotion or otherwise, or to act in any such office’.
Continuing, Section 318(3), says that ‘references to
a person holding an office shall include reference to
a person acting in such office’. And there is more at
Section 11(1) of the Interpretation Act, which says
‘Where an enactment confers a power to appoint a
person either to an office or to exercise any
functions, whether for a specified period or not, the
power includes to appoint a person to act in his
place, either generally or in regard to specified
functions, during such time as is considered
expedient by the authority in whom the power of
appointment in question is vested’.
Then, Section 11(2) adds the clincher that ‘A
reference in an enactment to the holder of an office
shall be construed as including a reference to a
person for the time being appointed to act in his
place, either as respects the functions of the office
generally or the functions in regard to which he is
appointed, as the case may be’.
The plain meaning of the foregoing provisions is
simply that our laws don’t strictly require a
substantive INEC chairman for elections to hold; and
the President can legally appoint an acting INEC
chairman, if he so chooses.Thus, other than Jega,
any of the 12 national commissioners, appointed by
the President in acting capacity, can legally proceed
to conduct the 2015 elections.
Third, having thus far established the discretionary
powers of the President to suspend Jega, let us now
turn to the reasons the President might adduce for
taking such course of action, even though nothing in
the pertinent laws require the President to give any
reasons. Yet, if he chooses to, the President can
readily take umbrage under the Constitution, which
provides at Section 160(1) that ‘any of the bodies
may, with the approval of the President, by rules or
otherwise regulate its own procedure”.
The bodies referenced above are the statutory ones
created under the Constitution, amongst which INEC
is included. So, the next logical question is whether
Jega has unilaterally been making ‘rules or
otherwise regulating INEC procedures’ without the
approval of the President? It appears he has been
doing exactly that, as is evidenced by his publicized
many acts of insubordination to the President. That
alone, without more, means that Jega has serially
and brazenly violated the letters and spirit of
Section 160 of the Constitution.
Therefore, it is no longer a question of whether he is
amenable to being suspended or not, but when and
if the President will see fit to do so, as a matter of
lawful and sound exercise of his discretionary
powers.
http://www.theopinion.ng/forget-terminal-leave-jega-can-be-suspended/

SeverusSnape:

francizy:
The APC has been receiving donations from well meaning Nigerians of late. It's a very good sign to see people wishing to help the old general achieve his ambition for the first time since 2003. However, what's most baffling is the manner in which Nigerians are coming out to support the course of the APC.

An example is the story of a 92 years old granny donating over a million Naira to Buhari and the APC campaign. As if she doesn't have sons, daughters, grandsons, granddaughters, nephews, nieces, etc, that would have benefited from the money.

Then a 9 years old girl that should ordinarily be thinking of her academics, chocolates, biscuits, toys and funs, saving up to NGN 6,000 (or is it NGN 10,000 because am confused here) and presenting it to the old general to support his course and that of the APC. "My heart was filled with joy when I saw the title of this movie and after watching it, I smiled as I swallowed the tale like it had happened in real life".

Another one happened today where a dying man donated his body parts to the course of the APC campaign. These body parts includes the following: his joystick, heart, lungs, liver and brains. What these body parts are/were meant for we do not know as our correspondence wasn't able to extract these words from the man before he passed on. It is now left for the APC to lay claim to the donor's body parts.

Source: www.apcliesanddeciet.com

mickyeddi:
I understand the ruling party has been in power for about 15 years. Is that not enough time to fix the power issues, provide quality health care and provide basic security for its citizens. Your politicians will fly their families abroad for treatment for common cold because they don't trust the health care they are providing and someone is taking the money allocated for that sector.
Did you know it took less than 10 years after the 2nd world war for most of Europe to rebuild itself from the ruins of war.
If I was a Nigerian it will be anybody but this lots because they've had enough time to fix the country but it seems its getting worse.

WisdomFlakes:
I doubt that anyone can answer your question satisfactorily coz your motive is mischievous Jonathan has simply shown that he lacks the mettle to confront and tackle Nigeria's nagging problems. He's given his best, but his best is not good enough.

goofy124:
[color=#000000][b]IN THIS INTERVIEW, COL. TONY NYIAM, who was part of the failed attempt to oust the Gen. Ibrahim Babangida’s military government in 1990, tells WAHEED BAKARE and ALLWELL OKPI, how the Orkar coup originated and its relevance to Nigerian politics There is the argument that we don’t need to have another conference since we have representatives at the National Assembly. It is the most ignorant assumption. Why do I say it is ignorant? With all the political scientists we have in our midst, people forget that what we are practising is what we call indirect democracy. What do I mean? The proprietary right over people’s sovereignty is delegated to people we elect to make laws for us. When it comes to making constitutional reforms or constitution making, you go to what is called direct democracy. Direct democracy means direct voting by the people in the form of a referendum and that is why the universal practice is that a constitution making process that does not go through a constituent assembly, whose decisions are approved by a referendum, is null and void. We see the examples. Look at South Sudan; it’s creation resulted from a referendum. How is it that Nigerians do not understand that for a constitution to be legitimate, it has to be driven by the people, and the people are usually represented by a constituent assembly? And this constituent assembly is usually made up of non-partisan politicians, because partisan politicians are only concerned with the next election. They are not concerned about posterity or long-term issues in the country. So, constitution which outlives people and a generation should be driven by civil society, collection of every nationality in the country and clerics. I would cite an example. My second home is in Scotland and in Scotland those who drove for the national conference were the clerics of the Church of Scotland, they were at the forefront. We also saw it in Ireland. Britain has the oldest parliament in the world, why are they allowing a constituent assembly to go ahead, while there are parliaments? It is only in Nigeria that such argument is raised because of the ignorance of the difference between direct and indirect democracy. That’s why I have tried to do an aide-memoir to aid constitution- making. There are certain basic principles of constitution-making, which if we do not follow, would be like building a house on quicksand. Do you think we would have been able to tacklethese problems if the June 12 election had not been annulled by Babangida? The thing is, Chief MKO Abiola, who I had the opportunity to work with when he escaped from Nigeria to UK, was a man that we lost because his plan was to correct the national issues and start democracy in Nigeria. But because some western interests in Nigeria did not want this, they colluded to do away with him. You once said soldiers could be recruited for a coup without their knowledge. How is that possible? Yes, there are many instances. You might want to verify this from Gen. Buhari, he was not the initiator of that coup that brought him in as Head of State, it was Gen. Ibrahim Bako and Babangida that initiated it. But because they wanted a credible figure as a face, he was brought in. He did not know the genesis of that coup. He was not quite aware of the original idea behind the coup and that was why when he decided to make a change, he was forced to step aside. So, if this could happen to a whole Gen. Buhari, who was supposedly the leader of a coup, it shows how many soldiers can be brought in that way. Does that mean overthrowing Shagari’s government was IBB’s idea? It was the idea of late Gen. Bako and IBB. Buhari was only brought in because they needed a face with integrity. Can you give other instances? Gen. Yakubu Gowon was not part of the coup that brought him in. He was a decent man. Nigerians like to play what the Yoruba people call bojuboju; they bring a figure with integrity to cover up their real intention; the real intention of politicians in uniform who have found cheap party. Many elements of them are in our partisan politics today.[/b][/color]

francizy:
It wasn't even during Abacha's regime. He looted $2.8billion dollars during Obj's military rule and still illegally transferred funds into Abacha's private accounts during Abacha's regime.

mickyeddi:
That is not a valid argument. Did you know Nigeria was giving money to countries like the UAE and Singapore in the 70s but those countries are highly developed nations now. Your country has so much money and resources that's not trickling down to the masses. Y'all ought to start holding your politicians and lawmakers accountable for the office they are holding instead of the pdp vs apc warfare we see online. Your politicians are one of the highest paid in the world infact they will make the average politician here in Sweden look like a pauper with the amount they're earning. This is the reason you need to demand more from them.

WisdomFlakes:
The mere and simple fact that he is struggling and trying so hard to resell his candidacy to more than half the country is a huge indictment. If his performance was so glaring and sterling, Buhari won't even be in contention against him. Even you would have been spared the tough job of trying sell his candidacy here. Admit it bro, GEJ na bad market.

Obiagelli:
I think the lekki robbery was largely successful because of the visit of president Jonathan and Muhamodu Buhari to Lagos yesterday. I think the over concentration of the entire security agencies on Victoria Island made other areas vulnerable.
From eyewitness reports, the criminals had a filled time operating from close to fifteen minutes in a very busy area of Lagos, an area with usual high police and military (OP MESA) presence and there was almost no engagement or fire exchange. In fact the policemen that lost their lives were escorts to a private body.

The VIPs, Presidents and other top officials should look for ways to sort out their own security instead of putting the rest of us in danger. I don't see any reason why policemen should leave their formations to position themselves along the 3rd mainland bridge and major roads like mascots just because someone is visiting.

Obiagelli.

WisdomFlakes:
Change can be simply defined as a movement away from Goodluck to Buhari.

Goodluck has obviously failed else he won't be struggling so hard to convince more than half of the country to re-elect him.

mickyeddi:
If you've ever left the shores of your country and spent just a day in a civilized country, you will understand what type of change your country needs.

mickyeddi:
I am neither an advocate for apc nor pdp. Infact I'm not even a Nigerian but married to one and I also do business in Nigeria that's why I'm interested in its politics. From what I've seen, your country needs a massive change and your president is uninspiring.

francizy:
Where did our $2.8billion dollars run to during his time as petroleum minister?

olami234lekan:
All those things you mention that buhari has never done for Nigerian us not his responsibility as a citizen it is Government' s. Go around the world and prove me wrong. Building schools, hospital, recreation centers, constructing roads, bridges all what our governments are boasting of here are seen in the rest of the world as normal things no government can claim as achievement but how Strong their country is against the rest of the world is claimed as achievement, how their citizens are better off is achievement. And you claim buhari never wrote book and so on. On that he he not an academia but a military man and his records are there for all to see. He even has numerous lectures he has delivered at many prestigious gathering. Having said all that it is very interesting to inform you that your self acclaimed academia's work is no where to be found, his book and all. So in your own interest it will be better to keep away from insulting buhari for your own interest and GEJ's because any claim you bring forward will be exposed by a well informed Nigeria even those that are not APC member like myself. God bless Nigeria.

vicadex07:
Have u ever heard of abraham lincoln

barcanista:
Afenifere And OPC Favor Jonathan
The endorsement of Jonathan's candidacy by the influential pan Yoruba group Afenifere and O'dua Peoples' Congress will in no small way influence the voting pattern of their members-most of whom are grassroot people. Otunba Gani Adams, National Coordinator, OPC said, “we took time to study the situation of things and we took time to look at the capacity of the candidates involved. I won’t deceive you, from the National Coordinating Council, we have decided to inform our followers that they should vote for President Jonathan.”

The National leader of OPC Chief Fedrick Fasheun had earlier threw his support behind the re-election bid of President Jonathan.

However, another influential group, The Yoruba Council of Elders refused to publicly endorse any of the candidates.

A Look at APC:
No doubt, APC controls 4 out of the Six government houses in the SW as at today, but the party has seen a huge dip in its political fortune in the region. One of the factor that helped the party to win Oyo and Ogun States in 2011 was the heavy factionalisaton within the PDP. Today, the APC in Ogun has had a major split with the SDP coming out a very strong beneficiary taking all Senators. The PDP in Ogun State is united. The APC also lost ALL their Senators in Oyo state, they can't boast of any today- though they gained a Senator in Ondo. In Lagos State, the influential Justice Group left the APC for the PDP. In Ekiti State, the APC was rejected in 2014. In Osun where it hold sway, the anger of civil servants over delay in payment of five(5) months salary may reflect at the Presidential poll. In Ondo State, the APC is not a force as it has little or no structure on ground.

Conclusion
With the Leading parties in the SW and two highly influential groups queuing behind the President's re-election, it is safe to say that the Yoruba nation favors President Jonathan, while the APC candidate Gen Buhari plays second fiddle. Though it won't be fair to write off APC from the political calculation of the SW, yet it will amount to misinformation to say the APC is in control of the region.


God Bless The Yoruba Nation
God Bless Nigeria
God Bless President Jonathan
President 2010-2019