₦airaland Forum

budaatum:
Of course he can be a degenerate or whatever on this forum and in real life day in and day out so long as he is not a degenerate towards me! After all, like everyone here, I reap what I sow, and even I might deserve his degeneration sometimes, though I try hard not to degenerate myself. Besides, it's not as if I can stop him being a degenerate since I don't pay for his data.

We after all can disagree without him lying and constantly misrepresenting one's views (for which I can easily forgive him for considering how complex my views can be), but if he doesn't, he knows what I'd call him in return when I'm not completely ignoring him. Thankfully, readers have eyes of their own, and can choose to trust his lies or not and decide for themselves if it is I who enables him or you.

As for my supposed "questionable belief system", trust me when I say I present my views here to be questioned and challenged, and if I didn't want to be questioned, I'd keep my opinion to myself.

Why do you think you or anyone deserves his level of abuse? Did you think you deserved to have your picture plastered here and to have been made fun of in a very personal way?

So because you can't stop him, you enable him? So, if someone walks around the street murdering people, you know it yet are unable to stop him, would you sit around having pleasant conversations until he murders the next person? Or do you not think his level of degeneracy doesn't reach the level that causes you concern?

budaatum:
Willis dating Wade could cause dump to claim an unfair trial. And he just might find a maga judge who agrees with him. And since I want the orange dump to rot in jail, I'd rather have a squeaky clean district attorney trying him, which dump can falsely claim Fanni isn't, than one dump can claim has a conflicting interest even if she hasn't got one.

You didn't answer my question because I assume you'll fallen into the trap of repeating conservative propaganda and can't actually articulate any harm/prejudice to the defense by two prosecutors dating. You argument is that because someone says something will disadvantage the defense and they may claim an unfair trial without any evidence of it, we should bend over to alleviate that perception? If they claim her blackness is unfair to them and the defense won't get a fair trial because of that, how would you rectify that? Would you want her off the case because of her blackness? I'm comparing the two because neither have any relevance to whether a defendant gets a fair time.

That is wholly silly and not how the law works or should work.

basilico:
The judge would DQ her if he saw any appearance of impropriety.
His words.
I listed what I think is improper that he should have demanded more evidence. Misuse of funds, declaration of gifts above $100, etc.
I know you may have read his opinion, but you lack the capacity to understand any contrary point of view.

You posts are basically gibberish or baby talk. You barely comprehend the issue and the law and so just fill this place with nonsense. Still here talking about the judge should have asked for evidence of misuse of funds and declaration of gifts without even understanding that all that had no relevance on what the judge had to decide and in fact was the inappropriate venue for that. But you are forced fed that by whatever right wing propaganda you are allowed to be fed into your brain.

In your mind you are the smartest person in the world. But you are just as delusional as your posts.
Keep writing nonsense and being the most technologically illiterate supposed technology person there is.

budaatum:
I hate to be in agreement with you. And to be honest, I've noticed some level of civility from you towards me (though you still lie to represent me as I'm not), that I'm willing to suspend calling you an si so long as it continues. I likely wouldn't though, since I doubt you can change.

Fanni Willis could very easily have been kicked off this case, and she has significantly weakened her position enough that it wouldn't surprise me if dump is let off.

He can be a degenerate on this forum day in and day out but as long as he treats you civilily it's all good?
You can't see how that makes you his enabler?

You have a very questionable belief system.

basilico:
The judge was categorical

“It’s clear that disqualification can occur if evidence is produced demonstrating an actual conflict or the appearance of one,” McAfee said, according to HuffPost. “I think it’s possible that the facts alleged by the defendant could result in disqualification. I think an evidentiary hearing must......
John Acevedo, a visiting professor with Emory University, told Atlanta local news organization, 11Alive News. "The key phrase from Judge McAfee was 'the appearance of conflict of interest,'" Acevedo said. "And that's clearly what's on Judge McAfee's mind here; it's the appearance of impropriety, even where there may not be any.

Does this post even make sense. You don't need to respond to me. You're an idiot. And because you're an idiot your post holds 0 value to me. I'm trying to understand the case law/precedent he built his ruling on and you are here quoting me his words as if I hadn't read them and already processed them. The only person who addressed that is DahiLife
It's like you saying 1+1=2 while I'm talking about the pythagorean theorem.

If you want to be on the page I am, give me your view of why his ruling was correct based on those precedents and the law. Judges get shit wrong that's why rulings are often appealed. You're at the basic level of reading/understanding the ruling. Clap for yourself.

Your oft to stupid to understand how little you know. Case in point.

budaatum:
And I suppose that is why you constantly observe buda meeting "all magas disingenuous complaints" and why they have stopped complaining, right, or would you like to see magas quoting me here?

With respect, your quoted above does not show you get me at all, and is more like the gaslighting I get from the stupid magas here, and just blinds me to the rest of your argument.

Fanni should have known what magas do, and shouldn't have played into their hands as she's done by giving them enough to perceive.

Damn! If she wasn't having an affair with Wade, they'd have lied she was to discredit her, and then it turns out she actually was.

As it is, she's lucky the (shameless maga) judge did not remove her as it is perceived by me at least that he'd have loved to if he could.

You are basically Victim shaming. Arguing that someone should change what is not illegal because someone would falsely say it is illegal. And playing into the hands of those falsely saying it is illegal as if some level of perfection will stop them from doing it.

It's like stockholm syndrome domestic abuse victims have. They believe that they deserve the abuse and if they tried to be more perfect they wouldn't get abused. But no matter what they do, they will get abused because it isn't about them it's about the abuser needing to be in control and have power.

Let me ask you again. What is the conflict of interest or prejudice to the defense, actual or apparent. Explain to me how Willis dating Wade could cause a defendant to get an unfair trial.

raumdeuter:
How is it different from the acceptable ID that Democrats claimed is racist and rejected

Is it easier to make these broad generalizations than dealing in fact?
The Dems introduced a voting rights package that allowed for ID as long as those places that required it expanded what ID's could be used.

https://www.npr.org/2022/01/18/1073021462/senate-voting-rights-freedom-to-vote-john-lewis-voting-rights-advancement-act

budaatum:
Same outcome, right? And the right action I bet you'd agree, to avoid the "perception of impropriety" that some might have.

Fanni fuqed up, is my opinion. And her fuq up is going to let dump walk, sadly. But we'll see.

Justice should be blind. We can't have differing rules for differing people based on how hard they cry/compain. If the standard is the "perception of impropriety", then pass a law that says that. But you can't have conservative justices like Thomas being held to a standard below "actual conflict", while Democratic ones are held to a standard of "perception of impropriety". That breaks the system and it is not blind justice. It affords one group "super rights". And I would understand if the goal of that group was to have an even playing field, but that's not that goal.

Look no further than this forum. Basilco, Benalvino and Slyfoxx report all my posts. I've been banned multiple times for using the word "idiot". Banned for saying "Benalvino thinks he is a white Republican living in FL.". And everytime I'm kinda shocked, given the things that are said here. lol.. (I think even you've used the word idiot. ) Now why was I banned? Because those people repeatedly spam the moderators to get me banned. Does changing my behavior change what they do? No. Because their intent isn't to follow the rules, but to get me banned, so noone will challenge them not following the rules. And how well is this Forum doing?

You have this view that if people just meet all Magas disingenuous complaints they'll stop complaining.. That, if Fani was perfect, Trump wouldn't have found an issue. We've seen Trump for 4 years, when has that happened? Fani, could have been Trump's mother and he would have found a way to say she was biased against him.

DaHighLife:
I believe the judge was mistaken. He sought a predetermined conclusion and manipulated the law to achieve it. What's more troubling to me is the fact that he had the ruling finalized last week but delayed its announcement for a week due to security concerns from death threats. This a familiar pattern, particularly in matters associated with Trump and his associates.
.

Will check these out. Tell me, did you find any case law where a Prosecutor was ever removed because of an appearance of conflict not an "actual conflict"?

Benalvino3, I see your at it again, manipulating the quoting system.

benalvino3:
I apologize if my characterization of you as stupid caused you distress or offense.

hooray, I did 14 words.

Holy sh*t. You needed ChatGpt to write 14 words.

What a dimwit.
Fyi, It's easy to tell when you are using ChatGpt because of the vocabulary, sentence structure and the fact there are no improperly conjugated verbs. You basically have have the writing style of an 8th grader.

Lol.. He needed ChatGpt for 14 words.

benalvino3:
Ignoramus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IU0BiBSj5Yg

Are you still acting like you're qualified to even speak to me? Those one word sentences are more your speed. No verbs to f*ck up when you attempt to conjugate them.

The fact that you feel you are too stupid to rely on your own thinking and writing skills and have thus outsourced it to ChatGPT says everything about you.

What a loser.

raumdeuter:
Israel soldiers are on ground matching and fighting let Hamas soldiers too come out and stop hiding in creches if they really care about their own babies

When you start seeing yourself defending Hamas who strap suicide vest to underage Palestinian boys then you need to do serious self introspection

So when Israel drops a 2000 ton bomb in crowded Gaza that kills scores of woman and children. What is that? Does killing innocent people only matter when Hamas does it?

But that is fair, let Israel get out of their tanks, stop with the guided missiles and 2000 ton bombs and jets and fight it out with the Palestinians. I'm sure they'll do that.

And you never answered the question as you seem not to when you the answer won't fit your ideology. Was Reagan a terrorist lover because he actually stopped arm sales to Israel because of what he thought were their heavy handed tactics?

raumdeuter:
Hamas attacked Israel and killed 1200 people including Americans like yourself but you have nothing to say but carry the torch for those who kill people including those holding the same passport as you

If Hamas doesn't want their women and children to die, they should come out and fight like men and not hide in daycares, hospitals and creches

This young woman a tattoo artiste went to watch a musical show and she was killed, her dead body dragged all over, spit on while chanting Allahu Akbar

That emotional blackmail doesn't work on me since I've seen scores of imagines of newborns and children killed by US bombs in Palestine. And I supposed fighting like men means sitting in a room and dropping a guided missile from a drone. Do you hear yourself?

When Reagan halted F-16 sales to Israel because of a similar situation, was he a Terrorist lover as well?
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/israel/ghosts-lebanon

benalvino3:
It means day 1 in the united states. I enjoyed the couch.
You want to see my car?

Also, tell us where you think I am?
Let me make it easy for you.
1: Nigeria
2: Biafra (IPOB)
3: the United states.

Got it. It's the same company who you took a covid shot for in 2021 when you supposedly had to get it for work in the US even though you had never been to the US until supposedly 2023. Your stories sound suspiciously like slyfoxx's stories. Everywhere, but nowhere all at the same time.

bemeruca:
Majority of the people who took the vaccines were forced to do so. I took it because of work in the united states.
Before I took the vaccine, I got covid but I was not hospitalized.

I guess trolls who lie together stay together.

benalvino3:
Oh, my first day in the US. 🤣

Jealousy is a bitch

First day huh? Tell me, what dioes that even mean?
Did they give you better accommodations the 2nd day?
They valued you enough to buy you a car, which is rarely done in the US, but they put you here your first night?
Lies

benalvino3:
Providing information about my location or my personal circumstances shoul not elicit a strong emotional response from you. Jealousy is a bitch 🤣🤣

Yeah, clearly jealous that you claim your living in the lap of luxury like this motel you posted.
Why don't you tell us more how this American company found you on Linkedin, didn't value you enough to put you in a better hotel so put you in this crappy motel below, yet valued you enough to supposedly buy you a car.
Your life is a figment of your imagination, just like your ChatGPT posts you try to pass off as if you wrote them yourself.

btw. Nice view there. lol.

benalvino3:
He has to thick the leftist boxes 🤣
Remember, ijebos I'm one of the indigenous people in Nigeria 🤣

Tribalism and racism are tool of the stupid and uneducated.
No surprise they are things you employ freely.
To much of a dimwit to formulate a rational thought.

raumdeuter:
All these strong words and condemnation of the Israelis that are trying to protect themselves from murderous Hamas
The same Hamas and people who will chant death to you and your types based on the color of your passport on the regular

People who hate the west and western way of life and seek to destroy it are the same ones you and the Democrats cannot even bring yourselves to condemn

Why do you think Israeli life is greater than Palestinian life?
30,000 Palestinians have died so far. Mostly woman and children.

Here is a video of what is happening in the West Bank. Watch it and then come back and justify it for me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMYEHhCkedo

raumdeuter:
Unless you have a problem with facts.

G to most of those you and the democratic party fervently defend, Its mostly burning of US flags and chanting death to America

So everyone who doesn't suppport what Israel is doing is a terrorist lover? Convenient argument tool.

You may want to do a deep dive into the word terrorism. Study it for a while.
Then give me a definition of what a terrorist is.

benalvino3:
ChatGPT can't speak of freedom fighters?
You are at least 45 😒

Exactly my point. Can any rational person say they read this post and thought, Benalvino3 is clearly an intelligent person. They probably thought what I did. Is this person brain damaged?

benalvino3:
While I don't use ChatGPT for General language, I find it useful for coding and programming tasks in languages such as Python and C#

Thank God for ChatGPT 😃

You are one of those people who thinks everyone believes the bullshit you spread. That everyone is as dimwitted as you are. From the stories of how a US company bought you, a supposed immigrant, a car just because, to this.

Anyone who read the drivel you called writing that is riddled with improperly conjugated verbs and compared it to what you've posted the last few days - can easily tell it's ChatGpt generated. And to have to use ChatGpt to post and then lie and claim it's yours, means you understand how poor your writing truly is.

raumdeuter:
Its the convenience of how you dont take the UN as an authority and suddenly regard their resolution that is astounding

Do you respect the UN partition of 1949? Yes or No
Your are in lockstep with Hamas who don't respect it either

Its just the typical Democratic party flirting with terror organization. We already have Democrats in Congress who are spokespersons for Hamas

Ilhan Omar actually equated the US to Hamas not long ago.

You seem like a smart dude. This post is beneath you. You are arguing dishonestly.

Budaatum, back to what I was saying about the normalization of tribal slurs.

raumdeuter:
If that is your position then why bring up UN resolution now

You got cornered and are now playing games. Don't have time for that.

benalvino3:
Hamas numbers. No Hamas fighters were killed, just women and children 🤣

Hamas failed rockets killed Palestinians and they claimed Israel bombed and killed 500 civilians. The death that day was not even close to 100 people.

Mr. ChatGPT bigot, did ChatGPT break on you?
Lol. The fact that you had to Use ChatGPT to sound smart, will forever say everything about you.
You have admitted to be the dimwit I've always known you to be.

raumdeuter:
Suddenly these Random party now matter? When 30mins ago they were just a random party

Ok, you brought the UN up. So, you tell me when they should be authority. You can't have it both ways. Don't do the pretzel, disingenuous thing now.

My position is consistent. THe UN had not authority then to take Palestinian land.

raumdeuter:
The UN is the random party will only be said by those who have no regard for Authorities

What next Joe Biden is just some random old man who think he is the leader of the US?

Ok. Respect the Authorities at the UN? Square that with this.
The UN with the US abstaining has said that Israel is stealing land.

budaatum:
Watch the news. See that Palestinian child and let me know how old you think he'd have to be to forgive the State of Israel that obliterated his entire family with a bomb.

Exactly.

Israel has killed ~30,000 people. Most of those ~30,000 people brutally lost fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, brothers and sisters. What do you think happens next? What do those people do next?

This is what the US military and policy makers understand. That the president is belatedly understanding and they are now trying to mitigate. Americans will undoubtedly bear the brunt of Israel's policies that are not just.

raumdeuter:
This Random party will be the UN right?

Yes the UN. Filled with the some of the same nations that colonized most of Africa and Nigeria until we got our independence.
This is the problem I have, you seem to be a very rational person but then you seem to ignore most of history to argue for Isreal.
You saw the NY times article I posted where American Zionists were freely talking about colonizing Palestine, you know the history of colonization, lived in a country that was colonized and yet somehow are arguing as if you don't have that knowledge.

raumdeuter:
UN gave Israel a piece of Land in 1948. You can read about the UN partition of 1948 here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine

Their Arab neighbors decided to wage war to eliminate them for example in 1967 the Arab forces they all lost Sinai, Golan Heights Gaza West
https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/ea/97187.htm#:~:text=As%20a%20result%20of%20this,challenge%20to%20Middle%20East%20diplomacy.

I am taking the pain because I assumed you didnt know

I wanted to properly understand your narrative.

So some random party (let's use the word gang here) tells you they are giving 6/10 rooms in your house to someone else. You fight to get your house back, you lose because those people have more weapons than you. They tell you because you fought we are now taking 7/10 rooms in your house. The same people over the years systematically take more rooms until they own 9/10 rooms. They have more weapons and money than you. If you try to fight back with whatever means you have they destroy part of the only room you have left. Do you think that is fair?

And question, why do you not consider someone taking your house, an attempt to eliminate you from your house? Yet you believe people waging war to get their house back an attempt to eliminate those people who took it. Your framing seems very one sided.

raumdeuter:
The state of Israel was created by a UN charter in 1948 before their Arab neighbors decided to wage war on them and they lost land in the process

I'm a little confused. Did they lose the land when the UN charter created Israel or after they fought in trying to get the land back? I'm trying to understand whether you are being intentionally unclear in what you wrote.