₦airaland Forum

Here is Trump dismissing a case against people convicted of sedition [/b]and [b]terrorism [/b]against the US.
Another thing that would have gotten any other person impeached.
Barely made a blip.

Here is a Trump appointed Judge on this:

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, whom Trump nominated during his first term, said there is "little mystery" about why the second Trump administration decided to abandon this case and every other Jan. 6 riot case.
[b]"President Trump's views about the prosecution of those who attacked the U.S. Capitol on January 6 — whether those views are based on fact or fiction — are well known, as is his intention to extend clemency to them," Kelly wrote.
The judge stressed that his order should not be mistaken as an endorsement of the Department of Justice's decision to abandon the case. He referred to the Capitol riot as "a perilous event" and an assault on the constitutional imperative for a peaceful transfer of power between presidents.
"Moving forward, if this Nation's experiment in self-government is to last another 250 years, the American people — no matter their partisan preferences — will have to act together to preserve, protect and defend that miracle through our constitutional framework," Kelly wrote.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/judge-tosses-remnants-of-proud-boys-seditious-conspiracy-case-after-trumps-broad-clemency

Queue Raumdeuter who will now defend Trump dismissing this case and giving clemency to convicted US terrorists who committed sedition (attempted to overthrow the government).

raumdeuter:
Like the AG Eric Holder was fired and Obama was impeached when IRS was used and weaponized against conservatives

Why don't you point me to a court finding that said the IRS was weaponized and used against conservatives.
Don't bother, none exist.
Just imaginary rantings from people who now defend Trump weaponizing the government against Americans big and small.

But nah, defending rapists is the only thing you're good at.
Well, sexualizing teenagers as well.

In any other time, the AG would be fired and the President would be impeached.
In this time it's another Monday.

Judge slams Trump’s IRS lawsuit as ‘improper,’ refers acting AG Blanche to bar

raumdeuter:
The court document said Trump did not rape Ms Carroll

Emotions are no substitute for court docs

So, Trump is paying 5 million because he did not rape a woman?
Gotcha

Your lies are folding in on themselves.
Like must defend like, abi?

Raudmeuter, why don't you come explain to all of us why Trump has to pay Jean Carrol 5.8 million dollars if he didn't rape her.
#whenfactsgetinthewayofyourpropaganda

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/judge-orders-e-jean-carroll-be-paid-5-8m-in-trump-sex-abuse-and-defamation-case

raumdeuter:
They were the same who voted Platner despite knowing his history of sexual assault, the same "Believe all women" crowd refused to believe Tara Reid or the woman who accused Platner calling her a Republican operative

3x Adjucated Rapist(Grab em by the Poosey) voter, Mr. "there is no sexism in Nigeria" and Mr. "cha char tear rubber" himself is now the defender of women.

dayokanu:
If you are 30 then tia is not older than you. and she has the mileage of a 15-16yr old almost cha-cha tear rubber
Funmi I am not sure, she didnt have a boyfriend as at May this year but I dont know now, But the girl set die.
Why are you pitying yourself love?

Real talk. Imagine being comfortable posting while comparing a woman to a 15 or 16 year old's vagina and then thinking you have the ability to talk about vile people or sexual deviancy.

WriterrNg:
Lindsey Graham being wheeled off to the hospital like a sack of potatoes.

I can 100% bet he was poisoned by a Russian agent. There are some poisons that can stay for more than 24 hrs before taking effect.

They wanted the MF to be in the US before he dies.

This is one of those things that may sound conspiratorial at first blush, but is based in reality and I'm sure the authorities aren't going to immediately rule out.

Kobojunkie:
1. Storyland!

2. If the US Constitution vests the power to declare war in Congress alone, how can a President use such power? Also, Trump never declared war on Iran. So, what part of this is confusing to you?
https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/declarations-of-war.htm
https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures.htm

3. Oh, I am worse than a Republican... I owe no man or side my allegiance. I simply stand on what I believe and go from there.

I'm not confused, but clearly you are.
Go read the Constitution. Then read some of the reasons the Founders had behind the war powers clause in the Constitution. Then maybe you'll understand what it means to be in "war", why what the President is doing is illegal, and why he is still doing it.
And you'll also understand why these questions you wrote make you look uninformed.

Being worse than a Republican isn't a flex.
And you don't seem to even have a foundation on what you believe but seem to like running your mouth regardless.
If you asked me why I support a candidate, I'd be able to give you signature legislation, or things they have done that I think have improved America or things they say they'll do.
It's been how many posts now, and outside the glib meaningless propaganda of "freedom" you still can't name one thing.

cococandy:
I’m not a fan of the man but he will be remembered far longer than many men who sired a village of kids.

He left a mark on this country (for better or worse will depend on whom you ask). I think it could’ve been better.

But some of the laws, policies and systems he helped create in America will (unfortunately) be in effect decades after he’s gone. That’s what a legacy is. Not children.

True.
Trump is his legacy and he will live in infamy for it.

cococandy:
Look who’s left behind to deal with the consequences of decisions of old me with one foot in the grave.

Us young people and your children

It does speak volumes that the guy who was focused on getting the US into a war where other people and other people's children will fight and die, just died and will bear no earthly consequences for his decisions.

This is who Lindsey Graham was.

A man who warned of the dangers of Trump.
Then supported him.
Then after Trump led an insurrection, warned about Trump again, and said he was done.
Only to support him again.

He was a man without the ability to stand for what was right.
He was a political opportunist more focused on being close to power


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfQfcURNM0E

Kobojunkie:
You can view his voting record online, you know.
https://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/voting-record

So, outside the glib talking points, you can't really point out one thing Lindsey Graham has done that has actually affected your life, if you do actually live in the US.
And, no, a lot of Americans, if not the majority will not be celebrating his life.

Kobojunkie:
2. Have you ever actually read the U.S. Constitution before cause this statement causes me to doubt you ever have?

This is

Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the US Constitution.
[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; . . .

The US Constitution vests the power to declare war in Congress, not the President.
The founders didn't want one man dragging the country into war, without a plan, for his own reasons. Kinda like what Trump is doing with Iran.
Before questioning if someone read the constitution, it would probably be a good idea to read it yourself first.

Kobojunkie:
3. As for Iran, I like to compare the cost of the war to the cost of the U.S. walking on tippy toes around the IRGC for the last 47 years. Ever since I was a child growing up in Nigeria, I have known about this particular problem among many others, and I am finally glad it has been dealt with as it should have been from the beginning.

The guy said dealt with. What a joker.

You really do sound like you have 0 idea of what you are talking about.
But you are really good at uncritically pushing out Republican Right Wing talking points I'm sure you've heard on twitter somewhere.

Kobojunkie:
He didn't make or allow any stewpid laws to impinge on my freedom and rights as an American He voted instead on bills to further enhance my American experience, freedoms, and opportunities. 🤔

Generic propaganda.. expected nothing less from someone who is cheering Graham.

Let's try this again.
Name one bill that he passed that helped you.
Was it his vote on the Iraq war, which killed hundreds of thousands of Americans and cost us Trillions of dollars?
Or was it his vote to not force Trump to have to come to Congress to Declare war like the Constitution dicates, if he wanted to do what he is doing in Iran which has already cost us lives and will continue to cost us billions.
Be specific, but I guarantee you won't be able to.

Lindsey Graham

Kobojunkie:
You don't live in America, do you? 🤔


Anyways, every sane American who has ever paid attention to politics in the country misses him. He was a devoted politician. 🤔

If you live in the US, name one thing he did to make your life better.

Holy Sh*t.
US Congressman Ro Khanna was detained in the West Bank by settlers and the IDF.

Israel is soo out of control.

Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna DETAINED by Israeli Settlers during West Bank visit pic.twitter.com/QwKj2aALDe

— Ryan Rozbiani (@RyanRozbiani) July 11, 2026

cococandy:
Unfortunately you guys are operating under the assumption that these guys are different from Trump. And that tells me how “innocent” you are on issues of sexual assault.

As a woman who was raised in Nigeria where men have less consequences for overt perversion, I can tell you sincerely that a lot of men are like Trump, Including these ones on here supporting him. Most of your sisters and female friends can confide in you that they started experiencing cat-calling from ages 10 and above by full grown men. In public. With no fear of repercussions.

It’s the truth. And we don’t talk about it for fear of discomforting the men we love who we view differently from men like him. But there are way too many men who are like Trump. So, it shouldn’t astonish you guys that this is happening. It’s no surprise to me they’ll go to hell and back in defense of him.

100% with you.
I think I have heard tales of sexual assault (rape) and violence from at least 70% of my female friends/cousins in Nigeria.
The amount of stories I have heard actually surprised me when I thought about it one day a couple of years back.

When Raumdeuter tried to make a joke that I saw sexism/misogyny at the Lagos airport, it told me exactly who he was.

I'm pushing back on this because I'd like to draw a line at the casual sexism/misogyny and lack of repercussions for it I see in this forum from too many men.

budaatum:
It must be difficult and even impossible for some to understand how a grown man fingering a woman against her will is not rape.

I can understand if they were defending their sons who do that, but if the woman were their daughter would their fathers be unstruggling understanding unemotional men and call it play?

Just reading this again, shows how far the US has fallen morally.
We elected this man President.

raumdeuter:
The court said its not rape

Emotions does not determine the law.


Trump was taken to court and the court document clearly said it was no rape. If anyone's emotion cannot handle that then they should seek help

You still seem to struggle to understand what "the court" is and consistently struggle to read court documents.
In fact, you will have claimed to have read a ruling and yet argue the opposite of what the ruling says in plain language (ex. the Trump immunity ruling).

So, let me help you.
This is a court memorandum. It is an explanation of what the court (Judge) has decided.
E. JEAN CARROLL v. DONALD J. TRUMP (case name)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045/gov.uscourts.nysd.590045.212.0_1.pdf

You can read it in its entirety. Given your history and your aptitude, you probably won't understand it or in your emotional ranting think it says the opposite again.

So, let me pull portions out for you. I've even highlighted it to make it easier for clearly uneducated people like yourself to understand.

You are still embarrassing yourself.

raumdeuter:
The court ruled that Trump did not rape Ms Caroll simple. If that is not satisfactory to you, Go and meet the court

The court in your mind?
See mental illness.
I am sure he can read the words, but can't seem to process them.
You should go and meet the judge so he can explain to you what the court (you know the thing he rules over) found.

Go ahead, post another half page of a document and pretend like you didn't read the other half of it.

Degenerates defending degenerates like their life is on the line.

raumdeuter:
From your attachment, It shows that the court agreed that Trump did NOT rape her

Unlike your emotional wailing which did not fly by the court

You claimed Trump raped someone, yet you brought out court documents that clearly says NO he did not


Something must be broken inside you that makes you this emotional

Maybe you should become Trump's lawyer and reach out to the Federal judge in his case and tell the judge that he was wrong and emotionally wailing and that the jury didn't find Trump raped her.
And then go and tell the appeals court that they were also emotionally wailing and they shouldn't have denied his appeal.
And then go tell the Supreme Court that they are also emotionally wailing and that they shouldn't have denied his appeal as well.

Jesus, you've been at writing the same ido*tic thing for about a week now.
A normal person would have been embarrassed a week ago.
You? You're too emotional to have any shame or feel embarrassment.

basilico:
Trump ordered the ihit on Gen Solemani, Khamenei bossom buddy.
Islam has Qisas. Find out what that means before displaying ignorance.

Did you take your meds today?

raumdeuter:
The court document says something different. Emotions are no substitute for facts

I'm dying here.
This is a perfect example of who MAGA is.
They get emotionally invested in something and are either too uneducated to understand an issue or purposely pretend to be uneducated because it may hurt their feelings.
So they post half truths and propaganda to make them feel better..

1.) Raumdeuter has been literally posting half a truth (just half a page of a document) so he can pretend Trump wasn't found to be liable of sexual assault and rape.
(full document below)
2.) He has been purposefully pretending to ignore the words of the presiding judge of the case who said that Turmp was have found to have raped her. (words below)
3.) He is now pretending that he doesn't understand why the half document he keeps posting can say they didn't find Trump liable for "rape" which was defined(has since been changed) in NY as "vaginal penetration with a penis" and still be said to have raped her because Trump put his finger in her vagina.

What type of human being has to manipulate facts like this because their emotions can't handle the truth?
And this is a man in his big age, who claims to have a daughter, doing all this to rationalize why he voted for a sexual predator 3 times.
This is who MAGA is. Emotional children.

happney65:
Israel shared intelligence with the United States that Iran had recently devised a new plan to assassinate President Donald Trump, two sources familiar with the matter told CNN.

https://cnn.it/4f2nzDW

I'm sure they did.
They did a psycj eval and understand how to manipulate Trump.

Other U.S. officials suggested to CNN, however, that the new Israeli intelligence could have been an attempt to influence Trump’s thinking as he weighs whether to escalate U.S. military action against Iran.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5962032-israel-iran-trump-security-threat/

What incentive would Iran have to want to assinate Trump right now?
What does it get them?

cococandy:
This whole Trump era has really revealed who’s who among the people.

If anything I’m glad it’s happened so the ghouls can be separated from the normal people.

No way Trump made them this way. He just gave them an avenue to live out loud in their dark persuasions.

I am still astonished by it.
In the day and age of stuff you write online living forever, people have decided they are comfortable rationalizing rape online.

That is when you have let your deep dark persuasions overwrite any common sense you have left.
Jesus
As you said, Trump has made it easy to see the ghouls in the daylight.

raumdeuter:
Your emotions are all over the place, the issue was taken to court and the court ruled no Rape.

This is the judge of the case.
Jesus, you are publicly rationalizing rape using an unanimous account.
Let that sink in to your head.

We all the know the answer:
Democrats reject them while Republicans like Raumdeuter vote, celebrate and lie for them.

It is a question on which the left and right have largely diverged: In recent months, Democrats have sought to expel problematic men swiftly, while Republicans in the era of Trump have often batted back accusations and stood by their men. There are notable exceptions in both directions, but the different approaches have cost Democrats talent and energy, and allowed some of the nation’s most powerful conservative figures to flourish.

Donald J. Trump won the presidency in 2016 even after the accusations of at least a half-dozen women who said he had groped or forcibly kissed them. He denied every one of them, but he would later be found liable by a jury for sexually abusing the writer E. Jean Carroll, yielding a $5 million civil judgment that a federal judge on Wednesday ordered him to pay.

The president went on to stand steadfastly by his nominees for various offices when they faced allegations of sexual improprieties, including Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — and so did a vast majority of his party. Each man denied the accusations.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/08/us/politics/democrats-republicans-sexual-assault-politicians.html

raumdeuter:
Yesterday you claimed Trump was convicted of rape which i proved to you was a lie

Emotional people like ijebos tell lies

IjeBos:
Simple question:
Do you think a man inserting his finger into a woman's vajayjay without her consent is rape?

It was a simple question, that you couldn't simply answer.
You are a grown man, who is not anonymous on here, who claims to have a daughter.
Yet, you are incapable of saying that a man who puts his finger in a woman's vajayjay without her consent raped her.
Instead, you spend copious of amounts of time lying ad gaslighting to rationalize it and Trump.

There's an evilness in your soul. And I assume it didn't start with Trump.