₦airaland Forum

Hey raumdeuter, do you also think all the countries represented in the UN with the exceptions of the United States, Israel, Argentina, Czechia, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau and Papua New Guinea, who voted for or abstained from voting to recognize Palestine as a state are also terrorists or Hamas lovers? Just wondering since you seem to have this broad definition of anyone who supports Palestine as a terrorist or terrorist lover.

UN member nations vote overwhelmingly to back Palestinian membership bid

The resolution won a resounding majority of 143 votes in favor. Twenty five abstained, and nine nations voted against the text: Czechia, Hungary, Argentina, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Israel and the United States.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/10/middleeast/unga-palestinian-membership-resolution-intl/index.html

bemeruca:
Common man, you are my elder, you will be a senior citizen soon, by now you should know how to use your common sense.

With what I see these days especially with the college kids, I don't think I will advice anyone to go to college in places like Boston, they will be like you. 47 years and counting with nothing to show for it.

The guy who posted those facts is an American. Again, common sense is free, use it.

Blah Blah Blah. Advising kids not to go to schools in Boston like Harvard and MIT. Lol. Yeah, I'm sure their enrollment will struggle. Fyi. No one gives a fux what you think.

What I posted were facts and statistics, what you posted propaganda. You seem to not understand the difference. Maybe if you went to school in Boston, you'd know the difference.

But here are some facts for you. You are black asylum seeker in Canada, who was lying about being in the US, who does not have custody of his kids, who spends his life on a thread of a county he's never stepped foot in, trashing other black people and trying to hack into people's computers. Nice profile there.
Probably best to focus on sorting out your immigration issues and reuniting with your kids. Face your life.

Anyhow, wanted to interject some facts into all this fact free posting I've seen on here recently. As I said, arguing with your broken, mentally ill, lying self doesn't offer me anything. Pax.

I guess we can add Biden and Blinken to the list of Hamas and terrorist supporters, right raumdeuter?.

Blinken on Meet the Press on Israel: "It's reasonable to
assess, as we say in the report, that there are instances where they've acted inconsistent with their obligations under international humanitarian law. Those investigations continue both by us and by Israel." pic.twitter.com/0pRQX7bIDZ

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 12, 2024

Blinken on Meet the Press on Israel:

"It's reasonable to
assess, as we say in the report, that there are instances where they've acted inconsistent with their obligations under international humanitarian law. Those investigations continue both by us and by Israel."

bemeruca:
@raumdeuter, there is so much truth in this post.

Why don't you give that advice to all those white people who consistently vote Republican, though those Republican states have the highest poverty rates, highest obesity rates, lowest college educated citizens, lowest life expectancy and earn less than blue states. Tell me how Republicans can help black people in Detroit, when they can't help the white people who vote for them?

But, you can't. Consistency and Facts aren't your thing. You're a self-hating black person who gets his kicks off and spends his life demeaning people who look like yourself in a country you've never set foot in and have to lie about living in. All the while, you are seeking asylum (probably illegally), using Liberal immigration laws, in a Country that is so much much much more Liberal than the US.

You're a running joke of a person.

Below is a map of the poorest states in the US. Surprise, surprise, the overwhelmingly majority are red states who voted for Trump.

wirinet:
In the case of Stormy Daniel (and Karen Mcdougal), it was important that the prosecution prove thar sex (consensual) did take place. Because Trump has been lying (as usual) that he never met that woman. If no sex took place, then it would be difficult convincing the jury that the women needed to be hushed in the first place. It then becomes an extortion or blackmail. So the prosecution need to provide the reason why the women needed to be hushed.
Next they would then need to provide evidence of how the money was paid, and how it was covered up as campaign expenses.
The only way Trump can escape is to feign ignorance. Saying he was not aware that the payments was for hushing up the women or that he was not aware that the accountant made the mistake of putting the money under campaign expenses.

As to the last point, unfortunately for Trump, he already admitted he knew the payments were for hushing up Stormy and admitted to reimbursing Cohen. He admitted it in a tweet he fought to not have entered and also in a civil case against Stormy in June of 2018. Both were submitted into evidence last week.

More Details:
https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1788934715354788339

basilico:
****Edited.

That was a nutty post even for you. You believe that Cohen was really sleeping with Stormy and tried to cover it by paying hush money that Trump somehow reimbursed him for?
I'm glad you took your meds, realized how nutty it was and took it down.

wirinet:
In the case of Stormy Daniel (and Karen Mcdougal), it was important that the prosecution prove thar sex (consensual) did take place. Because Trump has been lying (as usual) that he never met that woman. If no sex took place, then it would be difficult convincing the jury that the women needed to be hushed in the first place. It then becomes an extortion or blackmail. So the prosecution need to provide the reason why the women needed to be hushed.
Next they would then need to provide evidence of how the money was paid, and how it was covered up as campaign expenses.
The only way Trump can escape is to feign ignorance. Saying he was not aware that the payments was for hushing up the women or that he was not aware that the accountant made the mistake of putting the money under campaign expenses.

Technically, they didn't need Stormy to testify, but the Prosecution has a good case why her Testimony was necessary. It was a good decision.

1.) Trump's attorney's made a tactical mistake. In opening statements, they argued that Stormy was lying about having sex with Trump. Because they did that, it allowed the Prosecution to go into further details/description of what happened to rehab their witness and prove she wasn't lying. Trump's attorneys could have easily stipulated that they did have Sex and left it there and the Judge wouldn't have agreed to further details coming out. I think the decision was borne of both not having a defense and Trump probably telling them to attack Stormy. He was worried more about the political optics of admitting he slept with a Porn Star while his wife was pregnant than the court case. And it hurt him.

2.) Trump has claimed he didn't know about the payment to Stormy and at the same time if the payment was made it was made for Personal reasons not Political reasons. So, by Stormy telling her story, it allowed the Jury to understand why Trump was so concerned about letting the story come out weeks before the election. Look at the uproar it's caused now.. imagine if it was right after the "pussy grabber" tape was released. So, her details bolstered their case - He paid her off to hide it for political reasons.

basilico:
Actually I have gon through the link.Seems to have a point, Ill circle back.
You need to understand what optics mean to lawfare.
Those boxes were shipped to Mar
Lago by GSA ? What does that site say? What does it say about Crossfire Hurricane an Russian collusion hoax?

Update. " Hiw we got to rightwingers cheering nuclear secret thief?"

Thst headline is enough for me to dismiss this emptywheel as a propagandist. He seems to have insider info, I guess he us a deep stater plant .It could even be Jackboot himself. Hes all about obfuscation

1.) It's a woman.
2.) The feeling that she has insider information is what someone sounds like who is very meticulous, very detailed and very smart. She goes deep into the weeds on this stuff and has a good command of what she talks about. It's impressive.
3.) Her record speaks for itself. She's consistently right on the issues she talks about unlike Julie Kelly.
4.) She's clearly a liberal, but she prioritizes being right over anything.

basilico:
You ended up refuting nothing.
The photo was for public consumption.
In Italics of what I posted were excerpts of Jay Bratt filing in court and a sample of how two media houses interpreted it on your behalf.
Making it simple. According to court filings the photo was staged.

1.) Julie Kelly got it wrong and has fooled you.
The box she is talking about is not what is in the picture. She got the exhibits wrong, maybe purposefully to fool people like you.
2.) This was a staged exhibit photo as all exhibits are staged. You see the 2A there? It's like cops do when they seize drugs. They stack all the drugs on the table and take a picture of them all.
The investigators found all the classified data in that room, laid them on the floor(as that was probably the only place big enough) and hid the documents without proper classified jackets (you can see the white). The goal was to show all the documents found in that room for evidence documentation purposes. If the FBI wanted to frame Trump they would have added classified jackets to all of them.
3.) Trump has CCTV. He was watching the search real time and probably has video of it. If they thought the FBI was framing him by faking classified dcoucments, he would have released the video a long time ago. He hasn't.

I've spent enough time trying to help you not sound stupid. You want to persist. Good luck with that. I'll set a reminder to come back and gloat when you are proven wrong again and as the conspiracy nut you are.

basilico:
According to court filings its FBI who placed the cover sheets. They were not in the boxes, they came with them.
If] the investigative team found a document with classification markings, it removed the document, segregated it, and replaced it with a placeholder sheet. The investigative team used classified cover sheets for that purpose.”

When did you know this? Just now because NYT has not said it yet.

What was the purpose of the photo being released? To create outrage and for zombies like you.
An ex-CIA officer told ABC News the cover sheets indicated the highest level of secrecy, which in the wrong hands could have resulted in murder.

The photo published by the government appears to answer that question quite affirmatively,” Washington Post resident fact checker Philip Bump wrote on August 31, 2022

So, let me entertain you.

The NyTimes wouldn't report on it because it's so silly and in the weeds. Basically a conspiracy theory. No serious person believes this will have any effect on the trial.
Now, I knew about it a while ago because I am a policy geek as I think understanding policy it's required to be a civic minded. So, I follow other policy geeks like emptywheel, who do a very good job of getting in the weeds and are usually spot on about legal things. This has been discussed and broken down in terms of right wing propaganda fooling idiots and hence affecting the Judicial system. You seem to be the "idiot" they are talking about.

Now for you. You don't live in the US. Why do you spend so much time and effort on getting in the weeds on US policy/legal issues that don't affect you and you clearly don't understand? It's odd and nutty for someone like you to dedicate such amounts of time here, when you could use that time to effectuate change in a place you do live.

Secondly, seeing that you clearly don't understand most of this. Like how investigations work or why investigators take pictures of evidence in places where they are found. Why did you pick someone like like Julie Kelly as your teacher? How did you find her? Did you look at her background? Investigate her credentials? Do you care she is almost always wrong esp. about matters pertaining to the Trump case and Judge Cannon? Like the very simple matters of law the appeals court overturned Judge Cannon on?

When she first popped up on my twitter feed a year ago, I read her for a contrary opinion. I at the time thought she was some Republican lawyer or such, why else would all these right wing people be promoting her? But she was almost always consistently wrong. Laughingly so. And her analysis always seemed off as if she didn't understand the law. I stopped reading her tweets. I recently found out she wasn't an actual attorney and didn't have relevant expertise. In fact she was just an ex- cook writing propaganda about things she didn't understand.

Lastly, the DOJ didn't leak this picture. This picture was an exhibit from a response motion the DOJ filed, explaining Trump had top secret documents, because Trump stupidly sued in Civil court saying they were his documents. A case Judge Canon allowed, your friend Jule Kelly propagandized for and a conservative leaning panel of the appeals court unanimously overturned and stopped.

basilico:
Oh, she is mom she knows nothing.
When you cant respond intelligibly, you attack the messenger.

Outside of the fact this is common law enforcement procedure - documenting/photographing where evidence was found. This whole thing is in the weeds. Marcy Wheeler does a good post on it for anyone interested.

RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA FAIL: JULIE KELLY’S TROUBLES WITH TEN AND TWO
https://www.emptywheel.net/2024/05/09/julie-kellys-troubles-with-ten-and-two/

But as usual in a few months, the motions will be denied or appealed and denied if Cannon does something stupid. The Right wing trolls will be saying she is democratic plant or the appeals court are democratic plants. You will still be the NUT you are and would have moved on to another stupid conspiracy being waiting to be wrong again.

basilico:
Bemeruca. This photo was staged. Those cover sheets were not in the boxes. FBi placed the cover holders, neatly clipped to whatever they planted, put them on the floor, took the photo and released it to media spin masters. This is outrageous and scandalous, a photo that 'proved' Trump had top secret classified documents carelessly strewn on the floor.
Details here.
https://www.declassified.live/p/the-dojs-doctored-crime-scene-photo

If photo was taken at mar a lago, then FBI took the cover sheets thrre ready to deploy them.

God. Now you're a crime scene investigator?
This is exactly what the FBi would do. You photograph the evidence where you initially find it, then you would photograph all the evidence together in the room where they were found. ex. they would say "these documents were found in the library" with a pic of all the evidence that was found in that room.

The problem is that you don't understand any of this, and the people(like Julie Kelly, who has been wrong over and over again) you rely on for your info, rely on your ignorance and your lack of critical thinking skills to play you. And you get played OVER and OVER again. Then you go back to them to get played again.

This is Julie Kelly, who you get your legal info from. No wonder you are always so uninformed.

basilico:
Bloody fool.. What a prosecutors star witness (she owes Trump $500K that she says she will never pay), and admits on the stand she hates him. Also has numerous tweeter posts fantasizing about him being in jail.
Anyway if 12 of your mentally challenged types are the jurors Trump is guilty.
CNN legal analyst Ellie Honig says her testimony was disastrous.Honig is a former AUSA and a Rutgers + Harvard JD graduate as if that makes sense to your severe TDS.

New York is the Financial Center of the World. So, it has the top Financial Companies headquartered there. And because of that, the top Service Companies, Law Firms, Accountant Firms, Security Firms, etc etc. So, it draws top talent - educated people, who are also hired because of their critical thinking skills - try an Investment Banking case interview. As reported, the Jury is filled with such people.

But you believe red States like Alabama or West Virginia, which are usually dead last in every quantifiable US Metric tied to success, are filled with more capable people. Critical thinking has never been your string suit.

You should try seeing the world for what it is, not what your delusional mind wants it to be.

Also, here is the full Honiq interview. Anyone interested can watch it and make up their own minds.
Stormy's testimony had 2 purposes.
1.) To prove they had sex.. which everyone thought she was credible on even Honig.
2.) To prove why Trump would pay hush money so she wouldn't speak to the Press. The story she told, the way Trump's allies have flipped out over it and the way the defense is going after her, helps prove the prosecution's point on that. The story would have been a big deal if it came out before the election. Those are the 2 things the Jury will take from the testimony.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mchsOA2RDus

Ate part of his brain? Yup.. makes sense.

LordReed:
Na wa for spin fa! Something we are reading with our own eyes you are trying to spin it to say what it doesn't.

That's his MO. He copies and pastes (usually plagiarizes) from right wing posts/disinformation sites he subscribes to without fully reading or understanding them. In this case, his post came from none other than Simon Ateba, who was banned/lost his press pass from White House press briefings for shouting at the Press Secretary. I guess he succeeded in elevating his stature for his new grift. Simon doesn't seem to understand the contempt powers the Judge can wield to manage the courtroom or how Judges are crazy about decorum in their courtroom.

But this whole thing is odd. If you or I acted like Trump we would already be under the courthouse. The Judge is bending over backwards to accommodate Trump, yet the Right somehow thinks the Judge is persecuting him.

LordReed:
When was this picture taken?

Melania is embarrassed. She also has not attended the trial. Political wives always attend these things and sit right behind their husbands. As it lends credence to the story that they believe it is a lie.
I'm sure it's not lost on the Jury that Melania has not been there.

Called it. Judge Cannon indefinitely postpones Trump's classified documents case. Going to be very hard to have the trial before the election.

ijebosb:
The more that gets revealed about the Documents case, the more you understand why Judge Cannon is trying her darndest to delay it till after the election.

Obrigardo:
Na wa ooo 😅😂😅🤣😭🤣

basilico loco will tell you that never happened. maga cultists in delusions of grandeur.

I mean who amongst us hasn't been thinking of their daughter while banging a prostitute raw? He's just an everyday regular guy.. lol (that was sarcasm)

It's wild. Trump is lucky that this wasn't televised.
And he was signing the hush money checks from the White House.
This is the Christian Rights standard bearer.

I think it's clear that Trump wants to bang his daughter, Ivanka.
I mean why would anyone compare a porn star they are about to bang with their daughter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sK8cap5gDk

Wild.

basilico:
Still holding on to jackboot? SCOTUS will send immunity ruling to lower courts, Cannon will wait for final ruling .Georgia cases will also stop because lower courts will have to examine what was official or personal actions by Trump in order to decide immunity
SCOTUS has also not ruled on jack Smith eligibility to be Special Counsel which will throw out all the cases.
Keep clutching at the straws.
In NYC judge Merchan wants to jail Trump.
Useless DEI graduate who reasons like a toddler.
Joe Biden read out aloud 3 tines classified docs commenting he knew he should not
The photo. Thats a new one. A plant in my opinion.

From the guy who has to use a VPN just to watch US News. Yeah, your opinions/conspiracies matter.
You are the definition of "Garbage in, Garbage Out". You get all your info from Garbage source and unfortunately Nairaland is the recipient of all that Garbage Out.
No need going back and forth with you. The fact that you are always wrong is reason enough. In a few months, everything will be settled and you'll be wrong again and creating new conspiracies as to paper over why you were wrong.

And fyi, the last place graduate of any school I went to is miles and leaps smarter than you.

The more that gets revealed about the Documents case, the more you understand why Judge Cannon is trying her darndest to delay it till after the election. Trump's valet took pictures of 2 classified documents and shared them with someone over text message. He better cop a deal. I'm not sure why he thinks he's the only person who crimed with Trump who won't get royally fuxed.

Two images of classified documents were found on a phone owned by Donald Trump's valet, federal prosecutors have claimed in court.

Prosecutors will call a phone expert to show that valet Walt Nauta allegedly shared one of the images in a text message. If true, this could help convince a future jury that Trump did not secure classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, and that staff had access to them.

Nauta, who still works for Trump, is accused of helping Trump to hoard classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

https://www.newsweek.com/photo-evidence-trump-classified-documents-case-walt-nauta-phone-1897561

wirinet:
My error, I meant to say 2020. I was very busy and somehow distracted while writing that post that I made an error. You should have noticed that I was referring to Biden throughout and never mentioned Hillary Clinton.

You were mostly right. In both 2016 and 2020, there was polling that had Trump winning or within the margin of error. In 2020 I believe it was Rasmussen, that had Trump above, by a point or 2, a week before the election. In both cases, the right would use the polling to do exactly as you mentioned. Esp. in 2020 they argued that since in 2016 a lot of polling didn't have Trump winning that if the polls said it was close in 2020 that meant Trump was actually going to win.
In fact, people were so concerned there were multiple articles written where people were sounding the alarm that Trump and co. would claim they won the election because of the Red Mirage (in person voting counted before mail in voting). It's happening again.


Scenarios for how an election disaster could unfold in the United States next week involve lawsuits, lost ballots, armed insurrection and other potential crises in thousands of local jurisdictions on 3 November.

'Red mirage': the 'insidious' scenario if Trump declares an early victory
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/31/red-mirage-trump-election-scenario-victory

But there is one much simpler scenario for election-night chaos, centering on a single address, that many analysts see as among the most plausible.

The scenario can be averted, election officials say, by heightening public awareness about it – and by cautioning vigilance against carefully targeted lies that Donald Trump has already begun to tell.

Known as the “red mirage”, the scenario could develop if Trump appears to be leading in the presidential race late on election night and declares victory before all the votes are counted.

Obrigardo:
Imo that was the end of the trial. Cohen and stormy are just going to give hope Hicks testimony iron clad in reverse. From the theme of this trial, it looks similar to his recent civil fraud trial when the court determined he already committed fraud, they only need to decide the penalties.
So here, the Jury's work is to decide how long criminal trump should be sentenced to jail.

Yeah, in fact whether Stormy testifies or not doesn't matter at this point. The point is Trump thought the allegations would hurt his campaign after the "I'm a Pussy Grabber tape", so he made the payment scheme and falsified documents to prevent them from airing and affecting his campaign. Hope Hicks testified as to the climate after the tape aired. Plus Stormy's lawyer who drafted the agreement already testified. Maybe hearing the story she might have told the media would add a little extra for the Jury, but not sure how much extra. Let's see.

I am curious to hear the defense still.

Obrigardo:
Xenophobic black man hater regurgitates fox news sour take without his own brain produced analysis. And these are the fools calling other people programmed.

Don't even think Fox reported that. It's sooo off the mark, the opposite of what happened.. Probably found it on one of his nutty Youtube channels or a Tweet from someone who didn't listen properly to a report on it.

Edit:
I was wrong. He did get it from Fox. He even copied the tweet almost word for word. I misunderestimated Fox's ability to lie to/misinform its own viewers. (Pic Below)

Obrigardo:
Hope Hicks has SHATTERED criminal trump.
🤯
She broke down and started crying
WOW

When the case started I wasn't sure how or the legal reasoning Bragg was using to the elevate the original charge to a Felony. But seems Bragg has already proven most of the elements of the case. Hope Hicks was another nail in the coffin. At this point, looks like Trump is going to be convicted. Not sure what the defense could even be.

He's a very proper guy. He will be an asset to the bank. Well deserved. Congrats!!

wirinet:
Things are about to rev up for MAGA cult and it's megaphone - Foxnews, Hunter Biden is preparing to sue Foxnews for defamation. MAGA is about to go into overdrive with their propaganda and conspiracy theories, and not forgetting fake outrage. They will now be given opportunity to present all their evidence in court or pay another set of millions in damages.

It's going to be a hard case and I'm not sure he'll prevail, but let's see what evidence discovery produces if it gets there. There is a high bar for defamation as he would be considered a public figure and he would have to show actual malice. Fox's recent loss for lies about the election was very rare. And they are probably more cautious about what they document now in texts/email.

I think its true purpose is to put Fox News on notice, like a brush back pitch. So, in the future they are going to have to be careful about the lies stories they tell about him. If they continue, now they know it's false it'll rise to "actual malice". It's already working as they pulled down the "Mock Trial" miniseries they made about him.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/30/politics/hunter-biden-fox-nation-series-removed/index.html

I do wish more Dems would do this. Fox News and co. lie with impunity and it's not good for US Democracy. Hillary Clinton should go after Pecker for defamation as he's already admitted, during Trump's current trial, that he made up the stories to help Trump.

First Picture: Police Presence on Columbia Campus to remove protestors

Absolutely insane footage of the NYPD entering Columbia University. It’s endless. pic.twitter.com/6zc3Pji0Lz

— Read Raising Expectations (and Raising Hell) (@JPHilllllll) May 1, 2024

2nd Picture: Students protesting the Vietnam War at Columbia 56 years ago to the day.
History repeating itself.

basilico:
I offered him a truce and he vomited on me. Whats fair is fair.
I have solid grounds to go tongs and hammer with him.
Ijebos, you admire how my verbosity

I can't imagine you've seen how I've beclowned Bemeruca and Mr. Mental Case and think you'd fare better.
You should go back to having imaginary online Facebook sex with your imaginary Internet ex. Probably better time spent.

MentalCase98:
You’re a hopeless case I swear. I read this and I felt my IQ drop. There is something deeply wrong with you and I am not the first person to say this.

I don’t have much time to banter with your retardedd self this evening. I will advice you to go look after your imaginary wife and kids. Sick Delusional fvcktard.

Mr. Mental Case

I too when I'm wasted at a club, about to pick up chicks, with my goons at a meeting that's not a business meeting though we discuss business, though I don't have time to banter, also post 10 messages on Nairaland. I mean who amongst us hasn't posted 10 messages on Nairaland when we're out in a club with our goons? <sarcasm>. Lol

10 posts and counting you Lunatic Liar.

Next you'll supposedly be in "bed" with a "chick" you just met while posting on Nairaland.

You a Nut. Lol

MentalCase98:
Illiteracy is a bad thing. I don’t expect any better from the son of an illiterate loser mother and a violent animal father.

Here is my post again. I said I was at a meeting with some men at a “private club”. I did not say it was a business meeting although we did discuss business over drinks as you can see in the pic. Plus the “clubbing” I was referring to was in response to you saying I once claimed to be in a club while posting on nairaland in the past. I wasn’t referring to today you dope.

And is there a law that prohibits drinking at 8pm in Lagos I don’t know about? Hahahahahahahahahaha. What is this illiterate saying? You are one stupid fvck I swear. There is a time stamp in the pic if you are not blind to see. I was there drinking since around 3 pm and I’m still hanging out now at a restaurant waiting for my order. Hahahahaha.

You know nothing about private networking clubs in Lagos because you are not on that level. You are a kid still suffering from mummy issues so I don’t blame you.

A grown man who sits down and creates an entire imaginary family in his head is the very definition of a LOSER!
You are not even man enough to wife and impregnate a woman in real life so you have to create them in your stupid loser head 😂😂😅

I will never get over this GROWN near 50 year old man creating wife and kid in his head.
Hahahahhahahahbahahha

That’s The biggest LOSER move ever made on nairaland.

Switch back to DaHighLife and greet your wife and kids for me.


Hahahahahaha

LOSER!!

Mr. Mental Case

So you are out meeting with some guys who you call your goons but it's not a business meeting, though you did discuss business. And though you got to the "club" at 3pm, you were wasted at 8pm, yet still waiting for your order at 10pm. (Aside: When I hang out with my goons, I too call it a meeting.. lol).

And at this meeting with your goons that's not really a business meeting even though you did discuss business, you got drunk and are about to pick up chicks yet have posted 8 times on Nairaland.

Gotcha. I'm sure that made sense to everyone else as well.
You're a lying Lunatic
And Your lies are so silly, you're beclowning yourself.