₦airaland Forum

This is exactly what I thought during Kyle Rittenhouse's trial. Seems all the Right Wing celebs are frauds.

bemeruca:
Lol, okay if that's what you regard as fat OK.
But why are you gay? 😂

Ms. Fatty Bom Bom..
Lol @ "what I regard as fat". No, illiterate. That's what every str8 man regards as fat.
I'm sure she's not married. If she is her husband's most likely a fat slob as well.
If that was my sis I'd buy her ozempic.

Really though, why is your sis so fat?

bemeruca:
Lol. What you did shows you don't believe she is fat. But why are you gay?

He said the woman he named Big Sis T-Bone isn't fat.
Your sister is fat. And I'm sure even fatter than the pic you posted. Women generally put up their best pics from the best angles.
Look at her back fat in that pic, it's like she has another butt on her back.
And the width of her arms. They are about the size of her head.
She is a fatty bon bon.

She should really cover up.
Why is she so fat?

bemeruca:
You will tell us why you are gay.
Why are you gay?

Found a pic of "Big Sis T-Bone" Fatti Bom Bom at the beach
Why is your sister so fat?

bemeruca:
But you are a incel
Why are you gay?

Ms. Fatty Bom Bom, Bis Sis T-Steak looks like she got hit with then ate the ugly stick.
Look at that back fat.
And this is probably her best pic - you were probably proud of it.

bemeruca:
46 years old taking bunkum and balderdash 🤣

Why are you gay?

See Ms. Fatty Bom Bom - Big Sis T-Steak
At least you got her nickname right.

bemeruca:
A self-identified incel is talking about his girl 😂

Why are you gay?

This guy.
The same guy who spent Easter on Nairaland talking about his God (me).
The same guy whose baby momma left him, because she probably didn't want a guy who talks about other guys "deeks" grooming her children.
The same guy whose baby momma wouldn't let him talk to his kids till 3 days after Easter.

bemeruca:
Why are you gay?

It seems that question is stuck in your mind.
I guess if my girl ran off with my 4 kids because she thought I was suspect for saying stuff like "he has the deek", I'd be asking myself the same question.

Your baby mama ran away from you and took your 4 kids. Kids she didn't even let you speak to until 3 days after Easter. lol.

bemeruca:
Why are you gay?
It is write

It's actually 'writes'. But again, you and your inability to conjugate verbs.
Where's Bemeruca_ChatGPT?

bemeruca:
you should be wondering why you are GAY and why you are a self-identified incel.
There is no record of you speaking about this.

bemeruca:
Sly do the screwing of girls because he has the deek.

bemeruca:
Slyfoxx is a better person than you will ever be.
He is not a beta male like you. And he does the screwing.

What str8 man writes this? It's homoerotic type sh*t.

basilico:
There are mistakes in war. In this war Israel mistakenly killed their own hostages too running away from captivity.
In wars friendly fire has happened. American jets have fired on their own columns.
Hamas uses ambulances to transport their fighters. They had a battalion sized weapon storage at All Shifa hospital, hiding among patients hoping IDF would kill civilians. 300 terrorists killed, 500 arrested within a hospital compound.Hamas depends on people like you who scream the loudest when israeli kills civilians
I don't know of an army that sends leaflets and calls civilians to evacuate pending a raid. Palestinians sometimes go to the rooftops to thwart a building getting bombed.
In Iran Iraq war children were sent to the frontline to test if pathways were mined.
Hamas are beneath animals and behave that way because of coddling by the West.
You could write code that smart bombs or bullets can use to identify fighters dressed as civilians like Hamas does. Coding since 10, 36 years of experience.

You can stop responding to me. 99% of what you type here is propaganda fueled nonsense. It has 0 value to me. I'm sure you post it here because everyone else around you thinks you're nutz and is tired of hearing you talk about this nutty stuff.

Obrigardo:
Netanyahu is just a Criminal.
I don't believe it will have any effect on President Biden's reelection, because voters know Criminal trump will gladly allow netanyahu to level Gaza entirely and wouldn't call him out just as President Biden and VP Harris have done on many occasions. Even Chuck Shumer wants the war Criminal netanyahu gone.

But Criminal trump and slimy jared kushner wants to build a sprawling waterfront property in Gaza and they wholeheartedly support netanyahus ongoing genocide.

Voters will stick with the obvious choice and reject the four time indicted Criminal and rapist.

I think there is real anger out there. Was reading a report that even some big donors haven't given because of this. In WI, I believe, ~50,000 made protest votes in the primary. He won the state by less than ~20k. I've been annoyed at this for a while, but even I'm getting pissed off that he's not doing more. I don't want the US plunged into a war with Iran because Netanyahu wants to stay out of jail. Bombing the Iranian embassy? Wow.

LordReed:
They effectively be probing themselves, not likely.

Agreed, that's why this whole thing is hypocritical.

bemeruca:
so your criticism of Bizen is not about the death of the 7 aid workers, but rather it is about the election.
try and be humane for a moment. You are filth you know?

You and Netanyahu have this in common. Two examples of people whose friends instead of checking them when they are making mistakes, leave to their own devices and they further destroy themselves.

Unlike your illiterate self I've been speaking about this shortly after this "war" began. And unlike you my awareness and anger at the humanitarian toll didn't just start when 7 western aid workers died.

Begone, Mr. illiterate wanna be hacker.

What's going on in Israel has the potential to derail Biden. There is real anger at this point. I think what happened with the WCK and what is happening with the support for Israel is partially Biden's fault. He should have put his foot down with Israel a long time ago and set boundaries to protect them from themselves. The arrogance of Israel to kill Western WCK aid workers says it all. They bombed 3 seperate cars in the convoy in a 1.8km range in a deconflicted zone they control when they were told the air workers would be there and told again after the first car was struck. How is that unintentional?

Chef José Andrés said the 7 aid workers killed by an Israeli airstrike were "targeted deliberately," and he believes the conflict in Gaza is "not a war against terrorism anymore" and instead, it's a "war against humanity itself." Israel blamed the strike on "misidentification." pic.twitter.com/wIP1NqXEia

— CBS News (@CBSNews) April 3, 2024

bemeruca:
Haha waste of life. Do more excel 🤣
It feels good talking to my children 😃 you have no idea, you are gay 🤣 why are you gay?

Lol. He posted an image with the name "Jessica Daughter". He has to remind himself when she calls it's his daughter.
You probably even manipulated that image like you did the one below. Liars gonna lie.
You're an utterly useless person.

When you supposedly went to church on Easter, did you pray for more children out of wedlock?
Or did you pray that God allows you be more successful in hacking people's accounts?

Serious question, what do crooks like you pray for?

raumdeuter:
What does 10% for the big guy mean to you? I believe you are not programmed nor brainwashed

Why are you asking me? You posted it and keep posting it. I'm sure by now you'd have some exact theory of what it means and why it's so important that you keep posting it, right?

bemeruca:
You don't want to waste energy? Your whole life is a waste. 46 years plus and no kids, no wife, no achievement 😂

You keep excel spreadsheet of nonsense time spent on the forum 😂

Your life is a waste.

Guess Easter is over. Hopefully your Baby Mamma let you speak to your 4 kids on the phone.

Updated the Spreadsheet to make it easier to read and added some additional info. enjoy!

raumdeuter:
Possibly 10% of votes, 10% of oxygen 10% of fighter jets

It's left to Hunter who confirmed the big guy was his dad to tell what 10% was going to him

Isn't this what we talked about yesterday. There is never any deeper thought to any of this. It's always so surface level. You've been saying 10% for the Big guy for a long time. But don't even understand what it means or have any evidence of anything illegal surrounding it.

Do you understand how brainwashed and programmed you sound? Key phrases trigger you and you can't even explain them, but you know they are bad, because someone told you they were bad.

raumdeuter:
So its lobbying when you tell potential foreign business that "10% goes to the big guy" and Hunter confirmed that the Big guy was his dad?

Does that mean that Joe was profiting personally from his post as VP?

I don't even care to waste energy on going back and forth on this with you. The Republicans impeached Biden and have subpoenaed mostly if not all Hunter Bidens accounts. If there was any real evidence of any of this, they would be screaming it from the ceilings. They are not, so there is not. Instead you keep writing "10% goes to the big guy". 10% of what? And which of Biden's accounts did it go to? It's the same..propaganda and spin.

Try this. What policy do you think Biden broke or abused? Then take that policy and apply it to every other politician, like Trump and now tell me if you think it makes any sense or is even fair that you are investing so much energy on this one thing and on Biden alone.

raumdeuter:
Which influence was he selling? Influence of a US VP office?

Should Tinubus son be negotiating with foreign govt and business on the promise to get his dad presidential approval

It's called Lobbying. Welcome to how things really get done. Google K-Street. People are paid big money (ex. ex-politicians) for the access they provide. Doesn't mean things will get done, in some cases it does (AIPAC), but it will make sure they get a meeting or some access. But there is a line that makes it clearly illegal. There is no proof Biden even got close to that line.

Read the book outliers. Illuminating as to how some people became successful. One is knowing the right people.

LordReed:
I heard of one lawmaker that recently had a bill passed, almost immediately he resigned and joined a private company that bill he sponsored will benefit.

Exactly. I think some of it crosses the line. And that should be thing Republicans are probing. But that would require them to actually care and not just be playing politics.

budaatum:
'Influence peddling', we call it in Blighty, and some, 'privilege', because of the exclusivity of the institutions one had to belong to, considering some institutions didn't let you in unless your great-great-grandfather was in, but I can understand it in today's supposedly more 'egalitarian' world where brains connected to matter

I'm sure I'd be paid too if I have connections to sell, and I can't see why I shouldn't even paint pictures if find a maga.

Basiloco, show me Joe peddled influence so I can berate him a little.

I even think influence peddling is a loaded term. I'm not sure that's what he was doing.

Look it. I just redid my fence. I was quoted 11k. And that was a good price already. The installer came by and said he would give me a discount of 3k if I let him put up his sign. I thought about and and agreed as long as it was tasteful. He paid me to basically advertise in my neighborhood. He did a great job. Win win for everyone. Me, him and any neighbor who needs good work done. So, things like that happen in every industry. Is it always fair/right? Maybe not, but Hunter Biden isn't the first one.

This is the republican MO. They politicize everything. If they really have an issue with this, make laws against lobbying or "consulting". But they won't because as soon as James Comer leaves he'll join a lobbying firm or board of some company making tons of money. It's exactly how Devin Nunes found himself on the board of Truth Social. What expertise did he have to run a social media company?

budaatum:
Hunter Biden, you mean.

In Big Law, Finance, Consulting, Lobbying etc. people are paid big money because of the networks they are in and thus the people they can bring in. If I have a great idea and need financing and have a friend who knows a bunch of billionaires, it only helps me. If a partner of my law firm knows a bunch of billionaires who need lawyers, it benefits my law firm. That's one of the benefits of going to top law/business schools. The people you meet. Because they hire these people doesn't mean that they are doing bad things, it just means they have more access to sell their products. And it could be good products.

I'm not saying what Hunter Biden was selling was legit, I don't know. But I am saying, arguing because he was being paid because he was a Biden, and that is somehow illegal, misunderstands how networking works.

Also, if the argument that Biden wasn't selling anything tangible so his work was illegal is the new standard. That means a lot of the stuff big consulting firms like Bain, BCG, McKenzie etc. do would be illegal. What do they sell besides ideas? Same with lobbying firms.

bemeruca:
The only thing agree to is trump bad rnc bad gibs gibs gibs. As long as trump bad or rnc bad is in a sentence you will agree with it. No matter the gibberish the sentence is. This is why I said you should utilize your sandbox. Play, get use to reality.

You should switch back to ChatGPT. You aren't making much sense. Sounding as illiterate as ever.
Who would have thought, a career in internet fraud wouldn't have taught you English.

basilico:
Hard to get another moniker miss Jessicarabbit or dalowlife.

And your attempted insult betrays how what you really think of my intelligence.
You really believe the I am any well written poster who posts here. Lol..

basilico:
Lauren answers intelligently as someone who understands the situation on the ground.
Unlike you , who does not know being in America increased your IQ to room temperature. Writing long meaningless love letters here devoid of substance. Hard to get another moniker miss Jessicarabbit or dalowlife.

I don't agree what what she/he wrote. I think the analysis is wrong and her/his view of Biden and electorate is wrong. But her/his post seemed reasonable enough not to argue. And generally if people's posts are reasonable enough, I don't care where he/she may be posting from. But since you brought in an understanding of "the situation on the ground". I think it's fair to understand where our perspectives come from. So, why don't you ask Laurene where he/she is posting from.

raumdeuter:
What is the reason Democrats are interfering in the GOP primary? If its not to ensure that they win

Its funny when you scream gerrymandering when Democrats have been doing as much redistricting as well but as with Democrats they blame others for what they do as well. Maybe you will blame Republicans for forcing you to gerrymander

Democrats have been in power for 12 of the last 16yrs yet they still point at Republicans for not being able to effect the changes they promised the voters

You can probably answer most of these questions yourself or already know the answer. But most of the things you write can only be written if you assume you are only looking for a surface level discussion or talking to someone who has 0 clue about any of this.

Ex.

1.) You are talking about Democratic interference. Of course Democrats want to win, but how are they doing it? Not by not allowing Republicans that ability to vote like you want to do with IVF and abortion. But by telling Republicans more about the candidates that are running. Dems aren't lying about the candidates. And no one is forcing Republican voters into choosing nutty candidates who scare everyone else. So instead of worrying about Dems, you should worry about why, when Republicans are giving choices of candidates, they always choose the nutty ones who are unelectable by the broader electorate. Again, your argument can only be made if you are talking to someone without more than a surface level understanding of all this.

2.) The gerrymandering argument. Yes Democrats Gerrymander. But they have done it as a means to not unilaterally disarm, and are even more stymied by Supreme Courts in their respective Democratic states. But given the opportunity to get rid of all gerrymandering, Democrats would vote for it, Republicans won't. Just look at the new Democratic Voting bill.

So, to make your argument, you have to believe that Republicans in Congress also want to end Gerrymandering and didn't just filibuster a bill to make sure it didn't happen. That Supreme Courts in Republican states generally don't have an issue with it, whereas Supreme Courts in Dem. states do. Also that current Supreme Court didn't uphold it because Republican appointed Supreme court justices don't have an issue with it while Democratic appointed Supreme Court justices did. But we know all those things to be untrue.

3.) In terms of being in Power for 12 of the last16 years. To make this argument you have to define "in Power" to mean that being President makes your party "in Power". But that is not how the US functions. As I'm sure you are aware the US government has 3 branches and a President can't pass laws without the votes of the Legislative Branch. Your stat also curiously stops in 16 years why not 24? I did say the last 20 years. In that case it would be Democrats have been "in Power" for 12 of the last 24 years while Republicans have been in power for 12 of the last 24 years. So, you are even trying to gaslight some more with the dates you purposefully chose. But even so, I can name things the Dems have passed that have made America better, start with the ACA. Or how Obama got us out of the recession. Or Elizabeth Warren and the CFPB. Or the new Infrastructure Bill. Or the Chips Act. It's your turn.

But all this makes my earlier point. For Republicans to make an argument, they have to rely on obfuscation and gas lighting. I asked you precise things and you followed it up with surface level bombast.

raumdeuter:
It is Democracy and parties have strategies to win
Its why the Democratic party is spending money on GOP primaries and propping up perceived weaker candidates that can be easily defeated in November. Its part of strategy to win

Winning is the name of the game and anything that affect your chances is winning should be avoided

It's not Democracy. But that is the way Republicans see it. They win to just win or for power and use strategies like gerrymandering to do so. And the goal of winning is to implement policies or more strategies they know they couldn't get through if voters understood them or had a chance to vote for them. Which in turn helps them stay in power more.

You're arguing that politicians should lie or keep what they are planning to do for the American people a secret so they can get in power. What is the purpose of putting them in power then? When you say Dems are "propping up the weaker candidate". Democrats are actually just running ads pointing out what those candidates are saying and Republicans are voting for those candidates. If Republicans are voting for those candidates because of their policies, why does that make them weaker candidates? Oh yeah, those policies are weak to the non-nutty, general electorate.

Everything the Republican party is for is precipitated on gaslighting Americans. What has the Republican party accomplished in the last 20 years that has been popular with Americans or moved America forward? I can think of two signature accomplishments, the Iraq War and the ending of Roe v. Wade. Both are very unpopular, so much so that they are even scared to mention either now or run on them.

Winning is not the name of the game. Governing and making American's lives better is.

bemeruca:
A man with a baby mentality has spoken. He wants to lecture us about democracy. No one plays with strategy. Go play in your sandbox

I'm sure you're busy today looking for more ways to hack into Naira lander's personal info to leverage it into whatever scams you're running.
I know you enjoy that fraud life, but you should probably get a real job.

raumdeuter:
Same thing I feel, This is not the time towards election that you will be ruling on IVF and abortion

You'd prefer they enact rulings through fiat, where people don't have the option of giving their input?
This is democracy.
Maybe it should be a clue for politicians that the idea that they have been pushing for decades and everyone is aware of is sh*t . And that they should stop pushing it, if they are afraid to rule on it so close to an election so people can vote on it.

But nah, it's the fact that it's so close to the election that is the problem.

Obrigardo:
You are so insane. I seriously doubt you have daughters as you claim or even any kids. You must be one sad psychopath who can't play with his own kids, that is, if you have any.

He sexualizes any and everything. I agree, it's very odd!