₦airaland Forum

What are these policies? Let's be clear and sure, because aside removal of subsidy which everyone agreed to do. There's no other policy that has caused the inflation that we all complain about. We all knew it was going to happen when the subsidy is removed. it's simple logic.

Good for you Boomark. i still await the next round oh. Like i used to say, na you need AI, i don't. If anything, i believe you have learned the following.
1. In 2 Corinthians 3:17 "Holy Spirit" is the Spirit of the Lord.

What AI has said IN CONTEXT is that the Lord is Jesus, because Jesus is Lord, which is my Trinity claim BTW. i didn't show that the Spirit is Lord in the same way that i showed that Jesus is Lord and therefore God.
No wahala. You insisted that you didn't see the Holy Spirit in the verse and in your direct words said "In 2 Corinthians 3:17 "Holy spirit" is not the spirit of the Lord."

You must have also learned that
2. ChatGPT's default program doesn't favour Trinity.
3. AI is subject to the topic asked.
4. AI and chatgpt depend on what you feed and on GIGO"

Thank you.

Kukutente23:
Kindly show the part in your post that says the two ARE being done together. Is the rain falling heavily so as to dampen your senses over there?

- Ministry for humanitarian affairs budgeted ₦130 billion as a general intervention fund across poverty and humanitarian programs, for just this year alone.
-The Ministry of Health’s 2024 approved capital budget was ₦233.66 billion, but only ₦26.55 billion (15%) was ever released, due to cash flow constraints and policy procedures.

You don't believe these 2 but you readily believe over 700billion not yet disbursed. On what logic?

Wow, that's massive. i wasn't expecting it. Good boost for our athletes. i expect uncommon wailing from opposition.

Kukutente23:
What you have here is a conjecture. The two CAN be done together is different from the two ARE being tackled together
All over the world, human emergencies especially involving children usually take the top of the pyramid except of course in black hearts of black Africans who think looking good to visitors has same importance as saving dying kidds. Like I said, same hypocrites are on the internet day and night wailing about Gaza.

The right time to do anything is when it ought to be done.
You mean generating revenue is more important than saving the lives of 400k kids? This is alarming
I am a thinking rational, human who realises that human life is sacred, more sacred than buildings and ports. Are you?

Lolz, you disingenously removed the part of my post that shows that the two ARE being done/tackled together. Infrastruture 'ministry' is not the one to tackle hunger and hospitals, it is the work of humanitarian agencies and health departments. Here it is again though you know already that they exist.

The Renewed Hope Infrastructure Development Fund is for INFRASTRUCTURE. There are ministries and bodies for catering for poor people, malnutrition and building hospitals.Ministry for humanitarian affairs budgeted ₦130 billion as a general intervention fund across poverty and humanitarian programs, for just this year alone. The Ministry of Health’s 2024 approved capital budget was ₦233.66 billion, but only ₦26.55 billion (15%) was ever released, due to cash flow constraints and policy procedures.
The RHIDF aims to avoid such logjam that has bedevilled the country for DECADES. MMIA was built in 1979, it wasn't built to accomodate what it takes today. Planned for about 200,000 annual passengers, today it handles millions, far beyond original design and severely outdated if you've been there before. In this current plan, there will be a Complete structural overhaul of Terminal 1, expansion of Terminal 2, including a new apron, aircraft parking, access bridges and new ring roads, including enhanced security infrastructure. You have a fundamental right not to use it when it is completed.

According to data, total revenue generation for 2024:
Murtala Muhammed International Airport (Lagos)
→ Generated ₦256.067 billion (67% of total)

Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport (Abuja)
→ Generated ₦81.220 billion (21.3%)

Mallam Aminu Kano Int’l Airport (Kano)
→ Generated ₦20.241 billion (5.3%)

Port Harcourt International Airport
→ Generated ₦10.764 billion (2.8%)

Boomark:
Don't you see what I feed it in the videos?

Did I alter anything you posted?

If I start talking off point it will tell me. The same with you. So I feed with our claims.

We cannot remove Instructions and boundaries it must no exceed. It's default program favours trinity.

So you requesting that we remove topic is indirectly ask it to favour you.

It is not my fault if your topic or subtopic is not properly backed by scripture. That reason we are here. To verify the truth using a neutral third party.

ChatGPT's default program doesn't favour Trinity. i wonder where on earth you got that. Anyway, listen to your ChatGPT yourself, i helped you to ask in the images attached below.

Boomark:
Image123 I need this

That the Father is God, the Son Jesus is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and yet they are one God.

Boomark:
I will do that now. I wanted to address your concerns first. I don't like the feeling that I'm manipulating th AI. That's why I make the video so everyone will it is transparent. We have equal opportunity to make our subtopics favour us.

I will prepare the result now.

No problem. It is up to you, i only explained how AI works. The results it gives showing who used scripture more clearly and accurately, did either person use scripture out of context, did either side prove or avoid the point, who followed the challenge rules more closely which is to focus on the scripture alone, and which response was closer to the truth based on the Bible alone can change or differ significantly just by introducing a heading/topic/subtopic.
So you need to prioritise what you want: an echo chamber or a real/neutral analysis based solely on the posts and Bible verses used? For the umpteenth time, i don't care about the AI results for myself.

I CLAIM:

Boomark:
This will show you that the Ai knows what it is doing. We will use it to do the neutral test you are asking for.

i like the word you used which is the logical thing, neutral. i have never said that AI does not know what it is doing. i have only cautioned you that AI is GIGO-based, depends on what you feed it, and is subject to the topic asked. So if you are looking for unbiased analysis, be careful what and how you feed it.

2 Corinthians 3:17 NIrV
[17] Now the Lord is the Holy Spirit. And where the Spirit of the Lord is, freedom is also there.

I am doing this so you know I am putting myself at a disadvantage. But I will disagree with this translation and prove to you that it is a wrong interpretation.

There's no advantage or disadvantage here, only truth in context and without extrabiblical inputs. The Bible refers to the Holy Ghost as the Holy Spirit and also as the Spirit of the Lord. This is the direct observation and meaning across many books and verses of the Bible. A claim that the Spirit of the Lord is not the Holy Spirit is not found in the Bible. Like your verson quoted, it is straightforward enough without any eisegesis. Now the Lord is the Holy Spirit. Many other versions also mention Him in the verse, either as Holy Spirit or Spirit of the Lord. This is why we say the Holy Spirit is Lord as seen in the Bible, Jesus is Lord as seen in the Bible, the Father is Lord as seen in the Bible.
2 Corinthians 3:17
(BBE)  Now the Lord is the Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there the heart is free.
(GW)  This Lord is the Spirit. Wherever the Lord’s Spirit is, there is freedom.
(KJV)  Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
(YLT)  And the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is , there is liberty;
Rom_6:23  For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Rom_7:25  I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
Rom_8:39  Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Rom_10:9  That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth[b] the Lord Jesus[/b], and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
Gen_2:18  And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
1Sa_2:2  There is none holy as the LORD: for there is none beside thee: neither is there any rock like our God.

So what you will do is to make a claim that passage is talking about the Holy spirit. If you know anyhow you want to do your claim do it so you don't blame me if you fail. As usual, you have to present key verses to support your claim.

I will make claims that the passage is not talking about Holy spirit but Jesus Christ and also present my verses.

All over the Scriptures, the Holy Spirit is referred to as the Spirit of the Lord. All verses refer to the Holy Spirit and His power in context. None is said to refer to Jesus in the Bible and rule 1 says the Bible alone.
1Sa_16:14  But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him.
2Sa_23:2  The Spirit of the LORD spake by me, and his word was in my tongue.
Act_5:9  Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out.

Even our chapter is gracious enough to refer to Him in the earler verses.
2Co_3:3  Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.
2Co_3:17  Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
2Co_3:18  But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.

Key verses:
2 Corinthians 3:17
(BBE)  Now the Lord is the Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there the heart is free.
(GW)  This Lord is the Spirit. Wherever the Lord’s Spirit is, there is freedom.
(KJV)  Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
(YLT)  And the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is , there is liberty;
Rom_6:23  For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Rom_7:25  I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.
Rom_8:39  Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Rom_10:9  That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
Gen_2:18  And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
1Sa_2:2  There is none holy as the LORD: for there is none beside thee: neither is there any rock like our God.
1Sa_16:14  But the Spirit of the LORD departed from Saul, and an evil spirit from the LORD troubled him.
2Sa_23:2  The Spirit of the LORD spake by me, and his word was in my tongue.
Act_5:9  Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out.
2Co_3:3  Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.
2Co_3:17  Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
2Co_3:18  But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.

Boomark:
This will show you that the Ai knows what it is doing. We will use it to do the neutral test you are asking for.


2 Corinthians 3:17 NIrV
[17] Now the Lord is the Holy Spirit. And where the Spirit of the Lord is, freedom is also there.

I am doing this so you know I am putting myself at a disadvantage. But I will disagree with this translation and prove to you that it is a wrong interpretation.


So what you will do is to make a claim that passage is talking about the Holy spirit. If you know anyhow you want to do your claim do it so you don't blame me if you fail. As usual, you have to present key verses to support your claim.

I will make claims that the passage is not talking about Holy spirit but Jesus Christ and also present my verses.

We will not use topic. So posted your preferred scripture first and start making your claim under it. If we are to use to topic it will be: is 2 Corinthians 3:17 talking about Jesus Christ or the Holy spirit.

But we are not using topic so don't start saying it sway AI. I don't even know where it will sway this time. It will to your side if you present solid claim and key verses without talking out of point. So if I win don't think it is magic. The truth stands.

Below are the rules. Check if there is anything you want us to edit in the rules. We will make our presentation before 6pm tomorrow. After this we will start our normal challenge. I will check results and you will also do it with your own AI. I will post video here and will also bring your own video. Or you confirm if what I presented is the same with yours.



Rule for the participants

Rule 1: The Bible Alone
Only the Bible will be used as authority. Each person must prove their claim with scripture. No assuming or borrowing anything from science, commentaries, traditions, creeds, etc.

Rule 2: Context Always
Verses must be explained in their immediate and full context. Never isolate a verse to prove a point.

Rules for you ChatGPT

Rule 1: You must strictly analyse and make judgement based on claim and key verses presented only.

Rule 2: You must not be partial.

Rule 3: You must state who won the challenge.



MR I CLAIM:
[Paste your full message here]


MR B CLAIM:
[Paste their full message here]

✅ Instructions:
Please analyze both claim according to all the rules and score this round based on:

1. Who used scripture more clearly and accurately?

2. Did either person use scripture out of context?

3. Did either side prove or avoid the point?

4. Who followed the challenge rules more closely which is to focus on the scripture alone?

5. Which response was closer to the truth based on the Bible alone?

Oh okay just reading this now. So this is like a break or what? No wahala. You didn't mention me. i tend to read my mentions rather than followed topics. i'll reply this soon sha.

Where is Boomark na, has he given up? He probably asked AI those questions and got shy. For someone who'd have rushed out to inform about ChatGPT results and how he's making a lot of sacrifices, this silence is deafening. Boomark, are you not going to make video and inform us on the result of the last round and these questions?
1. Ask the same ChatGPT to remark our 'arguments' without the TOPIC that sways to Jesus has a God. Simply type remark and score our 'arguments' without the TOPIC
2. ask it, "does AI and chatgpt depend on what you feed it?" and "does ai and chatgpt depend on gigo"
3. Ask "Is AI subject to the topic asked or neutral"

The answers to 2 and 3 should better inform you on how AI works, instead of accusing me of blaming AI.
When will you be posting your next round of claims, or are they the same circles as the one where Jesus has a God and He is over all?

Kukutente23:
Herod. The poor deserve to be taken as a priority as responsible govts do all over the world. Even the MSF that's taking care of these poor kids in your doormat are sponsored by govts from other parts of the world.
I'm sure you're among the crowd crying about starvation in Gaza every other day. When are you going to tell Hamas to reconstruct Gaza airport since things can be done together or this your homily only works for Nigeria your fatherland where it is OK for kids to starve to death in our homes as long as we look good to outsiders?
Have a soul
Have some shame!!

Like i clearly said but you refuse to READ. The two can be done together. Don't be allergic to good news.
Answer simple questions.
(a) When is there ever going to be a right time for anything in your eyes?
(b)How much revenue does mmia generate?
(c) Do you think at all or just made up to oppose everything?

The Renewed Hope Infrastructure Development Fund is for INFRASTRUCTURE. There are ministries and bodies for catering for poor people, malnutrition and building hospitals.Ministry for humanitarian affairs budgeted ₦130 billion as a general intervention fund across poverty and humanitarian programs, for just this year alone. The Ministry of Health’s 2024 approved capital budget was ₦233.66 billion, but only ₦26.55 billion (15%) was ever released, due to cash flow constraints and policy procedures.
The RHIDF aims to avoid such logjam that has bedevilled the country for DECADES. MMIA was built in 1979, it wasn't built to accomodate what it takes today. Planned for about 200,000 annual passengers, today it handles millions, far beyond original design and severely outdated if you've been there before. In this current plan, there will be a Complete structural overhaul of Terminal 1, expansion of Terminal 2, including a new apron, aircraft parking, access bridges and new ring roads, including enhanced security infrastructure. You have a fundamental right not to use it when it is completed.

According to data, total revenue generation for 2024:
Murtala Muhammed International Airport (Lagos)
→ Generated ₦256.067 billion (67% of total)

Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport (Abuja)
→ Generated ₦81.220 billion (21.3%)

Mallam Aminu Kano Int’l Airport (Kano)
→ Generated ₦20.241 billion (5.3%)

Port Harcourt International Airport
→ Generated ₦10.764 billion (2.8%)

United we stand. When they do well, you hear their tribes- amaka, agba.

Kukutente23:
It's a misplaced priority
MSF just told us that there are 400k children suffering from malnutrition in Nigeria. Some have died overnight as we type
Yet our problem is how beautiful or not our entry to hell-hole looks like
Neither the Minister for Humanitarian, Health or Women Affairs have come out to say anything about that shocking report nor have the FG approved any sum to save those 400k children's lives
Meanwhile that report was given by an international NGO not any govt parastatal!!

Judas, the poor now dey finish. No government in the world drops every other thing to take care of the poor. The two can be done together. When is there ever going to be a right time for anything in your eyes? How much revenue does mmia generate? Do you think at all or just made up to oppose everything?

But opposition was criticizing the state of the airport just few days ago.
For me, Keyamo has given us a timeline of 22months to complete the job. Let's see how it goes. The project is not mutually exclusive, and doesn't stop any other good thing being suggested some which are already ongoing anyway. Like building hospitals and schools.

For those like Judas who hypocritically say things like why wasn't this money given to "the poor", or that this is another debt. NO, it's not a debt. It's financed by the Renewed Hope Infrastructure Development Fund. Same with Lagos Calabar coastal highway.
Presidential Infrastructure Development Fund was created on February 25, 2018 by fPMB administration. Renewed Hope Infrastructure Development Fund was approved by the Federal Executive Council on March 25, 2024 and it absorbed the PIDF. They are both legally and constitutionally valid via executive action.
Formed to improve efficiency, reduce bureaucracy and broaden capital mobilization.

The opposition aim is in the video link below, don't be gaslighted.

When you are gullible and easily pander to fake and unverified news with your emotions. Remember you are the target of this set of evul humans in this audio.

Avoid some certain bloggers and online influencers cos dem dey use your head bréàk coconut wey dem dey chop.🥥

Shame no… pic.twitter.com/2dZ5ZkKuy8

— Senior Pastor Okezie James Atañi (@Onsogbu) August 4, 2025

drLammy:
Can someone please explain what happened between 1999-2007 that Nigeria had 4 senate presidents instead of 2

Atiku happened according to OBJ. He kept trying to bribe the senate to usurp/impeach the president. In return, it kept backfiring. The letter writer didn't take such lying low as he kept scattering them.

Evan Enwerem June – Nov 1999 Removed over allegations of falsifying name/credentials (controversial screening process)
Chuba Okadigbo 1999 – 2000 Impeached over corruption allegations and power struggle with President Obasanjo
Anyim Pius Anyim 2000 – 2003 Completed tenure but had a strained relationship with Obasanjo; did not return in 2003
Adolphus Wabara 2003 – 2005 Resigned after being implicated in a bribe scandal involving education budget
Ken Nnamani 2005 – 2007 Stepped in after Wabara; completed the term without major scandal

The Ken Nnamani you see there is a close friend of Tinubu that was SP during the saga o OBJ wanting 3rd term. Nnamani still thanks Tinubu till tomorrow for helping him with strategies at that period.

CBN Governors since 1960:

⚫Mai-Bornu 1963-67
🟤Isong 1967-75
⚫Ciroma 1975-77
🔴Vincent 1977-82
⚫Ahmed 1982-93
🟢Ogwuma 1993-99
🟤Sanusi 1999-04
🟢Soludo 2004-09
🟡Sanusi 2009-14
🟤Emefiele 2014-23
🔴Shonubi 2023
🔴Cardoso 2023-

Totals: 🟤SS 22y, ⚫NE 17y, 🟢SE 11y, 🔴SW 7y, 🟡NW 5y

ClearFlair:
Encouraging fiscal recklessness. This is exactly the type of comment you would expect from an APC supporter.

You wonder where these APC supporters originated from, because me I don't know people who reason like this in real-life

Vanguard reporting this is usually anti APC and pro opposition.
Adeleke is a known PDP governor.
The CodeTemplarr you quoted is anti APC.
This thread has zero and nothing to do with APC.
But miraculously, APC is your subject of blame and discussion. Do better please, it's another month.

Seems NNPC cabal is turned on this guy. Na so things dey work for Nigeria. Perhaps northern who is who.

casualobserver:
The Ibos have desired the presidency for decades. You are currently their biggest hope and you sell out the Ibos by promising 1 term?

Are you subconsciously telling others that Ibos are not deserving of 2 terms? That they are second class?

Anyway it doesn’t matter he will never be president!

He's only telling us his level of desperation, just the tip please. He once mentioned two years. Maybe after 2027, he'll beg for one day You know how Tinubu used to give learners one day to be governor of Lagos State.

Lord lambarino

Boomark:
Let me help you since it is difficult for you. Check some translations and you will see what you should be showing me.

Use scripture and prove your point and not by begging me to accept. Oya go and check.

I have been preparing a response to that with almost the whole of chapter 3 and part of chapter 4. I will post it this night or tomorrow. It will certainly be in the right context.

What translations, am i quoting koran? Which of these translations does not say Spirit of the Lord? How do YOU come to some weird conclusion that the Spirit of God is Holy Spirit except in this verse?
2 Corinthians 3:17
(BBE)  Now the Lord is the Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there the heart is free.
(GW)  This Lord is the Spirit. Wherever the Lord’s Spirit is, there is freedom.
(KJV)  Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
(YLT)  And the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is , there is liberty;

Holman Christian Standard Bible
17 Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.
English Standard Version
17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.

New International Version
17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.

You want to use two chapters to show me that one verse does not contain Spirit of the Lord, it's called FORCING it. Don't accept na, who's begging you?

These are the questions you can help me with, i don't need 2 chapters of twisting and turning. i await your round 5 claim.

1. Ask the same ChatGPT to remark our 'arguments' without the TOPIC that sways to Jesus has a God. Simply type remark and score our 'arguments' without the TOPIC
2. ask it, "does AI and chatgpt depend on what you feed it?" and "does ai and chatgpt depend on gigo"
3. Ask "Is AI subject to the topic asked or neutral"

Boomark:
My brother I don't know if you enjoy falsehood or that you don't really understand English. I don't even know what to call this thing I bolded.

You said I am arguing that the Father is God in your comment which I bolded. I don't know whether to call this a false accusation or lack of understanding of english. I am not arguing anything. I made a good claim that the Father is the only true God according to Jesus Christ. That the Father is God over all. That the Father is the God of Gods.

You can't use distorted words to pull me down to the level in your comment so you can gain a point. The things I bolded is where your trinity doctrine cannot reach. I know what am doing. You don't understand them because you go outside the bible to borrow the things believe in. See the screenshots or go to page 1 and see my claim clearly. They are all in the bible as I wrote them.

Stop lying against me and stop talking out of point.

You have also proven that you don't obey instructions. Or don't you understand english. See the screenshots where I said that you either support a claim or make a rebuttal. I thought you will support most of the things I wrote. After saying their is no argument against my subtopic you will go ahead and start making rebuttal that is off point.

Please I need a video of what you fed to ChatGPT. Start on new page in your ChatGPT. I don't trust you. See my response to you last night which was removed. I screenshoted it before refreshing the page.

It's not a lie, you are arguing that the Father is God, YES. To "argue" implies putting forth a claim. An argument is essentially a claim supported by reasons and evidence. More specifically, or word-for-word, you are arguing that the Father is the only true God according to Jesus Christ. Again, no one disputes this, we also teach it. The difference is the ALSO, we also teach that Jesus is the only true God, and the Spirit is the only true God. The same goes for being God over all, and God of gods. This has already been explained in the rounds, except you want it re-explained.
There's no distortion in saying that you claim that the Father is God, especially when i have earlier elaborated in the rounds. If you don't feel that the Father is God, then you can claim it as a distortion. you don't have to talk or think like a robot, like we've never had previous discussions and everything has to be repeated every single time. The teaching of trinity reaches and largely SURPASSES your teaching. That's why there's disagreement in the first place. That the Godhead is not just the Father, but the Son and the Spirit.

Lol, i just saw your support a claim thing though. i guess i understood your procedure as strictly a claim and rebuttal thing. That's why i use to say that i wait for your rebuttal. Nonetheless, that does not significantly change much except in your feeding of AI.
As you don't trust me or the images and text that that posted from ChatGPT, you don't need to go through the pain of trusting my video. It can be doctored you know? Here's the easy straightforward thing to do, which i suspect you have already done but you're too shy to tell us.

1. Ask the same ChatGPT to remark our 'arguments' without the TOPIC that sways to Jesus has a God. Simply type remark and score our 'arguments' without the TOPIC
2. ask it, "does AI and chatgpt depend on what you feed it?" and "does ai and chatgpt depend on gigo"
3. Ask "Is AI subject to the topic asked or neutral"

Round 1 you claim
we all, including Jesus Christ, have one God. And that one God is the Father not three persons. All the sentences and key verses that follow show what we both agree in bold. It is only right that i set you right to explain that Jesus is also one God and He is our God, the Spirit is also one God and He is our God.

Round 3, you claim again
Jesus Christ has a God. His God is the Father and the explanation still rotates around the similar thing. God over all. If you pause and ponder you'll notice that you're just spinning around. Let's hope there's something new in Round 5 though

Boomark:
In 2 Corinthians 3:17 "Holy spirit" is not the spirit of the Lord.


I have made bold so you see it properly incase you didn't see my previous answer.

If you say it is, show show me where you see Holy spirit in that verse.


I have also made it bold so you don't pretend you didn't see it or understand what I said. So answer my request.

Ahhhh, Holy Spirit is the Spirit of the Lord except in a particular verse. Wonderful.
Where are the answers to my questions and your next claim?

CBN Governors since 1960:

⚫Mai-Bornu 1963-67
🟤Isong 1967-75
⚫Ciroma 1975-77
🔴Vincent 1977-82
⚫Ahmed 1982-93
🟢Ogwuma 1993-99
🟤Sanusi 1999-04
🟢Soludo 2004-09
🟡Sanusi 2009-14
🟤Emefiele 2014-23
🔴Shonubi 2023
🔴Cardoso 2023-

Totals: 🟤SS 22y, ⚫NE 17y, 🟢SE 11y, 🔴SW 7y, 🟡NW 5y

hatchy:
Now that you have finally mentioned the name Obi that is living rent free in you people's brain, can you allow us rest now?

Duh, is Obi not opposition again or has he joined the ruling party?

hatchy:
Just imagine the senseless comment you made and how many likes on it.
This shows the level of miscreants and Bots operating in this Nairaland.

What is sensless about it? Does Obi not disturb our ears about Tanzania and Bangladesh?

DelphiOracle:
11 titles? What were other countries doing?

Same thing they're probably asking about the Nigerian women having 10 football titles.

jaxxy:
I never said Jonathan was a saint or performed well, yes projects suffered, infrastructure suffered but he didn't plung millions into hunger and untold hardship.

So u campaigned on CHANGE and the brougbt buhari and destroyed the economy with mediocrity and nepotism?

U can have infrastructure and suffer hunger and hardship. That's what apc is giving to Nigerians now.

Not sure you read the foundation of the thriving? Oil and good exchange rate. This was the foundation stage where we should have solved our problems of electricity, water, agriculture and other infrastructure like roads and good airports and hospitals. These were the same time the UAE was building, the time when the naira ws close to the dollar and when we enjoyed the world's goodwill after coming out of a long era of military rule. But the profligates wasted everything and literally didn't save for the rainy day. Those were the people that plunged us into today's state. Even NOI knew this and any intelligent person did.

https://thenationonlineng.net/okonjo-iweala-warns-successor-of-tough-year/?

It's like a man being paid 1million naira and more for many years but lavished everything away and in the process married many wives and had 10 more children. Somehow, his salary came down to 300,000 naira. Now, the kids have to start school, the house rent is due and increased, etc. This is a illustration of what happened to Nigeria. Our uneducated and poor population kept multiplying with little or no plans for them. Any savings buffers that could have helped was spent by the GEJ admin. All that was left was vibes of stay strong and Inshallah. The previous PDP administrations were the chief culprits and cause. Buhari went to start borrowing to build infrastructure, meanwhile rent, school fees debt, interest, transport and car maintenance costs kept piling astronomically as he wanted Nigeria to still maintain the fake life(fuel and FX subsidies). Probably didn't want to be the one to repeat the 1985 hardship
Buhari was not mediocre, i'll agree more with nepotistic though, not strict and supervisory enough and slow. GEJ was mediocre and clueless.

Boomark:
What do you mean by flawed subtopic? So in you don't write topic before copying all the notes you copied. You see topics in text books?

The problem is not AI but you. I told you that you are talking of point but you didn't realise it just as you didn't realise that there is no Holy spirit in 2 Corinthians 3:17.

Let me show you how you are talking of point in the screenshot below. AI was right. You could not overturn the subtopic.

1. First screenshot.
You agreed that the there is no arguments against my subtopic. In other words you have agreed that Jesus has a God and his God is the Father. But instead of throwing in the towel, you on to start saying things that could not counter my claim. You forgot I used key bible verses to support that subtopic. You even made a fatal blunder by saying that God the Father also has a God and never told us who his God is. You quoted Hebrew 1:8 and left out verse 9. Our aim here is not to deceive people and win argument. Don't even try to say this kind of thing again.

2. 2nd screenshot
You said Jesus made everything. This never opposed the subtopic which are back by scriptures. You left weightier matters to attack little things. You could not overturn the subtopic.

3. Screenshot
Jesus also claimed to be more powerful.

This is out of point

4. Screenshot

Still out of point because it didn't oppose the fact that Jesus has a God. Out of point.

So this is the reason you fail. You things that are off point.

If you you analyse my rebuttals you will see that I oppose you word for word. And most importantly those ones that are connected your subtopic. I present key verses to show that they are false. This is one that counts.

Nobody does anything stating their topic. The fault is from you not the subtopic.

By the way you are gradually shifting away from your main topic which is trinity. I noticed it in round 3. What ever subtopic you present must reflect support for trinity.

Lolz. Reading this shows that you actually understand what i have been saying. See me thinking of helping you, poor me
Firstly, there's a lot of poor writing and grammatical errors in your posts, i need to struggle and assume your position to easily understand what you are typing. Try to do some revision/review before posting.
Think of your life, are you here to argue about suitable subtopics or to actually know if the Son is not God and the Spirit is not God? For the umpteenth time, every christian says that God the Father is God, that is why we are THEISTS. You can't force me to argue that He is not God because you have written some topic or subtopic. Are you looking for the overturning of topics and subtopics or for truth?
i have not blamed AI but showed you that AI is GIGO and you need to be careful what you feed it if you want good and not skewed analysis. Remember you said that you're just 2 months old in this. Take advice from an older more experienced user. Be humble.

Remember, you are arguing that the Father is God, no one is arguing against that, i am not. We are both arguing that the Father is God, nothing to rebut or overturn. The DIFFERENCE you think the Father alone is God. We say and i say that the Son is also God and the Spirit is God. That is what you should try to disprove or believe, rebut or accept.
i'll help repost what your AI said about Hebrew 1:8.

Boomark:
Now you have met me.

It is now very difficult to quote a single verse you used to defend a false doctrine and show us where you saw "Holy spirit?"

Or is it a spirit word?
And this is how you want us to discuss human to human?

Larying no dey tire satan

Again, you evaded the question. Here it is again.
1. So, Holy Spirit is not the Spirit of the Lord?

Boomark:
I don't believe you and I don't trust you.

How can I trust someone that didn't see a matchbox on a table but he is insisting there is a matchbox on it?

You didn't even do the right thing and you came out with pictures castigating the AI and making it look like I manipulate it. You removed the topic? So if you are into coding, you will remove the aim of your codes?

I told you and some other people that under normal condition the AI will favour trinitarians because almost all the church believe in it. So to avoid that I gave it instructions that will make it to remain neutral. It will not go outside to borrow information for the analysis.

Use the instructions as I posted it after Round 1. I would like to see what it gives in your own.

But you trust and believe ChatGPT na, or are you afraid to ask it? Simply say, remark our 'arguments' without the TOPIC that sways to Jesus has a God. Simply type remark and score our 'arguments' without the TOPIC that sways to Jesus has a God. i think your belief is that AI doesn't change and that it is not based on what you feed it. Ohhh, come oh, did you ask already and you're shy to say? Because all this beating around the bush is suspect.

Get it right, the aim of the code or AI prompt was clearly stated by you. Here they are. You wrote them yourself, remember?

Please analyze both responses and score this round based on:

1. Who used scripture more clearly and accurately?

2. Did either person use scripture out of context?

3. Did either side prove or avoid the point?

4. Who followed the challenge rules more closely?

5. Which response was closer to the truth based on the Bible alone?

This is the main thing you should be after instead of being scared about the topic change/removal. Rebuttal is an english word dear. The AI will check if the topic is rebutted, it cannot be neutral to the topic, it is SUBJECT to the topic. Don't take my word alone for it as you evidently do not believe me. Simply ask lord AI "Is AI subject to the topic asked or neutral?" You need to think and analyse your aim of the discussion. Is it for rebutting topics nobody is arguing about or the above quote? Who is using scriptures accurately, or in context? Who is proving the point or avoiding the point, and who is based on the Bible? As i have repeated, i don't depend on AI for such, but since you believe so much in AI, then set your priorities and focus properly.


P.S i didn't find the instructions you posted after round 1. Are they significantly different from the OP? If yes, please show me and kindly edit the OP to reflect what you are using.

Boomark:
Round 4


Rebuttal:

That Jesus Christ is called God in the scripture does not in in any way support trinity because he has a God who he himself called the only true God. Jesus Christ himself showed us in the scripture how to distinguished between the Father, son, and the Holy spirit by telling us that the Father is the only true God, that he is the Son of God and the spirit he will ask from the Father is the Holy spirit. So the phrase God the Son is unscriptural and should not be used at all.

Evidently, you do not know or understand what people who believe in Trinity do or teach. The Trinity doctrine teaches that the Father is God and He is over all. Your robotic attempt to keep proving that is laughable, it was never disputed. i have used an illustration with my name a couple of times but it seems to fly past your head. ia am not arguing that you're not Boomark. You shouting and repeating "I am Boomark, I am Boomark" is ridiculous, there's no contest or rebuttal in such a claim. Feeding such to AI is unproductive and a mockery of technology. Use your God given brain dear. Again, no one that believes in Trinity will tell you that The Father is not God, whether of Jesus Christ or of anyone else. We also teach and believe this. Your insistence that it must be rebutted shows you're just here to joke and not discuss. Understand what you are discussing and challenging. That Jesus Christ is God is why He is called God the Son. You continue to ignore this simple fact for whatever reasons. How can Jesus Christ being God not support Trinity, what sort of joke is this? The Bible says Jesus is God, you don't clearly agree or disagree but insist that it should not be used at all. Which kain wahala be this? Should the term 'Bible' also not be used since we don't find it in the Bible? Was the Bible written in English?

Jesus clearly told us that he has no authority of his own and that he was sent to do, not his will but the will of God the Father. The will of the Father is the salvation of mankind. This is the reason why God the Father (Yahweh) said, "there is no other saviour but me." Jesus is also called saviour because it is God the Father that made him a saviour also known as Messiah by using him to save the world. If God the Father refused to send him, he will not be called a saviour and the world will not be saved through him. So It is only God the Father that can say besides him there is no saviour. It is the will of God the Father, the only true God to save the world not the the will of Jesus Christ as Jesus himself said.

This was not a claim so i wonder what you are rebutting here.The claim was clear; Jesus Christ is called God in the scriptures. He carries out divine functions of Saviour and Redeemer in a sense like no other being aside from God. Try going point by point instead of running all over the place without a good plan except an AI one That way, you can probably pick up at least 1 lesson. It is all these jumbling that makes you run around in circles, which prompted you to seek AI to help you in the first instance. If you calm down, discuss step by step and point by point, like they say line upon line, you'd be better for it.
Jesus is called Saviour and there's no other Saviour beside God. Clear and clean. All these reasons are not needed or valid in the discussion. You're stepping outside to get these. i'll be very surprised now if AI doesn't pick up these roaming around. i will now pay some more attention to your AI thing to help you the 2 months user do things better for yourself.

God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is clearly the Father who sent Jesus. So God as saviour in the old testament does not apply to Jesus. LORD does not apply to Jesus also because LORD was used in place of Jehovah, the name of God the Father.

So It is the Father who is the only true saviour and redeemer by his will and he is the one that made Jesus a saviour and redeemer. Without the Father there won't be any saviour of the world. It is still only God the Father who is true saviour and not a trinity God.

You must still prove this your LORD and Lord thing from the Bible oh, not by faith. You must use it as one of your claims and proof. What part of the Bible says that LORD is the Father alone and not the Son? This your rebuttal that was endless, are you saying Jesus Christ is not Saviour, since the Father is the true Saviour?