Did a primary school pupil write this article? It seems the journalist was among the 'survivors' because he is writing like he is in a state of shock. Incoherent
LASG will NEVER demolish any structure without prior notices. I have been through this enough times.
What usually happens is the process was slow or someone was in a hurry.
Back in the 2000s my old place did a flurry of upgrades. Our then HOD was chummy with some lasg planning ogas and we did alot of upgrades without approvals.
Fast forward to the 2010s and we were upgrading again. We met with lasspa and were first slapped with fines for all our unapproved previous upgrades
One project we put a structure within the setback. One year later lasbca came and told us to remove it. They literally brought a bulldozer.
A lot of contractors for commercial projects will tell you how they tried to skirt rules and got into trouble.
And then afterwards they start playing the victim.
SamuraiXXX: Interpol's involvement is in possible apprehension of the criminal because there is a fear that he may have fled to another country after he committed the crime in Nigeria
eazzzy1: Lol it’s not a joke. People have had sex with minors and ended up marrying them too, does that negate the fact that it is legally considered rape? The law is the law and it doesn’t care about your emotions.
If the matter ever makes it to the court an affair between an employer and employee will be seen as coercion and rape. Just because people got away with it doesn’t make it not rape.
In this case, the burden of high expectation is on the person who wields the power. A lot of people have married their rapist, it doesn’t mean the act of rape did not happen. Not every one can quit their jobs because of harassment and the law will always side with the person with less power.
It's all semantics, sir. Consensual sex between an employer and employee who are both adults and of sound mind is not rape. This is where false accusation arises from.
eazzzy1: Well we will agree to disagree. I searched online if a househelp can consent to sex with an employer in Nigeria and the answer was an emphatic no. Whether it’s statutory or full blown, rape is rape and sex with someone who can’t consent is rape.
Unless the lady lacks proper legal representation, she used the term rape in the right context.
You've got to be kidding me. Are you being for real right now? So what of the stories that abound of house maids transitioning to wives of their employers? Is that rape? I have seen videos of the maids who developed an intimate relationship with their bosses which led to marriage. Is that rape?? Or the maids who had to leave their places of work because of unwanted sexual advances from their employers. They had the free will to resign and they exercised it without getting raped.
eazzzy1: Ishilove, I’m not saying her comment is warranted. Heck, I think she’s bitter the man found love & happiness after divorce. However, she’s curated her comment in a way that does not contravene any law.
A lot of sex with minor is consensual in the true sense of the word ‘consent’, but the law sees it as rape. In a lot of jurisdiction power imbalance in relationship has the same legal term of rape. A maid can’t reject sexual advances without repercussions from her powerful boss. She’s only called their relationship by its legal term.
She never said the maid is a minor, she said most likely younger. Younger than what? 100 years?. Unless Paul’s ex lied under oath, there are legal documents that claims he slept with his maid and the court annulled his marriage on the basis of that document.
If cuppy has made the same allegations against him will he be threatening to use all resources at his disposal to deal with her? Ask yourself why Burna arrested speed Darlington but couldn’t arrest chief priest for same issue.
We can’t protest against police high handedness sometimes then support it when we like the person involved. This is a civil matter and from where I stand, Paul has no case.
I completely disagree. Sex between an adult and a minor is classified as statutory rape whether or not it is consensual, but forced intercourse with an unwilling party is full blown rape. Anita cited infidelity as one of the grounds for seeking divorce and she used the word "affair with the housemaid" in her deposition. This suggests intercourse between two consenting adults. The Tweeter wrote that he coerced/raped the housemaid, which in itself is a very serious accusation and must be backed by evidence. Failure to provide evidence is deemed as defamation and that is a crime. He has a case because since she stated, by her own words that he is a rapist, the onus lies on her to provide proof to back this accusation. Paul is allowed to seek damages if she can't provide the evidence.
eazzzy1: She’s covered by law. There’s no accusation anywhere. Paul ex wife accused him of sleeping with the help, due to the power balance, such relationships are never consensual. She also said the help was ‘most likely’ younger. She didn’t say a minor, would Paul sleep with a maid who’s older than him?
Unless he wants to kill her, he has no case. She should make another post alluding threat to life and say if anything happens to her Paul should be held responsible.
Which law? The law covers presenting allegations as facts without proof? Was she a witness or privy to the alleged rape? Does she know the victim of this rape? Does she have any relationship with the victim? Is she privy to any private knowledge of the true circumstances of the alleged rape?
See, unless she has any of the above and is not simply parroting rumours (which she obviously is because she mentioned "way likely younger" in her tweet, suggesting mere speculation), it is best she hides her head and pray it blows over, because if it does not and Paul makes good his threat, then she is in hot water . You don't know how terrible false accusation is until you become a victim yourself.
All these celebs no send una. Make una no dey chook mouth for their mata
See those ones wey no get sense talking about simps and money on a thread about a lady brutally murdered by a psychopath. The murdered lady broke up with him because of his overbearing and excessively jealous attitude, but these ones here have immediately assumed it was because of life savings and investments.
sonssyo: Believe me, you won't even notice that Ogbono is inside, all the wives my brother's married said the same thing untill they tested , right now it's the soup or nothing for them :
I tasted ogbono and egusi combo once and I didn't like it. My tongue was confused because my brain was undecided if it was tasting slimy egusi or patchy ogbono.
thats what the guy did for jada pinkett in set it off
what happens when you erm date below your level
Ha, so it is movies?? Like seriously? So people are actually copying nonsense from movies? Demanding money to buy a dress to come on a date with you is totally shameless and feels way too transactional. No wonder some of the men feel they are entitled to the girl's body on the first date because she has more or less sold her dignity to him.
bentenny: But why will you send a lady money for a date dress? Abi she nor get dress? Some guys need to get sense or borrow if the free one is unavailable!
I am forced to agree. Any lady that asks for date dress money is skanky. I can't even imagine showing up to a date dressed in clothes bought by a man one is not intimately involved with on any level. That is so cheap.
I don't know when this demand from money for date dress started. It is on social media I am reading about it.
GloriousGbola: there is an article i read where someone was justifying using mercenaries in the middle eastern theater - i think yemen
basically he said that it is very hard to get muslims to kill muslims
or at least to get his own soldiers to kill yemenis
same principle here
it is also why the FG is trying to et more recruits / grunts from the south into the army. if your army is core northerner heavy - and northerners these are the same people who are chasing sharia up and down, as well promoting their religious police
- ultimately they and boko haram and co have the same long term goal.
islamization one way or another
and at their core - they have no regard for unbelievers better known as 'kaffirun'
Islamisation of the entire country is not possible in the long run because a lot of militant factions, non-state actors have been weaponised by politicians and these factions often times go rogue and start constituting nuisance. These factions will push back and throw the entire country into chaos.