₦airaland Forum

KingEbukasBlog:
Wise man

DeepSight:
It is not true that many adhere to religion and have no faith? It is not true that many have faith and adhere to no religion?
It is not true that faith is what I described it as: belief or hope in an idea, person or expectation?

Ranchhoddas:
Arrrgggh...Pride. I give up. You have made a decision and you have to live with it. [s]I hope you do not rue this decision on your deathbed[/s]:p:p

DeepSight:
Absolutely wrong sire.

There is indeed a difference between religion and faith. Many adhere to a religion and have no faith. Many have faith and adhere to no religion. I have faith and I do not adhere to any religion. Indeed, what is faith but belief and hope in something: in an idea, a person or an expectation? I have great faith in myself, I have great faith in love and I have immense faith in the grand order of all things (which many may call "the will of God" ).

In the grand scheme of things - a scintilla of which we cannot even conceive or apprehend, we are way too presumptuous to begin to judge and conclusively assess the justice of the Grand Order of things: of eras and epochs which we cannot and will never be able to conceive in the bird's eye view trajectory: we grope: worse than the blind men about an elephant: and ridiculously declare that which we know not.

Of all people: you ought to know better.

DeepSight:
A person is indeed very lightly attached a a car. Only the body rides in it really.

The rest of what you wrote simply shows that you have not improved in your thinking over the last few years. Enjoy yourself.

PastorAIO:
Oga, I didn't ask you the quality of the question, whether it was a good question or not, neither did I ask you if you'd asked the question before.

I asked in direct response to your claim that just as a car carries a person so does a body carry a person.

Your other vague wishy washy notion of being lightly attached to some wishy washy thing such as mind or soul or whatever does not tally with your definite statement that

"A car carries a person in the same way as a body carries a person."





A person in a car is not 'lightly attached' to the car.

Ranchhoddas:
Instead of you to dey thank me for this free job wey I dey do for you, you dey there dey yarn another thing, na wa for you self.

Ranchhoddas:
Not necessarily. I am just feeling like Sigmund Freud. I know I'd make an excellent psychoanalyst.

Teespice:
relationship advice and marital advice are two different things oga.

I doubt I have seen her give marital advice.

Ranchhoddas:
I know say you no fit. I have impeccable instincts. Your silence is understood- Tacit assent.

Ranchhoddas:
I dare you to deny my claims in clear terms. State categorically that you have no designs on that lass and shut the gates of Ishi's kingdom to you forever. It's a dare.....Think carefully before you respond, your next reply might have dire consequences.

An0nimus:
See as you expose Logicboy minsitry. Not fair mehn



LB na checkmate be this, don't take the bait

Ranchhoddas:
I have decided to construe this comment as an agreement with my initial postulation.

Ranchhoddas:
I have impeccable instincts and you are yet to deny my allegations. Let's face it, she's smart, pretty and [size=14pt]nasty on the side[/size]. Just what you desire in a dame. Delay is dangerous bro. Man up!!

Ranchhoddas:
You did not deny it. This is your chance to come out clean. She's clearly not sensitive to reverse psychology.

Ishilove:
It is his female relatives that are the old cargoes.

He stalks me on Nairaland but I've realised he is a pathetic, attention seeking little brat so I ignore him most times. On the rare occasions I throw bits of attention at him, he goes over the moon with joy

Ranchhoddas:
After following you as logicboy for years, I have come to the conclusion that you have a thing for that lady. You just have a crazy way of displaying it. This might just be love and you know that true love is hard to find. Don't fight it bro. *runsoutofthread*

Nancy2016:
Was it necessary to call her 'old cargo'? Didn't your mother teach you how to talk to ladies?

Ishilove:
Now make like a rat and scram. You've exhausted your monthly ration of attention

Ishilove:
In your rush to troll, you failed to read and comprehend my post.

Go back and reread the first line, this time S-L-O-W-L-Y...

Ishilove:
Your stupidity is spine chilling. Must you stalk me?

If you must troll, troll with sense and reason.

Ishilove:
Many times I refrain from dishing out marital advice because hey, I'm not qualified, but it just makes me mad when I see some youngsters commenting on marital issues.

There's one particular poster here who goes from thread to thread in this section dishing out bullshit. Initially I thought she was married, only to find out she wasn't and not only that, was lying about her age and maternal status (she lied she has a child). She's one of those who scream 'divorce' at every given opportunity.

There's another kid, about 23/24 from romance section who doesn't even have a girlfriend, yet I see him telling married folks how to solve their marital challenges.

Some years back I was gisted about one poster here, a married man who comes to this section, all sanctimonious and _shit, preaches, gives sound counsel on marital issues, meanwhile at home he's all shades of Tyson on his hapless wife. I was flabbergasted.

Do we talk about the married users who fell into coogar's sexual trap?

Or the user here, married to another user (they're separated now) who claims to be a bible thumper, spirit filled and born again, who gives 'sound counsel', is a feminist and all that tosh. She's spirit filled alright, just not the Holy Spirit. Lives on government benefits but comes online to present the perfect life.

My point is this: people marry for the wrong reasons and in this age of social media, they come online to seek counsel from individuals who don't even know what marriage is all about, or people who also married for wrong reasons, so how can contemporary marriages last?

DeepSight:
Its just as obvious that a moving ball must have been acted upon by a force or trigger outside of itself.

It's that simple, you dodo.

DeepSight:
Its interesting but escapist.
Elements of it here and there are true: regardless: [size=14pt]the Creative Factor of our Reality transcends this reality.[/size]
It is flawed in that regard.

KingEbukasBlog:
Alright then .

So as an atheist ,why do you think the pantheist's view of the universe as god wrong ?

KingEbukasBlog:
As an atheist ,why do you think the pantheist's view of the universe as god wrong ?



Polytheism is the worship of many gods .

KingEbukasBlog:
What's your view on Pantheism bro .

DeepSight:
Did you fall off your bed and crack your skull this morning sire?
Your puerile low self esteem has always been a problem for me. I don't understand how any human can think so little of himself as you do.

DeepSight:
Where is Plaetton. He is Pantheist too. Come here Sire.

blueAgent:
The Bible does not support Slavery.it has been proven here on Narialand.

It was christains who stopped Slavery.(Williams Wilberforce and others).

blueAgent:
Christainity did not introduce Slavery to Africa.
Slavery have existed in Africa for over 600yrs before the Whites and Christainity came to Africa.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_slavery

psalmz:
Jackbizzle and Ishilove have a history of beef between them so don't believe anything he says.

When you wanted to prove sukkot has been chatting with yu since 2014 you pulled out link in less than 30 mins so why haven't you pulled out links to prove she is chasing yu? The babe has been hollering at you to post the contents of the mail so you have no reason not to post it.

I have been following this thread from the beginning and from what I'm seeing she is following sukkot, not you. If she appears on a thread where you at, its becos sukkot brought her there and not becos she's following u.

Guy look in the mirror. Yu and I know this is all about beef. It's all shades of messed up accusing someone of something when you know it's a lie. Guy, yu fvck up.

I'm out. Peace