₦airaland Forum

God will save us all from scandals

obi58:
bros

u sure u know what u r doing?

the listed accord in the pix is manual not automatic.

i dnt think he knows. Hes marketing without putting a number u can reach on

obinnaven:
Aircon - Factory fitted very very very Cold
Colour - wine
Cylinder - 4plugs
Fuel - Petrol
Gearbox - Automatic
Model Year- 2003
Vehicle Type -Honda Accord
Car Stereo -WMA/AAC CD DECK with 4 side speakers , 2 Back bigger speakers , 4 side twitters.
Doors - 4 doors
Interior –Fabric Seats
Power Steering-Yes
Power window.-yes
Tyre: 4 New Tyres with Alloy wheel

Asking price:1.8M
if interested call or text ,

Nigerians like to doubt everythng. Some will doubt the date their parents say they were born.

Live now on joy sport. Scfreiburg vs Entraintfrankfurt multi tv

Bayern munich forever

Mr Abu, what do you want here?
[quote author=Abuzola ! link=topic=159075.msg6764493#msg6764493 date=1284641605]'and whoever disbelieve, do not let his disbelief grieve you. To Us (ALLAH) is their returns and We shall inform them what they have done. Verily Allah is All knower of what is in the heart (of men). We let them enjoy for a while then in the end We shall oblige them to enter a great torment' Quran 31:23-24[/quote]

Islam is a hoax

@nopuqeater has anything been mentioned on this thread that concerns islam?

We shdnt deceive ourselves, if jonathan gets the PDP ticket, he would win the election

We shdnt deceive ourselves, if jonathan gets the PDP ticket, he would win the election

Ok lets make it even. You started it and i'll end it

thehomer:
I see you've resorted to quote mining. You seem to remind me of some other outrageous Nairaland character. Anyway, I'm done with you. Feel free to return when you're better able to evaluate information.

As per quote mining, may be its cos of my job of that entails investigation
when u are chanced, u might want to let me know the outrageous Nairaland character
I ve always been able to evaluate information my man.

---

Take care, we might be some other time to have a friendly discussion soon

I feel like letting u be on this subject, cos it seems u are running out of gas. One more throw before i go

thehomer:
You would be better off trying to understand what was being evaluated which is how many threads a person has to respond in will one be considered to be obsessive.

There was an error in ur evaluation lets see

[quote author=thehomer on: August 24, 2010, 10:26 PM »]I have responded on less than 7 of these topics. And more recently, on three of them.[/quote]and this
[quote author=thehomer on: August 25, 2010, 03:15 PM »]Though from what you've posted here, it seems I've already replied in 8 of your topics.[/quote]well thats what im talking about

---

thehomer:
You don't seem to understand it. You may need to go through it again.

I understand it well well. You need to do an overview on it

thehomer:
You could simply paste this scenario and what you understand about it here

U posted it in the first place, tell us what u were talking about

thehomer:
Ohh? This is even worse. You don't know if you would offer advice on something you know nothing about.

It may be worse to u but not to reasonable people
Yea any crime in that? i don't know means when the time comes then i may decide on offering advice or not. I don't know until that thing comes up

thehomer:
I omitted a word there. Here is the question again.
Will you accept advice from someone who knows nothing about what is being discussed?

What caused the omission? were u drinking? lol

thehomer:
I asked because you were wailing that it may be more than that to you. And of course, you've been trying to evade answering and failing at it.

Im not evading it, If u had asked first, i may have told u. Rather u guessed first. So im angry with u

thehomer:
You can simply present your evidence on what you considered frivolous and let me make it clear enough for you to understand.

No No No No. U made some statements which wasn't part of ur discussions on those threads. Try to relate the actions to what frivolous means is what im telling to do

thehomer:
I already answered this please go back, read and understand what I've posted.
Have you read the New Testament that refers to Jesus?

No i haven't, that was why i asked how did u know God has a son and you are yet to answer till now. Im u know best purposely evading.

thehomer:
[b]I don't think I have the time or energy to even start trying to satisfy you [/b]on any issue with the difficulties you've been displaying here.
It seems I'll just have to take Deep Sight's advice.

Thats a lie. Im not satisfied yet. If u quit, i quit as well and vice versa

toba:
@ jesus what is happening between you and the thread author?

It doesn't concern u. Stay out of this

thehomer:
Again you show how difficult it is for you to evaluate proportions.

Whats this u are saying. Who did the evaluation what is me or u?

thehomer:
Go and read my posts there.

I have already done that. Tell me whats new

thehomer:
Nasty scenario?

Yea pls check it out, its on the previous page

thehomer:
Ahh your poor logic keeps manifesting itself. You should also understand how the word "proof" should be used in such a discussion.
Now please answer this simple question. Would you offer advice if you know nothing about what is being discussed?

I don't know

thehomer:
Will accept advice from someone who knows nothing about what is being discussed?

Does the above make sense? I can really get it

thehomer:
You really should try to remedy your ignorance.
Whatever you use here as your username is your handle.

If u are so sure its a handle why then did u ask if jesus was actually my name outside of Nairaland?

thehomer:
You go ahead and do that. You're also free to present the evidence of the posts being frivolous since you're making the claim.

U asked a question on the use of the word frivolous, which i directed u on what to do and u are yet to do so pertaining to the subject thread

thehomer:
How difficult is it to comprehend? Here let me spell it out for you.
Your handle here is "jesus." (Check your posts it's right next to them).
The name of the Messiah in the New Testament was "Jesus". Do you now understand the reason for the comparison?

No the question is how do u know God has a son? Once u answer this, i would be half satisfied

thehomer:
Wow you must really love being embarrassed.

No, u should direct the statement to your self. U did the mis calculation and not me

thehomer:
So do you actually think posting in 8 out of 111 is obsessive? You now also wish to add a poor ability of evaluation to the mix.

Yes and the poor 'ability of evaluation' was displayed by u after all 7 and 8 aren't the same no?

thehomer:
There you've stated it. The thread was about two issues being considered simultaneously. And you claim to be able to understand.

How do u reason? two issues and how many of those issues were u guys arguing about out of the two?

thehomer:
What do you mean? I already told you that the reason for this thread was from the previous one. You really need to resolve your confusion or clarify what you're saying.

U are looking for a run away tactics. Go and review the nasty scenario u posted Mr man

thehomer:
This coming from you? Just read the question in the first line of your quote.

Whats wrong with it?

thehomer:
I see. How did you expect me to understand that from the below quote? Also, what do you mean by the last sentence there?

thehomer:
Do you think they seem to mean the same thing?

Any way, do you see the sort of reasoning you're demonstrating here? Would you offer advice if you know nothing about the subject being discussed? Would you listen to a person who knows nothing about the subject being discussed? Your poor logic knows no bounds.  

Whats this trash u are saying here? why don't u prove that anyone who offers advice must be implying that he/she has prior knowledge to the topic he/she is trying to give advice on and stop chasing shadows

thehomer:
There is no reason for me to take it as your real name but it is your handle on this forum. Again, you may wish to note that many nairalanders do not use their real names here; just handles.

Tell me something. Why the word 'many' how do u know that 'many nairalanders do not use their real names here; just handles' ? if u are told to prove it, u will then display your poor evaluation ability. Why do pple like u homer like talking trash. If u believed that im using a handle on NL thats your problem and IF u also believe other wise thats also your problem. I stand to loose or gain nothing from u as regards that. What im telling u to stop making wrong guesses which is usual of u

thehomer:
Again, responding in 7 or 8 or 20 out of 111 is obsessive? You need to get your ability of evaluating proportionality checked.

U better keep quite and don't embarrass your self more. U displayed poor evaluation technique yet u still have mouth to talk abi? U did the evaluation your self and not me

thehomer:
Which ever came first I'm asking now, is it your real name? You must really love trying to evade but you just don't know how to do it.

It seems u have a challenge. It took u time to concede that u made the guess before asking the question( putting the cart before the horse), yet  U still have the gouts to ask this question after saying this

thehomer:
There is no reason for me to take it as your real name but i[/b]t [b]is your handle on this forum. Again, you may wish to note that many nairalanders do not use their real names here; just handles.

U need to examine your reasoning ability. Why asking when u ve already said the bolded words. isn't it obvious that u are embarrassing your self here?

thehomer:
Again your confusion manifests itself.

Its your comprehension challenge thats being displayed

thehomer:
For evidence presented, review the responses I've given on some of OLAADEGBU's threads.
I see that you're still learning to use the quotation marks. I see you wish to redefine frivolous. You really need to review my posts on the relevant topics.

Just keep quite. U have the internet to log on to. Find out what 'frivolous' means and we then relate it to your posts on the subject threads and see if they do not match.

thehomer:
I already answered them on #18
You need to stop embarrassing yourself here.

Lets see your response on post 18  to my question

[quote author=jesus. on August 24, 2010, 09:37 AM]U haven't answered the questions i asked. here they are again
'son of God? how do u know God has a son? and that i have a handle similar to that of his son?'[/quote]your response


[quote author thehomer on August 24, 2010, 10:12 AM]I don't know this but you seem to be a Christian
[quote][/quote]Can u now see that u are embarrassing your self? u made a comparison and yet u couldn't support your claim with any evidence. Does that make any sense to u?

                                              [size=15pt]How do u know God has a son thehomer[/size]

I first felt the need not to reply the bull.crap u ve posted, but nonetheless i would still do to expose ur folly

thehomer:
It seems you're quite confused . You claimed that I know too much. It seems that I have now come across a person that has not made any errors.

You are the confused one if u don't know as can be depicted from ur posts
Your errors of mis calculation/judgement kept on occurring even on this same thread that u authored. ur 'knowing too much' is in quote as revealed in my posts

thehomer:
Of course keep shaking your head. You should first try to understand what was being counted.

Why wouldn't i? who's doing the counting and who made the number error?

thehomer:
The logical approach would have been for you to wait until such an incident occurred here.

Yea i indeed waited and discovered that u said 7 topics wheres u posted in 8. no?

thehomer:
And what was the topic of the thread? You really seem to have some comprehension issues.

Hear this guy, ur comprehension challenge is incredible. Let me help u out. There were two things on the thread that concerns the pope. gay marriage and abortion. U both were arguing on just one of it which is abortion and he(toba) said nothing about the other subject, but out of ur overzealousness u alleged that he was defending the pope on the other subject which he never did. Go review the post to see if what i said about u is wrong u liar

thehomer:
You should try to realize that you are making claims about me that I'm trying to point out to you as being unreasonable.

The claims are based on ur antecedence no? yet u did the same thing i said here again

thehomer:
Of course not.

Yes i cant even imagine such

thehomer:
I think you need to clarify what you were saying then.

I know u would claim u didnt get the gist as u seldom do. U brought up a scenario on the previous page, im simply telling that ur scenario isnt applicable here. Thats all.

thehomer:
And what's the relevance of this statement? You can point out the questions I asked that were irrelevant or the ones that seem insensible to you. I've done the same for one of yours but you seem unable to grasp what you posted.

U see u have a great challenge, was my statement a question mr ITK?
here it is again
[quote author= jesus. on Yesterday at 11:22:31 AM]But its possible to ask irrelevant or insensible questions at times[/quote]May be u ve done that before or intend to do such now or later

thehomer:
Your confusion is starting to show glaringly. You claimed I was all knowing. I've pointed out to you that what you posted made little sense to me. I was hoping that you would clarify it.
Here it is for anyone who can interpret it for me to understand what you're trying to say.

If u weren't confused u should have gotten it easily. Let me help u out. U said if any one advices, then by implication the advisor must know about the subject. I simply asked does it mean no one can advice except he/she has prior knowledge of the subject. Thats the question are to help ur comprehension challenge

thehomer:
Here is my original quote. It also looks like you have some problems understanding the order of the sentence.

I ve said it, that are a liar and a bloody one. I challenged on why u were doubting that jesus wasnt my real world name other than it being a 'handle' for the forum

This is a quote from OLAADEGBU to u 'Yes, that's what 'am talking about. All of your 70 posts bar 1 were all posted this year alone, a[b]nd you know that you were stretching the truth [/b] when you said that you only replied in 7 of my threads/topics, stretching the truth always have its own way of coming back to haunt you, and as they say "Nothing else ruins the truth like stretching it".'

Thats exactly what u are doing lies lies and lies

thehomer:
You may wish to note that the question (the sentence that ended with the question mark) came before the name comparison.

Lying again im talking about ur doubt about my real name being jesus and not on the issue of comparison. Stop pretending and get really guy.
Which one came first? ur guess or the asking about my real name? why didn't u ask about the name being jesus before u jumped the gun and referring to it as a 'handle' on NL was the point i was making. Stop lying Mr

thehomer:
It seems you're deeply confused. You should realize that whenever you post on a thread, your handle appears right beside it. That was how I knew what it was.

Who’s talking about this with u? U should be telling this to ur self and not to me mr u are simply confused. Read my statement before this one and get ITK. The gist is about ur guess that's not been factual

thehomer:
It doesn't but you seem so hung up on it that I had to ask to clear up all the noise you're trying to generate here.

What noise have u cleared? Rather u’re making more

thehomer:
Of course that would be your opinion. I wonder, how do you decide on what makes a post frivolous? It seems you really dislike having evidence presented to you. If you're this interested, you can still comment on those threads I don't think they're locked yet.

What evidence(s) have u provided? Like u said 'u need to connect to the internet'. Then Google/ask from online dictionary meaning of the word frivolous and check with ur posts on the threads in question to see if there isn't a match

thehomer:
And here you are asking questions that have been answered.

I just have to shake my head at a character such as yourself. Deepsight tried to explain the basic stuff to you to save you from embarrassing yourself but you just seem determined to continue doing that.

Show me where u ve answered the questions. 'Which new testament are u talking about' and 'how do u know God has a son'
U are the one embarrassing ur self with lies and mis calculation

thehomer:
But hey you're the one pointing out my all knowing ability. Disinformation is actually just a euphemism for what he was spreading.

U can decide to be more direct or even use more offensive words rather than the euphemism of disinformation adopted by ur self, i careless. Get it the 'all knowing ability' which i used in describing u is in quote, i hope u understand with ur wrong guesses and errors u make and later say ' i rectified it'

thehomer:
Ok here it is.
OLAADEGBU has created 111 topics as of the time of my review. I have responded on less than 7 of these topics. And more recently, on three of them. This makes the ratio < 7:111. Do you think that this is overzealousness?

See above OLAADEGBU has defended himself. Its called obsession. Rem hes a man and not a woman just imagine
'My last count of your response to the threads I started was 70 posts out of just 8 topics!'
I just shake my head imagining the sort of person u are

thehomer:
Why would I?

Cos u done it in the past and could possibly repeat such errors here

thehomer:
Were the comments frivolous? You really should read through those posts and try to understand what you read there.

The lies in ur comments were. U said the guy defended the pope on the gay issue, whereas he never said any thing about gay marriage. What can u call that

thehomer:
Do you think someone can actually post replies on this forum while being unconscious?

Yes a good example is u the 'all knowing homer'

thehomer:
Yes it is. It happens in conversations. I hope you do have conversations from time to time.

Yes but not with people like u

thehomer:
Why not? The reason for which I decided to start this thread was from that previous one.

Why don't u go re-read the scenario to see what im talking about. Guy its isnt applicable at all

thehomer:
I've found out that asking questions is a very efficient way of finding out other people's opinions. You may wish to try this sometime.

But its possible to ask irrelevant or insensible questions at times

thehomer:
You might need to rephrase your question here. I really don't understand how you got the last line there from what I said. Or are you mistyping something there?

Rem u are 'all knowing' try to figure it out. Im not like u that makes rectification. Go read again to get the gist

thehomer:
You should read that post again. I did ask first.

You are a bloody liar Why then did u post this

thehomer:
I meant handle as in pseudonym. I'm guessing that jesus is not your real name.

and later said this

thehomer:
It's based on your handle here "jesus." which is similar to that used to address the "Messiah" in the New Testament.
Or to put this part to rest, is "jesus." the name you were given at birth or a name you have legally adopted?

Did u first asked or guessed?

thehomer:
Here you go again. Why don't you simply answer the question about the relationship between your handle here and your given or legal name.

How does it affect ur life?

thehomer:
I think you need to go through all those threads and try to understand the concepts raised there.

What other concept were there. One was on the issue of the pope and gay marriage whilst the other was on whether all the unanswerables for science could be attributted to a metaphysical being. And on both threads u made frivolous posts.

thehomer:
What other New Testament is there? Please present me with a list so I can clearly pick it out for you.

U talked about new testament which one is it?

thehomer:
I think I've answered them all or at least most of them. Just answer that simple question and put all this to rest.

No u ve not

thehomer:
Please point out how I contradicted myself.
I've already answered this on post #18 is there any word or phrase there that you did not understand?

How do u know God has a son?

^ u now bi correct guy

Deep Sight:
^^^ Nope, I disagree - and here's the proof -

Quote from: jesus. on Yesterday at 09:00:42 PM
Which readily shows Mr. Jesus did not grasp the usage.

- but its none of my business anyhow. I should shut my mouth and await noetic/ thehomer to progress the original discourse.

U are still talking nonsense. that was done on purpose to ask him what he meant in the context of it being used,which he did. If u reasoned well u would know im on the internet and its easy to Google out any word that might be difficult

handle could mean any of the following

Be in charge of, act on, or dispose of

Interact in a certain way

Touch, lift, or hold with the hands

Handle effectively
A way of understanding or controlling something

Show and train

and lot more. Pls don't make me angry DS

^^ u dey mind the guy. Another ITK

Deep Sight:
^^^ Mr. Jesus, the word "handle" as used by thehomer refers to a pseudonym - "psuedonym" here refers to the adopted name you use on nairaland. The adopted name you use on nairaland is "jesus". For this reason thehomer simply means that since you adopted that name, perhaps you might also have some perspectives on the famous one called "Jesus of Nazareth."

Don't push it. Its embarrasing you ddn't get that.

Whats this one saying. Seems u just woke up from slumber and posted in a haste. Who's talking about the meaning of 'handle' in the context of it being used here. Cant u read my post on the various quotes, are they all talking about 'handle'?

He asked if my real name is jesus after first claiming thats its a handle(my forum name) thats what i said in my post above in response to his question. Also making a comparison which was what the last part of my post was centered on

I dont know who requsted ur assistance here as regards 'handle'

thehomer:
My obsession with God and Olaadegbu? Are you fine with his spreading disinformation? That may be fine with you but not with me. As long as this is an open forum and I'm a member, I will selectively post where I wish.
You may need to review what you mean by and "obsession with him" because he has started numerous threads. Can you present a ratio of threads he has started that I've responded in to the number of threads he has started? I think it would be quite low.

Yea just feel free to display ur 'all knowing' ability since u claim that another person is 'spreading disinformation'.
In fact use same 'knowledge' to present the ratio since this directly concerns you

thehomer:
I made a request and he accepted. This is how polite and civilized individuals relate with one another.

Really i hope u wouldn't make allegation(s) against noetic to be 'spreading disinformation' upon concluding the discussion

thehomer:
You may need to further properly review the threads of those posts. If I did make allegations that were not true, I rectified them. Review those posts.

I may then say u actually admitted to have made unwarranted error and could possibly have been as a result of overzealousness or being unconscious when the post was made before being rectified

thehomer:
That is reasonable activity on an open online forum.

To make frivolous comments and posts and later rectify is also part an open online forum

thehomer:
[b]We had started a conversation though it was on another thread,[/b] it pertained to this topic.
I guess you have a different concept of what overzealousness and irrationality actually are.

Thk you which means the scenario is brought up isn't applicable on this thread

thehomer:
What channel would that be?

sems u know how to ask questions. Give it a try once more i may oblige u then

thehomer:
Try to understand what you were doing. [b]You were trying to advice someone else thereby implying that you probably had some opinions on the topic at hand. [/b]People don't try to offer advice if they feel the person they're trying to advice already has a good enough grip on the situation.

This is increadible. where did u get this logic from? OMG i hope u wouldnt want to discuss with noetic with this kind or reasoning. If u do that im sure this thread might not end well. U mean for u to advice on a subject implies u have 'probably had some opinions on the topic at hand'?
So no man/woman could possibly give advice with prior knowledge or experience on the subject?

thehomer:
I couldn't have known that until I actually asked.

Why didnt u ask instead of first comparing and talking about 'handle'? u placed the cart before the horse

thehomer:
That was a guess on my part and I fully admit this to be the case. How is this overzealousness? Of course to you I do seem to know a lot but remember that I am connected to the Internet while accessing this forum.

U must really be 'good at wrong guessing" Im sure thats what u probably have done on the thread u and toba had issues on some of ur posts which u found to be wrong before u rectified. Hope u would do same here if u erred by chance

thehomer:
Do you have another one that I may be referring to?

Ridiculous question. U talked about new testament, Kindly tell me the new testament u were referring to

thehomer:
Of course you may wish to retreat and run when the question has been posed directly thereby cutting off your long stories and poor attempts at evasion.
Or you could answer the question resolving the issue once and for all.

How many of mine have u answered mr guesser/ mr rectifier?

thehomer:
How have I contradicted myself? There is a reason why the phrase "Son of God" is in quotation marks.
You may also want to understand the meaning of the word "irrational" because I don't think you're using it correctly.

that one nah story
here it is

'son of God? how do u know God has a son? and that i have a handle similar to that of his son?

thehomer:
Overzealous? Moi? I don't think so. How have I claimed to know too much?

U may not think so, but  u are an overzealous person. Typical example is the way u go about your obsession with God and Olaadegbu. Where ever he goes or start of a thread u seem to 'know' too much and jump in to start questioning his posts no?

Point 2 U conceived this same thread on same in which noetic on the other thread made a post to the author and u jumped in to make a request from noetic which led to this subject thread no?

Point 3  I went through your previous posts and saw that not once but twice and on two separate threads u made allegations on Toba's posts which weren't true, that made him backed out of the discussion No?

So what do u call the above actions of yours?

thehomer:
Try to understand the scenario. Two people are speaking and a third person tries to offer some advice to one of the speakers is it irrational to think that maybe the advisor has some other interesting insights that he/she may wish to share?

Let me help u out. Two pple havent started speaking as regards this thread cos when i made my post on the advice, noetic was yet to respond to your questions isnt that true?
In your case its overzealousness and irrational

thehomer:
If you did not wish to answer them, you could have simply said so.

Why did u ask me in the first place was my advice directed to u? May be u wanted an advice from me as well which i might have given if u sort through the right channel

thehomer:
If the Government heard you were trying to advice me and they extend an invitation to you too would you actually consider this as acting irrationally?

Yes cos there was nothing in my advice that directly points to me wanting to be part of the discussion. As in this case was there any of such in my post to noetic?

thehomer:
I'm the one extending the invitation. I don't have to invite everyone that shows up on the thread to discuss the topic. [/b]I will simply invite who I may want to have a conversation with.

Means u took a wrong step by inviting someone who might not want to honour your invitation based on hs/hr perception of your antecedence.

thehomer:
It's based on your handle here "[b]jesus." which is similar to that used to address the "Messiah" in the New Testament.

Thats a bull crap. How do u know that jesus isnt my real name to have alleged that its a fictitious name? Thats sure overzealousness and 'ITK' on your part

which new testament are u referring to?

thehomer:
Or to put this part to rest, is "jesus." the name you were given at birth or a name you have legally adopted?

I would have loved to answer u, but wouldn't. Reason being that u have said its 'Handle' and u now got your reasoning back to ask a logical question at the wrong time. U should have asked this before irrationally talking about Handle no? MR questionnaire. U got it wrong this time

thehomer:
I don't know this but you seem to be a Christian. With regards to the handle, see above.

Im happy u are contradicting your self. How come u dont know and yet u compared me with the 'son of God' ? Could either mean u are a liar or just made another irrational post

thehomer:
Pending his arrival, would you like to attempt them? Since you have a handle similar to that of the "Son of God", you might have some previously unconsidered insight.

U said the above, now defend your statement u said i don't know. How come? My handle is similar 'yes' how do u know  God has a son? simple

Here he goes agin the overzealous homer who claims to know too much

thehomer:
I only asked since you seemed interested.

How did u know i seemed interested? to give advice now means an interest in wanting to have that same discussion? If thats what u think, i laugh at ur logic being displayed here.

If i read in the dailies of ur invite to the UK by the british Government for a discussion and inturn gives u an adivice of things that might be of help, does that means i want to go in ur place to the UK or means im interested in the topic to be discussed? I don't know what to say about u.
I hope its not on this irrational thinking that u want to base ur discussion with noetic16 on.
Atleast im not the only who contributed on the thread. Mazaje, Toba and Deepsight also did. Why didnt u direct such question to Deepsight, knowing mazaje is an atheist[b](and could possibly have same believe with yours)[/b] and DS is not?

thehomer:
I meant handle as in pseudonym. I'm guessing that jesus is not your real name.

Ur guess is also based on what? assumption or probability? cos this is ur first time of seeing that name being used for u to have made wrong guess?

U haven't answered the questions i asked. here they are again

'son of God? how do u know God has a son? and that i have a handle similar to that of his son?'

thehomer:
Pending his arrival, would you like to attempt them?

did my first post talked about me wanting to attempt or just an advice to noetic16?

thehomer:
Since you have a handle similar to that of the "Son of God", you might have some previously unconsidered insight.

which handle are u talking about? Giving advice now means having handle similar to that of another person?

son of God? how do u know God has a son? and that i have a handle similar to that of his son?

toba:
who have u directed the questions to?

To someone who believes in Gods existence or to the one who says 'no i havent seen or heard from God, therefore forecloses his existence?

I need to know, cus i like to answer your question, but need to know first if i should

its directed to me. lol

@noetic the questions asked are very relative and as such u may choose to answer in your own view and don't be pushed to the wall


cheers

Purist:
I wonder when Tudor became female.  She used to be male!

PPle can be deceitful at times

https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-297632.0.html

---

tpiah:
tudor no be only you dey this thread.

will you ever learn to post without excessive and unnecessary aggression.

May be in 2099

clefstone:
Jaaiztech u r being biased. Do u believe that in Sapele, Delta state Muslims block the road to the Mosque during their Friday service and nobody frowns at it. The truth is that christians r more tolerant to other religions than muslims. I am not saying this cos I am a Xtian but tell me how many times have u heard of religious crisis in the south.

Why wouldn't they be tolerant? Christians are followers of christ who lived an exemplary life, never fought with anyone or went to any battle. Unlike the Islamic leader who did the opposite of what christ did

toba:
You bit me to it. I would have said same thing.

If tudor is not dragging with noetic, he would either be dragging with u(jesus), toba, romeo4real, davidylan etc.

It doesnt make sense at all. Since everyone is entitled to hs/hr opinion, should you then crucify such for airing same?

This is absurd

---

Any way my guy how u dey? long time

Oga i dey o, nah all these trash they keep me off NL

[quote author=Tudór link=topic=497785.msg6594134#msg6594134 date=1282142730]Really daft basterd.

Again i post the quote I WAS RESPONDING to for t[b]his donkey:[/b]




Can this jackass [/b]show me how this above quote suggests ''



That according to you ''some muslims'' use the verses to justify their violence does that equate to islam being a ''confirmed'' violent religion as the quoted poster has suggested??


If [b]dimwits like you can ''confirm'' islam as violent and intolerant based on a few verses people misuse then I can equally ''confirm'' christianity as violent based on similar verses too in the bible. Simple
You want instances you senile old basterd?

Howbout www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/oct/07/iraq.usa - I guess going by the link christianity must be a violent war mongering  religion since GWB is a ''born again'' christian.

.

- Damn to you daft basterds christianity must be a violent faith.

Silly hypocritic fools. Allah is a violent bloodsucker because verses exist in the quran that ''some'' people use to justify violence but NO Jehovah is not violent
even though the same  verses and atrocities exist in the bible. .s[/quote]I just wonder if it would ever happen that Tudor would grow, show some maturity and exhibit traits of a person that has interpersonal skills and wouldn't result to abuses and insult like a tout.


Every 1 out of ur 4-5 posts is filled with insults and abuses. What sort of a person are u?. male, female or Hermaphrodite?


U need to change. U might decide to pounce on me, but trust i dey kampe to give it back to u as usual.

In fact u deserve a ban