₦airaland Forum

Misogynist2014:
I can't laugh! I am 100% sure that the Good Book is true.

Misogynist2014:
Like I said, Gen is not subject to Moses alone.

ifeness:
@johnydon22 @Misogynist2014. Now that it is obvious that the Bible is not Original,will Misogynist2014 stop using the word "God"? Will he accept gracefully that he had been deceived all along? Will he accept the series of evidence put before him and thank/apologies to the two gentle who have enlightened him about the flaws and plagiarism surrounding the bible?

Misogynist2014:
The Enuma Elis is a distortion of the account of Genesis, since Genesis happened in reality, its historicity is not subject to Moses alone. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enûma_Eliš It cannot destroy historicity of the Bible due to being a myth, no, it establish it! (Bible is independently verifiable)

21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him
not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their
imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an
image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and
fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness
through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their
own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped
and served the creature more than the Creator, who is
blessed for ever. Amen.

http://creation.mobi/myth-about-myths
@ Jonydon22
@ ifeness

Comparative mythology provides historical and cross-cultural perspectives
for Jewish mythology . Both sources behind the Genesis creation narrative
borrowed themes from Mesopotamian mythology, but adapted them to
their belief in one God , [5] establishing a monotheistic creation in
opposition to the polytheistic creation myth of ancient Israel's neighbors.
[16]
Genesis 1–11 as a whole is imbued with Mesopotamian myths. [17]
Genesis 1 bears both striking differences from and striking similarities to
Babylon's national creation myth, the Enuma Elish . On the side of
similarities, both begin from a stage of chaotic waters before anything is
created, in both a fixed dome-shaped "firmament" divides these waters
from the habitable Earth, and both conclude with the creation of a human
called "man" and the building of a temple for the god (in Genesis 1, this
temple is the entire cosmos). [18] On the side of contrasts, Genesis 1 is
uncompromisingly monotheistic , it makes no attempt to account for the
origins of God , and there is no trace of the resistance to the reduction of
chaos to order (Gk. theomachy , lit. "God-fighting", all of which mark the
Mesopotamian creation accounts. [5] It also bears similarities to the Baal
Cycle of Israel's neighbor, Ugarit . [citation needed ]
The Enuma Elish has also left traces on Genesis 2. Both begin with a
series of statements of what did not exist at the moment when creation
began; the Enuma Elish has a spring (in the sea) as the point where
creation begins, paralleling the spring (on the land – Genesis 2 is notable
for being a "dry" creation story) in Genesis 2:6 that "watered the whole
face of the ground"; in both myths, Yahweh/the gods first create a man to
serve him/them, then animals and vegetation. At the same time, and as
with Genesis 1, the Jewish version has drastically changed its Babylonian
model: Eve, for example, seems to fill the role of a mother goddess when, in
Genesis 4:1, she says that she has "created a man with Yahweh", but she
is not a divine being like her Babylonian counterpart. [19]
Genesis 2 has close parallels with a second Mesopotamian myth, the
Atra-Hasis epic – parallels that in fact extend throughout Genesis 2–11,
from the Creation to the Flood and its aftermath. The two share numerous
plot-details (e.g. the divine garden and the role of the first man in the
garden, the creation of the man from a mixture of earth and divine
substance, the chance of immortality, etc.), and have a similar overall
theme: the gradual clarification of man's relationship with God(s) and
animals. [13]

Misogynist2014:
What I mean is that, wasn't life on earth triggered by tiny particles?

Misogynist2014:
Though the Jews don't believe in Trinity because it hasn't been revealed, they at least believe in the (26 And God said, Let us make man in our image,) GODLINESS (plural distinct state bond by LOVE) which was hidden from the foundation of the world in order not to be mixed with gods.

That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet,
saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter
things which have been kept secret from the foundation of
the world.

Misogynist2014:
There will be at least a rainfall before December.

Misogynist2014:
Big bang

Misogynist2014:
If not by faith, how will I predict the future? If I have a very strong database, won't it be a walk in the park?

ifeness:
Even if they do,the bottom line is the story belonged to the Sumerians. They told it,not Moses. The answer still points towards Big Bang theory. We need to chill and let science figure out more or add the dots. Remember science deal with evidence and not assumption. God is a lie.

Misogynist2014:
Showing the absurdity in your post.

Misogynist2014:
Doesn't clay contain 'TINY PARTICLES'?

Misogynist2014:
Neither does it make it untrue. But you cling unto things because they have proven to be trustable
17 (As it is written, I have made thee a father of many
nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who
quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not
as though they were.
18 Who against hope believed in hope, that he might
become the father of many nations, according to that
which was spoken, So shall thy seed be.
19 And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own
body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old,
neither yet the deadness of Sarah's womb:
20 He staggered not at the promise of God through
unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God;
21 And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised,
he was able also to perform.

ifeness:
That was the original. The bible wrongly claimed humans were made from clay,but at least it was obvious genetic manipulations were made in a lab by many god-like beings who themselves had their own planet filled with millions of them. Just like us visiting another planet and out astronauts being worshiped as gods when they landed.

Misogynist2014:
TRINITY

Misogynist2014:
SUBSTANCE OF THINGS HOPED FOR, EVIDENCE OF THINGS NOT SEEN.

Misogynist2014:
What about their differences?

Misogynist2014:
Anu , the god of gods, agreed that their labour was too
great. His son Enki , or Ea, proposed to create man to bear
the labour, and so, with the help of his half-sister Ninki , he
did. A god was put to death, and his body and blood was
mixed with clay. From that material the first human being
was created, [size=20]in likeness to the gods.[/size]

26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, [size=20]after our
likeness[/size]: and let them have dominion over the fish of the
sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and
over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that
creepeth upon the earth.




HOW DO THEY CORRELATE?

ifeness:
What is that?

Misogynist2014:
Why not?

Misogynist2014:
I have a lot of things against Bible safely stored on my opera, which I open whenever I have nothing to do. When you have something 100% true, things like this are a walkover.