₦airaland Forum

kay1one2:
Still an apple tree. In one fruit all existed. Just like the Spirit is the giver of life. In Him we all were. The creation brought what was already in Him to existence to begin a journey that will be evidence of where and why we ended up at a part of eternity. Before time you existed in God. All this charade of living now is like a movie that will be played back at judgement to justify where one ends up; heaven or hell!

still an apple tree that is not that particular apple tree. . . so going by this . . Your god has a source which is different from him, and this source also has a source and this will only amount to a chain of infinite regress. .

kay1one2:
Who gave birth to the apple tree? The apple seed.
Who gave birth to the seed? The tree. As is with God.
Its like placing two mirrors in front of each other. He is from age to age. We're all finite but He isn't. That's the "cheat code" as to why we owe all to Him and regard Him as Almighty!

An apple tree cannot come from it's own seed because the seed that gave birth to an apple tree must be existence before the apple tree, so the seed must be from another apple tree. .

Misogynist2014:
Have you heard about 'missing link'?

Once upon a time, their were not even any link before until research, study and experiment (science ) found some, their are some still missing links which is why more study, research and experiments are needed and is still on going.

...

.......

kay1one2:
Yes.

Do you know what source means?

kay1one2:
The heavens first of all include the starry host. He is the source of all life including His. The Word is His tool for creation, the Son. And to add, if this were a science experiment, He can be proven through a personal relationship with Him.

He is the source of all life including his own . . .

kay1one2:
Because the Three existed from the Beginning as One!

You just said this

"the Spirit gives life". Hence God brought forth Himself from His Spirit and equally begot His Son/Word.

asserting it/he/she created itself from its spirit.. bringing something out from something means that thing is the source. . therefore you just asserted that god has a source which is the spirit and this spirit pre-exists before god. .

kay1one2:
If you claim to be igbo.

I don't claim to be sir. . . . Ina ada akam sounds very weird. . couldn't have been better to say "Ina awum na ani" instead of "Ina ada akam" this is the first time am hearing someone say that

kay1one2:
You're "falling" my hand.

..lmao.. in what way ni?

kay1one2:
I na da akam!

what language is that bro?

kay1one2:
Definitely not the "big bang"! But here's a sneak peak; "the Spirit gives life". Hence God brought forth Himself from His Spirit and equally begot His Son/Word. Hence once He was done with Himself, He began the Creation of the Heavens and the earth.

Ok seriously did you really read what you just wrote bro?

He brought forth himself from his spirit? Meaning His spirit was in existence before him. then he creates himself from his spirit. wooooow...

KingEbukasBlog:
God is self-existent , that's why He is the Almighty . He is the creator and you , one of his creations, are an evidence of His existence. Understand the basics first

And following this, someone can as well assert that the universe is self existent.

KingEbukasBlog:
Lmao , i bu onye igbo self . It was his rant that vexed me walahi . What could I have said na ,no be cert wey go proof person no be moro.n

Right on the contrary, am sure you know their are schools out there for slowpoke.s, and they gain certificares too...

So certificates proves nothing to anybody, just a statement is enough to deduct someone's intellectual prowess.

Anyways onye mgbu, abum complete nwa igbo zuru ezu, amadioha bu my paddy na . . just finished chilling with the nigga even sango and thor came . .

abeg make una face the discussion and stop the show me ur jamb stuffs.. i nearly piss my pants laughing ..

...

..

I wouldn't deny a tear escaped my eye when i read this. . . And a human being have the heart to kill another... in this horrible way.. #My heart bleeds badly..

#Sighs. . walks out of thread.

sell ur freaking daughters as slaves.. In the bible

Let us post pics of our wonderful link http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_slavery ... hehehehehe it just turned to the best memes ever

..And they just derailed the thread.. Am out

KingEbukasBlog:
For someone with a noble SAT score , waec , jssce , cov uni app test score ... jeez I hate blowing the trumpet , u guys force me to and I hate it !!

Ebuka so only SAT, waec, jssce, cov uni app test score

No uni degree, masters and the rest of them? . . . wow please enough with the certificate chapter ... **closes face**

Is the new trend in nairaland is operation show me your certificate ?

which happens to be only jamb and waec ... lol..

Nnam, can you stop the show me your certificate brouhaha? this is nairaland not ministry of education.

i.e - A-level certificate is not a determinant for intelligence talk more of O -level ...

Misogynist2014:
Since you love Wikipedia, try reading this link from beginning till the end, it will surely quench your ignorance. Just finished reading it.... articulate, non partial, true, orderly and well written.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_slavery

lol and you just shot yourself in the head with that link.. First the link clearly shows most slavery in the bible even sexual slavery.. a man selling his daughter to slavery and etc.. And you just finished yourself.

And again nowhere did the link stipulate that the bible ever said [size=20] Do not enslave anybody/ slavery is bad [/size] which has been the point my meme raised but you choose dabble into cheap defence and helped me castigate cheeky bible more..

from the link Exodus 21 a man can sell his daughter into slavery.. THE BIBLE FINDS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT..

Everybody please i recommend you read this link http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_slavery Our dear misogynist gave us and see where the bible said [size=20] Do not enslave it is bad [/size] hahahahaha

Misogynist2014:
..

Wooow i was looking really hard to see where it said [size=20] Do not own a slave or indulge in slavery[/size] But i couldn't see one. . You just posted about hebrew slaves. . . when the point we passed was No slavery . . . thanks for bringing that up bro, You just confirmed this pic.

Esdb3:
Wow look at this genius. So every dick and harry is on NL. And I told you already if you haven't been drinking from the lethe of insulting you'll remember

.

..lmao.. Google my name too, you will see many links to me.. its canon..

Now how dah fvck did you get to know ur own bernard shaw, u cant even say... Hahahahaha its obvious son

Esdb3:
So every dick and harry has links and pictures? I thought you were smart, now I know better.

google Johnydon22 you will surely see my nairaland link and my picture..

Now since their is no record of this your bernard shaw what so ever, How dah fvck did you get to know about the bernard shaw then?

Just say "Yes" I saw this shiit on internet and decided to poste it here because we have seen this made up crap like 4years ago..

..

ok... Good. at least next time get the spelling of Illuminati right

kay1one2:
Sometimes when you talk I laugh at your own ignorance attempted to be covered up with vile language. You're very uneducated I give that to you. The origins of the evolutionary theory begin with one unique or wonder cell giving birth to all creation. Lemme give you an example, in your bone marrow exist pluripotent cells capable of giving rise to virtually any kind of cell in your body. That's where the idea of a bone marrow transplant comes from. Now those cells cannot produce plant or cow cells because both cells are intrinsically different from each other. Some small cells like hiv virus only contain one strand of ribonucleic acid not the double strand like humans; dna. These differences make it impossible for one cell to birth all.
No fossil has been found linking dinosaurs to birds and that brings up the point "missing link"; a well known argument amongst scientists and evolutionists. You don't fall in any where that's why the term sounds strange to you. I study life for a living so I won't bother try bringing you up to my level. Just watch you fool around copying and pasting!

Hahahahahahaha this is a very typical example of you always throwing insults ...

You are still clinging to your misguided theory of evolution of a wonder cell arent you?

I have told you to define evolution, you cant!!!

But you are only interested in clinging to a very fallacious retarde.d myth you heard from probably another dummy.....

How can i discuss evolution with someone that dont even know what evolution is even after i have already defined it ..

#Sighs. . just another chance for him to vent out his frustration by insulting people. #TypicalChristianMorality.

kay1one2:
Ok. You came out of cosmic darkness that has nothing to do with evolution or science. You're really worth pitying!

You still cant define what science, big bang or evolution is can you?

cupid1:
it is common logic to say that there is a creator even if it isn't the jewish deity as portrayed in the bible. It would be foolishness to believe we just dropped from the sky or materialised from nothingness. Even if we were planted by some extraterrestrial race, they are still our creators. Thats why in my first post, i told the op ''keep calm and wait for judgement day-if it be real''.
Hope i explained it well enough.

Isn't it more logical to say "I dont know" than to assume a creator.

Since u believe that life can't evolve through a biological process without a creator then and following ur assertion that one must have a creator then this creator must also have a creator who in turn will also have creator and this will result to a chain of infinite regress cus following by ur analogy everything must have been created by something.

Is it not a more reasonable answer to say "I DONT KNOW" seeing that this particular subject is still under heavy study and research than just saying a creator being did it...

malvisguy212:
that's the points Paul is indicating, I don't understand what I hear is the nearest to say I don't hear. Let me give you an example;

Are u always like this
I dont understand is closest to i dont hear? . . Did you study anything in English at all?

malvisguy212:
The closer atheists have admits God exist is this, when you ask an atheist, what happened before the big bang? The answer is 'I don't know'. In other word, God did it.

You see ur life? If someone says i dont know, ur brain translates it to "god did it" are you theists always purposely dumb or just act like it? How is "I dont know " same thing as "god did it"? When someone says "I dont know" it mean he is saying that he doesnt know and that is it.. that he'd rather say "i dont know" than assume up a lie like you as theist who wil say "a god did it" when you lack knowledge about a phenomenon.

malvisguy212:
"did they hear the voice?yes, what did it say? If there reply was ' we do not understand,it will look like embarrassment to them, instead they say to Paul we do not hear the voice"

Note: acts chapter 9 was the actual incident but verse 22 was after the event.

Just as always, he brings in childish assumptions into it, the more you do this the more you contradict ur comic book...

I bid you to stop lying for once in your life for ur bible crap and be honest for once ... Look at what someone is saying and is proud of it.

So saying "we heard a voice but did not understand" will be embarrassing to them? . .says who? . . Do u really have to conjure up a cheap lie? ..instead they say to paul "We do not hear the voice" Which voice? if u didnt hear the voice how would u know there was a voice or do you just snap and say "i dont hear a voice?" ...I marvel at ur thinking honestly

Esdb3:
I called you a fool and will still call you again and again, because the point that 'THAT is ANOTHER BERNARD' can't stick in your grown head. I just showed you different causes of death, yet you are still blabbing. Ok.

Hahahahaha you still venting out your frustration with the insults huh?

..lmao... You still showing us a typical example of christian morality.

..Wait.. isn't it funny how you are unable to provide a link and pic of this your bernard shaw just like i did