K2039's Posts
Nairaland Forum › K2039's Profile › K2039's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 207 208 209 210 211 212 (of 212 pages)
chukwudi44: Biblically, Mary was a dirty, rotten, vile, sinnerAll our holiness is as filthy rag and Mary is not an exception.What makes her Virgin Mary up till now or Holy virgin of all virgins as she is called.When it is so obvious in the scriptures that she didnt remain a virgin througout her life. Besides whats the big deal about her being a virgin,afterall everyone is/was a virgin at a point in their liives. My point is,since Mary didnt remain her virgin througout her life,then the title virgin mary or Holy virgin of all virgins shouldnt be ascibed to her.Virgin all virgin would have made more sense had she remain a virgin her whole life. |
chukwudi44: Ol boy did moses rise from the dead or not? Is he still in the grave?all this talk about saints lying in the grave and awaiting the arch angels call is balderdash.Even if you choose not to believe the vision of judas macabees you should @ least believe the gospels.The saints in heaven can and are interceding for us.The catholic church have hundreds of thousands of postumous miraculous intervention by its saints.Am sure you refering to Luke9:30-31 30 And behold, there talked with him two men, who were Moses and Elijah; 31 who appeared in glory, and spake of his decease which he was about to accomplish at Jerusalem. How does this reflect your point that they are interceeding. [i]They descended from heaven to talk to Jesus,and ascended back to heaven after their discussion,[/i]is that your assumption. Well the bible never said anything about that,they definitely returned back to where they came from after the discussion and am sure it wasnt heaven. Have you heard of abraham bosom.Luke (16:22-23) |
chukwudi44: You have already proven you do not believe some parts of the scripture.So which moral authourity do you have over the homerHow did I prove that? |
chukwudi44: if you choose not to believe the vision of judas macabees you should @ least believe the gospels.The saints in heaven can and are interceding for us.The catholic church have hundreds of thousands of postumous miraculous intervention by its saints.And where is that in the gospel,that saints are interceeding |
chukwudi44: Maybe you don't know but the septuagint which was translated in 272 BCE by the 77 jewish scholars and which formed the greek OT was used by the apostles themselves.More than 70 percent of the old testament quotations in the new testament were sourced from the septuagint.So if even the apostles used the septuagint and regarded it as scripture who are you then to say it was not inspired.I understand where you coming from,but as long as their is no direct link,I mean "Scripture says..." or "The Law says...",then I still dont beleive it was quoted from the septuagint. Example:Examining statement A,B and C,where A is Sirach 28:2,B is Matthew 6:14 and C Mark 11:25 Sirach 28:2 But if you forgive someone who has wronged you, your sins will be forgiven when you pray Matthew 6:14 If you forgive others the wrongs they have done to you, your Father in heaven will also forgive you. Mark 11:25 And when you stand and pray, forgive anything you may have against anyone, so that your Father in heaven will forgive the wrongs you have done. For the fact that A is similar to B or C doesnt mean that B and C was quoted from A. Lets look at Matthew 4:7 and Exodus 17:2,the former is a qoutation from the later Matthew 4:7 "It is also written:Do not put the Lord your God to the test.That is a direct quotation. Exodus 17:2 So they quarreled with Moses and said, "Give us water to drink." Moses replied, "Why do you quarrel with me? Why do you put the LORD to the test?" My point is the fact that two statement are similar doesnt necessarily meant one was quoted from the other.Except you can show me a direct quotation |
chukwudi44: Maccabees is not part of the Biblical canon. The reason is obvious. The writer himself acknowledges that what he wrote was not inspired by God. He did not know if it wasBut the lettere of Paul is still relevant in the Church today,and besides the foundation of his letter is rooted on the precept laid down by Christ,he wasnt writing a fiction like Judas Macabees |
thehomer: 2 Chronicle 18:18 - 20 talks about God and the lying spirit. Use that as a reference in the Holy Scripture.2 Chronicle 18:18 - 20 Micaiah continued, "Therefore hear the word of the LORD: I saw the LORD sitting on his throne with all the host of heaven standing on his right and on his left. And the LORD said, 'Who will entice Ahab king of Israel into attacking Ramoth Gilead and going to his death there?' "One suggested this, and another that. Finally, a spirit came forward, stood before the LORD and said, 'I will entice him.' "'By what means?' the LORD asked. I dont understand your point,and the relevance to what we discussing,maybe you explain better.Sounds to me like you taking the bible out of context |
frosbel: Besides I do not believe in the vision of judas macabees or any catholic for that matter, I believe only in the vision of John the revelator regarding the prophecy of end times, judgement , salvation and punishment. Even demons can give people false visions.2 Maccabees 15:38-39 Good News Translation (GNT) 38 If it is well written and to the point, I am pleased; if it is poorly written and uninteresting, I have still done my best.39 We know it is unhealthy to drink wine or water alone, whereas wine mixed with water makes a delightfully tasty drink. So also a good story skillfully written gives pleasure to those who read it. With this I conclude. The so called maccabees wrote that crap,so why should I beleive him,when he isnt sure of what he wrote.The guy was just trying to write a fiction or a story,and someone is telling me this maccabees deserves to be in the bible. |
frosbel: No saint is praying for you now, it is a Hoax - do not be deceived.I agree totally |
italo: Do the "Catholics" you know really tell you that 'Mary is a saint because she's Jesus' mother' or are you deliberately lying to win the arguement?Ofcourse only on the basis that italo: She co-operated with God's grace and will.and the basis that she accepted Jesus Christ as her LORD and Savior,and also that she walked in the light of this points,will I accept that she is a saint. But ofcourse we dont have any document to prove that She walked in that light till her death,so where is the basis of Catholics making her a saint. Besides I dont beleive in your canonization of the blessed to conclude that the person is a saint,It is crap. |
italo: Does that mean that we should know nothing else? No Holy Spirit, no Bible, no pastor, nothing! Just Jesus?Lol,you didnt put Mary there,am really suprised. My point is all focus should be on Him,not one Mary,General overseer,Pope,Cardinal or Priest. Ofcourse Holy Spirit,Bible,pastor will definitely lead one to the knowledge of Christ.I just dont buy the idea of praying to some saints. |
italo: So you are saying that you and Joagbaje are on the same level as the mother of God abi? May God help youBiblically, Mary was a dirty, rotten, vile, sinner—just like you and me, and everyone else. The only sinless Person to ever walk this earth was the Lord Jesus Christ Himself (2nd Corinthians 5:21; Hebrews 4:15) Hebrews 4:15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are--yet was without sin. 2 Corinthians 5:21 God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. Mary was a sinner and needed a Savior just like everyone else. In fact, Mary called Jesus “God my Saviour” in Luke 1:47. Jesus is the precious Savior! Luke 2:11, “For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.” Amen. frosbel: Mary is NOT and I repeat NOT , I repeat again NOT , the MOTHER OF GOD. GOD has no MOTHER. Stop repeating these blasphemies , please.I agree with Frosel.Mary was never the mother of GOD,Even Jesus pre-existed Mary John 1:1 and John1:14 John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1:14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. |
thehomer: But he could always send out a lying spirit. How do you know he hasn't done so in this case?My justification is based on the Holy Scripture.I already showed you a reference John 14.Although their are lot of references.Besides do you beleive in the bible. |
thehomer: No there isn't. The existence of this Heaven too is in question.Jesus promised in John 14 that he would prepare a place for us. John 3:16 says that we have eternal life believing in christ so that is Gods promise and God cant lie! Numbers 23:19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? |
Joagbaje: She be ame a saint because she believed in Jesus. She is not more of asaint than any spirit filled christian,As far as am concerned the bolded phrase will be her only justification for being a saint and not that she is the mother of Jesus,because a lot of catholics that I know lay emphasis on "she is the mother of Jesus". Joagbaje,some folks need to here this "If Mary mother of Jesus is a saint as claimed by certain people then she is not more of a saint than any spirit filled christian" So may they reduce all the hype on Mary. For I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified 1 Corinthians 2:2. |
frosbel: I like your humble response.Thanks for the correction on the puntuation,copied it from NKJV. Your comment made absolute sense,so it will be unreasonable to pray to a dead person or beleive that a dead saint is interceding in heaven |
Joagbaje: heaven is only a temporary abode ,just for 7years. Our permanent abode is earth.On what basis was that assumption made. As far as am concern that is HERESY,except you can explain the basis for your assumption |
venorite: Chei,am so in love,if only she understands how its doing me |
chukwudi44: I actually meant macabees 15:12-16Maccabees is not part of the Biblical canon. The reason is obvious. The writer himself acknowledges that what he wrote was not inspired by God. He did not know if it was accurate or not.Hard to believe? Read 2 Maccabees 15:38-39 2 Maccabees 15:38-39 Good News Translation (GNT) 38 If it is well written and to the point, I am pleased; if it is poorly written and uninteresting, I have still done my best.39 We know it is unhealthy to drink wine or water alone, whereas wine mixed with water makes a delightfully tasty drink. So also a good story skillfully written gives pleasure to those who read it. With this I conclude. k2039: 2 Maccabees 12:43-46The bolded sentence says it all,that was only an assumption on his own part(Judas).That is his own opinion that atonement should be made for the dead.He read his own doctrine into the matter. |
italo: @OP, we know that the mother of God is in heaven. If you think she's in hell, good for you.How did you know?. Besides on what basis did she get into heaven?,on the basis that she was the mother of Jesus,just asking. |
DANILSA: But I want to put it to u all that GEJ will not be defeated,How? GEJ will strengthen the electoral system thereby making Baba, IBB and PDP incapacitated, then he will try and pls the masses by working on major projects like power. Just my personal opinion.Honestly thats the smartest thing GEJ can do,the ball is in his court |
mekaboy:I dont think that is necessary,he will defeat all other pdp candidates,just as he did to Atiku in 2011,He is still the sitting president. I cant agree less with all your point,power,jail fuel subsidy thieves.I can assure you that he will win come 2015.Just that some Nigerians are myopic in their thinking,I know that some people will still vote against him because of some sentimental reasons,like party affliation,ethnicity etc,but like I read from ypzilanti's qoute on nairaland,'to fulfill the 'outlier' demographic in statistics. The theory that there will always be someone that is either uninformed, silly,unintelligent, malicious, or just having fun that will vote that the pope is not a catholic anytime you set that vote to a thousand people'.They will count has minority,and GEJ will win,provided power remains stable. |
sambos994: One solution people!!!Vote for any party but the PDP, simple as that!!!Voting based on what.........? GEJ still has two and the half year or thereabout left,if he does well in the remaining years,I will personally campaign for him.Besides if power remains stable as it is now,he as my vote.I think voting should be based on what each candidates record.And what gives you the assurance that another party wont be worse,afterall ''Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason''. |
Politics is only as good as the people who make it their calling and those who put them into office either by voting or refusing to vote. The maintenance of good government is dependent on good people |
yinchar: I cant believe that for close to 13years that PDP have nothing to offer, some nigerians can still be thinking of voting for PDP againPoliticians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. |
shaybe baby: It is in your opinion but I am saying there are other factors as well. This is but one of many issues you will face in your union. Should we chuck our partners everytime there's a difference of opinion or try to work around those differences. Are you saying that if she attends the same church as you but is a total b**ch at home you'd be happier? She has every right to her faith as do you, it is a fundermental human right. If you can't respect each other, free each other and look for someone who shares the same faith with you but don't go thinking that marriage will be more successful. It might not and what will you do in that instance? Love the person you are with.There was a mutual agreement about the church they were going to attend as a couple before they approached the alter(she agreed acording to the poster).She is violating/violated that agreement. |
MRbrownJAY: @OPYou read my mind.I cant agree less |
hillsate: So any small talk now they mention power. Please stop mentioning power as GEJ's achievement. Power was more stable than it is now in the eighties. He merely is completing what others seriously started.On a more serious note I think GEJ has done well in terms of power,atleast he completed what others couldnt,he should be commended for that.Though I will wait till after the rainy season before I conclude.And you should also know that in the 80s the nations power consumption was small compared to now,we had few industries. |
drnairalov: THE GREATEST JOKE OF ALL TIME nd since u acually looged in to view this...thanks, U re a very FuglyYou are dumb |
sexkillz: www.nairaland.com/ogugua88I cant possibly agree less |
chukwudi44: @opBut these are written, that you might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you might have life through his name.John 20:31 I agree chukwudi44: Revelation 5:8Rev. 5:8-14 ...Verse 8 says speaks of the "golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints." Verses 9-10 speak of a new song sung in heaven. Verse 11 speaks of those around the throne of God and verse 12 says that they were saying "Worthy is the Lamb..." Verse 13 mentions every created thing in heaven and earth saying, "To Him who sits on the throne, and to the lamb, be blessing and honor and glory and dominion forever and ever." I have no problem with those in heaven hearing what is said on earth.Many Christians deny that this is possible, but it seems to be clearly taught here. Regarding verse 8, can the prayers be authored by those who are already in heaven? It doesn't say. There are different interpretations on exactly who the saints are because their identity can't be precisely demonstrated; after all, Revelation is a highly symbolic book. Therefore, if it cannot be demonstrated conclusively who they are, then it cannot be demonstrated conclusively whose prayers they are, either. Nevertheless, verse 9 says "they sang a new song." Who is the "they"? It would have to be either the the four living creatures and/or the 24 elders since "prayers of the saints" don't sing, "creatures" and "elders" do the singing. In verse 11-12 the angels, the creatures, and the elders who were all around the throne (which means they are in heaven) were praising God directly. In verse 13 it says every created thing in heaven and earth was praising God, then the elders fell down and worshiped, v. 14. ...Just because those in heaven can hear the prayers of those on Earth does not mean that is okay to pray to saints. If they can hear the prayers of people it is because God grants that to them. Think about it. Can those in heaven hear the prayers uttered without speech? Can they read minds? It is only God who knows all things and only God can grant anyone to hear or know what the prayers are of those who pray in silence. Let's not give the saints superhuman powers similar to omniscience. Nevertheless, all the text is saying is that they can hear the praise and worship of God. It does not say that they are to receive prayers, nor does it imply praying to them is permitted. All it says is that they can hear the prayers and praise. chukwudi44: Besides if you had a complete bible you would have read about the vision of judas macabees in 2 macabees 12 where the prophet jeremiah in heaven was praying for the isrealites on earth2 Maccabees 12:43-46 Judas, the ruler of Israel, took up a collection among all his soldiers, amounting to two thousand silver drachmas, which he sent to Jerusalem to provide for an expiatory sacrifice. In doing this he acted in a very excellent and noble way, inasmuch as he had the resurrection of the dead in view; for if he were not expecting the fallen to rise again, it would have been useless and foolish to pray for them in death. But if he did this with a view to the splendid reward that awaits those who had gone to rest in godliness, it was a holy and pious thought. Thus he made atonement for the dead that they might be freed from this sin. Now I understand where the concept of purgatory is coming from and the concept of prayer for the dead.I will get back to you |
Antivirus92: Bible without doctrine is rubbish!doc·trine is a rule or principle: a rule or principle that forms the basis of a belief, theory, or policy 2. ideas taught as truth: a body of ideas, particularly in religion, taught to people as truthful or correct what is the doctrine based on,a doctrine doesnt necessarily mean it is right Antivirus92: That kind of passages cannot be understood merely without doctrine.All Scripture is inspired by God 2 Timothy 3:16,But there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty gives him understanding Job 32:8 Cannot be understood without doctrine sounds funny,when infact only the author of the bible himself can interpret it(Holy Spirit) |