₦airaland Forum

^bullsh[i]i[/i]t

This does not make sense at all. It is bullsh[i]i[/i]t. If  a video of osama's death body is shown in the next few days it is bullsh[i]i[/i]t. Remember we are in the age of technology if a photo comes of Osama's "supposedly" death body before thrown in the sea it is bullsh[i]i[/i]t. Mind warfare.


A nation will control the world and it has started, people need to stop been ignorant and see what is going on and not wait till judgement day for everything is revealed. You have to look deeper and seek what has been disguised.

[size=15pt]Be wise as Serpents [/size]

ogugua88:
If the body needs to be shown, it will be shown. Quite frankly, I don't see why we need to post pictures of bodies the way they do. Americans are above that and it's finally about time they acted like it. I find it barbaric to be honest. Granted, Saddam Hussein, too did horrible things, but he didn't need his corpse broadcast all over the news and web the way they did. The body was buried at sea so that radical Muslims didn't turn a burial site on land into a shrine, place for worship, or a place for recruiting. They were supposed to capture him dead or alive but it turned out to be a gun battle. He shot at them, therefore they shot back. He was recognized by the troops that were sent in before and after death, his identity was matched using biometrics, and again with a DNA test. They do have photos and what I've heard from correspondents on CNN is that he is recognizable by the photo.

He probably won't remove troops. OBL is dead, but the idea is still very much alive.

He was the reason we went there, just that President Bush and his administration had no real intent of finding him soon. He said himself that bin Laden was marginal in comparison to the entire Taliban/Al Qaeda movement. As far as I'm concerned, Pres. Bush and his administration had given up within six months of 9/11 lol.

I did not say I want to see him because I know my reasons why but for the millions who believe he has killed and destroy lives and want him captured the evidence of him should have been shown dead or alive, it does not matter if for human rights or whatever it is that might stop them, the body should have been carried all the way to land and shown.

Ofcourse, that is what they are going to say they have DNA and photos of him. But I am not here  to have the discussion with you over it I simply was referring to ernest0011's comment.

dayokanu:
Yes i swing both ways between you and armyofone

I am sorry but I only like men who swing just my way. You can have armyofone

armyofone, are you female? If not, dayo yu dae swing both ways?

Well you can highly doubt it but I am not here to force anyone to see the world as it is. Obama is part of the controversy too he is in the US government.
He died ages ago. If it was really what they say it was the body would have been shown instead of the burial at sea. It is just does not make sense for them to throw his body at sea when millions of people have been anxious to see his arrest and waiting to see him whether dead or alive.

Remember Obama said he is going to remove troops from the middle-east so by claiming they have got what they went for it is very easy for the troops to now leave so people will not say US has destroyed thousands of homes and lives and came out with nothing.

Osama was not the reason troops where sent.

190:

Im sure this kandiikane had sex last night with 190


Im quite sure~

In your dreams. I was great wasn't I?

[quote author=BABE! link=topic=655537.msg8247007#msg8247007 date=1304363797]Even if it's my siblings sef, at least I still dey tutor.

Wetin you fit do? 

Just name one thing you fit do apart from Tanning [/quote]I am an expert researcher

ernest0011:
they buried him accordin 2 islamic rites, i woukd hv prefered him been place in a museum 4 every one 2 watch, d most deadliest man in d world or am i nt right

Your first post and you post this lie.


America is fooling you guys about Osama been dead, there is a lot of controversy going on with Osama, 911, the invasion etc. Mind Warfare.

debosky:
Rich enough to have trips planned to four different countries this year.

Is it enough for me to join you ?

swisscash:
Any girl 4 me 2! Nah only debo dey here.

Go open up a thread an advertise yourself

Babe tutor it?

How can a 15 year old be tutoring? Do you mean your siblings?

190 stop hating dammit


@debosky, that is fine by me. Are you rich?

deji2009 and denzel 2009 are you the same person or are you work colleagues?

I can see that but I want to know more about the mystery behind the hat

mcnepow:
Rotten meat BYL

lol BYL

Lung cancer and smoking have direct connection. A cigarette has about 18 carcinogens( the number might be wrong).


Myth 4: Circumcision can reduce cervical cancer rates
Fact 4: The above statement probably derived from an article in New England Journal of Medicine in 2002 that claimed that circumcision reduced the risk of causing cervical cancer. Despite the study being flawed and the conclusions exaggerated, many still cite it as "proof" that circumcision can reduce cervical cancer rates.


That fact is most medical institutions such as American Cancer Society, The Cancer Research UK, The American Academy of Pediatrics and Canadian Paediatric Society do not link non-circumcision to cervical cancer.
Consider this fact: 91% of American men born in 1970 and 83% of American men born in 1980 were circumcised and U.S is considered to have very high rate of circumcision rate but strangely U.S is also reported as country with highest cervical cancer rates compared to countries with the lowest rates of circumcision like Holland, Belgium, France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Scandinavia, the U.S.S.R., China, and Japan. It is obvious that circumcision rates do not affect the cervical cancer rates across the globe.

oh hush,

lol, is that sugar mummy tpiah?

ok, first how old are you?

@debosky, I would like to know now

ok

Its natural

Im kidding, Igwe419 used it on me and I thought it really was not a bad idea


Tpia@ what does dayokanu have to do with this?

yes, why?

[quote author=Blood_Shed link=topic=656327.msg8237299#msg8237299 date=1304212346]People who buy into the idea that those who live alone are automatically going to be miserable or something is somehow wrong with them.

Matter of fact, some people are safer away from me, so I'm doing them a favour  [/quote]lol, I can see that from your name.

I know quite a lot of older people who are unmarried and you know they are going on with life as usual but deep down it is miserable because they have noone to share with.

I have always known how babies where made since I could talk.

My aunt once tried to tell me when I was 8 that when a boy kisses you you get pregnant so I should not allow any boy to kiss me and I was like "yes ma" thinking to myself she really thinks I am stu[i]pi[/i]d.