₦airaland Forum

Ellexy:
The share size of the conspiracy is impressive. While it looks like Isreal is the number one aggressor and pushing the US into a war it doesn't necessarily want, it's actually the US who is behind it all and using the desperate Israel to shadow their true interests. Isreal may be fighting for survival but UD is fighting to total world dominance. There are levels to this game mahn, China no even get levels like that. When will Nigeria level up mahn....

The conspiracy falls flat when you realize Israel has been trying to talk the US into going to war with Iran for decades. Only Trump was dumb enough to fall for their manipulations despite making numerous tweets accusing other presidents of planning to attack Iran for various reasons.

Ellexy:
Yeah respect to Trump, he doesn't sugarcoat it all. He's a very good president for America but a bad leader for the rest of the world probably.

Lmao......this is like an American saying Tinibu has been a good president for Nigeria.

larride:
In a proper competition, Deschamps will go ahead with his tested and trusted 4-3-3.

I don't think he will just change a formation and set up he has never used in almost a year at the world cup. He has constantly picked a 4 man attack. Maybe in some games he might go more solidity.

AirBere:
Right now he's a guaranteed starter for France and that's based on data not opinion. He even started the world cup final when he wasn't even this good.

Deschamps has never used Dembele as a 9 that means he's fighting for the wing spot and 10 role. Olise already has the right wing on lock for me, Mbappe gets the free roaming role from the left wing. Ekitake and Thuram fights for the striker position. That's how I see it going by his recent team selections.

larride:
Deschamps is definitely not using any an AM. He will have to fight for mins on the wings from the bench.

He has used an Am for their last 10games if not more.

France scores another even with red card. 2:0 against Brazil. Ekitake with the goal.

This Brazilian team is not good enough.

Griffon:
I’ll rather go:

Kante, Tchouameni and Camavinga in midfield. Then Olise at RW, Dembele ST, Mbappe LW.

On current form, Thuram has no right to start ahead of Olise in a front three.

When has Dembele ever performed for France for all of you to be treating him as a guaranteed starter.

larride:
It's possible to implement in Nigeria but currently it's akin to putting the cart ahead of the horse because we still don't have a solid, reliant and updated database.

The only state that has a little bit of database is Lagos.

Exactly.

raumdeuter:
Why not? Why cant we do it. Its easier for states to manage the smaller number of their state license plates holders, even individual states have different state laws which might differ slightly

For example I got a ticket for using cell phone while driving in New Jersey, In Texas its perfectly legal

That is the true Federalism we claim we are trying to do in Nigeria where every state has their own laws and its a separate entity

You and I know why it works here in the states. First of all you will need a Nationwide database. How many States in Nigeria have a fully digitalized interconnected system ? 2.Corruption and bribe 3. Does Nigeria even have a residential database.

Its pretty standard. If you move to Texas for example, at some point you will need to exchange your Utah drivers license, license plates, etc and register yourself with Texas but you cannot compare the states with Nigeria. Here it's done to update the database and make sure every individual residing in the state permanently is accounted for. I don't see how you can even implement it in a place like Nigeria effectively.

popizaino:
Pls don't mention me i don't want to insult you.

He's asking a harmless question why the anger lol

Ibime:
Rosemary had buying but decided to kill his career with his goalkeeper passing experiment and messing with Sanchez confidence that Maresca had solved

Excellent karma for his hubris

Please Sanchez has been a bozo and will always remain a bozo.

Are you not enjoying the game?

BlueRayDick:
That’s not what he did . He confirmed the incident did happen , but tried to claim he was disciplined in line with the school’s disciplinary system .

By the time the guy has other ex-students come out to reveal how they were treated like criminals by the proprietor and his team of teachers , the judge will have no choice but to view them as violent individuals abusing students in their care .

The proprietor is saying because the guy’s parents who are lawyers settled with him back then over the incident , then it shouldn’t be an issue now and the guy shouldn’t be suing him. 🤡

You sound pretty biased against the principal side of the story which honestly makes more sense here. You are already siding with the student without any solid evidence to support it. Also if the punishment was really as harsh as being claimed, the family would not have sent another child to the same school, at least I know I wouldnt.

Interesting discussion on the Overlap with Wright, Neville, Rooney and others. Was Neymar a better player than Henry, Rooney and Salah? More talented yes but those 3 actually did more for their respective teams than Neymar ever did.

andrewbaba44:
Me self see am and I shake head

Egbon say chelsea match psg

The first leg was an even game before Jorgensen brain farts. Same amount of shots plus Chelsea created 2 more big chances than psg. They were just very clinical unlike us. The 2nd leg was dead when Sarr committed that error 5 mins into the game.

Once again I am tipping PSG to do it back to back. I thought they were bad going by their Ligue 1 form but it seems they can turn it up in the champions league when they want to.

[quote author=Bimmarlykay post=138814989][/quote]Well deserved victory especially that 2nd half.

patrickmuf:
Kimbeast, remember I told you that Newcastle United will struggle at the Camp Nou.

The first half gave me hope they could do something but the 2nd was a gad damn massacre. Barca ran riot.

Eddie Howe at a bigger club that spends more money would be interesting.

I said it. This game is going to be fun.

rooftops:
Na highline go kill these ones

Barcelona should honestly go for a centerback like Kushinov or whatever his name is since they love highline.

With that front three I can see Newcastle causing Barca soo much trouble.

raumdeuter:
I have seen teams walk out before I even remember Lille players walking out of a CL game vs Man Utd but what I have never seen is a result of a game that was ended and the referee concluded to be changed weeks after the game

They returned to the game Brahim Diaz took the penalty and missed, Senegal scored a legit goal, ref ruled it was a concluded

It literally happened in our group. You didn't see South Africa 2:0 win against Lesotho changed to 3:0 lose by FIFA just last year here?

larride:
The funny thing is that something like this happened in 2018 in the CAF champions league final between Esperance Tunis and Al Ahly.

Al Ahly won the first leg 3-1 at home and Esperance won the second leg 3-0 thereby winning the trophy.

Esperance Tunis alleged after the first leg that the first leg was rigged by the ref because they gave 2 controversial penalty to Al Ahly

The same CAF Appeal decided to forfeit the first leg that Al Ahly won 3-1 saying Al Ahly has engaged in misconduct and one of their players was engaged in simulation (Remember that Esperance Tunis already won the trophy on their own merit by winning the second leg 3-0)

Al Ahly appealed to CAS, CAS embarrassed CAF by telling them to stick to their own rules that the outcome of a match is final irrespective of referee decisions, mistakes or errors.

CAS clearly told CAF it's powers are limited in altering already concluded match outcomes.

Another disgrace is waiting for them at CAS.

A very useless sport association.

Bro none of this happened lol. Maybe you are confusing yourself with 2019 when CAS sided with CAF against Wydad and crowned Esperance champions when Wydad walked off the game in the 2nd leg.

larride:
Maybe you should try to read more and not just gulping anything you read online.

The ref should've abandoned the game after the Senegal team walked off during the game but he didn't and the game continued, extra 30mins+ played and the game concluded with a final match outcomes.

Article 82 cannot cover it anymore, it was not an abandoned match anymore, it is a concluded match.

Another embarrassment is waiting for CAF at CAS, that's for sure.

A useless body that cannot properly interpret it's own rules.

Please stop, you are embarrassing yourself when it's very obvious. Senegal breached article 82 and got punished by forfeiture. They are basically telling you the extra minutes played after they came back was void.

larride:
Are you a zombie that swallows anything without context?

Article 82 cannot be invoked for a match that was CONCLUDED. Once a match is played and concluded, the result is final.

The ref should've abandoned the game when Senegal walked off, he didn't. The moment Senegal came back and the ref allow the game to continue, article 82 is out the door.

Apply your common sense please.

Bring out your source for this. The organizers are literally telling you different yet you insisting on going by your own understanding despite being wrong.

larride:
For article 82 to stand, the ref should've abandoned the game when they walked off. He didn't.

The game continued with the ref and all the players playing. The ref decision is the final decision on the pitch and the ref says Senegal won the match. It is final.

CAS will embarrass CAF once again like they did in 2019.

As you can see the ref doesn't have to end the game for it to be applicable. You have seen teams getting kicked out of competitions for breaking rules like fielding an eligible player even when they won the game. CAF did the right thing by applying the appropriate punishment.

Amigoos1:
The decision was right, just too late. It should have been made as soon as the Senegal players walked off. Since it wasn’t, making it now just causes confusion. At this point they should have just left it as it was.

Justice can never be too late. Leaving it as it is sets a very bad precedent.

larride:
It's another thing if the ref ended the game when they walked off. The ref did not.

They came back, the ref played on, Morocco players played on, another extra 30mins of game was played.

CAF own rule says nothing can change the result of a match already concluded. The game was concluded.

It was a stupid decision from CAF

That's a lie. Article 82 and 84 are very clear. I have never seen when an organization applying the rules is making a stupid decision after appeals.



Key Details Regarding Articles 82 & 84:
Article 82 (Withdrawal/Refusal to Play): If a team leaves the ground before the end of regulation time without the referee's authorization, it is deemed to have lost and is eliminated.
Article 84 (Forfeiture Penalty): A team violating Article 82 is eliminated from the competition and loses the match 3-0. If the opponent has a more advantageous score at the time of interruption, that score is maintained.

Unlimited22:
Did You also read the section about the referee's decisions on the field and his interpretation of the laws of the game?

How does that absolve Senegal from breaching article 82?