Kkins25's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Kkins25's Profile › Kkins25's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 162 pages)
cococandy:Is it that the Nurses involved are being duped, or they themselves are involved in the scam? |
IMAliyu:Are the people backward, or just impoverished? |
Obrigardo: ![]() how will it transform the world? Make una come down with that blunt abeg ![]() |
Kaycee54321:What you're suggesting here is no different from me carrying my son's school fee to buy PS5. She, the wife, can---if funds are available---go for plastic surgery. However, again---to stress Op's point, both of them had agreed that it wasn't a priority. Both agreed to wait till after they Japad. That's it!!! He's not complaining she wants one. You seem to be missing the point. To clarify on OP's behalf: "I'm not saying she can't perform the surgery, but we had a plan. Now, she wants to destroy that plan." That's all. |
Kaycee54321:The koko is not that he doesn't want to provide the money. It's the fact that she is putting herself above the needs of the family now! Did you understand OP at all? |
bukatyne:kobo has already answered for me. |
Kaycee54321:You keep assuming OP is the one who is forcing the wife to get the surgery. Is the OP complaining about the 2M? OP's concern here is that she is suddenly risking their plans (their kid's future) for her belly. |
Kaycee54321:This is one of those "women can do no wrong" nonsense. There is nothing wrong in having cosmetic surgery. It's because we can't afford it here. I don't believe in the nonsense "Everybody was made special" either. If your body has an issue you can afford to fix, fix it. So, why should OP be against the surgery if, indeed, he knows her belly will look better? |
Let me comment so elders can join mouth... If na me, gaskia, divorce for don enter my mind. Cuz, i don't take someone making a drastic decision that impacts the whole family lightly like this.. You better be on the watch, your wife might be planning to leave u... No way a person thinking straight, a woman for that matter, will blunder the plans like this... No. No. No. No... @budaatum. |
bukatyne:I don't think there's any inherent skills to parenting. If both individuals are stable, then I don't see why they can't guide children. Ishilove:I didn't get it from my first read.. Wow! I think it's too harsh oh! |
They should instead adopt children, and stop using women's bodies as baby chambers. |
Cesarr1:buhahahahahahahahahahahahaahah.... The Lion King ![]() |
pansophist:is this yab? buhahahahahaha. |
US at the back be like: "Make sure to strike the oil refineries bro. Forget the UN, na me dey run am" 🤣 |
bemeruca:
|
Blue3k:Reddit has a private message system, where you can block a user from DMing you. But, I see no button for blocking users on the public forum side. |
Zooposki:interesting. Yes, this was my analogy. Perhaps, not understood? You've not acknowledged the misinterpretation of the data, though. |
Is that even feasible? I've not seen any forum with a block feature. |
Zooposki:Hey! Interesting research! I uploaded the doc to ChatGPT, my new BFF, to understand its content and how it relates to the claims you've, rather, the YouTube made. I've argued that women are better at comprehension, which I believe, is why they perform better in subjects that involve reading and writing and dominate such industries. For example, the content writing industry is completely a woman's domain. So, I was excited to give the study a look. Now, to the substance of the article, let's begin with the statement, "Correlation isn't causation." Point 1: [/b]The participants of the study included: 119 healthy adults. 26, 683 patients with psychiatric issues. [b]Point 2: The objective of the study was to figure out the amount of blood flowing through the cerebrum in both males and females. The researchers used this as an indirect way to measure the level of cerebrum activity between the genders. Point 3: The researchers observed that females had higher activity in many parts of their cerebrum compared to men. These parts are indeed areas of interest because the cerebrum is the "brainy" part of the brain. In fact, It's largely responsible for the comment you're reading right now! Okay, as my BFF would say, let's delve into point 4. Point 4: I find that the speaker in the YouTube video ( I didn't watch the video, but I'm assuming that's how you drew your conclusion) try's put words into the mouths of the researchers. The research aimed to uncover insights into the difference in psychiatric disorders between genders. It is known that women are more susceptible to certain psychiatric disorders, such as mood and anxiety disorders, while men are more prone to addiction and antisocial personality disorder. The researchers are trying to understand why. Could there be something different about the male and female brains? The answer is yes. That brings us to point 5. Point 5: The study finds that women have significantly more blood flowing through their cerebrum indicating higher neuroactivity in the region compared to men. Could this be why women and men get different types of psychiatric disorders? Possibly. But, this research alone can't answer that question. What it does is take us one step closer to the finish line. That said, I can infer how the YouTuber drew their conclusion: 1) Women have higher activity in the brain. 2) Does higher activity mean a better brain? 3) Yes. 4) Therefore women have better brains than men. But, that's somewhat misleading. I propose an analogy: An organism with longer legs will run faster than another with shorter legs. At face value, it's sound logical. But, wait a minute! Giraffes have longer legs than Cheetahs! Oops, not so logical now. That's because there are many facets to running. The structure of the leg, the weight it carries, the size of the animal, and so on. Replace "Cheetah" and "Giraffe" with "Male" and Female," then replace "running" with "neuroactivity." It's the same faulty logic that the YouTuber uses. Since women have more brain activity in regions associated with leadership skills, they are considered better suited for leadership. While I don't disagree with the premise or find it an absurd claim, I’m simply pointing out that, based solely on the journal cited, that's a misguided interpretation. What the study does say, is that because women have higher blood flow in those regions, it makes sense that they are more likely to struggle with disorders such as mood and anxiety disorders. |
musicwriter:For real!!!! In Ghana, the King of the Akans has an overlord to whom he is accountable. That person is a woman and has always been a woman! That seat is specifically designated for women only! I'm not talking pre-colonial whatever. I'm talking today! We inherited alot of rubbish from the West. Now, they even want to tell us how to define a "woman." |
wirinet:Hmmmm. Master genocide detector. ... They need to start a war in order to have justification for bombing Gaza and West Bank, thereby driving the Palestinians away from the land.hmmmm... Master mentalist. Seems to have electromagnetic receptive antennas that can successfully detect the hidden intents of human beings. Israel often looks for triggers to prod the Palestinians into violent reactions in order to look for excuses to start bombing apartment buildings, schools, and hospitals. This Israel does by expanding settlements into occupied territories or arresting Palestinians and locking them in Israeli jails.Okay, at this point your claims are getting ridiculous. How do you intend Israel to handle the situation? The War broke out in 1948 when the Arabs rejected the two-state solution, which the Israelis agreed to. They then waged a war with genocidal intent to eliminate the Jews. Mind you, at this time, the Palestine flag was still British-looking (It could be that my eye is paining me sha). The so-called lands taken by Israel were under the rule of Either Jordan or Egypt. Israel fought and won that war. A consequence of war is the victor gets to keep the spoils (Although, currently frowned upon). A "Palestinian" in 1948, would have either been Jewish, Arab Christian, or Arab Muslim. Let's get this clear, Jewish civilians didn't all emigrate from Europe! They came from North Africa, "Palestine," and Arabia. Of course, they were also getting the Hitler treatment in these regions and had to flee. A large number of in Israel today are from regions of Iraq, Yemen, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Syria, Ethiopia, and Libya. They were expelled! So If they weren't allowed in Arabia, wasn't it common sense that they deserved their state? When did "Palestine" reject the 1948 UN deal? Why then, will any tribe in their right mind, want to leave under the rulership of the very state that persecuted them since the dawn of Mohammed? There is no way Benjamin Nathanyahu will tell the world that he was not aware of the October 7 invasion of Israel by Hamas commandos. MOSSAD that had infiltrated the Iranian security agencies and Hezbollah could not infiltrate the less òrganised Hamas?Here we go again with "The Earth is flat." You're sounding like one of those conspiracy channels talking about how the government faked 9/11. How can you assume that Netanyahu "allowed" Hamas terrorists into Israel to kill 1,200 people just so he could invade a place they had conquered and given back to the inhabitants in 2005? When Israel left Gaza in 2005, was it Israel that installed Hamas to govern the affairs of the region? No! Israel and the new Palestinian state had agreed to the two-state solution. Israel was cool. But Palestinians voted Hama into power, did they not? Hamas took over. Started attacking Israel. Israel says, "Hey, Palestine, take care of your dogs if you want this peace deal to progress." Did the Palestinians take care of their dogs? Moreover, this only goes to show you why Israel needs a strong hold over Gaza. If they relent, even just by one bit, Hamas will strike--- and they will strike to kill as many as they can find. Iran will strike. The threat is always there. Israel is constantly being hit with missiles. That is a huge problem. Do you expect the US to keep dashing them billions of dollars to play "Catch the Rocket" with Hamas? Should Israel fold its hands and wait until Hamas can garner more support and power even though Hamas is the instigator of conflict here? "Ahh, since Boko Haram isn't a threat and only kills one or two people, let's just leave them." If your president told you that would you not stone him? Palestine, thanks to Hamas, has squandered its resources on pointless battles. It is unfortunate innocent people are caught up in the Hamas madness. But, that's why it's called war. Are you a pro-Palestinian or a humanist? You can't be both! |
wirinet:Everything here is false, and an uninformed excuse to justify the atrocities committed by Hamas and some of the Palestinians. |
IMAliyu2:What do you mean she doesn't take correction? Are you saying all the countries that voted to not ascribe the war as genocide are less knowledgeable about the matter than you? Come on bro! From what I see, we have people who have allowed the media to play with their emotions to the extent that to call outrightly call out the crimes of Hamas must come with a disclaimer----"Hamas rose because of oppression." It's like me saying we shouldn't sentence P.Diddy because he has watched too much pornography. The Arab communities are solely to blame for the escalation of this nonsense war. |
With all she's said on TikTok? Or, is she suddenly missing the atmosphere? |
wirinet:tor, you see the problem. I never really understood the rational of valuing a fetus more than the woman that is to suffer the pains and consequences of birthing, and then caring and raising the child. Anti abortionists have no stake whatsoever in the child outside primordial religious/moral sentiments. They are just like Muslims preventing others from eating just because they are fasting. States have no business checking the viability of a fetus much less contemplate carrying out an abortion at any time in the pregnancy. That decision is to be left for the intendingYep, they do. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/abortions-later-in-pregnancy-in-a-post-dobbs-era/ I have a cousin that had tried for decades to have conceive a child for her husband that had been married for 17 years. When she got pregnant at about 45 years of age, the doctor after scanning informed my cousin that the baby would suffer some sort of deformity and recommended abortion. She vehemently refused and insisted on birthing the child. The baby, a girl was born with slight deformity and autism. She and her husband provided the best medical care for the girl. Today the girl just celebrated her 30 year birthday.You need states to fund research and medicine for parents to carry out that procedure, right? According to the legal definition of a person, the fetus become a person the moment it leaves the womb. Any unaliving then is regarded as murder.It depends on who you ask. Some pro-choice will slap you if you talk to them about aborting a fetus with a beating heart. Some will slap you if you talk to them about aborting a fetus who's already kicking. In America, aborting baby during this stage will empty your bank account. What converted me to a strong pro choice advocate was when I saw a newborn floating on the lagos lagoon beside behind NPA on V/I. The baby was obviously birthed that morning and just thrown into the lagos lagoon. Thar memory traumatised me till date. I would rather the fetus be aborted early in the pregnancy than murder a fully born baby in the most gruesome manner. There are lots of examples of mothers dumping new born I'm dustbins and even soakaway. I believe the baby and mother need not go through these trauma.Unfortunate. |
Obrigardo:Well, I'll allow those people who grapple with it to provide us with a response. Myself, I'm perplexed as to why Roe vs. Wade was overturned even though most people (except the white protestants) support abortion under certain circumstances. All I've said so far is mostly pertaining to the metaphysical aspects of the pro-choice argument: 1) Women have the right to abort their babies. 2) Women need society to assist with the procedure, and that's where the issue comes from. 3) The woman and society each have their right to autonomy. 4) Thus, Society equally have the right to deny the women access to the procedure if it believes a fetus is equally human. I don't include women who have to abort due to harsh realities of life, like rape, health issues, and so on. budaatum: Just so we all know barbarism still exists.A German woman did something similar some month ago. She threw her baby out of the window. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13603529/mother-newborn-dropped-window-katarina-jovanovic-porsche-germany.html |
Does he have a sexual assault case or what? |
BadNews:Jesus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
LordReed:We already have mandates for other vaccines. The Vaccine in that context was COVID vaccine. [quotes]Are you strawmanning me? Did I ever use the word parasite to describe the fetus?[/quote]That's just one of the theories often used. Humans have been performing abortions since the prehistoric age when we only had herbs to aid us so no abortion is not a recent development.Yes, I'm aware. Our society is predominantly Christian and Muslim now, and the values have changed. |
wirinet:I'm not considering that context. or share raw uncontrollable sex instincts taking control.Interesting. I can see lawyers exploiting these "sex instincts" to defend rapists. I wouldn't go there. Its not every time a woman engage in coitus that she will to get pregnant.I'm actually not pro-life. That's because I somewhat hold a nihilistic view of life in general. I also value life based on how it relates to me or my values. For example, If I were to press a lever that would save 5 Atheists, but doing so would lead to the demise of 1 million Muslims, I'd push the "save the Atheist" lever. You see. Pro-abortionists would call me a murderer but, I'm simply spinning their arguments against them. some people value the fetus just like I value Atheists. I'm not particularly arguing against abortion, I'm just trying to point out that the arguments for abortion, aside from that of rape and minors, aren't a solid one. Or, rather, not convincing. Can you answer this though, If an unborn child is not your "child" yet, why do all states agree to check for viability before even agreeing to contemplate carrying out an abortion on a 24-week-old fetus? Why not abort an 8-month-old fetus? why not just wait until delivery and then unalive the baby? We can go on and on about the metaphysics. For example, see this act: The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law that recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."[1]It's just semantics. So, there's no objective inherent value of human life. Maybe tomorrow, some people may want the right to unalive their fresh out of the womb child. who knows? At that time, today's pro-choice will be the pro-life. hahahaha.. Society!! |
LordReed:"You" as in me? or "You" as in Republicans, or "You" as in "anti-vaxers" or "You" as in Liberals? I certainly know I'm me and me is Liberal. I don't know where I opposed vaccine mandates. Afterall, I have vaccines running through my viens and watch in horror as a certain demographic who refused to take them keep producing kids with body deformities---of the outrageous kind. To top it off, these kids were inbreeding. It's a horror house! Like I said, I can go to the pharmacist and demand for prescription drug without a prescription, but society exercises it's autonomy over mine. Suppose we were on the brink of extinction, pro-abortion laws will also be revoked and society becomes pro-life. That's just the way it is. Abortion, in our society isn't the norm. Since it's an new development, it's up to it's champions to come up with arguments to convince society to accept it. Either that or they employ the governments autonomy to enforce it. You can't enter building and tell somebody who believes babies are gifts from God that the "baby is like a parasite." Haba! That argument won't cut it. |

Okay, as my BFF would say, let's delve into point 4.