₦airaland Forum

9jii:
Your current hardship you're complainin is because of your failure and bad decisions in your life.
Blame yourself and people around you

9jii:
Its only d Ipod yoot that hate Buhari and change process
Na them full here pass because of their joblessness.
They blame their failure in life on baba.

They will cry,wail and kick but the change process will continue.

9jii:
Its only d Ipod yoot that hate Buhari and change process
Na them full here pass because of their joblessness.
They blame their failure in life on baba.

They will cry,wail and kick but the change process will continue.

Slikbae:
That was the military regime, democracy is the order of the day now. I know its going to be nothing like he did back in the day.

kachnov:
It's obvious this will become an oppressive rule,kiss your freedoms goodbye.

Jesusloveyou:
is good to criticise but is bad to criticise good thing, except u are a saTANist, a lover of corruption and evil personified, and God wil punish u for criticising good thing

naijadeyhia:
You also said the earth is far older than mars right? I guess once again the internet is smarter.

sekundosekundo:
Even the Heaven you are looking at has no Pillar holding it, a child in the womb is also a mystery. All things Bright and beautiful all Creatures Great and small the Lord made them all. Including Kobosmalls.

naijadeyhia:
I am done with arguing with you. When you are debunked you shift goal posts conveniently.

Enjoy your life

naijadeyhia:
Can bacteria survive on mars? Yes or no

Lilbrown007:
[size=60pt]Olodo[/size]

naijadeyhia:
So the conditions on other planets cannot allow for other life forms to exist right? Riiight

The same bacteria science claims we evolved from can survive on mars yet conveniently evolution never occurred on mars with the law of natural selection and mutation to cope with environment. Science indeed is great.

Same science claims the earth and mars probably formed at the same time yet bacteria conveniently came to earth and not a single on stayed on mars. Yet they say bacteria can survive on mars. Aint science a joke?
Your brain cannot fathom creation bro. So lets just leave it at that. Even science is confused and can only offer lots of hypothesis. Again lets leave this issue. You dont get it and I canot make you get it. End of story.

naijadeyhia:
Wow indeed you have no idea what DNA is do you? Allow me to give you a simple crash coursd on DNa.

Let us suppose that, as evolutionists suggest, there actually was some way for organic, biologically important molecules to have formed in a significant quantity on a primitive Earth. An indescribable mess would have been the result. In addition to the 20 different amino acids found in proteins today, hundreds of other kinds of amino acids would have been produced. In addition to deoxyribose and ribose, the five-carbon sugars found in DNA and RNA today, a variety of other five-carbon sugars, four-carbon, six-carbon, and seven-carbon sugars would have been produced. In addition to the five purines and pyrimidines found in DNA and RNA today, a great variety of other purines and pyrimidines would exist.

Further, of vital significance, the amino acids in proteins today are exclusively left-handed, but all amino acids on the primitive Earth would be 50% left-handed and 50% right-handed. The sugars in DNA and RNA today are exclusively right-handed, but, if they did exist, sugars on a primitive Earth would have been 50% right-handed and 50% left-handed. If just one right-handed amino acid is in a protein, or just one left-handed sugar is found in a DNA or RNA, all biological activity is destroyed. There would be no mechanism available on a primitive Earth to select the correct form.

This fact alone destroys evolution. Evolutionists have been wrestling with this dilemma since it was first recognized, and there is no solution in sight. All these many varieties would compete with one another, and a great variety of other organic molecules, including aldehydes, ketones, acids, amines, lipids, carbohydrates, etc. would exist. If evolutionists really claim to simulate plausible primitive Earth conditions, why don't they place their reactants in a big mess like this and irradiate it with ultraviolet light, shock it with electric discharges, or heat it, and see what results? They don't do that because they know there wouldn't be the remotest possibility that anything useful for their evolutionary scenario would result. Rather, they carefully select just the starting materials they want to produce amino acids or sugars or purines or whatever, and, furthermore, they employ implausible experimental conditions that would not exist on a primitive Earth. They then claim in textbooks and journal articles that such and such biological molecules would have been produced in abundant quantities on the early earth.

sekundosekundo:
You can call me names but I was like you an Atheist just accept this fact.

MrPresident1:
Since Noah's ark and his animals are literal stories, surely creation was also in six literal days, isn't it?



You are a devious, slimy, lying piece of s.hit, and I assure you the dead will rise again, how will you face them? You are finished. . Devil projecting as angel of light, wolf in sheep clothing, THE DEAD WILL RISE AGAIN!!!

The MOST HIGH GOD REBUKE YOU!

naijadeyhia:
So everything came from nothing and the nothing became everything?

naijadeyhia:
Are you suffering from a cognitive disorder? If not how is it that you fail to read and comprehend simple things but delude yourself into thinking you can understand more complex things?

You just want to respond to keep your relevance intact and I have been courteous enough to oblige you. I think I will stop now.


Copy and paste and dont just click on the hyperlink


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human–animal_breastfeeding


Below is how the link begins


Human–animal breastfeeding has been practised in many different cultures in many time periods. The practice of breastfeeding or suckling between humans and other species has gone in both directions: human females sometimes breastfeed young animals, and animals are used to suckle babies and children. Animals were used as substitute wet nurses for infants, particularly after the rise of syphilis increased the health risks of wet nursing. Goats and donkeys were widely used to feed abandoned babies in foundling hospitals in 18th- and 19th-century Europe. Breastfeeding animals has also been practised, whether for health reasons – such as to toughen the nipples and improve the flow of milk – or for religious and cultural purposes. A wide variety of animals have been used for this purpose, including puppies, kittens, piglets and monkeys.


Copy and paste everything including animal_ breastfeeding

Lagazine:
You are a confused human being. U need to think very well before u react to a sensible discussion like this. Anyway, if u don't believe, go to Turkey, u will see d real Ark of Noah on d mountain Hararat. Stupid bigot.

sekundosekundo:
The Almighty God have the capacity to do things that are beyond human understanding. Including your conception and delivery. It's only a FOOL that says there's no God.

Chuvin22:
Two of every living thing on earth won't go into that boat.. He Should explain that first. Its the only proof we need.

malvisguy212:
your answer is here http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/longlife.html

Ability247:
Really? Advances in science make us live up to 80 today? Because I have great grand parents who lived up to almost 200 in my hometown, and they had no access to "advances in science"... and they weren't the only ones in my hometown. Or in other people's hometown... probably even in yours. Why is the "go organic" movement gaining ground? Don't you think "advances in science" is the indirect cause of reduced lifespan? Do you know what harm those motor fumes you inhale daily on your way to work or elsewhere do to your organs? And thats just one out of innumerable examples.

Have you read the scientific article where scientists asserted that the brain has the capacity to keep living way more than it does in us, which led some of them to commence a study on "why we die"? This capacity could only have been designed or developed much before now, then it's potency eroded over time, aided by our "advances in science". It didn't suddenly develop.

If Christianity bothers you this much, why are you here? Why not go find a thread where atheism is glorified or something? Well, I hope this helps you think more deeply of your stand and spur you unto a genuine change of heart. Its never too late for anyone. One love.

naijadeyhia:
This is my last response to you. "World" also means a particular region or people and not the whole earth. We know the earth's population and geolocation was far less than today sk the whole would then could have been just Lagos in Number and size. So the flood we talk about here could have had a smaller focus as against worldwide.

Ps; do not mention me again.

ireneony:
Nice art work. .
To those atheists here is ur proof

NZAGHA:
berra mind ya words else.... :\:\

you dis djhandsome, what do you even think you're

Becareful. Else, you invite the wrath of God upon your head

naijadeyhia:
Are u sure you are educated? Most fish are self ferrilizing in other words have male and female sexual reproduction capabilities so all we need is just 1 fish and not 2 as some have internal fertilization while others have external fertilization.

Fishes are not that big to occupy that much space and again like I said, 40 days would cause a chaotic response.

naijadeyhia:
Just because we have 5 continents now doss not mean we had it then.

naijadeyhia:
You still dont get it do you? If a cow gives birth and the calf is separated from her with artificial stimulation replicating feeding of her calf such as with the use of hands to milk the cow it can continue producing milk for almost a year.

Milking cows by hand fools the cow into continuing to lactate.

I guess a 500 year old Noah was smarter than you.

naijadeyhia:
As an addition, baby animals occupy a lot less space and a wise man would have considered how to fit such animals in the ark after being given dimensions. Simple intelligence would suggest, "the smaller the better" a baby lion would be like your house cat "playful". A baby elephant would be same. A baby crocodile would be 200 times smaller than it would be when fully grown.

Or dont you know you can tell sex of an animal from delivery?

Plus temperament would be in its infancy so very easy to manage.

naijadeyhia:
Did it ever occur to you that when the bible says 2 of every animal it never said if the animals should be fully grown?

Only fully grown animals are territorial. Baby animals know no better.