₦airaland Forum

Zoharariel:
This write up is not in any way funny & can lead to aggression & violence.

If d article pain u, I guess u know wat to do. I blv there is a transformer in ur street, or a battery full of acid. Wen u wia caln jona clueless u didn't knw it wasn't funny and can lead to unrest

dannyville2:
Our brothers are repping..

I don't even know the part of Nigeria they are from. Can somebody help me please?

Just like we dont know the part of Nigeria doz our brothers dt murdered a policeman in the Uk are from, I think Adebolajo and 1 other Ade something.

royallord1:
just an observation...oooo
d above bolded words do not just mean animal but children of animals.... just saying... in other gist: u knw d fruit dont fall far from d tree; likewise children and parent nah joke oo... no use am play...

Sorry o, Buh is d child of an animal not an animal? i meaan children of animals are also animals demselves, so d bolded in ur quote is correct. Its just like saying offspring of human beings are not humans

rebranded:
Is attorney general now separate from Minister of Justice

If No..then this is false

U dey reason with ur head. 1 chilled heineken

CR77:
RIP


Chima should be held responsible.

Did u think before u typed?

Hopefully they can win it for the 1st time. LetsGoNaija

Claireshan1:
lol go and sit down

Manutd has won, let's wait for d draws moro to see if you will have your wish. I am sitting

Claireshan1:
i want man u to win because i wanna meet them at group stage

No be by mouth. If na by mouth, leciester city go win epl. Relax

badnature:
accepted anioma and asaba is not igbo! but my question is,WHY DO NIGERIA REGARD MAJOR CHUKWUMA KADUNA NZOGWU AS IGBOyoloba pipu and awusa pipu i and chino,Buddhamonk need ANSWER kita kita

You just nailed what is in my mind. God. Are u a mind reader?

DFemaleBoss:
Very senseless post. Op is a clown

Sometimes I wonder how people reason. Come to think of it. The ring leader of the coup which is Nzeogwu was from anioma. The igbos never rejected him as not being an igbo man. The whole nation turned against the igbos cause of the actions of a group of soldiers led by an igbo from Anioma. Now after d whole thing they wanna deny and say they are not igbos. Nnpc GMD came they said he is delta igbo, not igbo. Buh if it's a coup he will be core igbo

Shymm3x:
And what damage is that going to do to an underground and heavily fortified nuclear programme site? Israel is also within Iranian strike range and nah, they have thousands of missiles that can hit Israel - from Iran and all their proxies scattered all over MENA.

From Iran, The number of missiles that can hit israel is not more than 200, You saying thousands shows you aint informed. forget about the iron dome defense, have u heard of Arrow missile defense system? and arrow 3? abi na iron dome u know? 42 Jericho Missiles are all that is needed to hit the 3 major nuclear sites. U do not know the capability of the Jericho missiles. I bet You have not even heard of SPICE by Rafael, lets not argue this matter bros. they have the operational capability to take out the key nuclear sites.

Shymm3x:
There's no way they can attack Iran from the air without flying over the Iranian airspace. As for missiles - just any missiles won't be effective. They will have to use heavy cruise missiles - the type that's more powerful than the US' tomahawk missiles. And Israel doesn't have that capability.

All the noise is just good for sabre rattling - those in Israel aren't suicidal. Especially now that the big brother in Washington doesn't want any part of it.

what about their jericho Missiles? It has a range of 11000 km. with that range, Iran is well within range of a strike. Iran has thousands or missiles buh only about 100-200 that can hit israel. Let's take it from there

Missy89:
The problem with the hypothetical theory is that they will need another sovereign nation's airspace to refuel. If they cant get it all, That will even make Iran more likely have have the damn bomb because Sanctions wont matter anymore. That is why they will never go thru it in the first place.

Natanz is even father east than Arak and hitting the facility there is highly unlikely. Everyone saying that Isreal can get the job done are very quick to say they are no general when they are asked how they will do it ALONE.

That's my take. They do not need to take out all of the reactors to set back the program. Just the principal reactors. Well I pointed out I ain't a sky Marshall though I am confident that my plans are feasible because that is my view as a defense enthusiast not as Israeli military chief. I believe they even have a better plan than mine. As for the refueling, I agree with you. But the basis of my argument is operational capability to take out reactors, not political help.

Missy89:
So tell me how they will do it on their own. give me some hypothetical facts based on what we know

Ok missy. Assuming israel doesn't have to land in turkey or Iraq, it means they must refuel mid air using airborne tankers. I am sure israel doesn't have enof of doz tankers Buh they have unrivaled experience in using f15s and F16s outfitted as tankers. Then they might need about 40 planes to do the work. F15s and F16s fitted with GBU 28 bunker busters.
Then missy I dnt think taking out all of d reactors is possible. That will need over a hundred planes and weeks. So the most feasible is to take out the key reactors like d one in Arak dt u mentioned in ur earlier posts. The 1 in natanz province, the uranium conversion facility and d rest. Not more dan 8 reactors. I am thinking a simultaneous take out. They can't take out all becos of the way d reactors are scattered Buh I think they can take out the key ones. I am low on battery, would love to continue with you tomorrow. Waiting for your critique about this proposal. Not a sky Marshall though

Missy89:
But the US is not interested in taking them out. The Initial argument was how will Israel do it alone? and the answer is they cant.

Talking about all out war between Iran and Israel however, The same reason why Israel will be unable to take out the reactors is the reason why they will be unable to establish the air superiority that you are talking about.

Now if Israel have few allies then that might change. The size and distance alone makes your theory very unlikely.

The size and distance? There is no rule that says Israeli airplanes must engage the Iranian airforce in Iran. Can israel take out the reactors on their own without logistical support? Yes. Without political support? No.
The basis of my argument is not about whether they will or they should, Buh rather whether they can. How?....

Shymm3x:
Lol @ "quick, in-and-out, mobile operation". How feasible is that and have you ever bothered to check where Iran and Israel are located on the world map, how big Iran is, where Iran's nuclear programme's sites are located, and the fact that Israel would have to use either Saudi or Jordan's airspace for any air attack? I'm sure you know Iran isn't Syria or Iraq - and the barrage of missiles that will hit Israel after any miscalculation would make armageddon look like fire crackers. Israel is just US' aircraft carrier in MENA - its military capabilities are grossly overrated.

You mean the same Iron Dome that got exposed by Hamas after they started using Iranian mid-range missiles? And that's little hamas, a militant group that has to keep hiding its low stockpile of missiles. Now imagine what will hit Israel if Iran were to unleash the dragon on the country. You lot need to enjoy Bibi's posturing - he's a comedian. A terrible one though.

Your argument about airspace would have been valid if israel is using a fighter jet, as such they need to get into Iran. What if it's a strategic long range bomber? Then we have to consider the range of the bomber and as such they don't need to enter into Iran. As for the missiles, that's where Iran would hurt israel. Military strike against Iran is not beans Buh certainly an option.

Missy89:
I am misunderstanding something. Are you talking about an all out war with Iran? or just taking out much of reactors hypothetically?

If you follow my discussions with adeyemi, you will know we are talking of the war and not the reactors. I am talking of the air to air combat after d reactors have been taken out "hypothetically". I know they are embedded within mountains and all of that, Buh I believe the US and israel can reach doz reactors if they decide Iran is developing a nuke

Missy89:
This is not a video game.

Lol its not. Buh I can't imagine Iran dominating Israel in the air. U know the truth. I blv u r very informed and u know what I am saying. Truth be told missy they have the experience of dogfights and they have superior planes. If Israel establishes air superiority, then the war will be won by israel.

adeyemi2015:
That's your own submission which I'm gonna respect. The World should live in peace and not in pieces.

Yes. Honestly I wish Iran is pursuing a peaceful nuke program. Unfortunately they ain't. Israel and Iran are not the only ish. N Korea and Russia and USA nko? Bringing up d cold war era. Bros I wnt peace Buh d world is closer to armageddon dan peace unfortunately. I am enjoying u too

adeyemi2015:
Honestly I'm really enjoying you bro.
Let's assumed Israel ain't allowed to use WMD in the War, then who is likely to win?

what are ICBMS. Are they not weapons of mass destruction? Remove icbms and nukes. Let's do it d conventional way. Airplanes and ground forces and battle tanks, Israel is superior in d air. They will take out all Iranian warplanes, u know that. Once they establish air superiority within hours, the war is over. It doesn't matter if the ground forces are smaller. As for the navy, Israel has a decent navy too Buh the key is the air combat

adeyemi2015:
Seems you think Iran can't aim and strike Israeli Nuclear Arsenal precisely? Besides, Nuclear weapons are not allowed in Wars, and if Israel dares to violate it, they would be nuked by (either China or Russia) an Iranian Ally in retaliation which can cause WWIII. Perhaps North Korea might seize the opportunity to test-run their nuclear weapons on Israel too!
I do not pray for War to come between them, but if it does; my Brother, ready to live with the word (Israel) only appearing in papers not on the Earth again!

Did u say nukes are not allowed in war? Well if it will lead to ww3 alright. Buh do u seriously think it's only Iran dt has allies? Israel doesn't have allies in US and France and UK who have nukes. Nope. They will fold dia arms and allow Russia and China and N Korea to use nukes on Israel. Bros we are digressing from the argument. Exclude Russia and US and China and UK. Israel vs Iran, in a race to wipe out each other, Israel will win. Y r u seeking for help from China and Russia if u r confident of IRGC? As for irgc attacking Israeli nuclear sites, no one in d world knows d exact location of Israeli reactors if not dt modercai vanunu shed some Lil light let alone knowing where d weapons are cos Israel has neva accepted owning 1. IRGC vs IDF in a race to erase each other fromm d map, IDF needs hours. Talk bout banning nuclear weapons, attacking civilians are also banned. So if Israel attacks a military installation and Iran decides to wipe out d whole con3 with its civilians instead of attacking military installations, nukes can be legal. D only way Israel will not attack Iran is if they discontinue their aim to get a nuke cos Dts wt armadinejad and Iran wnts. Odawise it is inevitable. About wiping off Israel, Saudi Arabia and Gamal abdel Nasser of Egypt set out to do it too. Easier said dan done. Iran will work towards getn a bomb, it's a sure banker, Israeli attack is a sure banker. Ww3 is inevitable bro. Let's face it

adeyemi2015:
Israel is being over-rated with their military capabilities. It's so funny that many are under-rating the Iranian forces. Iran Military is less equipped comparing to IRGC!
The IRGC forces are ready for martyr, and they voluntarily joined to protect the interest of the Country, their religion and Spiritual Leader.
I've been following Iran Military developments quite a while, and this is a Country who is fully capable of producing military hardware and software respectively. Name it; they are good and capable in the air, on the Sea or Land!
I think those who are condemning Iran Military Capabilities should sacrifice little MB to research on their military capability status; bet me, they wouldn't come back and under-estimated them again.
If war breaks out today between Israel and Iran (God forbids), as Ahmadinajadi, their immediate past president once said, Israel will no longer appear on the World Map!!!

Adeyemi, did you say Iran manufactures military equipments? Hardware and software? Well you are correct. Guess what, Israel manufactures guns, helicopters, battle tanks, and fighter jets. What about drones, Israel has d best drone technology in d world. Haven't u heard of Rafael corporation? Software and hardware-wise they are superior to Iran. Pls sacrifice a few mb and research about Israeli defence corporations. IRGC and Iran are a decent force on paper, they were bleeped up by saddam. They hvnt had any real warfare since. U talk of matyrdom. So d Israeli soldiers ain't willing to die for Israel? Na only IRGC soldiers wan die for dia con3

adeyemi2015:
They were receiving Rockets (manually lunched) not missiles. FYI IRGC and the Iranian Army are equipped with Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. Both Military Organizations are capable of "precisely" hitting the "tiny entity" called Israel from Iran. Do you know how many Ballistic Missiles Iran has? They have enough to wipe out Israel within few days! The Israeli Iron Dome can only withstand Hamas Rockets not Iranian IBMs!!!

Agreed. Now Dts ma point. U nailed it. The keyword in ur statements is "days". Israeli intelligence know d locations of doz missile silos. Iran needs about 5 days to wipe off Israel from d map. Israel needs 2 hrs max to wipe out Iran with nukes. Not ICBMS. They just need to render their military operational bases useless. The missiles won't stand a chance against nukes especially since Israeli strikes will be precision-based to reduce the missile capabilities since d locations are known.
Ur assumption is based on d fact dt Iran will be bombarding Israel with missiles continously for 5 days and Israel will relax with their own nukes and missiles waiting to be wiped off.

Defense section? Hell yea. I am in for this one. It won't be a Nigerian thing if it is to be successful. Seun please do something.

Obiagelli:
Every intelligence agencies go extra miles to get the job done, don't paint iran black out of sentiments.

I don't know who will win but certainly both countries will come out a disaster

I am not painting Iran bad outta sentiments. Maybe if Iran is receiving the number of missiles inside their territory like Israel does from hamas on a daily basis and hezbollah in 2006, they would have invaded. They invaded Egypt and Syria because they were besieged. They didn't just wake up to attack Gamal abdel Nasser without Egypt and d Arab coalition amassing armies near Israeli border.

Missy89:
You cant say you are no general and think you know how a country will react to a bomb raid at the same time. or claim a nation has operational capability to perform a task when their defense chief say they dont. In that case you should provide us with some details on how it will be done.

What you are saying might be based on your own perception. Do not assume we are both arguing based on perception. Do you even know how far in land some of those reactors are like the one in Arak? how many bombing sorties do you even think they will have to do in order to achieve acceptable result?. and what guarantees does the IAF have that they will get everything?

If you insist that the reason why Israel is not attacking Iran is diplomatic/political and not Military That should end the argument already. Military conflicts are not just about shooting alone. If an operation lack political/diplomatic success/backing ,That mission is a burst! and probably wont happen. What the got away with in Syria and Iraq they wont get away with it in Iran. In fact, Bombing Iran will even make Tehran have the bomb and not otherwise.

Israel will be satisfied with an extended breakout time. I dont think they are worried about Iran having the bomb eventually (It is inevitable). After all, they can defend themselves.

I agree with you totally Buh missy something is amiss here. I do not think that Ehud with his background will come out and say the IAF doesn't have the operational capability to strike Iran. I think it is a decoy. You know why I think so? There was a report on how the Israelis have already detailed a plan to attack iran's nuke site. An already prepared operational plan by the IAF and all that is needed is d go ahead from d prez. It leaked and I think Ehud wnts to deflect d attention away. Israel has been in d know of doz sites for yrs and any1 who thinks d airforce ust started to plan in 2010 on d operational details is naive. Even the USAF already has operational plans on how to strike if d need arises. All dey need is d go ahead and d jets are off. I think for Ehud to say such, he is trying to decieve the outside world and Iran into believing that Israel is hvn operational hitches attacking them. It's a decoy

Obiagelli:
CIA, mossad don't?

Mossad does not weaponise sects. They kill and sabotage and gather Intel Buh they do not support sects with arms and ammunition like IRGC does in Yemen and the rest. As for d CIA I agree they do that. Truth be told if a war breaks out between Israel and Iran, a conventional war, Israel will defeat Iran. Though it won't be without consequences Buh it's a certainty. All they need to do is take out their key miltary installations like missile silos and airplanes and stuff. Worse still bfr Iran can get 20 missiles to Israel, they can use just 1 or 2 nukes. If u r familiar with way Israel has fought, then u know dt the aim is to cripple key elements within minutes or hours. Fcos they will suffer heavy casualty Buh they will win Iran in a conventional non guerilla warfare

Missy89:
The small size of Israel is actually its problem. Israeli planes can get to Iran but coming back and getting the job done is the problem. That is why the minister daid they lack operational capability.

Iron dome is defending against rockets not missiles. There is a huge difference. rockets dont carry laser guided techs that can evade radar and travel at fast and accurate speed so the iron dome defense system is basically useless against Iran missiles should they counter attack

Agreed that d dome is for rockets. Buh Israel has a missile defence system although it is classified just like their nuclear program and their top secret super spy agency headed by a Brig Gen X in the negev. How can you say the Israeli planes may not get the job done? Pilot for pilot they have the best airforce cos of the no of kills in dogfights and precision strikes on targets. They have decent fighter/attack jets. And they may not even need to use a fightet jet, a long range bomber will do.
As for turkey being d greatest military in d east, well in numbers yes. Buh numbers don't always win d war or determine d best if not Russia and China will be d best cos they have more numbers than US. Secondly I can't remember turkey fighting a conventional war apart from drills in nato and war games so they dnt have real warfare experience compared to Israeli military that has fought several wars. If numbers counted that much then Israel should have lost to the Arabs wen their warplanes( superior MIGs) outnumbered Israeli planes by 5 to 1

BeeBeeOoh:
In other words, he should be warming up for a free travel to US of A..

Nope, its a simple comprehension. the court threw out the case seeking to extradite him. the fg did not appeal the decish so the discarding of the suit to take him to USA still stands.

Yomieluv:
I won't in any way condemn their tradition,whatever that pleases them...

We all shouting backwardness,even in civilised world,there are certain protocol followed in the burial of certain personalities..if this is the best way it can be done to Ooni,let them be.

After all,we are still in Africa.

yes i agree with u. u shdnt condemn it. it is a very good thing. i also pray that u remain alive wen either the oba of benin or the next ooni or the alaafin dies, so dt ur head and dt of maybe ur wife and children will be used to bury him. nope, u guys will be buried alive with him cos i know dey dnt kill dos peeps, dey bury dem alive. Nonsense

doe1994:
It is important to note that women who are involved in military and CIA are largely very strong headed masculine types (Hilary Clinton types). These are not the average women and when they average more sensitive/emotional women do end up in male dominated sectors, they do get treated differently and in insensitive ways in relation to their male counterparts.

I disagree doe, if i am a drug king pin and i see a woman who is strong headed like hilary, i would suspect dt she is a spy. go and research about israeli and russian female spies, they look very average and feminine so as not to arouse suspicion buh physically they r deadly.