₦airaland Forum

veekid:
As a woman; how do you feel; knowing you officially share your husband's dīck with another woman?


I need a woman to answer me sincerely #noabuse

My brother, I'm a woman.

I swear I don't know how the Muslims do it!

I can't even imagine sharing my husband not to talk of living with the b!tch in the same house and seeing her face everyday

Lol.... mavordi go gree die?

ObaKlaz:
How come I can't find Nnamdi KANU, Chiwetalu Agu and of course the 'hero' from Otuoke on the inaugural invites?

GEJ was invited. He is going with WIKE.

buhari was not invited.

Nigerians can't seem to mind their business

Can't they arrest that bastard?

Gej remains a hero.

To all haters and the guy below me, go and remove Jammeh. See if it's easy

All this nonsense ameachi and buhari is doing... it will come back to hunt them

thaoriginator:
you already cursed nigga

So are you.

nwamehn:
Did u read that subsection 1 well? It says 'for the benefit of all, or any of the parties to AND the children of the marriage'. Did u see that AND and not OR, it didn't say for the benefit of all, or any of the parties OR the children, but it says AND the children, which means that children must be involved before this subsection is valid. Nevertheless, let me talk about children not being involved. Let me give u instances of where subsection 1 prevails in marriage where there ar no kids. Do u know that if a man marries a woman and deprives the woman of working for so many years and so she couldn't make savings and then decides to divorce her, that the court would likely prevail on him to make settlements? Do u know that if a man builds a house by the contribution of both him and the wife and after then decides to divorce her, that the court will compel him to make settlements? There ar many other cases aside these two. These are the cases I'm telling u that warrant settlement according to that subsection 1 once the woman is able to prove any of these, but not that if both the man and woman work and the woman never contributed anything to any house or property acquired by the man, that when they divorce they will now share the man's property equally and she gets 50% as u claim. U haven't been able to show me where the Act said they will share the man's property equally as u have been claiming. I suggest u contract a lawyer to enlighten u more on settlement of property, so that u understand settlement of property doesn't wholly translate to division of property equally, it can mean provison of accomodation, it can mean giving a house or a land, it can mean giving a shop etc.
Subsection 3 nullifies subsection 1 when the marriage has a child and he or she is 21years. So, if u claim settlement refers to division of property into two, what does subsection 3 mean? Does it mean that once there is child in the marriage and he or she is 21years, that the woman will forfeit her 50% share?
If a man and a woman would share the man's property equally when they divorce, so can u furnish us with details of cases in Nigeria where the couple divorced and the man's property was divided into two? Don't bring examples of the man providing accomodation for his kids because that is different from dividing a man's property into two.

That's your interpretation of and.

Cute baby but I won't put the coat of arms on my kid!

To avoid the curse of Nigeria

PORTHARCOURT

nwamehn:
It's actually section 72 because the entire section 73 talks about alimony, payment of lump sum, periodic sum, order for all kinds of payment etc. It's section 72 that talks about settlement of property and section 72 subsection 1 talks about the settlement of property for the benefit of all or part of the parties involved including the children and not in anyway about dividing a man's or a woman's property into two. This settlement of property relates to accommodation of the children, how the family can raise money to take care of the children in the case the man owns a rented house and the family had been depending on that house for livelihood. This particular settlement of property in this subsection is what the court uses to prevail on the man to rent an apartment for his wife and kids, leave the house for them to stay in etc but IT'S NEVER USED TO DENY THE MAN HIS HOUSE OR ASK HIM TO FORFEIT HIS HOUSE PERMANENTLY TO THE WIFE, except for special cases for eg where the woman's money was actually used to build the house and now the man wants a divorce etc, the court can interpret it that way if the woman can actually prove that it was her money that was used to build it.
Subsection 2 of this same section 72 talks about ante-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements which ar binding in marriage. I might want to have a written agreement with my spouse before we marry. The agreement might contain that in the event of divorce, the children will go to her, then I will dash her my car and give her a house somewhere to use and take care of the children, the agreement might also contain that in the event of divorce she gets nothing from me aside the weekly or monthly money to take care of the children, it can just contain anything, and such an agreement is called ante-nuptial agreement and it's binding according to that subsection 2 of section 72.
Subsection 3 of the same section 72 states and I quote, "The power of the court to make orders of the kind referred to in this section shall not be exercised for the benefit of a child who has attained the age of twenty-one years unless the court is of opinion that there are special circumstances that justify the making of such an order for the benefit of that child".
U can see that this subsection 3 states it clear that the entire section 72 including subsection 1 that talks about settlement of property becomes null if the child in question attains 21 years. So if subsection 1 translates to the man and wife dividing the man's property equally as u claim, does it mean that once the child is 21 years, the woman will return all her 50% share of the properties divided or does it mean that if the man and wife had children all above 21, that when they divorce, the woman will not have any 50% share again since the law says the settlement of property is binding only if the children ar below 21?
What subsection 3 is saying is that if we divorce and I rent a house for our kids or I leave my house for our kids to stay in for accommodation, that by the time they ar all above 21, I am no more legally obliged to keep on renting property for them or accommodating them in my house. However I can still decide to leave them there for life, after all they ar my kids, whether old or young.
And do u know that if I and my wife both earn salaries, and in the event of divorce the court determines that I have custody of our kids and not my wife (which happens especially when the woman is certified to be into drugs, alcohol or certain bad occupations etc), that I will have the kids with me and my wife will get no single penny from me and she will still not live in my house?
I repeat, there is no law in Nigeria at present that mandates a man and wife to share the man's or woman's property equally when they divorce, that law can only come into action when the gender equality bill is passed into law.

72 (1)The court may, in proceedings under this Act, by court in order require the parties to the marriage, or either of them, to make, for the benefit of all or any of the parties to, and the children of, the marriage, such a settlement of property to which the parties are, or either of them is, entitled (whether in possession or reversion) as the court considers just and equitable in the circumstances of the case.

Is it that you can't comprehend? or are we reading different laws?

YOU KEEP REFERRING ONLY TO KIDS. ARE CHILDREN PARTIES TO MARRIAGE??

THIS SECTION STATES CLEARLY THE COURT HAS THE POWER TO MAKE PROVISION FOR SETTLEMENT OF ANY OF THE PARTIES!

What of cases where there are no children but a party wants divorce, is the other party (he/she) not entitled to settlement?

When women complain of infidelity men will say what of our father's in those days.

The truth is that most of them fathered children that were not theirs..

nwamehn:
Maybe u can furnish us with the particular sections of the Marriage Act or the Matrimonial Causes Act of the Laws of the Federation of Nigeria that state that property acquired by a partner during marriage would be shared equally between couple in the event of a divorce.
Getting married under these acts (and not customary or Islamic rites) guarantees no division of property equally in the case of divorce. It only guarantees that the man or the woman in special cases where the woman earn far higher than the man makes arrangement for a lump sum to be paid, or alimony or provision of accommodation for the child(ren) till the said child(ren) reaches 21 years or if there is a special situation like being handicapped, imbecility, etc, that would extend the stay beyond 21 years, after which the man or the woman is not deemed to be legally responsible for the child's accommodation and general welfare (I can provide the sections of the Acts that say this). The law of sharing property equally would come into action by the time the gender equality bill is passed into law, and then these Marriage and Matrimonial Causes Acts would be amended to reflect it too.

Read all section 72 and 73 Matrimonial causes Act Nigeria.

Then get back to me.

nwamehn:
U see why I said that we need the real facts of the case? U are just furnishing us with these facts in question little by little, the man is providing accommodation for his kids even though it has been decided that the man and wife wouldn't be married again and as such cannot live together anymore, and as the court granted the woman custody of the children. It happens everyday, sometimes the man is asked to rent an apartment for them in the case the man has no place of his own. But fact is that the said house still belongs to the man (unless there is another truth under because we were not directly involved in the case) and he didn't abandon the house to the woman because they ar divorced, as done in the West. In the West, if a man and a woman divorce, the property is shared equally and the house they live in will turn out to be given to the woman if it's part of the woman's 50% share. But that law isn't in existence in Nigeria yet.

So in Nigeria when a man divorces his wife or wife files for divorce on the proper grounds, she gets nothing? ? Is that what you are saying? Then what is the difference between customary law and being married under the Act?
Once married under the Act except otherwise agreed, each spouse is a part owner of their spouses property upon death and in the event of divorce, properties which where acquired during the marriage are shared.

nwamehn:
U see why I said that we need the real facts of the case? U are just furnishing us with these facts in question little by little, the man is providing accommodation for his kids even though it has been decided that the man and wife wouldn't be married again and as such cannot live together anymore, and as the court granted the woman custody of the children. It happens everyday, sometimes the man is asked to rent an apartment for them in the case the man has no place of his own. But fact is that the said house still belongs to the man (unless there is another truth under because we were not directly involved in the case) and he didn't abandon the house to the woman because they ar divorced, as done in the West. In the West, if a man and a woman divorce, the property is shared equally and the house they live in will turn out to be given to the woman if it's part of the woman's 50% share. But that law isn't in existence in Nigeria yet.

So in Nigeria when a man divorces his wife or wife files for divorce on the proper grounds, she gets nothing? ? Is that what you are saying? Then what is the difference between customary law and being married under the Act?

lastpage:
When l here this kind of one-sided bullshyte, l just laugh!

I laugh because the proponents of such never tell us the "flip-side" of the story!

That is, what happens when it is the wife that Cheats?
Does the cheating wife get kicked out ........ or does she still kicks her husband out (when the cheating causes an uproar as likely)

Is it only the women that have "rights that can be enforced"?
Do the Men also deserve the SAME RIGHT as their female spouse"

And finally, does the law give them the liberty and freedom to enforce and enjoy such right, as granted the wife, under the same circumstance.


Just sit-back and think: How many men have successfully kicked their wives out, for Cheating on them in marriage? can you count them or are you saying Women are such Saints they dont cheat on their marriage? (Dont make me laugh because the reality will surely shock you! )

Unfortunately, men like you are the "greatest enemy, the weakest link and the Achilles heel" of men to enjoying EQUALITY with women, which is what you think yo are preaching!





Lastpage!

A law cannot only favour one gender. If a woman cheats she gets the same treatment. Are you aware that women pay alimony, spousal support and child support where she has a higher income?

nwamehn:
If we get the real facts of the case, we will realise why the judge ordered the man to abandon the house to the wife and not because of anything divorce. It could be that the woman actually built the house and not the man, or that the man built the house in the woman's name and as such the house would be hers, it could be so many things. The law of sharing ur property equally with ur wife in the case of divorce is not in place in Nigeria at present, that law is part of the gender equality bill that the Senate struck out the other time, only the law of alimony is in place in Nigeria at present. So, if a man divorces his wife at present in Nigeria, the man only owes alimony and none of his properties would go to the lady. It can only change when the gender equality bill is passed.

I know the lady personally. The man built the house. He was ordered to provide accommodation for his kids.... hence she got the house he built. If the court can only provide alimony, where will the kids live??

These people should say the truth. This was not a mistake, boko haram mist have infiltrated the army.

SweetJoystick:
them never see anything yet. my brother 2m don waka as things stand

My sister own na 3m

kayzat:
You need to have your head examined. Because some idiots are sending their husband's out over flimsy excuses and the corrupt system is supporting them does not justify that crap . It is still an allegation of infidelity which the woman is yet to proof against the man .


Why will I marry someone only for her to throw me out of what I laboured for in the name of marriage? Is this what the whole gender equality all about?


Rubbish.

Remain in Nigeria and marry an illiterate. If not... if you cheat you get kicked out! If you don't want to get kicked out, keep your preek for one place!

By the way once you marry it's no longer your house. Especially if the house was built or bought during the marriage!

pinkyruledworld:
and u think this makes sense? how I go struggle build house one woman go com send me out of the house? its wickedness. I dey tell people say if I wan marry my wife go sign book say she no dey carry my property go if we divorce bkos me sabi the kind man wey I be, some women are devlish tho.

So you that wants to live anyhow and expect your wife to suffer and endure all her life , what are you? Are you not satan himself

Don't worry. You will meet your match

kayzat:
That woman is a bad excuse of a wife . I watched the video where she was threatening her husband with arrest and jail if he fail to leave their house in 2 minutes ( The man said the house is his and he can't leave for her).



Which kind woman will send his husband out of his house even when the man did not make any attempt in touching her. I wonder where she want him to leave to.


She eventually call-in the cops to take his husband away in the presence of their children and her Sister.



I am not saying she killed her husband o but that woman is a real excuse of a bad wife. Imagine coming to Nigeria to marry and take you to America and you end sending me out of my house?



https://mobile.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1593378294022186&id=100000500938066&refid=17&_ft_=top_level_post_id.1593378294022186%3Atl_objid.1593378294022186%3Athid.100000500938066%3A306061129499414%3A2%3A0%3A1485935999%3A-8689672391110133677

Get out of your local Nigeria way of thinking. Is it because most of our women here are afraid to enforce their right?
Once you are legally married and your spouse cheats you have the right to file for divorce and claim that which is jointly owned. Especially where kids are involved. Except agreed otherwise. That's why abroad when a man cheats his wife kicks him out!
Some women are even doing here in naija. A judge recently ordered a man to leave the house he built for his wife and pay a certain amount monthly for the upkeep of the kids and alimony. RIGHT HERE IN PH!

What motive dose she have to kill her husband??

na wa o. So so bad news today

I have a strong feeling that the so called accidental air bomb by the army was not an accident but was carried out by a member of boko haram in the army...

May the souls of the faithfully departed rip

Imagine if this happened under GEJ administration.

Rip to the dead... the sorrow and suffering of these people seem to know no end

Abeyjide:
I got my GH this morning. my bank alert.

Picsure or...

Put him fire

Thank God says na small money I use...

CXLVII:


Another cause of heart disease, heart-attack to be specific

Na wa o.

I just tried this sh!t for the first time..


But na small money I put sharr so no biggie