₦airaland Forum

BluntBoy:
You are a big fool.

Before AJ got his belts back, he had to rematch Ruiz, you illiterate.

Ruiz's stock had risen by then, and yet the match still never went for 50-50. So, enough with that stock nonsense.

Get that into your thick skull, village idiot.

You dey town so?

BluntBoy:
You are a big fool.

Before AJ got his belts back, he had to rematch Ruiz, you illiterate.

Ruiz's stock had risen by then, and yet the match still never went for 50-50. So, enough with that stock nonsense.

Get that into your thick skull, village idiot.

You call me an illiterate, lolzzzzz, bros school no pass through you sir, you just go for nothing, arinya

BluntBoy:
You idiot should understand that no one wants to fight an undisputed for anything order than 50-50.

Even greats like Lennox Lewis had told Hearn to consider the boxing world and accept Wilder's 50-50 terms.

Now, even Hearn has realized that the only way an undisputed would happen is with 50-50 split.

Can't you read? I provided a link where Hearn himself said only a 50-50 can make an undisputed bout happen.

My problem is that why is he just realizing this after so many years?

I guess Tyson and other legends in the game did that too, arinya

BluntBoy:
It is enough for you greedy idiot.

But that is not how they do it in boxing.

You talk percentage, not amount.

The fight between Joshua and Wilder did not happen because Wilder did not trust Hearn.

Both Wilder and Joshua showed that they wanted to fight. Each man wanted to be the undisputed champion of the world.

When last did we have an undisputed heavyweight champion? More than 20 years. Since the time of Lennox Lewis.

The world of boxing wanted the Joshua-Wilder fight. There is nothing bad if Wilder demanded 50-50 for such a huge prospect of a fight.

That fight was called different names from being the biggest proposed fight in the history of boxing. You expect Wilder to come into the fight without clear terms and a feeling of trust that he would not be cheated?

Fine, at that time, Joshua had 3 major belts, but it was not entirely about Joshua's belts or his marketability. It was about Wilder too. Everyone said it was going to be a very exciting fight. It was not just Joshua that would sell out the fight. The fight would have sold out irrespective of whether Joshua was marketable or not.

Joshua-Wilder was a fight that everyone wanted to watch. So, why didn't they just agree to a 50-50?

I guess wilder is one of your kinsmen, that's why you know he doesn't trust Hearn, mumu

kenex4ever:
remind me this when ever AJ agrees to fight fury

Better

Valkrie:
This quote is meant for Pastor Adoboye, Oyedepo and co...These Yahoo boys nah play dem still dey play for their side! !!

Dem force you go their church, if you have families going to their church pursue them na,,,,

livinbygrace:
My bro,I dey tell you .I never really knew the value of my father until I grew up.I am in my forties now and no go lie he no easy to be a man,not to talk of a responsible father .

That's why you see some men, they have done their best but the woman keep complaining, wetin you do sef, funniest thing be say wetin woman dey take person eye see sometimes dey pass pikin own, you will just have to swallow it.... Bros, if real men open out, person no go wan marry... Cus at the end they get very little praise.

BluntBoy:
Bro, just stop spewing trash.

When Ruiz took Joshua's belts, his stock rose. How come Hearn still refused a 50-50 in the rematch? Supposing it was an undisputed fight, I am sure Ruiz would have forced them to make a 50-50 split.

You are just spewing rubbish since.

An undisputed fight has nothing to do with stocks rising or falling. It is all about the belts. Hearn says Joshua wants the fight. So, Hearn says it appears like only 50-50 would make the fight happen.

Even if Bash Ali has the WBC, and he insists he would only fight for 50-50, would his stock matter if Joshua is keen on unifying the divisions? Of course, not[color=#000099][/color].

Joshua has 3 major belts, Fury has the last one. Joshua needs that last one to make history. Fury needs Joshua's 3 belts to make history. And you are here talking about stocks.

We are talking about the undisputed in this generation of four major belts, you are spewing trash about stocks rising and falling.

You know these too, walai you be mumu

BluntBoy:
Bro, just stop spewing trash.

When Ruiz took Joshua's belts, his stock rose. How come Hearn still refused a 50-50 in the rematch? Supposing it was an undisputed fight, I am sure Ruiz would have forced them to make a 50-50 split.

You are just spewing rubbish since.

An undisputed fight has nothing to do with stocks rising or falling. It is all about the belts. Hearn says Joshua wants the fight. So, Hearn says it appears like only 50-50 would make the fight happen.

Even if Bash Ali has the WBC, and he insists he would only fight for 50-50, would his stock matter if Joshua is keen on unifying the divisions? Of course, not.

Joshua has 3 major belts, Fury has the last one. Joshua needs that last one to make history. Fury needs Joshua's 3 belts to make history. And you are here talking about stocks.

We are talking about the undisputed in this generation of four major belts, you are spewing trash about stocks rising and falling.

AJ rose the heavy weight division again, if you do not know, sorry then

BluntBoy:
Bro, just stop spewing trash.

When Ruiz took Joshua's belts, his stock rose. How come Hearn still refused a 50-50 in the rematch? Supposing it was an undisputed fight, I am sure Ruiz would have forced them to make a 50-50 split.

You are just spewing rubbish since.

An undisputed fight has nothing to do with stocks rising or falling. It is all about the belts. Hearn says Joshua wants the fight. So, Hearn says it appears like only 50-50 would make the fight happen.

Even if Bash Ali has the WBC, and he insists he would only fight for 50-50, would his stock matter if Joshua is keen on unifying the divisions? Of course, not.

Joshua has 3 major belts, Fury has the last one. Joshua needs that last one to make history. Fury needs Joshua's 3 belts to make history. And you are here talking about stocks.

We are talking about the undisputed in this generation of four major belts, you are spewing trash about stocks rising and falling.

An undisputed won't fight anybody again bah, and again, a boxer will always have an edge, you talking as if there have neva been an undisputed before, if them agree on 40/60 go change am then. Any thing can be finalized on a fight and shouting undisputed all around the place, you just Sabi the word undisputed ni

BluntBoy:
Bro, just stop spewing trash.

When Ruiz took Joshua's belts, his stock rose. How come Hearn still refused a 50-50 in the rematch? Supposing it was an undisputed fight, I am sure Ruiz would have forced them to make a 50-50 split.

You are just spewing rubbish since.

An undisputed fight has nothing to do with stocks rising or falling. It is all about the belts. Hearn says Joshua wants the fight. So, Hearn says it appears like only 50-50 would make the fight happen.

Even if Bash Ali has the WBC, and he insists he would only fight for 50-50, would his stock matter if Joshua is keen on unifying the divisions? Of course, not.

Joshua has 3 major belts, Fury has the last one. Joshua needs that last one to make history. Fury needs Joshua's 3 belts to make history. And you are here talking about stocks.

We are talking about the undisputed in this generation of four major belts, you are spewing trash about stocks rising and falling.

Bros, no vex, I guess na you Sabi how dem dey do the purse sir

BluntBoy:
What has this got to do with me?

How can you offer a man money rather than percentage, and expect him to jump on it simply because it is a large amount?

Tell me if it is 50-50, not offering me money when I don't know what the other man is taking home.

That is how they do it in boxing.

Wilder may not be as skilled as Joshua, but he is not a fool.

They never wanted that fight. If they wanted it, all they should have told Wilder is "See, we are going for a 60-40, or 50-50". Offering even 100 million dollars does not state what percentage of the whole money that is. So, what if 100 million is 30 percent of the whole true pool, and Joshua goes with 70. Is that not like cheating Wilder?

Offering him money he has not collected in a match fight is enough bro,

BluntBoy:
What has this got to do with me?

How can you offer a man money rather than percentage, and expect him to jump on it simply because it is a large amount?

Tell me if it is 50-50, not offering me money when I don't know what the other man is taking home.

That is how they do it in boxing.

Wilder may not be as skilled as Joshua, but he is not a fool.

They never wanted that fight. If they wanted it, all they should have told Wilder is "See, we are going for a 60-40, or 50-50". Offering even 100 million dollars does not state what percentage of the whole money that is. So, what if 100 million is 30 percent of the whole true pool, and Joshua goes with 70. Is that not like cheating Wilder?

I guess you were there na, wilder is not a fool na you know na

BluntBoy:
What has this got to do with me?

How can you offer a man money rather than percentage, and expect him to jump on it simply because it is a large amount?

Tell me if it is 50-50, not offering me money when I don't know what the other man is taking home.

That is how they do it in boxing.

Wilder may not be as skilled as Joshua, but he is not a fool.

They never wanted that fight. If they wanted it, all they should have told Wilder is "See, we are going for a 60-40, or 50-50". Offering even 100 million dollars does not state what percentage of the whole money that is. So, what if 100 million is 30 percent of the whole true pool, and Joshua goes with 70. Is that not like cheating Wilder?

I guess you were there na

BluntBoy:
You are here again, arguing blindly.

AJ this AJ that.

Hearn is a coward. Look how quick it was to get Wilder and Fury to fight. And they fought twice breaking the bank for far more than Hearn's cash cow ever did.

Just know it that Hearn will never put Joshua in with Fury because they are scared.

Yesterday, Hearn tried to steal Fury's limelight by mentioning Anthony Joshua. All this while that Wilder was unbeaten, they refused to make the fight happen. The world wanted it, and they refused because Wilder wanted 50-50. If they had wanted the fight, they would have made it happen.

Now, that Fury has helped them get rid of Wilder, they want to come and talk terms. Then, when Fury demands 50-50, they will stall the fight and claim that Fury's team is not serious and doesn't want the fight.

Go and check Hearn's Twitter page, and read comments on the post he made about making the Joshua-Fury fight. No one is falling for the coward anymore.

They will avoid Fury and wait for someone to help them get rid of him.

If wilder knows he go chop beating the fight will take century to finalise, you know nothing

salford:
common sense dictates that whoever brings more money to the table gets the highest percentage. Hearn/DAZN even offered the d!ckhead Wilder over $100m, but he declined to go and accept a $5m fight with Grandpa Ortiz . He rates himself so much and was thinking he is worth more than that despite his records filled with no-name journeymen boxers.

His last worthy paycheck would be his 3rd with Furry since he said he would pull the 3rd bout clause in the contract. He would chop beating again from Fury

Monica, BluntBoy

salford:
common sense dictates that whoever brings more money to the table gets the highest percentage. Hearn/DAZN even offered the d!ckhead Wilder over $100m, but he declined to go and accept a $5m fight with Grandpa Ortiz . He rates himself so much and was thinking he is worth more than that despite his records filled with no-name journeymen boxers.

His last worthy paycheck would be his 3rd with Furry since he said he would pull the 3rd bout clause in the contract. He would chop beating again from Fury

Bros, one guy dey here sef dey drag shit with me self, like fury na God

BluntBoy:
He said that before Sunday.

That was why he said only 50-50 would make the fight between Joshua and the winner of Wilder-Fury fight happen.

When Wilder had the WBC, they refused to accept 50-50 for a unification fight, why then did Hearn acknowledge the fact that only 50-50 can make the undisputed fight happen?

Watch how he changes mouth again when Fury demands 50-50. They will avoid him like they avoided Wilder.

You know absolutely nothing about boxing.

It's you that knows nothing, media is just playing your head like mugu, he said that before the fight cus, any winners stock will rise,,,, it's you wey no Sabi the game, if the two never fought, and Joshua Is to meet any of them, Hearn can never talk 50/50 if that fight is not gonna happen, bros you don't just get it.... Fury's stick was low before fighting wilder first, can you answer the question, what was the sharing formula in their first fight, compared with the second, fury stock rose compared to wilder in the first, since the second is announced, Hearn talks about the winner not the loser, if AJ is to fight wilder now, bros na 20/80,,, and if it were fury that lost its gonna be 20/80 too. Hope you understand now Mr fury

vizkiz:
It is not difficult to identify a bastard nowadays.

Just take a look at these kids undermining the post of a father in their lives. The system has so much brought down the role of a father. Making him look like a figure head. Praising the mother alone.

Little wonder we have so many days assigned to praise women and just a day to notice the value of a man (Father’s day). Most times the Father’s Day come and go without anyone noticing it

Same father who worked all his life to take care of his family? Same father who will risk his life day and night just to put food on the table? Same father who paid your fees from the very first day you were born till you started earning your own money? Same father who put a roof over your head and even assigned your own room?

Only for him to be cheated again when he is to reap the fruit of his Labour. Little wonder most of you are cursed. It is because you have offended God and man by being a fool.

Just take a look at the cheap gold-digging girls we have nowadays. All they do is look for a ready made man. So after having kids for that guy, those unfortunate kids will rather take care of her than their father who has worked for money all his life?

What happened to 50:50? To hell with you simpletons.

My mum has done a whole lot for me and I’ll do anything just to make her happy but my dad (bless his soul) deserves as much love and happiness

I don't know there people who sees this, if you are a responsible man, you will understand the role a man plays, e no easy, you suffer to make them enjoy, but laslas na woman dey collect the glory pas,,,,, until I lost my dad,,,, I don't understand so... Many things,,,, anytime I remember him I pray God forgives me, cus just attention I no give am ,,,, now I understands all he was facing then.... E no easy to be responsible

kenex4ever:
Fury go beat AK like small pikin.



AJ need to be at his best ever to beat Wilder

Put money and stop ranting

BluntBoy:
But Hearn has realized that only a 50-50 split can make the undisputed fight happen.

The joke is on you, sir. You have no idea about boxing.

Was he saying this before, Mr, with wilder, everything only changed after Sundays fight and stop taking from every part of your mouth

BluntBoy:
It is becoming clearer and clearer that you know absolutely nothing about boxing.

When Wilder still had his belt, a fight with Anthony Joshua would have been an undisputed bout. Marketability wouldn't have counted.

The world of boxing wanted that fight. If Hearn wanted it, he would have accepted Wilder's 50-50 split.

50/50 for average wilder, what are you saying now, AJ needs it more cus he had 4belt, where was wilder when AJ was merging those belt, and you expect him to have 50/50 with him, you most be joking

kenex4ever:
Losing against fury is different from losing against that kpof kpof oo.

Fury is clearly the best of them all.

AJ is better

otipoju:
Exactly. Fury knew that as long as he could avoid the straight right from Wilder (who is dumb enough not to have developed any other skill set), he will be good.

AJ has a more in his arsenal for Fury to worry about such as Knockout power from a powerful straight right with a snap that can also open a cut. He has got a stiff jab like to be used as a battering ram, unlike Wilders whi uses his jab merely to measure the range to throw his right.

Aj has a powerful left hook that can put any man on his bottom as he did with Ruiz and a thunderous uppercut useful on the inside that Klitchko will never forget.

AJ can throw solid and body shots that can destroy affect internal organs and can brawl as well especially against a Fury whose hands may be longer than his.... so AJ has the advantage to connect faster if they engage toe to toe. ( that was Ruiz advantage against AJ- faster hands that travel a short distance on the inside)

With AJ's loss to Ruiz, he added stick and move to his skill set and knows how to slip and evade punches. Fury is a bigger man and there is a lot of flesh for AJ to aim at if it comes to gaining points.

Wilder has the most horrible defense ever of any boxer no head movement, no bob and weave cant even hold a proper gaurd to cover his chin and body. He was badly exposed for the fraud that he was. He believed his own hype.

AJ is a different kettle of fish and i will bet on AJ over a Fury who admitted that AJ beat him badly in sparring as a 20 year old upcoming prospect.

Its a fight I eagerly look forward to.

Am with you, will bet on AJ, the guy complete as a boxer, very focused

Kiddogarcia:
you guys should stop making fury look flawless,if an unknown wallin could rock fury and take him to round 12,then I think AJ stands a good Chance.you guys are over praising fury because he defeated wilder who has limited boxing skills, aside from the big right hand,there's nothing left in Wilder's arsenal, he doesn't have that chin to withstand punch,he not the fastest puncher either.I think an AJ will defeat fury,check Joshua's resume,he's defeated ssome of the toughest heavyweight boxers, Klitschko,povetkin,whyte that everyone seems to be avoiding, parker,takam,the list is endless.fury is good but even whyte can defeat fury

God bless you sir,,,, I tell people wilder is an average boxer, fury should fight takam, povetkin, Parker, ruiz, Whyte, and let's see what he got,,,, AJ has never been cut deep like fury fight before wilder,,,, AJ is a very adaptive boxer, he fights you the way you bring the fight, very smart guy,,, I see him at the top for long, cus fame ain't into his head,,,, even Lennox knows these things him sef dey beef am somehow

Numerouno94:
Lol,i saw d disbelief in AJ's eyes wen he lost to Ruiz.
Nt sure such mistake will b repeated again.

For now he shuld concentrate on Pulev. Cos Fury is mentally ready 4 any opponent at d moment.

Una don start again, did you see this coming against wilder, forget shit, if AJ n fury meet next match its either ways, you guys should just stop this fury will beat him thing joor, wilder is an average fighter many people just fail to see it

OgunLaakaye:
AJ is not an all out fighter that Fury hope to dish out his gbas and gbos fight against.

AJ is a more tactical, sharp and calculative fighter. An expert in timing.

This is what people don't understand about that guy, I keep saying his first fight he lost his patience to finish the fight to quick,. AJ is a fast learner in the act, bro fury can't handle AJ ooo to me,,, all those him mind game no fit chop AJ

BluntBoy:
What has marketability got to do with an undisputed bout?

Before Fury demolished Wilder, did Hearn not say that only a 50-50 purse split could make the undisputed fight happen between Joshua and the winner of the Wilder-Fury clash?

Joshua's promoter, Eddie Hearn, has mentioned in several interviews that a 50-50 deal would likely be necessary to finalize a mega-bout with the Wilder-Fury winner.
https://www.boxingscene.com/joshua-not-sold-on-offering-50-50-split-wilder-fury-winner--146220

Who is talking about the undisputed fight?, furys stock just rose with the win, don't wat deal will happen for that

BluntBoy:
You are here again, arguing blindly.

AJ this AJ that.

Hearn is a coward. Look how quick it was to get Wilder and Fury to fight. And they fought twice breaking the bank for far more than Hearn's cash cow ever did.

Just know it that Hearn will never put Joshua in with Fury because they are scared.

Yesterday, Hearn tried to steal Fury's limelight by mentioning Anthony Joshua. All this while that Wilder was unbeaten, they refused to make the fight happen. The world wanted it, and they refused because Wilder wanted 50-50. If they had wanted the fight, they would have made it happen.

Now, that Fury has helped them get rid of Wilder, they want to come and talk terms. Then, when Fury demands 50-50, they will stall the fight and claim that Fury's team is not serious and doesn't want the fight.

Go and check Hearn's Twitter page, and read comments on the post he made about making the Joshua-Fury fight. No one is falling for the coward anymore.

They will avoid Fury and wait for someone to help them get rid of him.

Mumu, its now fury not wilder,,,, who is the most marketable between joshua and wilder, you will just open your mouth gbola,,,, answer the question?

shogsman:
The same wilder that Aj has been running from for eons,the same Aj that got schooled by a fatso,Hush mister.

AJ was not schooled, ruiz and wilder were schooled, I guess you don't really understand

shogsman:
The same wilder that Aj has been running from for eons,the same Aj that got schooled by a fatso,Hush mister.

You for bet on ruiz in the first match, funniest thing be say he won his rematch and you still here making noise, he earned more in both fight, you saying shit hear,,,, mcall no beat Lennox, same with rahman, does that reduce him less of a champion?

frowland:
The number of likes on this post gives me an understanding of the mental state of our people.

They are people from the east