MariaGoretti's Posts
Nairaland Forum › MariaGoretti's Profile › MariaGoretti's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 (of 116 pages)
free2ryhme: whay shld i careah ah, nna calm down na...no be fight. You are supposed to know nah...since you decided to badmouth the Catholics. |
superior1: And the pope issues you dogma and curse you if you don't believe it, no?lol, am sorry, can you rephrase that? |
doclan: Finally... This is the thread I ve enjoyed the most.. Thanks to U all(NAIJADEYHIA, SUPERIOR1, MARIAGORETTI,TRY96,PHILFEARON,DEYMA, CHUKWU, FREE2RHYME.. Am sowi if I dnt list ur name, i dnt knw every1. Tanks to all contributors) U are all priceless proponent.. May God show us all the way and lets take time to read the bible with all simplicity and holy guidance.. God bless U all.no be only you my brother... I really enjoyed it. |
free2ryhme: Do catholics study bibleif you had read the former post carefully, you will also find out that the person you just supported doesnt even comprehend facts written in short statements and that what we both have been arguing about is actually same thing...but you chose to be blind to it...na for your pocket o. Ehe, what exactly do you think the Lectionary is made up of?? please answer if you have gone through one.. |
free2ryhme: did you cross check the worship of relics in the bible ?lol, another one? What do you think is in the bulletin, uh? The same way your pastors explain things to you from the scriptures is same way our priest explain to us. Who bows down to graven images and which of the graven images? Honey, whats the frustration all about? Just spill and we will sort it out amicably and not acrimoniously, ok? |
caseless: my id has never been this sweet. Wont i rather bank with her(mary). How u doin,mary?am alrite...and you? |
naijadeyhia: jou kwa ya o. Everyone to His own. My prayer is that your eyes of understanding be enlightened.ooo nna....same to you o. |
caseless: Mariahello Casey Hello Dont |
achi4u: lol.nwannem nwoke, rapu that thing. This is the thread I have enjoyed the most. Yeild kwa? To whos advances? |
naijadeyhia: This shows you do not understand the plan of God right from after Adam fell. Only a sacrifice in obedience would suffice and nothing else. Yes God can do anything he wants but in this case the requirement was set in stone. I suggest you do a bit of studying your bible and asking the holy spirit for insight. |
naijadeyhia: This shows you do not understand the plan of God right from after Adam fell. Only a sacrifice in obedience would suffice and nothing else. Yes God can do anything he wants but in this case the requirement was set in stone. I suggest you do a bit of studying your bible and asking the holy spirit for insight.hmm, the fact that we are actually talking about same thing and you asking me go study my bible is really bizzare..! |
naijadeyhia: I know who Jesus is..the question is do you?nope, I didnt ask if you knew whom Jesus is. My question is this... Whats the arguement about? Is it whether Jesus is the son of God or the son of Man? |
naijadeyhia: God could not do anything he wanted without a sacrifice. God never contradicts himself. He set the pattern for atonement of sins as a yearly sacrifice of bulls and oxen in the old testament so only a sacrifice could achieve His aim and Hence the perfect sacrifice who was jesus |
naijadeyhia: God could not do anything he wanted without a sacrifice. God never contradicts himself. He set the pattern for atonement of sins as a yearly sacrifice of bulls and oxen in the old testament so only a sacrifice could achieve His aim and Hence the perfect sacrifice who was jesus''God could not do anything''? Are you serious? Do you know his mind? He set the pattern, do you think he cant unset it? Think well my brothe, it is God we are talking of here o. I said, God can choose not to use his son as a sacrifice but he did it anyway. That reply of yours ahve nothing in common with my quote. |
naijadeyhia: [b]Do you know that in the new testament the words Son of Man was used 88 times?. In Hebrew Son of Man means Son of Adam. Many sceptical scholars believe that Jesus referred to Himself as the Son of Man, because it is unlikely to have been an invention of the early Church. For example, in the Gospels, ‘Son of Man’ is Jesus’ favourite self-designation. Yet in the epistles, it is never used of Jesus. In fact, the term appears in the New Testament only 4 times outside of the Gospels and never in extra-biblical Christian writings during the first 120 years following Jesus. The point is: How likely is it that the Church originated the title Son of Man as Jesus’ favourite self-description, when the Church itself did not refer to him in this manner?my brother, what is tis long writeup? Whats this arguement about? Whether Jesus is the son of God or son of man? |
naijadeyhia: with my last expose i would like to let you know that Mary gave birth to a man child in the flesh and not a God Child in divinity. Do not let this confuse you. If it does then it does prove that a carnal man can never understand the things of the spirit.FYI, there was never a time Jesus as the son of God was seperated from Jesus as the son of man. Like I said before, even when he came to the world as a man, he is still God.. So, whats the confusion about? You are trying to differentiate the two personalities as two different personsbut my brother, he is just one and he possessed both of them on earth. He accepted to do the will of God that was the reason he came to this world as a man..so that that aim can be acheived effectively...because I know that God can always do whatever he wanted to do without even sacrificing his son but he did it anyway...so, who am I to question him? |
naijadeyhia: [b]Jesus always referred to Himself as the Son of man. In divinity he was the son of God but not in the flesh. In the flesh he was the Son of man. However He came as the son of man (in the flesh) in order to show man that it was possible to obey God till the end. Something the First Adam couldnt do, He the second Adam came and did. As long as he was in the flesh he was a man and not God which was why when Peter gained the insight of God and called Him the son of the living God he said flesh and blood has not revealed it to Peter but His father in heaven did. As a man he wept, he slept, he hungered, he suffered thirst. Qualities that God didnt have. As a man he got Angry, he called men Hypocrites and vipers and serpents. As the son of God he knew the mind of God and wanted man to see it manifest in Him. Including how to live in this sin laden world in total obedience to God. He had the Holy Spirit hence he could achieve it and we didnt have it so he said tarry until you are endued with Power from on high (the holy spirit). The apostles became new men the moment the holy spirit came upon them. The person whom men crucified was the son of man but from heaven God was seeing His son being crucified this was what made him a perfect sacrifice. If men knew who he was they would not have crucified him but alas they knew not.hian, nna, you shouldnt have gone through all this stress nah...are we not saying same thing? Ok, without this long epistle you wont feel at ease. Well am sorry I dont know how to write epistles...I just go straight to the point and understandable statement. |
naijadeyhia: If she gave birth to the Son of God when did he become Man? Before or after birth or during birth?do you know the meaning of ''conceive''? If you dont look it up, ok. When Jesus agreed to come to the world human form, how do you think he came? He passed through all the biological process involved...from conception to his birth. So, he started forming in Mary's womb as a man immediately the angel announced to Mary about God's will. |
naijadeyhia: Thank God you said that Jesus condescended to be a man in order to save us. So whom did Mary give birth to? Jesus the man or Jesus the God?ah ah, ki lo sele? Ok o, she gave birth to Son of God made man to save us.... Abi, e no dey your bible? |
achi4u: Maria G. how far nay...long time.lol, honey, dont mind me jare...this nysc stuff just swallowed my time...thank god it will soon be over |
jdbabzy: The B-I-B-L-E is good enough for me, I stand upon the word of God: the B-I-B-L-E!!!..you are lost indeed.. |
naijadeyhia: Since you have chosen to condescend to using Prison Break as a test case example i would like to ask a simple question. For Michael to become a prisoner did he or did he not commit a crime deliberately after which he knew for sure that once he was caught in the act, prison would be the outcome?of course he committed a crime to be there. I just used that as an illustration....that Jesus condescended to be a man in other to save us...TO FULLFILL ALL RIGHTEOUSNESS but that doesnt mean that HE HAS SIN IN HIM...HE IS WITHOUT SIN EVEN WHEN HE WAS ON EARTH because he is GOD. I knew you will capitalize on that 'prison break' thingy. TO WHOM BRAIN IS GIVEN, MUCH SENSE IS REQUIRED....! |
naijadeyhia: [b]Why, then, did Jesus come to be baptized by John? To fulfill God's righteous requirements. Jesus was the true Israelite who would obey God over against the disobedience of Adam and all the peoples of the world. Finally there had come one whose passion it was to obey God. As Paul said in Romans 5:19, "For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of one man the many will be made righteous." All have sinned and have come short of the glory of God, but here came one man, the true Israelite, who would fulfill all righteousness, all the righteous requirements of God, and who would, without fail, obey all God's laws perfectly....like my brother said, ''to fullfill all righteousness'' would have been suitable. its just like this series ''Prison Break'' For Micheal to achieve his aim, he became a prisoner to.. pls explain the human nature of Jesus to me... |
naijadeyhia: Why did the bible say that He that knew no sin was made sin? Why did the bible say that. In Romans 8:3 it declares "For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh". Now dispute that scripture with your own analogy and mindsetin that same verse, when apostle paul said, ''God condemned sin in human nature by sending his own son, WHO CAME WITH A NATURE LIKE OUR SINFUL NATURE, to do away with sin'', what came to your mind? That Jesus was actually with sin when he came to this world? The capitalised should enlighten you more. He came IN OUR SINFUL NATURE...meaning he came in form of human. That is why he is both God and Man...at the same time, then. |
naijadeyhia: [b]Mother of God indeed. I guess since the holy spirit overshadowed her that means the Holy spirit is the father of God. smh. The mystery of the Lords conception is beyond you and yours. FYI Mary said that she is the handmaid of the Lord. Handmaid means servant. It means of lowly estate. It shows how humble she was and not her so called high and lifted position you are all making her out to be. Even John the baptist was greater than Mary because Matthew 11:11, in which Jesus declares:ah ah, is Mary not the Mother of Jesus? Is Jesus not God? Chineke m.... If Jesus is God, why cant I say she is the Mother of God? Hian...na wa o. Mary was humble, thats why she was exalted or is there anywhere where it was written that she was proud? FYI, John the Baptist, was a servant too...a chosen servant, just like Mary. |
superior1: Yeah, She submitted to God's plan and I am also a believer in Christ. So myself, Mary and other Christ believers are the brother and mother of Jesus, Jesus refused to grant Mary audience and didn't give her any special recognition when she came calling on Him in the chapter i showed yougood....there is nothing more in that chapter other than what you have already affirmed. Verse 50 said it all, and th fact that she and we also do the will of God, we are his mother, sister and brothers. She has already being recognised and granted audience...same as all those who do his will. Honey, thats all that is to it. |
superior1: God's will as per what?Luke 1:38 '' I am the handmaid of the Lord, may it happen to me aas you have said..'' There and then she accepted to do God's will which is to be the Mother of God. Or was that not God's will for her? |
superior1: Is that all you have say?, Jesus refused seeing Mary in that verse and told His listeners those who do the will of God are is brothers and mothers....nwokem, thats a yes/no question. Ok, I will rephrase. Did Mary do the will of God or not? Did she or did she not do the will of God? |
superior1: Matthew 12:46-50...did Mary do the will of God or not? |
naijadeyhia: God didnt need Mary when He made Adam and Eve but the reason why he needed her for Christ was because Christ was meant to be a perfect sacrifice so He had to come in sinful form which could only happen if He came through a sinful vessel. Yes she was a virgin but still was the offspring of fallen Adam and Eve. The focus was Christ and not Mary....she was preserved. The spirit of God overshadowing her cause that to happen. She was without sin...and yes still a descedant of Adam. Dont you beleive God can preserve her from all sins? If you dont, then your are doubting God....and you are not a beleiver, at al. The focus may be christ but she is still involved in bringing thst focus to this world...so you cant ignore her. Of course, God need not mary when he made the world because she was already preserved another special task..which is bringing the saviour to the world. |
naijadeyhia: He did respond to her by calling her "woman"and not "mother". He did what she asked because it was in His nature to do good and not because she asked. A blind man asked Him if thou will i would like to receive my sight and He said "I WILL" receive your sight. It is His will to do good as that was why He came in the first place. Was Mary present in the other instances when he did good? Her presence wasnt relevant to His assignment. The Bible said "How Jesus Christ went about doing good and healing all that were oppressed of the devil" Was the presence of Mary relevant in all this?lol, Of course he called her woman, na man e go call am before? Are you saying that calling her woman makes her less of a mother to him? it is true that it is in his nature to do good but why still complain to her that his hour has not yet arrived? He is still God, isnt he? So he can decide to disagree to his mother's request. Now, why didnt Mary wait to confirm his affirmation to her request before confidently asking the servants to ''do what he says'', huh? Cant you see? She came to Jesus in 2 ways...as her son and God. She have in mind that God has favoured her and wont deny her of her request if its for the good of her children. She beleived in her son, who is also God. Whats so hard in this? |
naijadeyhia: Real believers are not taught by a church but by the Spirit of God whose assignment is to teach us all things, lead us into all truth and glorify God in us. A church might attempt at instructing but confirmation of the word comes from the Holy Spirit. You were taught by the catholic church but I was and am still being taught by the Holy Spirit of the Living God...so you beleive the spirit is absent in the Catholic church, just because we honour Blessed Virgin Mary? Tell me, was Mary filled with the Holy spirit or not? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 (of 116 pages)

