₦airaland Forum

Ken4Christ:
He is alive. He lives in me.

Ken4Christ:
So, why haven't they found his corpse for over 2,000 years?

Which thief will come near a tomb that was heavily guarded by the Roman Soldiers?

Ken4Christ:
Refuting a claim without proof is nothing. Show me the grave of Jesus and I will believe you.

But his tomb is empty. Hallelujah, Jesus lives.

Ken4Christ:
You that have done research, show your proof here that Jesus did not rise from the dead.

Queenttoast01:
Give your life to God and be useful to your creator, don't live a wasteful life

https://www.facebook.com/100063996131375/posts/pfbid038K6LpCQQVZeyo9P89kMFAwCisZHtduZY7m1hGam7BFZ9crgjwMfJvWh72pRh7z7gl/?app=fbl

SIRTee15:
Despite all his claim about thousands of new manuscript contraindications, he finally admitted that the core gospel message in all new testament manuscripts he has studied remain the same- they remain unchanged.

SIRTee15:
Ok, if u are a honest person, u will thank me for linking u up with Bart Erhman.
Now what I want u to do is study his works and how he critic the bible. U can learn one or two things bocs it's like u stuck without Oxford dictionary. Seems that's the only weapon u have.
I'm not brothered about his works. Other bible scholars have debunked majority of it.
Bart himself admits the honesty and sincerity of the apostolic fathers.

SIRTee15:
Are u done researching Bart Erhman?
I'm not queentoast, why bring her here.
I already gave u my definition of omniscience.

SIRTee15:
Go and look for my definition of foreknowledge. I already defined, I'm not going to waste my time repeating. If u confused, ask maynman for help.

jaephoenix:
Brainwashing na wonderful skills. Sometimes I wish that I have such skills. Write some bullshit in a book and tell peeps its the word of god and watch them swallow it hook, line, sinker, fish etc

Mysteriousworld:
All the early images of christ in churches as old as 2000 years ago have Jesus as a black man, from Turkey to Russia.... he was most likely dark skinned, but you see? Before he comes to gather us together, there'll be a great tribulation, especially it.

Ken4Christ:
The Book of Act is another evidence.

The experience of Paul as written in the book of Acts and his letters are evidences.

If their written records are not true, someone should be able to refute them with evidences but no one has ever done that.

Ken4Christ:
It's an undeniable historical facts that no one has been able to refute.

Matthew, Mark Luke and John are the first documented evidence.

The Book of Act is another evidence.

The experience of Paul as written in the book of Acts and his letters are evidences.

If their written records are not true, someone should be able to refute them with evidences but no one has ever done that.

Lastly, I am a living evidence that Jesus is alive because he lives in me. And he has filled me with his Holy Spirit.

jaephoenix:
This your Ray Comfort or whoever wrote this is either a liar or stupid.
Newton wouldn't be considered a Christian by today's standards.
Although born into an Anglican family, by his thirties Newton held a Christian faith that, had it been made public, would not have been considered orthodox by mainstream Christianity,[123] with one historian labelling him a heretic.[124]

By 1672, he had started to record his theological researches in notebooks which he showed to no one and which have only recently[when?] been examined. They demonstrate an extensive knowledge of early Church writings and show that in the conflict between Athanasius and Arius which defined the Creed, he took the side of Arius, the loser, who rejected the conventional view of the Trinity. Newton "recognized Christ as a divine mediator between God and man, who was subordinate to the Father who created him."[125] He was especially interested in prophecy, but for him, "the great apostasy was trinitarianism."[126]

Newton tried unsuccessfully to obtain one of the two fellowships that exempted the holder from the ordination requirement. At the last moment in 1675 he received a dispensation from the government that excused him and all future holders of the Lucasian chair.[127]

In Newton's eyes, worshipping Christ as God was idolatry, to him the fundamental sin.[128] In 1999, historian Stephen D. Snobelen wrote, "Isaac Newton was a heretic. But ... he never made a public declaration of his private faith—which the orthodox would have deemed extremely radical. He hid his faith so well that scholars are still unraveling his personal beliefs."[124] Snobelen concludes that Newton was at least a Socinian sympathiser (he owned and had thoroughly read at least eight Socinian books), possibly an Arian and almost certainly an anti-trinitarian.[124]

Most scholars conclude that was Isaac Newton was an Arian.

Then about Einstein,… that one is even funnier
He clarified however that, "I am not an atheist", preferring to call himself an agnostic, or a "religious nonbeliever." Einstein also stated he did not believe in life after death, adding "one life is enough for me." He was closely involved in his lifetime with several humanist groups.

You picked up just 2 scientists and erroneously labelled them as Christians but you ignored a host of atheistic(not even agnostic) scientists.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_atheists_in_science_and_technology
You suck

OLAADEGBU:
The Bible gives it just 11 words. It says, “The fool has said in his heart, There is no God.” (Psalm 14:1). Then it repeats those exact words in Psalm 52:1

Source

OLAADEGBU:
Atheism is foolishness—because it believes the scientific impossibility that nothing created everything. It is an intellectual embarrassment.

Ray Comfort.

Source

SIRTee15:
Then no need to continue this discussion because we at dead end now.
Nobody forces anything on anybody. We have our own definition of word.
Our definition of repentance is different from what's in the dictionary. No Christian ever forced our own meaning on secular world.
U are the one guilty of that. That's why I said go and learn from bible critics.
Everyone knows that no Christian ever said the bible is the direct word of God, but u and maynman have been disturbing Christians on this thread demanding we defend every sentence or phrase in the bible word for word. When we offer our explanation, u reject it claiming that's not the word used in the verse as if God spoke English.

I already gave my definition of omniscient and fore knowledge. Check my previous posts...too tired to be searching.
I think we should end this, just answer my questions esp the one re destiny of a new born child, I want to check something.
U are free to use any reference u like to answer my question on destiny....Koran, bible, Oxford dictionary, Wikipedia, book of fatalist atheism or even obatala. All join. just answer the question.

SIRTee15:
Go and study him yourself. Stop being lazy.
U asked me for a name of biblical scholar, I gave u. Now u asking me for his work. Which one do u want to do besides quoting Wikipedia and Oxford dictionary?

However here is what he wrote at the end of the nonsense book he wrote.
'To be sure, of all the hundreds of thousands of textual changes found among our manuscripts, most of them are completely insignificant, immaterial, of no real importance for anything other than showing that scribes could not spell or keep focused any better than the rest of us'
Bert Erhman.

SIRTee15:
Maynman wants to use Wikipedia and Oxford dictionary to argue with a doctoral fellow and one of world's leading textual critic.
He will eat u raw.

SIRTee15:
I already told u start with Bart Erhman, he's a new testament bible critic.
Despite all his claim about thousands of new manuscript contraindications, he finally admitted that the core gospel message in all new testament manuscripts he has studied remain the same- they remain unchanged.

SIRTee15:
Go to our topics where we debate Muslims, we use what's written in their Koran against them, not what's written in secular dictionary or the bible, because they don't believe in it.
U can start with Bart Erhman, he's an atheist like u.

SIRTee15:
See another one who wants to force Oxford dictionary into the bible.
It's a waste of time discussing with u guys. TenQ was right.
Both of u are just wannabe bible critics with nothing upstairs to back your claim.
As I said to maynman, go and study the works of bible critical scholars, then come back and discuss.

jaephoenix:
Lol. Hes preparing a place for only chrissies who are unknown

jaephoenix:
The guy is just funny.
He keeps on evading the question why yahweh is surprised by humans and why he regretted creating humans. I'm even tiring of the dodging

Queenttoast01:
He is omniscient so He knows.

SIRTee15:
Wow have discovered something new today...before it was meaning of theo and now meaning of bible.
What a great discovery!!!!! hallelujah somebody.
What's the next discovery...meaning of Jesus or christ

Seriously u wasting your time here, this will get u no where. Go and study the works of bible critics and learn how they argue Christian theology.
Imagine bringing secular dictionary meaning of biblical words to argue Christian doctrine. U are meant to study our own meaning of words and check if it affirms with what's written in the bible....that's critic.
Not all these nonsense u doing here.

Queenttoast01:
I would recommend to register at any Bible believing church and attend Bible study to know more about the word of God.


They were not perfect but Good for God. Yet, they have the ability to keep God's commandment if they wanted to. The woman was anxious to know what the devil said and not desirous. And the sins was attractive to her which leads to death.

Queenttoast01:
We have been given the power to become a child of God through our Lord Jesus Christ, so we believers are not slaves but sons and daughters. Those that do not accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior have been judged already and they are long dead and walking dead because they don't have hope of eternal life.

Queenttoast01:
Only God is perfect he created man and he saw that he is GOOD. Moreso, God didn't give human desire to eat the forbidden fruit, the devil did. Man is easily deceived because they were told they would become like God, sin is always attractive but the end leads to death. Shalom.

Queenttoast01:
Only those that accept him as their Personal Lord and saviour are given the power to become the Child of God.

Queenttoast01:
As many as those that refuse to accept Jesus Christ his only begotten son as their Lord and savior, they will end up in hell.

SIRTee15:
Seriously u not worth the effort. U have 2 to 3 phrases u keep parotting up and down. U can't rise above such mundane and boring arguments.
Guy u need to do more reading of u want to become a bible critic. U can start by reading the works of biblical critical scholars, u not helping anybody here.