₦airaland Forum

OkCornel:
LordReed, MaxinDHouse, Budaatum, Image123

Read this screenshot and explain to Maynmann Jesus the son of Damneus is different from Jesus of Nazareth aka Jesus the Christ associated with James the Just.

Comprehension of basic English is the problem here.

Where did you see Jesus called Christ is the same as Jesus the Nazareth?

OkCornel:
Anyone with functioning eyes and mind can see that the subject of discuss is Jesus of Nazareth, the elder brother to James the Just.

Jesus of Nazareth is not Jesus son of Damneus. James has nothing to do with Damneus either.

1. Jesus of Nazareth is Jesus of the New Testament.
2. He is the elder brother to James the Just.
3. He exists, as scholars have accepted Chapter 9, Book 20 of the Antiquity of the Jews as authentic.

Stop clutching at straws and deflecting to Jesus the son of Damneus. He is not the character of focus here.

Matthew 13 v 55;
55 “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas?

Jesus of Nazareth is Jesus son of Damneus. James is the brother, their father is damnues.

OkCornel:
LordReed, MaxinDHouse, Budaatum, Image123

Read this screenshot and explain to Maynmann Jesus the son of Damneus is different from Jesus of Nazareth aka Jesus the Christ associated with James the Just.

Comprehension of basic English is the problem here.

Jesus called Christ is not same as Jesus the Nazareth

OkCornel:
Is Jesus the Christ in your screenshot a high priest?

I don’t give a damn about Jesus of Damneus.

Jesus the Christ aka Jesus of Nazareth is the focus here.

Jesus of Nazareth is not same as Jesus Christ.
Nazareth is a place, heard of Nazarene..
The antiquity was talking about Jesus of damneus.

OkCornel:
To your question, Jesus of Nazareth was never a high priest while on earth.

The Jesus mentioned in antiquity was a high priest that replaced Annas after killing Jesus brother called James both are sons of damues all happened before 40AD

Desperate

OkCornel:
1. Did you see Jesus of Nazareth in your screenshot?

2. Did you see anywhere in your screenshot James is the son of Damneus?

3. Did you see anywhere in your screenshot that Jesus of Nazareth is the same person as Jesus son of Damneus?

Did you see where the Jesus was a high priest and he replaced Annas that died 40AD
Jesus and James are brothers that are sons of damneus, can’t you read?
James was killed by annas that’s why he was removed!

OkCornel:
Joseph the Carpenter. Duh!!!

Different from James mentioned in the antiquity
Was Jesus an high priest?

OkCornel:
Did you see in your screenshot

Jesus the son of Damneus is distinct from the reference to Jesus the Christ?

This further proves the existence of Jesus the Christ. He is the same as Jesus of Nazareth.

Bring a screenshot that proves Jesus the son of Damneus is the same person as Jesus of Nazareth. Patiently waiting.

Jesus of Nazareth, the elder brother of James the Just, son of damnues is DEAD

Who was James father?

OkCornel:
Do you understand English at all?

From your screenshot, Jesus the son of Damneus and Jesus of Nazareth are different people.

Why are you doing this to yourself?

Jesus of Nazareth, the elder brother of James the Just, son of Damnues is DEAD


Why you this desperate

OkCornel:
Pele, get well soon.

Thanks for proving Jesus of Nazareth, the elder brother of James the Just. Same Jesus of the New Testament existed.


Matthew 13 v 55;

55 “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas?

Jesus of Nazareth, the elder brother of James the Just, son of damnues is DEAD

OkCornel:
My focus is on Jesus of Nazareth, the elder brother of James the Just.

Try harder with the deflection.

The Jesus of Nazareth son of damues is DEAD.
Desperation
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_son_of_Damneus

OkCornel:
And there are thousands of Jesus whose brother was James (the Just) that was eventually killed abi?

Are you listening to yourself?

Yes,
The Jesus is DEAD

Too desperate

OkCornel:
Thanks for proving Jesus of Nazareth existed from your screenshot.

I’m enjoying the direction of this discussion

Jesus is a common name, this is a different Jesus, 599 desperate
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_son_of_Damneus

OkCornel:
Jesus of Nazareth. Duh!!!

It’s a different Jesus Olodo, this Jesus is dead!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_son_of_Damneus

OkCornel:
I hope you can see James the brother of “Jesus of Nazareth” in your screenshot.

We have thousands of Jesus that come from Nazareth.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_son_of_Damneus

OkCornel:
Back to the matter, after your desperate deflection.

Kindly prove to us that Chapter 9, Book 20 of the Antiquity of the Jews which attests to the existence of Jesus and is widely accepted by scholars is a forgery.

Everyone following this thread is seeing your futile attempt at deflecting on the real topic of discussion. THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

Which Jesus?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_son_of_Damneus

Desperate Christians edited testimonium to suit their Jesus agenda

OkCornel:
Says the person who claimed:

1. Antiquity of the Jews was written in Hebrew
2. Pseudo-Philo Biblical Antiquity is the same as Antiquity of the Jews.

Remove the log from your eyes before screaming about the speck in another person’s eye.

See desperation at its height

Which Jesus are you talking about? You won’t say.

As long as someone bears Jesus you will relate it your “biblical jesus” olodo.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_son_of_Damneus

OkCornel:
Says the person who claimed:

1. Antiquity of the Jews was written in Hebrew
2. Pseudo-Philo Biblical Antiquity is the same as Antiquity of the Jews.

Remove the log from your eyes before screaming about the speck in another person’s eye.

See desperation at its height

Says the person that said Old Testament was written in Hebrew,
Says the person that brought edited Soncino book claiming its Talmud.
Says the person that said the evidence of Jesus is found in testimonium but is now diverting.
Says the person that said Jesus is inside “war on Jew”

Desperation and hypocrisy, it shows the Jesus you are trying hard to force

OkCornel:
Which I've clarified

Lmao, this is you clutching at straws to stay afloat.
https://www.nairaland.com/7174898/how-realized-jesus-fraud/13#114036780

After realising your ignorance and mistake, you were too desperate to check it.
And you wrote it like you knew what you were saying, you goofed!

OkCornel:
Then provide sufficient evidences beyond all reasonable doubt that Chapter 9 of Book 20 of the Antiquity of the Jews which is widely accepted by all scholars as authentic...to be a forgery.

No room for sentiment in argument. Provide proof! Chikena.

How is new text more authentic than the older text?
Was flavinus alive when James was?
Are you no longer REFERRING to testimonium?
Think

OkCornel:
I'm sure you weren't blind when I posted this (see screenshot and link to the post). See how desperate you are to deflect.

https://www.nairaland.com/7174898/how-realized-jesus-fraud/13#114036780

After goofing. This is no mistake, you saw your blunder, you are desperate to use any source
You have the book with you yet you are goofing like this

NNTR:
Hasn't a Scooby Do idea.
Ask the demons feasting on you to help you with answering the three easy simple questions.
Now go to hell, and get the f off my mention

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

If you are thinking for yourself and not been a sheep you won’t worship Yahweh of shasu tribe.

OkCornel:
Argue with the Jewish and Christian scholars as the evidence of the existence of Jesus from Chapter 9, Book 20 of Antiquity of the Jews is widely accepted.

it’s no longer the testimonuim? Desperate running from one source to another.

A Jew can’t write “Christos”, if chapter 8 is not authentic what makes chapter 9 authentic?
Desperate

OkCornel:
Antiquity of the Jews, Chapter 9 of Book 20. Written by Josephus Flavius in Greek.

No where did it say “antiquity”
Is “war on jew” not part of the SERIES of flavius?
Desperate

OkCornel:
Antiquity of the Jews, Chapter 9 of Book 20. Written by Josephus Flavius in Greek.

A Jew can’t write “Christos”
It’s desperate Christian interpolation

OkCornel:
I’m sure you have functioning eyes when I later stated I was referring to Antiquity of the Jews, not War of the Jews.

Na so your desperation to score points don reach?

Panic mode.
Show us the “next” evidence in the “war of Jew”
Keep dodging

OkCornel:
You’re still grasping around. Josephus works described Jesus as a wise man. And that’s first version of the Testimonium Flavanium.

Next evidence is from Josephus’ book - The war of the Jews (A history of the destruction of Jerusalem)

Hypocrite when are you going to show the evidence of Jesus in “war of the jew”
Why you dodging? Listen to your advice na

OkCornel:
Thank God to this is one person’s opinion, which you are fraudulently trying to pass off as the public opinion of the Jews.

We don’t even know the name and origin of the person who posted that comment on your screenshot.

Sorry, this is dead on arrival.

What’s the name and origin of the Jewish book where you desperately said Jesus was written?
How will they know he exist if they’ve never read about it!

OkCornel:
See your problem?

Do a simple Wikipedia search and see your gaffe.

Don’t you use Google?

OkCornel:
We will confirm the proper olodo here now.

Who told you Pseudo-Philo Biblical Antiquities and Antiquity of the Jews are the same book?

Who told you they are not?

OkCornel:
One person’s comment from a discussion thread is now “they”?

Did the person write there that “Jesus never existed”? Hmmm?

Which Jesus! Hmm?

OkCornel:
Your own screenshot testifies against you

Antiquity of the Jews was originally written in Greek.

It was not.
That’s a later version.
Read it through olodo