₦airaland Forum

Akakanfirstclass:
so beside that...
are you saying there is no God?

Are you saying there’s no “Yahweh”?

Because god is a title not a person!

Ignore yaldaboath worshippers

OkCornel:
It's for the benefit of others following the conversation. And how you've inadvertently proven the existence of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, brother of James with your own screenshots!

Quite fulfilling I must say

Bwahahahah
I’m sure they can read and comprehend better than fallen yaldaboath worshippers in the watchtower!

OkCornel:
When you are ready to show proof that Chapter 9, Book 20 of the Antiquity of the Jews is forged. Let us know.

Okay.
“Case closed” since afternoon.

Chapter 9 book 20 is said to be “more Authentic” because of 1st century Judaism, and the Jesus is very different from the one in New Testament!
Book 18 is said to be FORGED, if they can forge the previous part why can’t they forge the later part? They became shy?
LOOK AT THE SOURCES OF YOUR “JESUS

Seems repeating all these doesn’t even convince you yourself bwahahahah

OkCornel:
Argue with facts! Not sentiments

Bring the evidence(s) that Chapter 9, Book 20 of Antiquity of the Jews was forged.

Thanks for confirming the existence of the progenitor of Christianity - Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the brother of James.

Boy let it go!

Thank you

OkCornel:
Thanks for confirming the existence of the progenitor of Christianity - Jesus Christ of Nazareth the Brother of James: Chapter 9, Book 20 Antiquity of the Jews

You have said it a hundred times. Boy bye.
Your Jesus comes from first century Judaism according to your own screenshot

If they can FORGE BOOK 18 why can’t they FORGE another chapter?

OkCornel:
Same you that claimed Judaism is Polytheistic. Bravo!!!

Budaatum is right, you love to create arguments which has no correlation to the topic in anyway.

Jesus Christ of Nazareth (progenitor), the brother of James in Chapter 9, Book 20 - Antiquity of the Jews existed.


All this talk of Yahwism and Judaism is off topic. Open a new thread to discuss that one.

Jesus Christ existed, thanks for confirming with your screenshots

Yes it is POLYTHEISTIC.

The Judaism we have now is “second temple Judaism” which evolve from rabbinical Judaism.


You lack comprehension if not why did you bring in FIRST CENTURY JUDAISM !
You were desperately looking for answers everywhere!


You’ll even make yourself DUMBER to defend your Yahweh aka yaldaboath!. That’s the extent of the desperation.

“SPREAD OF MONOTHEISM IN 8th century BC”

If they can FORGE BOOK 18 why can’t they FORGE another chapter?

Kobojunkie:
1. The pharisees were wrong in their accessment of the Old Law aka the Constitution of the Nation of Israel. The Sabbath is meant as a day of Holiness and Healing the sick, raising the dead, showing love, mercy, doing righteousness, are all Holy and acceptable acts on God's Holy day. Jesus Christ showed this, and vexed them even more for revealing their ignorance of the Law.

Recall, Jesus Christ lived His life in submission and obedience of God's Old Covenant Law of Moses, the Constitution of the Nation of Israel in the Land of Canaan. So accusing Him of breaking the Law amounts to saying Jesus Christ sinned against God.

2. The disciples did indeed break the Old Sabbath Law by eating corn in the field on that day - Matthew 12 vs 1 - 8. They were followers of Jesus Christ, living their lives in submission to and obedience of God's New Covenant Law and Truth in the Kingdom of God, as opposed to the Old Covenant Law of Moses/Constitution of the Nation of Israel.

You dwell in stack ignorance. Bwahahahah

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahwism

OkCornel:
You have functioning eyes, read this highlighted part that states

" It was during the national crises of the Babylonian Exile that the followers of Yahweh went a step further and finally denied that the other deities aside Yahweh even existed, thus marking the transition from monolatrism to true monotheism and from Yahwism to Judaism"


After reading this, you still claim first century Judaism was polytheistic? You need help mehn.

Open a thread on Yahwism for discussion.

Yawn
You lack comprehension

You’ll even make yourself DUMBER to defend your Yahweh aka yaldaboath!. That’s the extent of the desperation.

“SPREAD OF MONOTHEISM IN 8th century BC”

MaxInDHouse:
That's where you goofed big time Sir!

The Jesus of the Bible never expected people like you to believe what was recorded about him in the Bible but one thing is undeniable today:

Jesus' true disciples are doing what he said throughout the today! Act 1:8

So any intelligent person only need to find out if there's any group practicing what Jesus taught, if there is then everything written about him is TRUE!

Don’t mind the yaldaboath worshipper that just quoted you @Bacteriologist

OkCornel:
Read the highlighted again.

You'll see Judaism is monotheistic

Seems you lack comprehension
Weak

SPREAD OF MONOTHEISM IN 8th CENTURY BC

OkCornel:
You should have quoted the next paragraph na. Judaism which evolved from Yahwism is monotheistic

Weak.
You should have also quoted the next paragraph!

Why are you suddenly posting small letter pictures, darn

OkCornel:
Nah...Yahwism is polytheistic...Judaism isn't.

Get that bit sorted first.

Judaism is polytheistic. Judaism literally comes from yahwism.


Hope you know how Judaism evolve from rabbinical, second temple, Hellenistic..
Learn that first!

OkCornel:
First century Judaism is not Yahwism.

It is in full BLOWN

OkCornel:
Errr, there’s no talk of trinity in the screenshots. So…I don’t know where you got that from.

It’ll be great to open a thread on Yahwism and how that evolved over time to Judaism. It would surely be interesting.

What’s FIRST CENTURY JUDAISM that the SCHOLARS agree too And which Christianity did they reject.
And I hope the pagan practice in 19th century is not talking about TRINITY?

Which Jesus, how did he portray himself compare to the Jesus in New Testament .

If they can FORGE BOOK 18 why can’t they FORGE another chapter?
They were shy?

OkCornel:
Open a thread to discuss Yahwism. It will be an interesting one.

That’s what the SCHOLARS agreed too, and not the pagan trinity In terms of a “Jesus”
FIRST CENTURY JUDAISM!

OkCornel:
Your screenshot still validates the existence of Jesus Christ of Nazareth the brother of James. Chapter 9, Book 20 - Antiquity of the Jews.

Head or Tail, Jesus of the New Testament exists! All scholars except agree with that!

Going back to YAHWISM?
I told you, you are worshipping a lie, you are desperate you’ll use anything to defend Latin Jesus.

What’s FIRST CENTURY JUDAISM that the SCHOLARS agree too And which Christianity did they reject.
And I hope the pagan practice in 19th century is not talking about TRINITY?

Which Jesus, how did he portray himself compare to the Jesus in New Testament .

If they can FORGE BOOK 18 why can’t they FORGE another chapter?
They were shy?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus

OkCornel:
Read what you typed.
It's Book 18 Chapter 5, not Chapter 8 in book 5.

You can't say the entire Book 18 is forged whereas Chapter 8 of Book 18 is widely accepted as authentic! Self contradictory

Argue with the scholars...not me

A chapter is said to be authentic EVEN with NUMBERS OF DIFFERENCES, AND THE WHOLE BOOK is said not to BE AUTHENTIC, but you think that one chapter with NUMBERS OF DIFFERENCES IS CORRECT.
What about other chapters that has been PROVEN as FORGED.

These same early Christians were the one that created the canon and created the Christian bible, if they can interpolate a much early text, imagine what they do to the present book in their command.

Look at the obscure source of your god

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus

OkCornel:
Read what you typed.
It's Book 18 Chapter 5, not Chapter 8 in book 5.

You can't say the entire Book 18 is forged whereas Chapter 8 of Book 18 is widely accepted as authentic! Self contradictory

Argue with the scholars...not me

HOW CAN IT BE AUTHENTIC WITH NUMBERS OF DIFFERENCES
8 or 18, low blow. Cheap . How many times will you “good luck “. Let it go kid

A chapter is said to be authentic EVEN with NUMBERS OF DIFFERENCES AND THE WHOLE BOOK is said not to BE AUTHENTIC, but you think that one chapter with NUMBERS OF DIFFERENCES IS CORRECT.
What about other chapter that has been proven as FORGED.

Look at the obscure source of your god

OkCornel:
Oh, but according to you the entire Book 18 is forged, yet Chapter 8 of Book is 18 is authentic

Bros, your argument is with the wider community of scholars. Not me!

Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the brother of James and progenitor of Christianity exists!

HOW CAN IT IS AUTHENTIC WITH NUMBERS OF DIFFERENCES?

The whole book 18 not “chapter 5 in book 18” is said to be forged
The chapter 5 was talking SPECIFICALLY about John not “Jesus” and even at that there was number of differences in his John death account.
“It’s authentic with numbers of differences”

You only posted just a chapter, what about the other chapters in the book 18.

BOOK 18, CHAPTER 8 was talking about John not Jesus.
They are desperate they will look for anything

OkCornel:
You say the entire book 18 is forged, however...Book 18 Chapter 5 is widely accepted as authentic. Who do you this thing?

Book 20 Chapter 9 is widely accepted as authentic...and validates the existence of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the brother of James.

Your argument is not with me, but with almost all the scholars who agree Jesus Christ of Nazareth exists!

[/b]IT IS AUTHENTIC WITH NUMBERS OF DIFFERENCES[b]


The whole book 18 not “chapter 8 in book 5” is said to be forged
The chapter 5 was talking SPECIFICALLY about John not “Jesus” and even at that there was number of differences in his John death account.


You only posted just a chapter, what about the other chapters in the book 18.

BOOK 18, CHAPTER 8 was talking about John not Jesus.
They are desperate they will look for anything

The whole book 18 not “chapter 8 in book 5” is said to be forged
The chapter 5 was talking about John not “Jesus” and even at that there was number of differences in his John death account.

You only posted just a chapter, what about the other chapters in the book 18.

BOOK 18, CHAPTER 8 was talking about John not Jesus.
They are desperate they will look for anything

[quote author=OkCornel post=114057250][/quote]The whole book 18 not “chapter 5 in book 18” is said to be forged
The chapter 5 was talking about John not “Jesus” and even at that there was number of differences in his John death account.

You only posted just a chapter, what about the other chapters in the book 18.

BOOK 18, CHAPTER 8 was talking about John not Jesus.
They are desperate they will look for anything


You only posted just a chapter, what about the other chapters in the book 18.

OkCornel:
Good luck, Case Closed.

The whole book 18 not “chapter 5 in book 18” is said to be forged

You only posted just a chapter, what about the other chapters in the book 18.
Desperate.

OkCornel:
Good luck, Case Closed.

The whole book 18 not “chapter 8 in book 5” is said to be forged
The chapter 5 was talking about John not “Jesus” and even at that there was number of differences in his John death account.

You only posted just a chapter, what about the other chapters in the book 18.

BOOK 18, CHAPTER 8 was talking about John not Jesus.
They are desperate they will look for anything


What were the Christians doing interpolating it in the first place?

OkCornel:
Not in the scope of this discussion. I'm not too bothered to know the details.

You can create new thread to discuss Yahwism. We are discussing the existence of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the brother of James here.

Oh sorry, I guess there's nothing more to discuss...as your argument is now with the numerous scholars, not me,

Then why did you post “first century Judaism”, so desperate, anything to defend Latin Jesus
“Good luck” bro

Read what you posted and force yourself to believe that cheesy
What were the Christians doing interpolating it in the first place?
You worship a lie!

Book 18 is rejected as forged but Book 20 was said to be “more authentic”
What were the Christians doing in the first place interpolating?

They interpolated to match their book! Think!

If they can interpolate a part why can’t they interpolate the other part?
Who will stop them? Yaldaboath?
These same early Christians were the one that created the canon and created the Christian bible, if they can interpolate a much early text, imagine what they do to the present book in their command.

OkCornel:
Read the part underlined in blue. The argue with the scholars. Your argument is no longer with me.

Who lacks comprehension now?

The whole book 18 not “chapter 18 in book 5” is said to be forged
The chapter 5 was talking about John not “Jesus” and even at that there was number of differences in his John death account.

You only posted just a chapter, what about the other chapters in the book 18.

BOOK 18, CHAPTER 8 was talking about John not Jesus.
They are desperate they will look for anything

OkCornel:
At this point, your argument is no longer with me but with;

1. Josephus Flavius who clearly stated there’s a Jesus Christ of Nazareth who is the brother of James.

2. Almost all the modern scholars who accept Book 18 as authentic and not an interpolation.

3. All scholars who believe Jesus, the progenitor of Christianity exists.

Best of luck!

Hope you know what first century Judaism is? Yahwism?

Good luck

OkCornel:
Read my previous screenshots. Book 18 is now accepted by almost all scholars as authentic.
Argue with all of them.

The whole book 18 not “chapter 18 in book 5” is said to be forged
The chapter 5 was talking about John not “Jesus” and even at that there was number of differences in his John death account.

You only posted just a chapter, what about the other chapters in the book 18.

BOOK 18, CHAPTER 8 was talking about John not Jesus.
They are desperate they will look for anything

What were the Christians doing interpolating it in the first place?
You worship a lie!

Book 18 is rejected as forged but Book 20 was said to be “more authentic”
What were the Christians doing in the first place interpolating?


If they can interpolate a part why can’t they interpolate the other part?
Who will stop them? Yaldaboath?
These same early Christians were the one that created the canon and created the Christian bible, if they can interpolate a much early text, imagine what they do to the present book in the command.

OkCornel:
At this point, your argument is no longer with me but with;

1. Josephus Flavius who clearly stated there’s a Jesus Christ of Nazareth who is the brother of James.

2. Almost all the modern scholars who accept Book 18 as authentic and not an interpolation.

3. All scholars who believe Jesus, the progenitor of Christianity exists.

Best of luck!

What were the Christians doing interpolating it in the first place?
You worship a lie!

Book 18 is rejected as forged but Book 20 was said to be “more authentic”
What were the Christians doing in the first place interpolating?

They interpolated to match their book! Think!

If they can interpolate a part why can’t they interpolate the other part?
Who will stop them? Yaldaboath?
These same early Christians were the one that created the canon and created the Christian bible, if they can interpolate a much early text, imagine what they do to the present book in their command.

See the obscure places where your “Jesus” is found

OkCornel:
Read the screenshot (part I didn’t circle). Almost all modern scholars have accepted it as authentic. You can argue with them.

Book 18 is rejected as forged but Book 20 was said to be “more authentic”
What were the Christians doing in the first place interpolating?

They interpolated to match their book! Think!