Misogynist2014's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Misogynist2014's Profile › Misogynist2014's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 (of 134 pages)
You no get church? They are there. |
They should have killed him. |
Nothing special. |
Small smal o cos that Thing tears boxers ![]() |
The fertilizer stuff is due to the efforts of Akinwumi Adesina, not the clueless 'president'. |
Locomotives are very expensive, durable and one of the fastest trains ever built by man. berem: |
Loyalblak007:She caught him unawares, and brutally murdered her hardworking husband. Is that what makes you happy? |
May God save males from these violent, red hot, abusive and violent wives |
OK |
Some will say culture is dynamic, another will say, whatsoever is not of faith is sin. The world has changed and we must change with it. Though I did not watch the awards, I can boast with my precious dìck that no man exposed his chest. The more women try to fight it, the more they become objectified. I'm not saying you must wear bra, but must we see your breäst? I've checked the old pic, they still don't look sexy and sexually provocative, because they are not and never meant themselves to be. To what can we liken a lady that wore mini skirt and kept pushing it down, crossing her legs and staring at men, so that they could be scared looking at her? We can't justfollowit because people wore it 'worse', we wear it because it is of faith (WE are comfortable wearing and viewing it). Look at the Duchess of Cambridge, (the wife of the 'to be' king of England) and you will be proud being a woman, if you actually are. Once women say no to pre-marital sex, work hard for money and dress well, they don't need men to give to them their value. ramalot: |
Western culture is the culture of those that have lost their culture or have no culture, therefore it is not a surprise seeing uncultured Nigerians, whom their parents failed to culture dress without dignity. |
I've seen it, their parents will be very proud to see this, aunty mi. |
And its someone that will marry that girl! Spits on the ground. |
Do you know how fat his wife is? goldiam: |
May God save mankind kilokeys: |
This is totally uncalled for. |
Seen |
7stargen:My God, unto what can I liken this question? Read what you quoted again. |
7stargen:Whether his action is justifiable to you or not, we know he married his sister, like the daughters of lot collected the seed from their father. |
If it were WAEC, A1 would be sure Billyonaire: |
johnydon22:Though I admit my inability to quench your ignorance, Oduduwa is not a myth, he is an idolized legend. |
Have you ever looked a bird in the eye and wondered what it was thinking? Or do you have a precious dog and wondered what it was thinking about you? I once caged an agama lizard, went to gas cooker, boiled water till it was boiling and poured it on it, because it looked proud and seemed it was belittling me . Then you might just wonder, was there ever a time when animals could talk or at least mimick us like parrots? In the garden of eden, when everything was perfect, when there was no sin, I could talk to animals like in cartoons and they would answer me. Without trying to be imaginative or ambitious at the least, there are verses in the Bible to back up my claim 1. Gen 2-18 'I will make and helper for him'. You can't be my helper if we can't communicate. Gen 2-19 'and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was ITS NAME THEREFORE'. This verse can only make sense if the animals could listen to Adam. The purpose of the naming can only make sense if God wanted all the animals to know themselves by that name, after they were named in a moment time Luke 4:5. 3. Gen 3-1 Except you want to call serpent's ability to talk an individual case. 4. Gen 3-2 Eve's tone made the serpent's (satan disguised as serpent since it was a subtle animal) ability to speak sound incredibly normal. 5. Horse spoke Num 22-28. Has your house ever being broken into at your absence? And after about two months, you begin to search for a golden necklace and remember it might have been stolen too! Also due to the fact that the serpent succeeded in making Man sin through its ability to communicate with man, it would not be imaginative to think that God removed the ability of man and animals to communicate. That was the time when animals could talk like Man. |
7stargen:Its due to neccessity to procreate, not due to lust of the body that made Cain go to bed with his sister. As for your question, take this sage verse by St. Paul (peace of God abide with him)--> For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: |
7stargen:You're so ignorant of what you wish to condemn. |
Give me a single myth that makes use of history leke12: |
7stargen:Law came after the freedom of Israel from Egypt. Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. |
His sister. |
mmsen:Atheists argue that life popped out of nothing, therefore God is not needed in the equation. They are quick at using M and B word. They say Earth is billions of years old and man is millions of years old and evolved from tiny organisms. They have refused to give us detailed reasons why it took so long and every process man took, if possible catalyze the whole process, subsequently giving us a human being. Let me use the experiment that Galileo Galilei used to stun the entire world of science; the experiment that every object falls at same rate when air resistance is absent. To do this, we have to pump out the air to give us a vacuum (though logic tells us the vacuum is something, the absence of air molecules gives us a perfect example of nothing since we are only concerned about the air molecules and its emptiness.) Through this experiment, we see that for nothing(absence of air molecules) to exist, something must have triggered it. What if we want to get our air molecules back(a very important component of life itself)? Should we wait for a few days, months, years or centuries for air molecules to pop out of nothing? A sane mind will realise that something can't come out of nothing but nothing can come out of something. This proof singlehandedly shows that the genesis of the 'faith' of atheists is shaky. Since its now being proofed that life started from something and not nothing (even nothing must come from something,) we can then try to highlight the properties and characteristics this something must possess: 1) Must be called God because everything was created by him because without him was anything made that was made. 2) He must be infinite because he is infinity, he came from infinity, therefore he has no source, neither can he have an end because he is infinite. 3) He must be all powerful and infinitely intelligent. The works of his hands are sufficient proof. 4) He must possess properties beyond normal, properties beyond our wisdom e.g an invisible Spirit. People will wish to argue this one but Hebrews 11:3 says: Through faith, we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that "things which are seen are not made of things which do appear". This applies to everything in the universe, including you and this knowledge is applied in the making of televisions and phones. https://www.nairaland.com/2010775/absolute-proof-gods-existence |
Its beside the glass table reminiscing: |
veekid:It is beside the transparent glass table. |
I don't care what women wear now, but by the next century, they would be ardoned in beautiful, sexy and glamorious invisible clothes. |
Useless children, they can't close their legs for a munite. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 (of 134 pages)
