₦airaland Forum

isabi2lof:
Not everybody,I did not experience that , even down to my elder ones and younger siblings..

So you don't wear pamper or napkin?

Favour315:
The local process is tedious but it's just for a small quantity of palm oil.

Tedious but the best

Carcholce:
.
You did not add bed wetting
.

that one na for everybody nao

Ok

I will like to be the referee

BlueAngel444:
Liverpool really fvcked Chelsea over big time, how do you offer £110m+ and add sell on clause

The sell on clause Liverpool included in the Moises Caicedo offer was substantial. -
@AndyNaylorBHAFC

The whole things look suspicious to me, what kind of shenanigans be dis? You bid for a player that we are in his case over 3 months and you came in less than 24hrs and the bid was accepted without any objection.
Ha ha ha!!! The more you look the less you see.

Bluelines69:
We’re back in business boys

I begin to suspect foul play between Brighton and Liverpool.

Android17:
You're wasting my time. What am I talking about and what are you on about? If someone brags about training harder than Usain but still lost to him in a race I am wrong for saying the person's training was inconsequential to winning the race even though the person did not win the race? Which one come be "unlucky" and Masscom and all that Jazz?

You have not answered my question, have you landed your dream job, if not ( I don't expect an honest answer though ) is your certificate also inconsequential?

Android17:
When I think I will never see a stupider person than OVA200, MorataFC comes to his rescue.

Here is how to apply the analogy:

If you acquired a PhD because you felt it would be instrumental to helping you get your dream job but you lost that dream job to someone who did not have a PhD, it means your PhD was INCONSEQUENTIAL to getting your dream job in that moment.

Please stop bastardizing the profession and accomplishments of people's hard work with the wrong use of words, their certificates are not inconsequential but they were just not LUCKY to get their dream job. ( not everybody wey study mass com dey work for media house).

Rule of thumb: if you want to make a perfectly analogous statement to what is being challenged,

1. Define the objective: what is the person or group trying to achieve? For e.g City wanted to win the community shield.

2. Establish the actionable step that will help the person or group achieve that objective. In this case, City will have to score more goals than Arsenal.

3. Determine if the group or person achieved that actionable step. E.g City did not, because they did not score more goals than Arsenal.

Therefore, Palmer's beautiful goal was insufficient in helping City win the community shield. It did not lead to the CONSEQUENCE that City wanted.

You see that words "not" and "consequence"?

When conjoined they become inconsequent. Like "not" "valid" becomes "invalid".

Palmer's goal was inconsequential to City winning the community shield.

You're welcome.

From the get-go everybody knows it is only one team that will win the trophy, and EPL 23/24 is going to be won by just one team, just like every other team is buying and spending hundreds of £ to strengthen their team in preparation for the next EPL season but sadly only one team will win it.
So are you now saying the investments of other teams, like their training, the coaches they hire and some logistics they put in place that we don't even know are.....? (fill in the gap)
Not everyone that runs a race wins the ultimate prize, in the heyday of Usain Bolt everyone knows is going to win the 100-meter race, I expect the organiser to say Since we know you going to win the race just come and take the prize" but no, just because it is not for the prize or title alone, but for the entertainment, viewership sponsorship etc.
I'm yet to get my dream job but my certificates are not inconsequential, is your own certificate inconsequential?

OVA200:
God forbid I roll in the mud because of a pig.

I've past that level a very long time ago.

That guy mentality tire me, just because you failed to land your dream job after you got your PhD then you now declare all your certificates and education learning from primary to university level inconsequential.

HOMOTOYOSI10:
Really? When is he paying his debt?

How much is the debt sef, make I help am

portplus:
This click is worth it....

Walahi, na your comment make me watch am, I don laff tire

Kepa to replace Neuer or Sommer?

swiz123:
Everywhere good. Na season all man dey wait for make we dey active dey drag people for blokos.

[center][/center]

https://www.nairaland.com/7795919/chelsea-investigated-potential-breach-ffp

This must be a joke, right?

Hmm

Jodera:
I do respect your views most times cos you've a way of giving very valid points but Omorr you see this bolded..... Lai lai!!!

Anywhere you read that stuff or anything that made you believe that hogwash is what I don't understand.

A goal that made both teams play Penalties to decide the winner is what you termed INCONSEQUENTIAL because his team lost on penalties?

How can a goal be Inconsequential when it's the main decider for penalty shootout?

Imagine someone calling Mbappe WC final hat trick inconsequential France eventually lost out on penalties?

Do you know how light Inconsequential means for you to demean Palmer's goal to such extent?

🤣🤣🤣
Android17 Oya answer the question
Is Mbappe hat trick also inconsequential?

BlueAngel444:
Infinite Athlete Chelsea shirt sponsor £50m

So what happens to those who have bought d plain jerseys?

kingBolton:
18 points clear at the end of the season

Can I hear amen from the front and back

raumdeuter:
1That song is almost 30yrs old

It was used to advertise Rothmans cigarette back in the 90s

Yeah, thank you
I knew the song was used for an advertisement but I was thinking maybe Gulder or something else.

Android17:
This is not a league game where both teams would have shared points. That is when you bring up a draw.

Palmer's goal did not influence the result in City's favour. It was INCONSEQUENTIAL.

OlodorabataFC.

I know you registered to this forum in 2017 and your moniker is android17 and am dead sure also that you are still using an Android phone that was manufactured in 2017 that's why you are not updated on the new trends, bros wake up we are in 2023, not 2017.

BTW, someone should help me tell this guy the meaning of inconsequential 'cos his phone is outdated and can't perform such a task.

Ok

swiz123:
Page 1800
Signed: swiz!

Baba long time, how una dey?

BlueAngel444:
Our "very good friend" Anthony Taylor will referee Chelsea vs Liverpool.

Wahala no dey finish
Another match that will end in controversy.

Theuniverse:
wetin give nkunku injury now that season wants to start? all this useless injuries to our key players. players should be fined for ridiculous injuries .

Haaa

Ok

Android17:
I realized I am chatting with someone who has problems with comprehension.

If a goal was consequential why did City still lose the game? Yea. You don't know what it means for something to be inconsequential.

Read. Digest. Reply.

Till then, not wasting my time trying to educate you.

You are the one that is speaking nonsense with confidence, do you really know the meaning of the word inconsequential?
You sounded as if Arsenal is leading like 3 to 4 goals to nothing, then Man City now score a consolation goal in die-minute.
How can a game that end up as a 1-1 draw and one of the goals is tagged as an inconsequential goal?
You need to be charged for this blunder, walahi.

Android17:
You are now typing off tangent. You were arguing about shot on target and which team had more, have you now confirmed you were wrong? It was City not Arsenal like you alluded to.

You are the one that is talking off tangent, I never said Arsenal had more shots on target than City, so if you don't know the core of the debate you better read well in order not to misyarn.
I said I was shivering the way Arsenal play against City to the extent that City did not have a single shot on target in the first half.
How does that translate that Arsenal have more shot on target than City?

Off point again. The xG was to tell you that City's chances with Rodri and Foden were rated as better quality than Havertz' hence why I said they SHOULD HAVE scored more probably than he should have. Stop replying for the sake of it. Read, digest then reply.

Mr xG, maybe you need to tell FIFA to begin to award trophies for the team that has more xG now.
A fluke goal is better than a 1 trillion xG failed goal, is that hard for you to digest?

for the Umpteenth time, [s] if someone had a penalty, the expression will be the person should have scored it since it is rated as an 8/10 chance.[/s] You don't say Palmer should have scored his because that is a lower quality chance. Read. Understand. Reply.

Off Point

Won't you first acknowledge you responded without understanding? Next, I don't eat waffles for lunch so please stop sending them my way. You don't have to reply if you have nothing to say

Smh
.

There is nothing like inconsequential moment of a game yet City that scored first did not win? LOL

Another Off point.
So you mean man city's goal was inconsequential?

Who decided the better team? You who were cocksure City won't beat Inter?
LOL

Another Off point, how is my prediction from last season collaborating with what we are saying here?

Ballzproblem2:
obtainable mbappe is not feasible make una no dey dream.

Neymar has more followers than mbappe plus charisma,30+ won't block youngster pathways.

will bring vibes to the club

None of the two is feasible.

BlueAngel444:
Chelsea have been offered a lucrative package [£40m] by "My Club" to feature the adult subscription website as the team’s shirt sponsor in the 2023/24 season.
🙄😯😲😅🤣🤣🤣🤣 wtf is wrong with "my club" from gambling to sex 🤦🏾‍♀️ like whattttt

🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😆😆😆
When the price is right, everything is possible