Moriton's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Moriton's Profile › Moriton's Posts
Of all the females there it's the police he chooses abi, in fact Op, picsure or adonbilivit! |
I took a girl out and sensing I was about to ask some sensitive questions she was like: please can I get some take-aways for my boyfriend! Chai word to Oputa, #ourmumudondo |
so them been wan waka before |
how did he open it or was it not locked |
if there is no tu-face then there should be no other two faces there |
faze-kolomental |
it's a simple tins na. you no hear im na 'Gucci'. Where as howa own na 'aboki'. |
why the pikin come black. |
I have checked, what next |
obiorathesubtle:and used same android phone to snap the messages in the Nokia touch |
Thanks, it's open source sir. Here....
|
So I just got a notification from X Os of Infinix that open source is now available for my Hot 4 Pro. They recommend I comment to get a link to download it. Well this web-code-programming ish is not my thing really ( like what is rooting a phone sef), but I would love to know what open source or source code for mobile phones really means and what I stand to gain or lose from it. Thanks. |
hedonistic:Baba abeg take one crate of Origin for my head abeg....MA NIGGA |
As the ball is played into his feet, the camera is focused on Zinedine Zidane, as it has been for the last 70 minutes. Before he traps the ball with the toe of his boot, sending it a yard in front of him but no more, Zidane flicks up his eyes and spots something of interest, like a hawk eyeing a field mouse a hundred feet below. Within half a second he has opened his body to the ball, before caressing a pass with his instep. We don’t see the path of the ball, but Zidane’s movement and expression indicate that it has found its intended target. Of course it has. The scene is taken from Zidane: A 21st Century Portrait , a documentary produced by filmmakers Philippe Parreno and Douglas Gordon. At times it is a difficult watch, but it encapsulates not just the technical ability and laconic style of Zidane, but also his personality. His facial expressions – faint pleasure, anger, exasperation and brief moments of relaxation – give away the pattern of the match as well as his movements. There is space too for his flaws: Zidane is sent off in the final minutes of the match following a fight. By then (the film was shot in April 2005), Zidane is coming to the end of his career. His body and mind have aged beyond their peak. There is room for moments of sumptuous brilliance, and the Frenchman still has the capacity to be the best player on the pitch, but he is a year away from retiring from club football amid a sea of well-wishing banners at the Bernabeu. The final departure from his playing career would come two months later, in altogether different circumstances. ———– Zidane is one of the greatest players in the history of the game; that statement is so obvious it lacks any punch. Pele calls him “the master”, while Carlo Ancelotti believes him to be the most technically able footballer of all time. Ryan Giggs, Paul Scholes, Marcel Desailly, Didier Deschamps and Mesut Ozil have all named him either the best player of their generation or their idol. “When Zidane stepped onto the pitch,” Zlatan Ibrahimovic once said, “the ten other guys just got suddenly better. It is that simple. It was magic. He was a unique player. He was more than good, he came from another planet. His teammates became like him when he was on the pitch.” The youngest of five children and therefore a shy child, Zidane first caught the attention of scouts from Cannes, and was signed at the age of 14. His technique shone even aged 18 and 19, and Zidane helped the club achieve their highest ever Ligue Un finish before leaving for Bordeaux. After leading them to the UEFA Cup final in 1996 and being named Ligue Un Player of the Year, he was signed by Juventus at the age of 25. In a team with Alessandro Del Piero, Deschamps, Edgar Davids, Ciro Ferrara and Pippo Inzaghi and under the stewardship of Marcelo Lippi, Zidane flourished. He won consecutive Serie A titles and played in two successive Champions League finals, but failed to win the trophy. A world-record transfer to Real Madrid would quench that thirst. Zidane’s international career was even more successful. He finished with 31 goals from 108 caps, is currently fourth on Les Bleus’ all-time list for both, and was a leader of the team that won back-to-back major tournaments in 1998 and 2000. He is one of only four players to score in multiple World Cup finals. Zidane’s magnificence inevitably led to an array of awards, but one meant more than most. In 2004, a poll conducted by French tabloid newspaper Journal du Dimanche saw him voted the most popular Frenchman of all time. “To be recognised by a whole country is incredible,’ Zidane told the Guardian in 2004. “This is massive. Before it was hard to talk about certain things, especially if like me you came from a difficult area or from an immigrant background. But now it tells you how France has changed and is changing. It’s a message to everybody – politicians, the kids I grew up with, ordinary French people – about what can be done.” As Zidane grew into his twenties and succeeded as a player, French culture was in turmoil. Unemployment was high, and a growing far-right political movement threatened to exacerbate social discord. Jean-Marie Le Pen, leader of the Front National party, accused the French national team of being “artificial”. He used a struggling side as a metaphor for the country as a whole. The World Cup changed all that. Rather than discord, the national team represented community spirit and social integration. “I think what it was really down to was that French people could relate to the team,” said Thierry Henry, quoted in a BBC Sport article on the cultural impact of that team. “Because of the different heritages through the team, whoever you were and whatever your background, you could see yourself in that team. It was an amazing feeling.” Above them all stood Zinedine ‘Zizou’ Zidane, the son of an Algerian immigrant whose face was projected onto the Arc de Triomphe while the crowds offered their adulation. Zidane, the Frenchman who had never changed, who had never pretended to be something he wasn’t, who had never been ashamed of where his life began in La Castellane, Marseille. Even at Real Madrid, among the glitz and glamour of fame, Zidane always spoke of La Castellane. Zidane has never been interested in political point-scoring, instead taking an actively apolitical stance regarding his legacy. Yet so often it is those who try to avoid action that actually make the biggest difference. “Zidane president,” the crowds in Paris chanted on that glorious July night. Sport had provided a catalyst for a wider social unification over disunion. Zidane had done more than most. After retiring from international football after Euro 2004, Zidane was persuaded to change his mind a year later. “In France, everyone realised that God exists,” Henry said. “And now he is back in the French national team. God is back – and there is little else to say.” The divine reference from Henry carries weight, for there are few players with the omnipotence and omniscience of Zidane in his pomp. His passing was unmatched and his physicality obvious, but his set-piece execution, goalscoring and heading made him the complete attacking midfielder. He occasionally had a tendency, particularly in his later years, to drift out of matches, but he humbly admitted his own shortcomings: “There are so many qualities missing – especially consistency. Every season, I have always had periods of patchy form.” Yet if the greatest players produce their finest moments on the biggest occasion, Zidane’s left-footed volley against Bayer Leverkusen in the 2002 Champions League final can be matched only by Marco van Basten’s own volley in 1988. But it was Zidane’s touch that elevated him so far above his peers. Arsene Wenger remembers him as a player to whom you could kick the ball in any place, at any height, at any pace within a three-yard circle, and Zidane would stop it dead. His exactness when receiving the ball, playing it with a particular spot on his boot to impart spin, curl or distance, created the time and space that allowed the rest of his genius to flourish. Luciano Moggi, Juventus’ former sporting director, described him as “a player of the future”, and that feels highly appropriate. “For me, he is not a soccer player, he is like a classical musician. When he plays, behind his play, there is, for me, classical music,” Hidetoshi Nakata once said, and there is an obvious link to another classical art: ballet. Zidane’s Marseille Roulette, where he would drag the ball back with one foot before spinning and doing the same with the other, became his pirouette. There have been few more elegant footballers, and fewer still who stood over six feet tall. It would be a mistake to confuse elegance with flashness, however, and a greater crime still to introduce that most ugly of 21st century words: bling. Zidane’s style was intrinsically linked to achievement, not show. At Real Madrid he was a Galactico through reputation and ability, not personality. Forever awkwardly dealing with superstardom, Zidane’s elegance left him as he left the pitch. Nor too should we make elegance and determination unhappy bedfellows, for Zidane’s magnificence didn’t just happen by chance. As Kevin Keegan said: “He leads the orchestra. But he’s also willing to work.” “I reached this level by sheer dint of hard work, toiling away at scores of tricks and experiments,” Zidane said after retiring. “I used to play with the ball from dawn till dusk and just kept practising. If I wasn’t playing matches, it was trying out one on one or two against two with a tennis ball. Then I used to try aiming at certain targets. That’s the only way to learn. And if I missed the target, I kept trying until I scored.” “Sometimes I don’t know what takes me over during a game. Sometimes I just feel I have moved to a different place and I can make the pass, score the goal or go past my marker at will,” was another of Zidane’s famous quotes. After all, that is the point of hard work and practice: to make the difficult feel easy. It is no stretch to conclude that it is this extreme determination that made Zidane so ill-prepared to deal with failure, and at least partly explains his volcanic temperament. He received 14 red cards in his career (12 of which he puts down to provocation); from headbutting Jochen Kientz of Hamburg to stamping on Saudi Arabia’s Fuad Anwar in 1998, Zidane possessed an inner rage that regularly spilled over. “Nobody knows if Zidane is an angel or a demon,” as French singer Jean-Louis Murat once said. “It’s hard to explain but I have a need to play intensely every day, to fight every match hard,” was Zidane’s own explanation, given during an interview with the Guardian in 2004. “And this desire never to stop fighting is something else I learnt in the place where I grew up. And, for me, the most important thing is that I still know who I am.” That proved particularly prescient coming almost two years before Zidane’s headbutt of Marco Materazzi in his final game as a professional, now immortalised in statue outside Paris’ Centre Georges Pompidou. Roundly criticised by sports journalists who theorised on his mental state, the simpler explanation was that Zidane was, as ever, playing on the edge and reacted to the personal abuse of his family. It was a pattern coaches at Cannes had spotted 15 years earlier. There is very little evidence of post-incident regret from Zidane. “The reaction is always punished but if there is no provocation there is no reaction. The guilty person is the one who provokes,” he said on Canal Plus three days after the final. “If I reacted that way, it is because something bad happened. Do you really believe that ten minutes before the end of my career I would be able to make such a bad gesture? The provocation was very serious. I am a man and some words are harder to hear than actions. I would have rather been knocked down than hear that.” This was a man defending the honour of a family and childhood that forged his career and personality. The two were intertwined. I think Aime Jacquet put it best when he said simply of Zidane: “He is 100 per cent football.” The skill level was higher than all others, but so too was his commitment to fulfilling his extraordinary potential. When a man is “100 per cent football” all elements of his character will be apparent, including the flaws. “Zidane is a man, with all the faults of human beings,” as Lilian Thuram once reminded the French public. A human being with the technique of a footballing deity; what’s not to love? Daniel Storey http://www.football365.com
|
Tryna eat dinner ;DTryna eat dinner |
push party ko, bush people ni! |
Gala na word, gala don turn gay kwa |
mtchewww |
La click la craze.
OP oya goan buy sense!!! |
Ayam not understanding, who is she
Back here in Afghanistan we don't know her |
The recent attacks in London plus the latest London tower block fire got me wondering. Could all these ill fate befalling the inhabitants of UK be as a result of their continuous habitation of a certain Nigerian desperately wanted back home! N/B I call any name? |
According to Gary B in Pennsylvania the just concluded premier league season is likened to an academic session. His very words. End of term grades Feel free to add your own grades and comments Arsenal B – Doddering headmaster lurching into Alzeihmer’s…time to retire? vs Everton B+ Strong semester…if head boys stay on for Upper 6th form expected to do better next term Burnley A – Exceeded expectations but gets travel sick on school outings vs West Ham C – Struggled to maintain standards at new school Chelsea A+ Valedictorian and still going for extra curricula marks vs Sunderland F – Sullen attitude of headmaster permeates entire school Hull Sadly an F – New foreign language teacher raised failing grades but not enough to maintain government subsidy for the school vs Spurs A+ Splendid effort all round…just missed out on top scholarship honours Leicester C – Once they dropped the too difficult Italian Calculus course that affected confidence in abilities they improved dramatically in the final semester vs Bournemouth A – Remarkable achievement for Special Ed case Liverpool B – Might have been A but for baffling inability to score high in pop quizzes but earn top marks in serious exams vs Middlesborough F – Consistent low test scores results in repeating grade once passed. Man United B – Shines in exams but doesn’t finish regular schoolwork enough. For instance, writes good compositions but usually misses off conclusions vs Crystal Palace C – On the brink of being expelled from school but new headmaster provided the discipline needed for behaviours to improve Southampton C+ New French teacher maintained standards despite star pupils leaving for better schools vs Stoke C – Underachievement for the high IQ students within school. Headmaster must be worried about forthcoming school board meeting Swansea C+ Regular headmaster changes confused students until the latest one could speak both Icelandic and Spanish vs West Brom C – Infuriatingly doing just the minimum as usual to achieve passing grade. Worrying reports of bullying in the playground Watford D – Directionless curriculum could mean head boy will change schools vs Man City B – New expensive school arts lab made a valiant school-wide attempt at remaking the famous Sidney Poitier film “To Sir With Love”, but critics agreed it just didn’t have Hart. |
looking to get my hands on some new techs. found techno l9 plus to be cool but alas I don't like anything techno for reasons unbeknownst to me. so I found Partner Mobile on konga particularly the PS-Power . it seems cool going by specs but I don't know how reliable it is as a whole. Any one with ideas please drop below. Thanks!!! |
![]() sweeterman:4-2-2-2 keeper four defenders two central midfielders two attacking midfielders right and left wing two strikers attack from the wing add me Maurice Agim on fb level 29 ![]() sweeterman:4-2-2-2 keeper four defenders two central midfielders two attacking midfielders right and left wing two strikers attack from the wing add me Maurice Agim on fb level 29 |
find out the location of the closest Carlcare representative in your state of residence. lay your complaints to them. they might ask for receipts or other form of ownership plus if it has warranty. |
na number one sure pass |
A fine email on Football365 and ‘bias’ On the recent accusations that F365 is biased against José Mourinho or Manchester United , here’s my two cents. Full disclosure: F365 lets me contribute to the site on a regular basis, although I don’t get paid for it. [and never will – Ed.] Over the past couple of years, my sense is that F365 has been particularly harsh on four managers: Sam Allardyce, José Mourinho, David Moyes, and Alan Pardew. By “harsh” I mean talking more about their failures than their successes (not that Moyes has had any successes), and criticising those failures in very strong language. These four managers have two big things in common. First, they have a high opinion of themselves, and broadcast it. Moyes is slightly less culpable than the others, maybe because he seems more bravado than smugness, but the other three leave you in no doubt who’s the smartest man in the room. Second, they tend not to take responsibility for their mistakes and failures, preferring to blame others. It’s not a particularly attractive combination of traits. In fact, it makes you a bit of a d*ck. There are lots of different types of d*cks, but for whatever reason, this specific form of d*ckishness seems to be particularly abhorrent to the folks at F365. Mourinho may seem to be the biggest target, but that’s only because he really is the biggest target. He manages the highest-profile club, and goes out of his way more often to behave in the two ways described. I could be wrong, but I don’t think F365 has any more dislike for Mourinho than for the others. Ideally you want a football website to be as objective as possible. But there are worse things than being harsh on these kinds of d*cks. In America we elect them President. Peter G, Pennsylvania, USA Culled from f365, that last paragraph though... savage!!! |
– Claims to partner WHO, NMA, CDC – Extort money from victims – Uses the Police to manhandle victims BY NSEOBONG DAVID A fraudulent group known as Noble-steps Growing Concept (NGC) has emerged in Uyo with a new technique of defrauding job seekers in the state. The group which has an office at No. 183 Ikot Ekpene Road, a green storey building (first floor) opposite Shop and Save Supermarket, claiming to be a Non Governmental Organization, is engaged in extorting money from job seekers through a text message inviting them for a job interview, where they use a whole day to brainwash them in a seminar-like atmosphere, after which they spin money from them in the name of training/registration. THE INK reporter who decided to carry out an investigation on the activities of the daredevil group, discovered that the group is a component of fraudsters who claim to employ people and train them on how to create awareness about an outbreak of a disease which they said would spread across African countries by the year 2020; and for a shortage of health personnel to involve in the awareness campaign, they decide to employ more people who will be sent to travel across African countries to create awareness about the “ 2020 anticipated disease.” In addition to their brainwash, the group deceived that they have a partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO), Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) as well as Centre for Disease Control (CDC) who have subsidized their training fees and offered some very juicy monthly allowances to participants who would be successful at the end of the “interview”. In the course of the brainwashing session by the group, one of the fraudsters who acted as the manager of the Lagos branch of the group and gave her name as Queen Brown, calculated the juicy allowance to be paid to successful participants, to the tune of three hundred thousand naira (N300,000.00) monthly; only on condition that the participants at the “interview” were able to pay thirty thousand naira (N30,000.00) on two installments as registration for the License to practice as medical doctors during the awareness campaign. She added that the ability to instantly pay the N30,000.00 was as an automatic qualification to become a successful candidate for the “job.” Another member of the fraudulent NGC who gave her name as Peace confirmed in lies that the group partners with NMA, WHO and CDC to provide employment. Fascinated by the juicy three hundred thousand naira (N300,000.00) monthly allowance, some of the unsuspecting job seekers who had such amounts in their accounts rushed to the banks to withdraw their monies to pay the fraudsters in order to be automatically qualified for the non-existed job. A victim (Ifiok David’s) narrated his ordeal with the fraudsters on his facebook page thus: “Akwa Ibom youths, stop falling prey to NGC or whatsoever they call themselves. I was sent a message from an anonymous number to attend a certain interview with a Non Governmental Organization that partners with WHO. I left what I was doing at the moment to attend that interview and I guess you already know the rest of the story. They brainwashed and dubbed me of N15,000 instantly that day and when I realized it was all scam, I went to ask for the refunds of my money. The MD of the place himself (Ifeanyi or whatsoever he calls himself) met me and told me the money was going to be refunded, only for me to be arraigned by heavily armed police officers some minutes later, who did this to me” (showing a picture of Police manhandling). He continued: “AKWA IBOM youths stand up. These guys have extorted money from lots of us and have even spread to Eket and other areas in the state where they are not yet known. What annoys me most is that some of us too have been recruited to be employees of the shady business. Your brother, sister, Son, daughter, wife, husband etc could be the next victim. I went there today peacefully, without arms or weapons but I got this in return from a foreigner who is accruing wealth from deceiving us. Don’t be silent any longer. We can push this fraudsters out of our Lands, but only if we do it together. I am posting this from Ikot Akpan Abia police station”, he lamented. However, the chairman, Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) Akwa Ibom State, Dr. Aniekeme Uwah in a phone call has dismissed having partnership with the fraudulent group, saying that NMA in the State is not aware of such a group. In a phone contact with the Police Public Relations Officer, Supol Cordelia Nwawe she denied that the act of manhandling the victim was not carried out by his men, adding that she has not had such a case in their Station. [SOURCE: THE INK NEWSPAPER] Got sent a message about the interview today and a simple Google Search revealed the above. The said its strictly on recommendation but no one ever called me to say they recommended me for something. How they got my number I don't know. Akwa Ibomites and Nigerians beware!!! |
1. Who made you? God made me. (Genesis 1:27: Job 33:4) 2. What else did God make? God made all things. (Genesis 1:1-31; Deuteronomy 10:14; Nehemiah 9:6; John 1:3) 3. Why did God make you and all things? God made me and all things for His own glory. (1 Chronicles 16:28; Romans 11:36; I Corinthians 6:20; 10:31) 4. Who made God? Nobody made God. (Psalm 90:2) 5. Has God ever had a beginning? No. God has always been. (Psalms 90:2; 93:2; Revelation 4: ![]() 6. Will God ever die? No, God lives forever. (Psalm 90:2) 7. How can you glorify God? I can glorify God by loving Him and doing what He commands. (Micah 6:8; John 15:8; I John 5:3) 8. Why ought you to glorify God? I ought to glorify God because He made me and takes care of me. (Psalms 117:1-2; 146:5-10) 9. Are there more gods than one? No, there is only one God. (Isaiah 45.6, 18, 21-22; 1 Timothy 2:5) 10. In how many persons does this one God exist? God exists in three persons. (Matthew 3:1617; 28:19; 11 Corinthians 13:14) 11. Who are the three persons of God? The three persons of God are the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. (Matthew 28:19) 12. Who is God? God is a spirit and does not have a body like man. (John 4:24) 13. What is God like? God is infinite, eternal, and unchangeable. (Psalms 139:710; 90:2; Malachi 3:6) 14. Where is God? God is everywhere. (II Chronicles 2:6; Psalm 139:7-12; Proverbs 15:3) 15. Can you see God? No, I cannot see God, but He always sees me. (Jeremiah 23:23-24; John 1:18) 16. Does God know all things? Yes, nothing can be hidden from God. (Job 34:21; Ezekiel 11:1) 17. Can God do all things? Yes, God can do all His holy will. (Matthew 19.26) 18. Where do you learn how to love and obey God? I learn how to love and obey God in the Bible alone. (Deuteronomy 30:11-16; Joshua 1: ![]() 19. Who wrote the Bible? Holy men who were taught by the Holy Spirit wrote the Bible. (IL Peter 1:21) 20. Who were our first parents? Adam and Eve were our first parents. (Genesis 2:7, 18-22; 3:20) 21. Of what were our first parents made? God made the body of Adam out of the dust of the ground and formed Eve from the body of Adam. (Genesis 2:7, 21-22) 22. What did God give Adam and Eve besides bodies? God gave them souls that could never die. (Genesis 2:7) 23. Do you have a soul as well as a body? Yes, I have a soul that can never die. (Ecclesiastes 12:7; Mark 8:36; 1 Thessalonians 5:23) 24. How do you know that you have a soul? God tells me so in Genesis 2:7, "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." (Genesis 2:7) 25. In what condition did God make Adam and Eve? God made them holy and happy. (Genesis 1:2731) 26. What is a covenant? A covenant is an agreement between two or more persons. (Genesis 9:11-17; Psalm 105:8-11) 27. What was Adam's part in the covenant in order to stay in the Garden of Eden? Adam was required to obey God perfectly. (Genesis 2:15-17) 28. Did Adam obey God? No, Adam chose to disobey God. (Genesis 3:6) 29. Did Adam's sin affect himself alone? No, Adam's sin made all men lose communion with God, become sinful in nature, and subject to God's wrath. (Romans 5:14; 6:23; Ephesians 2:3) 30. How did God punish Adam's disobedience? Adam's punishment was death and separation from God, (Genesis 3:17-24; Romans 5:12) 31. What is sin? Sin is the transgression of the law of God. (I John 3:4) 32. What is meant by transgression? Transgression is failing to do what God commands and doing what God forbids. (I Chronicles 10:13; Psalm 25:6-7; Matthew 15:3-6) 33. Who is Satan? Satan is an evil spirit who is the enemy of God and all Christians. (Matthew 13:39; Luke 22:3; John 8:44; 1 Peter 5: ![]() 34. Was Satan ever good? Yes, Satan was once one of God's greatest angels. (Isaiah 14:12-15) 35. What was Satan's name when he was one of God's angels? Satan's name was Lucifer. (Isaiah 14:12) 36. Why is Lucifer not one of God's angels today? Lucifer became jealous of God and wanted to be as great as He, so God cast him out of heaven, (Isaiah 14:12-15; Revelation 12:7-9) 37. What is Lucifer now called? Lucifer is now called Satan or the Devil. (Luke 10:18; 1 John 3:8; Revelation 12:9) 38. Who is stronger, God or Satan? God is stronger. (I John 3:8; 4:4) 39. Does Satan want God's will to be done? No, Satan always wants people to do the opposite of what God wants them to do. (I Chronicles 21:1; John 8:44; Ephesians 6:11-12, 16) 40. What was the sin of our first parents? Adam and Eve disobeyed God and ate the fruit that God told them not to eat. (Genesis 2:17; 3:6) 41. Who tempted Adam and Eve to sin? Satan tempted Eve, and she gave the fruit to Adam. (Genesis 3:1-6) 42. What happened to our first parents when they had sinned? Instead of being holy and happy, they became sinful and miserable. (Genesis 3:8-24) 43. What effect did Adam's sin have on all mankind? Because of Adam's sin, all mankind lost fellowship with God, received a sinful nature, and began to do evil. (Romans 5:12) 44. What is that sinful nature we inherit from Adam called? Our corrupt nature is called original sin. (Psalm 51:5; Romans 5:12) 45. What does every sin deserve? Every sin deserves the wrath and curse of God. (Genesis 2:17; Psalm 89:30-32; Galatians 3:10) 46. Who can save us? The only Saviour of men is the Lord Jesus Christ, who being the eternal Son of God, became man and so is both God and man in two natures and one person. (John 14:6; Acts 4:12) 47. What does God require of man before he can go to heaven? No one can enter heaven unless his heart is changed. (John 3:3, 16; 5:24; 14:6; Acts 4:12) 48. What is this change of heart called? This change of heart is called regeneration. (Ezekiel 36:26-27; Titus 3:5-6) 49. Who can change a sinner's heart? The Holy Spirit can change a sinner's heart. (Titus 3:5) 50. How is your heart changed? My heart is changed by the Holy Spirit because of the grace of God shown in the work of Christ. (Titus 3:4-7) Source: biblebelivers.com |
Epositive:oh sarcasm, know it. |
just judge with a clean mind
|
A mother in-law visited her son and his wife but coincidentally, that day the wife was feeling Hot and she did not want to whisper to her husband since he was busy sharing stories with his mother. The wife tricked the husband by pretending she has headache and went straight to the bedroom. After some minutes,the husband followed her leaving his mother in the sitting room. He took some time there,but when he came back he had forgotten to close his zip. Mum:How is she feeling now? Husband:She is now feeling better,I have given her paracetamol. Mum:OK,close the pharmacy...... |
