₦airaland Forum

korel9:
Straight to the point. I've not been lucky in relationships with Christian ladies but always found genuine and true love with muslim ladies. Now I'm in another relationship with this Muslim girl and I'm ready to marry her.
We both have no problem with our religion but the problem is her guardians (her dad is late and her mum, though a Christian married to a muslim man is out of reach). To top it all, she grew up with a Hausa woman who has a Kogi airforce man for a husband. As for my parents, it can be worked out.
There's always been this barrier of Christian men not being able to marry Muslim ladies but the other way round is possible.
Is it possible to break this barrier and make her my wife?

nope u cnt if you really love her, why not embrace islam and then marry her believe me its worth it, islam is a true religion do research and see what u can do, muslim lady cnt marry a non muslim.

just came on board , hello brothers.

Coldfeet:
Hmmm! Ramadan Kareem to you.

ramadan kareem.

dasparrow:
India should take their embassy out of Nigeria and Nigeria should take her embassy out of India. I am tired of hearing Indian leaders wail. We all know the Indian is racist so they are free to ban all Nigerians from India while we ban them from Nigeria too. I am getting tired of reading about Indians abeg. They should just step aside. I also don't advise any Nigerian to go there as a foreign student either. There are better and more conducive nations that one can go to in order to study. India is just not it.

oh boy you cant deny the fact that nigerians are criminals.

bigtt76:
Stop Nigerians, stop the Indians from coming to Nigeria and nationalize their companies/temples. About time we sit up too. Country rough country rough nor mean say den go drive we from their countries

you just have to swallow the bitter truth nigerians are dirty and criminals, even here in libya all african are welcome but they frown on nigerians, "nigeria" how i wish i neva studied there.

madridguy:
Good news, meanwhile, I will also like to see the killer of Mrs Bridget too.

nope you won,t.

proudkafir:
Mr high IQ Muslim, why did you edit my post while trying to guide me? Arabic is of course the universal colonial and imperial religious language for those places that the Arabs have conquered. I thank God my region was not conquered by the Arabs, perhaps I might have been a Muslim with a very high IQ and with a real-human thinking faculty.

In the school I started my elementary schooling, we recite 'the Lord's prayer', which Muslim do as 'al-fatia', in our local dialect and we like it that way. However all Islam call to prayer is done in Arabic. why? Because is the way god sent it, and i understand that Muslims everyday want to guide the Christians and Jews.
But i cant. I hope someday allah soften my heart
I pray i accept allahh someday, and his apostle Mohammed (peace be upon him)

congratulation i will also pray for you, RAMADAN KAREEM

Segadem:
Hmmmm,...so u want him to condemn what he practises? Dont u think this man will take part in the killing if he's not the governor?

sleazy ignorant illiterate. one thing i love is, you only make mouth on social media.

proudkafir:
Quran was.

LOL but the facts remains one ask a muslim in nigeria to recite suratul fatiha and then in azebajan, checheniya, or saudi arabia its all thesame, so the quran is one and represent islam, unlike the bible which you have 1000different copies, thanks to the quran for reminding us of people like you "deaf,dumb and blind" but i hope your rock like heart one day soften by allah. Peace.

The Bible is a collection of writings by many different authors. The Qur'an is a dictation. The speaker in the Qur'an - in the first person - is God talking directly to man. In the Bible you have many men writing about God and you have in some places the word of God speaking to men and still in other places you have some men simply writing about history. The Bible consists of 66 small books. About 18 of them begin by saying: This is the revelation God gave to so and so… The rest make no claim as to their origin. You have for example the beginning of the book of Jonah which begins by saying: The word of the Lord came to Jonah the son of Elmitaeh saying… quote and then it continues for two or three pages. If you compare that to one of the four accounts of the life of Jesus, Luke begins by saying: “many people have written about this man, it seems fitting for me to do so too”. That is all… no claim of saying “ these words were given to me by God here they are for you it is a revelation”, there is no mention of this. The Bible does not contain self- reference, that is, the word 'Bible' is not in the Bible. Nowhere does the Bible talk about itself. Some scriptures are sometimes pointed to in the Bible, say: Here where it talks about itself, but we have to look closely. 2nd Timothy 3:16 is the favourite which reads: “All scripture is inspired of God” and there are those who would say, here is where the Bible it talks about itself, it says it is inspired of God, all of it. But if you read the whole sentence, you read that this was a letter wrote by Paul to Timothy and the entire sentence says to Timothy: “Since you were a young man you have studied the holy scriptures, all scriptures inspired by God” and so on… When Timothy was a young man the New Testament did not exist, the only thing that stems he was talking about are scriptures – which are only a portion of the Bible - from before that time. It could not have meant the whole Bible. There is at the end of the Bible a verse which says: “Let anyone who takes away from this book or adds to this book be cursed”. This to is sometimes pointed to me saying: Here is where it sums itself as a whole. But look again and you will see that when it says: Let no one change this book, it is talking about that last book, number 66, the Book of Revelation. It has too, because any reference will tell you that the Book of Revelation was written before certain other parts of the Bible were written. It happens today to be stacked at the end, but there are other parts that came after, so it can not be referring to the entire book. It is an extreme position held only by some Christian groups that the Bible – in its entirety - cover to cover is the revealed word of God in every word, but they do a clever thing when they mention this, or make this claim. They will say that the Bible in its entirety is the word of God; inerrant (no mistakes) in the original writings. So if you go to the Bible and point out some mistakes that are in it you are going to be told: Those mistakes were not there in the original manuscript, they have crept in so that we see them there today. They are going on problem in that position. There is a verse in the Bible Isaiah 40:8 which in fact is so well known that some Bibles printed it on the inside front cover as an introduction and it says : “ The grass weathers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever”. Here is a claim in the Bible that the word of God will stand forever, it will not be corrupted, it won't be lost. So if today you find a mistake in the Bible you have two choices. Either that promise was false that when God said my word wont fade away, he was mistaken, or the portion which has the mistake in it was not a part of the word of God in the first place, because the promise was that it would be safeguarded, it would not be corrupted. these are just few you name. THE QURAN come back to the Qur'an, and as I mentioned the speaker in the Qur'an is - in the first person - is God. The book claims throughout that it is the word of God. It names itself 70 times as the Qur'an. It talks about its own contents. It has self-reference. The Qur'an states in the first Sura after Fatiha that “This is the book, there is no doubt in it, it is a guidance for those who are conscious of God” and so on and so on… It begins that way and continues that way stressing that. And there is one very amazing statement in the Qur'an when you come to the fourth Sura 82nd Ayah which says to those who say Qur'an is something else than the word of God. It challenges them saying: “Have they not considered the Qur'an, if it came from someone other than God they will find in it many mistakes”. Some of you are students, would you dare to hand in a paper after you completed a research work or something at the bottom you put down there “You wont find mistakes in this”. Would you dare to challenge your professor that way?. Well the Qur'an does that. It is telling: If you really think you know where this came from then starts looking for mistakes because you wont find any. Another interesting thing the Qur'an does is that it quotes all its critics. There has never - in hundreds of years - ever been some suggestion as to where that book came from but that the Qur'an does not already mention that objection and reply to it. Many times you will find the Ayah saying something like: Do they say such and such and so, say to them such and such and so. In every case there is a reply. More than that the Qur'an claims that the evidence of its origin is in itself, and that if you look at this book you will be convinced. So the difference in Christianity and Islam comes down to a difference of authority and appeal to authority. The Christian wants to appeal to the Bible and the Muslim wants to appeal to the Qur'an. You can not stop by saying: This is true because me book say it is, and somebody else would say something else is true because my book says differently, you can not stop at that point, and the Qur'an does not. The Christians may point to some words that it is recorded Jesus said and say this proves my point. But the Muslim does not simply open his book and say: No, no the Qur'an says this, because the Qur'an does not simply deny something the Bible says and say something else instead. The Qur'an takes the form of a rebuttal, it is a guidance as the opening says (Huda lil mutakeen). So that for every suggestion that the Christian may say: My Bible say such and such, the Qur'an will not simply say: No that is not true, it will say: Do they say such and such then ask them such and such. You have for example the Ayah that compares Jesus and Adam. There are those who may say that Jesus must have been God (Son of God) because he had no father. He had a woman who was his mother, but there was no human father. It was God that gave him life, so he must have been God’s son. The Qur'an reminds the Christian in one short sentence to remember Adam - who was his father ? - and in fact, who was his mother ? He did not have a father either and in fact he did not have a mother, but what does that make him? So that the likeness of Adam is the likeness of Jesus, they were nothing and then they became something; that they worship God. So that the Qur'an does not demand belief - the Qur'an invites belief, and here is the fundamental difference. It is not simply delivered as: Here is what you are to believe, but throughout the Qur'an the statements are always: Have you O man thought of such and such, have you considered so and so. It is always an invitation for you to look at the evidence; now what do you believe ? The citation of the Bible very often takes the form of what is called in Argumentation: Special Pleading. Special Pleading is when implications are not consistent. When you take something and you say: Well that must mean this, but you don’t use the same argument to apply it to something else. To give an example, I have seen it in publications many times, stating that Jesus must have been God because he worked miracles. In other hand we know very well that there is no miracle ever worked by Jesus that is not also recorded in the Old Testament as worked by one of the prophets. You had amongst others, Elijah, who is reported to have cured the leper, raise the dead boy to life and to have multiplied bread for the people to eat - three of the most favourite miracles cited by Jesus. If the miracles worked by Jesus proved he was God, why don’t they prove Elijah was God ? This is Special Pleading, if you see what I mean. The implications are not consistent. If this implies that then in that case it must also imply the same thing. We have those who would say Jesus was God because he was taken up in the heaven. But the Bible also says the a certain Einah did not die he was taken up into the heaven by God. Whether it is true or not, who knows, but the point is if Jesus being taken up proves he is God, why does not it prove Einah was God? The same thing happened to him.

and who has written this new bible, i guess its popes. E.t.c even a nigerian pastor can have a new copy of bible written by him. THE QURAN IS ONE.

1500-year-old bible has been discovered in
Turkey. The holy book claims Jesus Christ was
not crucified,the work is allegedly the Gospel of
Barnabas. Shutterstock
A 1500-year-old bible has been discovered in
Turkey. Discovered in 2000, the book that
contains purportedly the Gospel of Barnabas has
been transferred by the Turkish government to
the Ethnography Museum of Ankara with a
police escort. Barnabas was a disciple of Christ,
and in the work, claims that Jesus was not
crucified, instead it says he ascended to heaven
alive and Judas Iscariot was crucified in his
place. Furthermore, the 1500-year-old bible
states that Jesus Christ was not the son of God,
but simply a prophet who passed on the word of
God. and also predicted the coming of Muhammad as a messenger.




please my advice don't start misquoting me and spewing thrash go do research know the truth before its too late. ma,assalama.

dorox:
You should start by first mourning the senseless killing of a woman in Kano for the sake of Mohammed.

yes even me i will, not önly behead, but skin her alive, ignorant coward illiterates you dnt mess with our messenger.

Ifeann:
u dumb muslim...do u know he was a member of the NOI a satire of islam..a muslim sect u islamists insult , now u are trying to claim him

"lady" islam (1) muslims are different he is a SUFI MUSLIM, one of the must peacefull sect, what did he say after defeatin "sony liston" i believe in ALLAH AND MUHAMMAD IS HIS MESSENGER. i believe in the oneness of allah and muhammad is his messenger and him too, and please go stop the an imam from leading his funeral.
the last time i checked is way bck in the 60s from cassius clay to MUHAMMAD ALI when he discorved the truth and came to light, how i wish you too will #nairalanderS all illit.....

DeltaOil:
Muhammed Ali was really a spotting icon, and fought for black people!

It's a pity he died as a moslem.
As we all know that Mohammed himself said he does not know what will happen to
both he himself "mohammed" & his followers, hence they won't make heaven.

Sura 46:9
"I am not something original among the messengers, NOR DO I KNOW WHAT WILL BE DONE WITH ME OR WITH YOU(MUSLIMS)."

If he had died as a Christian he would have the promise of salvation that moahmmed did not have nor his following muslims


Mark 16:16 (KJV)
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.


Jesus went to heaven in the view of people, unlike mohammed that is dead and buried

Act 1
9 And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.

10 And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel;

11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven

irrational, civilised , compassionate small brain, southern piece of thrash. He changed after knowing the truth, jesus did nt die on the cross for you, and cnt save you from the punishment of god (allah) the one and only. Keep being drunk and commiting adultery, then go to heaven. Illiterate, messenges of a llah says do as allah command and you shall be saved.

Muhammad Ali, a three-
time heavyweight
boxing champion who
transcended sports with
his outspoken stances on
religious, political, and social issues, died on
Friday at a Phoenix-area
hospital where he was
receiving treatment for
respiratory problems. He
was 74. You'll forever remain the GREATEST OF ALL TIME. may allah reward you with jannatul firdaus. How i wish some nairalander,s really know what islam is. No offence. ALLAHU AKBAR.

my favourite quote "i am so me that i make medicine so sick" get well soon the greatest of all time.

wiseass:
I would rather follow a prophet that died for man kind, lived a chaste life, encouraged equality of the female gender, preached forgiveness, never married a wife and while being crucified prayed for the forgiveness of his captors. That's a man worth emulating not your Mohammad besides Jesus was before Mohammad and Mohamed was never mentioned in the holy bible. Plus Jesus never encouraged jihadism

who is jesus? Simple answer Is, you dnt knw him.

abbey621:
You are also in the wrong, the true problem in the North is poverty and illiteracy, !

la ikraha fiddin, no compulsion in religion, there is no 1 forcing the other to accept islam, but saying ill agaisnt the holy prophet is completely unacceptable. And mind you just bcoz i havent been in western skul does nt make 1 illiterate. And all nigerians are living in poverty.

funstufz:
Is that your new name...

So, if you respect the person of Jesus Christ and any of His follower should provoke your prophet, you think killing is the next thing to show your so called respect.....

Mr.know it all...

you ppl are no real followers of christ a real follower of christ will always be a muslim, christ neva says worship me.

hisen abre, my president, youl forever be celebrated by us your sentenced in prison but not in our heart, our parents always mention your name and hail your, that blood sucking corward idris derby god, willing we will remove him, PROUDLY GURAN.

funstufz:
Even though am not the type that support these killings, but I think something is greatly missing about the way these so called 'muslim' take whatever is writing about their prophet or highly placed individual.....

When they are not Vampires or BLOOD SUCKING DEMONS....

Killing at the slightest provocation...

Fasting for the muslim is around the corner, one would wonder at the blasphemy against the Church of Christ and Christ Himself from these blood thirsty set of people, yet the Christian will not because of that go on killing spree...

Worse has been said about other religions and even about Christ....

haba,

By their fruit ye shall know them....

****no any real muslim ever even called the name "isa" jesus christ without adding (MAY PEACE BE UPON HIM) we love respect jesus, but the problem with you is your followin him wrongly . Hes not a son of god but a slave and messenger god, jst as other messengers. And whats shocking is the ppl that liked your comment it seèm they all knw nothing.

onosprince:
Which person workshop this people don go scatter say na bomb making factory... No be only bomb na nuclear weapon factory.

you just worded it right.

"todays final will go like this"

barcafans; will support atlc madrid even though they know thats ATLC was the reason why their out of the champions, bcoz they dislike the beast RONALDO which today will score a hat-trick.

And those self aclaimed "best league in the world" guess who




premear league fans: there jealous bcoz spanish teams are the underdogs in europe bcoz we give them a small chin-chin team like bilbao to beat their best teams (not need to mention). But anyway but finalist are spaneard, but they dislike real madrid simply bcoz we were the best. Hala madrid all the way. Madrid fans be aware of hater,s today will be like "1 real fan"
"20 haters"






peace anyway its just a game, but history forever.