₦airaland Forum

cococandy:
and you need to post more often

Nairaland is not for the faint hearted o.

DaBullIT:
..., just go through my posts and take a peek at the kind of mentions i get for expressing my opinion as neutrally as i can until they start their madness

and again , i did not mention anybody , the words i used are the kind of words that were used when i was mentioned, even worse than that so before you go running up and down to your brothers who love banning people like me , i said it i would excuse myself pretty soon

This isn’t true, I can personally attest to that. You go to the gutters all by yourself without being preempted. The thing about the mindset of “I will meet you in the gutters” is that you have to have had it in you, and sometimes you may not realize that you are marching on all by yourself. And so what if you didn’t mention names? It doesn’t take away from what comes out of your cybermouth.

Nonetheless, there is room yet for change, and you can start with your seeming obsession with people’s ethnicities. You are not better or worse than anyone based on your ethnicity.

Tajbol4splend:
I just don't like it when the people are quick to accuse the government officials of wrongdoing whenever they do their job because of their past wrongdoing, you are too reasonable to be an Igbo, are you?

So what if I were? My ethnicity, like yours, is nether here nor there.

Leave bigotry for insecure people who lack the intellectual and emotional intelligence required to engage in conversations. I hope you are not one of those people, or at least planning to work on developing both.

Tajbol4splend:
Why would he be arrested for using Hanan's previous number? What could possibly be their intent to arrest a random person for using Hanan's previous number? You don't think for a second he could have done something incriminating with that line for them to have arrested him

Could he have done something incriminating? Yes, he could have because he is human.

Could the DSS or SSS have arrested him for no just cause other than someone, who was not aware that the lady no longer had the number, reported a suspicion, without doing their due diligence before the fact? Well, precedence suggests they could have, and hope something will stick after the fact.

Would the DSS or SSS have let him go if he did infact orchestrate impersonation of the lady for any reason? Highly unlikely, and it’ll be a gross irresponsibility if they did not charge him to court for that?

If he committed the crime but still has the chutzpah to call them out publicly, are they likely to just release a rejoinder like the above? Highly unlikely.

The math doesn’t add up in favor of the SSS at this point.

That he got to walk away with the SIM card puts a big dent in the claim that he was using it to commit crime. Why leave him with the evidence of crime?

EDIT: This is assuming SSS sources indeed shared this, and it’s not all made up.

cococandy:
The internet is filled with demons

They go home and are normal with their families so their families don’t know how truly demonic they are. You can see their true colors when it’s time to dump on other folks who have no idea they even exist.

Don’t you see how the stupid blogger ended the disgusting post “Hopefully they’ll come back together again”, just so they when he or she is outed for writing false information, they can claim the couple finally came back together.

Hmm...

I think they might be this way at home too. But I like your optimism.

kunleweb:
Speculations sha. A good woman turns away attention from herself to her kids. Unless a heavy blow hits, divorce should be a last resort. We know this lady even before marriage. The guy can't tame her. Marriage can't. Only God and the devil can tame some women. She's one of them. Trust me. I've turned down lots of relationships when I see that unruly qualities. The kind CeeC has. But towtow aroma and tatse no go gre Peruzzi hear word before that one too gets ruined.

If the women in your life are okay with crap, including impending HIV, so long as whatever blow meted to them is not heavy, it is still not your place to dictate to other women what they are allowed to tolerate from the kind of man one can deduce from your posting that you'll grow up to be. I am sure there are lots of girls who wouldn't mind being tamed by you, you that needs to be tamed o, and I pity them already.

Who is raising these boys these days!

kunleweb:
The law. Na una our sisters no wan put head down. My mum has been complaining bitterly about how young ladies don't place value on their marriages in the past one week and it's been one divorce to the other all over the news. It's okay sha. Dakore can join the clubs of her sisters, HenShaw, Tonto, and Co. They can even have foursome for all we care. Women should take it easy on we men too

Women!

I read two or three of your posts, the prize in you for any woman was not glaring. Then I read this. What?!?

With every respect due her, I wish your mum would divert the energy she has been using to focus bitterly about "how young ladies don't place value on their marriages in the past one week" to sit you down to reflect on what role you can play in ensuring that the woman, God bless her, who ends up marrying you wouldn't be complaining bitterly about how the older you places little to no value on your marriage because you've been trained to believe that it is 80% her responsibility to make the marriage work. Or at least that she'll use the energy to help clean you up a bit so that you are not cussing out people you disagree with at the drop of a hat.

This much drama and name-callings over unsubstantiated rumors!

DaBullIT:
Go and eat cow dung Mr smart by fool

Is it nutritious? I know it's good as a fertilizer, and I think I'll stick to that use until you can confirm that it's tasty.

Back to the issue... I hope you now understand the difference between what was said and how your brain processed it.

thatigboman:
he signed a document not to take any legal action against the service

According to him, under duress.

APCNig:
You were well fed, you were not physically tortured, but you still want to take DSS to Court. Well, Buhari owns DSS and the Courts. Since you love trouble and you are looking for it, then you are about to see the trouble. This DSS does not take rubbish.

So because he was fed, he should pretend like they didn’t violate his fundamental rights for no reason? Isn’t that what the court is there for? That’s like saying if a kidnapper treats you well until he gets a ransom, and lets you go you should praise him. Nigeria should not be left to remain a Banana republic. We have to insist on law and order at every level, and from every citizen.

DaBullIT:
it says here that


Okolie’s lawyer told The Guardian that in trying to get his client arrested, the DSS monitored his telephone conversation and initially arrested an elderly person who has a relationship with him until they later found Okolie


http://saharareporters.com/2020/01/06/dss-detains-man-unlawfully-10-weeks-after-purchasing-mtn-sim-card-previously-used

Sahara reporters posted the news first and they quoted okolie's lawyer after which other bloggers started posting slightly edited versions


why would dss monitor someone's line and then have to arrest the person's relative before they could arrest him ??


A LOT OF YOU ON NAIRALAND ARE VERY STUPID


now that you've seen proof will you be humble enough to apologize or will you come up with another stupid rhetoric ?

Why are you being smart by half? And being arrogant about it? Indeed we may not know what happened yet, but how does having a relationship with him equate to being a relative of his? Doesn’t his business associate have a relationship with him? Stop pretending to be daft just to win an argument, unless you’re getting paid to do this.

paraltero:
So because there are rape apologies elsewhere, we should condone them in Nigeria. Same you guys would say "we don't have to accept gay marriage because it is accepted elsewhere". But being a rape apologist is suddenly fine because there are rape apologists elsewhere.

And female rape apologists are as shameless as the male ones.

”You guys?” Please read my comment again. I don’t want to derail the topic.

ornicus:

In addition to that, the power most rapists hold over their victims is shame. By coming out, she has taken that from him. Also, she has made certain that EVERYTHING is in the public space. No opportunity for pastor to engage some police to kill the case.

The case will be prosecuted in lagos, a very progressive state that has aggressively pushed for female protections.

I also suspect that there is a lot more information eg old medical reports that will come out.

I love your first paragraph in bold. Your third paragraph, or an electronic or taped recording of him or one of the alleged witnesses’ clear admittance is the only reason I can think of for this move, unless they are not planning to actually sue and just want the investigation results out in the open. Or maybe one of those who reached out to them has enough strong evidence.

In this, my heart goes out to the other victims on both sides (the children of both families) irrespective of which side is telling this truth in this particular case.

paraltero:
No rape apologist on Nairaland?

You guys have been saying she should file complaint, she should file complaint.

Now the lady has filed one, some are already hoping it works against her, so they can gloat.

Nigerian men, what new low will you guys not sink to?

Why blame all Nigerian men for the follies of certain males AND FEMALES who, yes, have written like rape apologists on this issue? Haven’t there been voices from Nigerian men on the other side on this issue? And is it only Nigeria that we have rape apologists?

I didn’t see this coming. What evidence might they have to take this to the courts after all this while!? Curious to see how this plays out.

chuose2:
BIODUN FATOYINBO IS A FREEMASON PASTOR

[b]Four reasons to show that Biodun Fatoyinbo does not worship God.

1] This is Biodun on the left and 2 Freemasons on the right, same sign [b](thanks to sender)
...
2] The god of Biodun Fatoyinbo is satan, thats why he can be seen here flashing the devils horns
...
3] Biodun Fatoyinbo is boldly flashing 666, the number of the devil just to show he worships satan...

The logo of COZA is a Pyramid, with light coming from the east, just like in Freemasonry.
Why will a church logo be a Pyramid?
...
ALL THE PASTORS COMING TO HIS AID ARE FREEMASONS TOO

No actually, he is a Cagedminer. Evidenced by the shape of his eye glasses.

And the conspiracy begins! And has been embraced by over 2 dozens of “likers.” One needs to do research before gesturing or posing, lest one be accused of exhibiting the pose Dr Satan was seen to be doing in Agege.

Is this an attempt to quickly deny the God he worships before he goes down, in case he goes down? Could he have truly believed in the God he said he worshipped and done what he thought was right but yet still be so human that he submits to those which he believes and preaches to be wrong? Why can’t their logo be a pyramid or anything else?

Sigh!

ayokellany:
Illicit affair doesn't necessarily mean it is a rape case. The onus is on the accuser to prove her case in court. Until then all this SM noise is just noise. There are pastors with two wives in this same Lagos, the dude could have fucqed her with consent n possibly marry her n still be a pastor. What happen to that angle of event ?!

Must every being soul be wired like yours that demand righteousness from the guy, the same righteousness Jesus describe at best as a flighty rage ?! Do you even understand what a rage is ? Now imagine a flighty one, that is the best among you can do n am talking the Adeboye's n co talk less of a Gucci pastor with all the signs of flight written upon him like a shining armour.

You can not persecute a man for righteousness let the lady persecute on her claim of rape n let see who wins.



Is there jail term for adulterers in Nigeria ?

I think you read or heard, at least that part of, the Bible wrong. Don’t you mean filthy rags?

Meanwhile, I don’t that the lady said she wanted to press charges or was after justice for herself. Rather, she wanted to alert the public of what she claims to be his folly to encourage others to speak up, warn potential victims, and dare him to sue.

You initially said she was 17, now you say 18. Could it be that you worry that I might remind you that statutory rape is a crime by law?

I have not concluded or even inferred that the rape did happen. Where or how? I have maintained that the claim in isolation, like any claim is 50% likely to be true or false. You on the other hand sought to find faults in the accuser to use to justify the crime. Which suggests to me that you are not contesting that a sexual encounter occurred, you even contend that it may have been without an express consent, but you are inclined to be believe that she must have brought it on herself due to promiscuity or an involvement in an affair with him.

Which is why I ask you that even if all that you accuse her of were true, how would that have justified her being raped?

obinnawhyte:
Maybe you have enough evidence to conclude the accused actually did it....i didn't answer your question because you're bent on seeing this just the way you want. I said all i said based on the half baked story released and the way it was presented.
Growing up as a teenager people did many things ignorantly but definitely not without their consent.
If she was 18 then who knows how old the accused was because from the picture trending I don't really see much age difference.
Just as Rape is bad, Defamation of name is bad also. There has been several cases of false rape accusations, we should be mindful of this before concluding. Proper investigation and interrogation should be done from both ends before concluding.
Till now her story doesn't add up to me simple.

laudate:
See, people like the guy you responded to, already have a flawed mindset regarding this case. They are wired to justify evil misdeeds and vice. Even if virtue came to knock on their door, they would ignore it, because they are used to entertaining vice.

Don't let them annoy you, with their faulty irrational answers.

It is appalling, but we have to keep trying with the hope that they will either choose to change, or that someone else watching does. No annoyance at all.

obinnawhyte:
Still you didn't answer the question because you too don't know because it was never mentioned in her story. Maybe I'm curious to know since it will help me or any sane person in making judgement and conclusion.
If the reverse is the case would you also be quick judge like this.

Hypocrisy is another issue here, that you see it the way you choose doesn't make you more concern or against rape than me. Be rational and get your facts real right before concluding. THERE HAS ALSO BEEN ISSUES OF FALSE RAPE ACCUSATIONS.
The pastor maybe anything but to me the story surrounding this particular one doesn't add up for now at least.

Your position so far has been anything but rational, I’m afraid.

You failed to state how your “question” has any bearing to her claim. There is a reason judges side with lawyers when they object to opposing lawyers raising certain issues on ground of relevance. You, or any sane person that care to know whether a person claiming to have been raped is promiscuous before forming an opinion, need to ask yourself why you are trying to victim-shame. Are you really that concerned about promiscuity, or trying to shame future/other victims into silence?

If you can show how your question is relevant. You could have made your point about the likelihood of her claim being false (just as there is a likelihood of it being true; 50% chance) without trying to cast aspersions on either party if you were truly being rational and in pursuit of facts, and not being a misogynistic rape apologist as your post which I first responded to screams.

I see how you are deflecting from the direct questions I posed to you.

In one sentence you claim to not be in support of rape, in the next you justify rape in the case where the victim is promiscuous or not a virgin? Which is it, Obinna?

My concern with posts like yours is not that you question the validity of her claims, as I think that's perfectly valid. It is the rape apologist statements you keep making/suggesting such as: "if she did not enjoy it she would have reported, maybe there was a relationship, she was not a virgin..." So what IF indeed there was a rape? Are rape and relationship mutually exclusive? Do promiscuous boys and girls deserve to be raped? Do we put male rape victims through this virginity test too?

obinnawhyte:
You're only being irrational and one sided without making any defense for the accused. How much do you know about the two persons and have you heard from the accused. She claimed she was raped 18 years ago when she was 17,early morning in her father's house while the elder sister was at home. She heard a knock on the door and on opening the door she saw the pastor and immediately he pushed her to the chair and raped her without her sister knowing, meaning she didn't scream and if how mouth was closed after he finished she didn't cry or still tell her sister immediately which an average 17 should do especially in this particular kind of situation.
Nobody has asked if she was a virgin at that age and was it the day she got disvirgined because this also goes a long way to tell the kind of girl she was growing up and she also claimed the act was done multiple times and ask where did all take place and if it was done the same way he did it the first time.
If she was 17 then, please how old was the pastor because from their pictures trending I don't see much difference.

I'm against rape in all ramifications but I wouldn't be quick to conclude in this case for all I see is half baked story but soonest everything will unfold.

MChaze25:
But she worked in same church. Why is her story coming just few days to their mega yearly concert?. Probably she was left out in the scheme of things relating towards preparation of this money generating venture. This is Nigeria and I don't expect any more critical thinking from the citizens unlike the whites...
Her timing for the outcry is still suspicious.
If you trust that woman 100% then you don't know women at all.
Woe betide those who praise her courage forgetting that hell knows no fury than a scorned woman.
Fatoyinbo obviously has skeletons in his cupboard but Busola is playing a card.
Wife of which millionaire musician?
Even Dangote still dey find money though not the one that will smear his image shaa

Since you brought in inability to think critically, let's start with rethinking your idea that "Probably she was left out in the scheme of things relating towards preparation of this money generating venture" through again, critically this time, in light of her story where she said clearly that she is no longer a member of the church. You are reaching. Deal with facts, you can still speculate based on facts and antecedents.

Also, you must admit that these submissions from you do not suggest ability to think critically: "I expected Timi Dakolo to bow his head in shame.
What made your wife hid such info from you all these years till now?". How did you arrive at these or expect a victim (and her/his support system) to be ashamed were part of my initial questions, don't pivot.

I never claimed to trust or distrust her, that's not the point of my initial post if you read it.

Your thoughts on whites being superior to you is neither here nor there. I don't share it.

MChaze25:
Don't mind them.
So it took her and her husband so long to come out abi?
I expected Timi Dakolo to bow his head in shame.
What made your wife hid such info from you all these years till now?

You are assuming that because the public just became aware of her story (whether it is factual or not), then the husband too must have just become aware. Why did it not occur to you that he may have known the story longer than the public, or maybe even before they got married, but because it was not his story to tell until she wanted to tell, he kept it our of the public domain. According to him, Busola just decided to go public with her story some months back. I don't see where he said she just decided to share it with him.

On when she came out with her story: pray tell when the right time is, and how you came by that timing? Have you not been paying attention to successfully convicted cases of victims who spoke out decades after? Google...

Furthermore, they said Busola was raped, not that she raped someone. So why should they, the victims, be ashamed again? Or is your reasoning that any man who is matured enough to marry a woman that is known to have been violated by a rapist ought to be ashamed for being matured? What then should the perpetrator do? We need to stop this victim shaming (which is what your comment implies, whether or not this case is true) in Nigeria.

gypsey:
You are very clever with words I like that. But you have been fair this time.. I accpet your description of My sexual escapades, Mind you that doesn't mean i am a bad person..perhaps i was more promiscuos than others.

I have since curtailed my sexual recklesness, as you put it. people would hardly know that i ve slept with that much women unless i tell them. I could still get married to some one who isn't Similar to me, but fortunately for that would be someone similar to me Marriage isn't for me. I wouldn't want to put Any woman through my infidelity. Though i could still care for and respect Any woman.

In my opinion, no singular act that a person takes makes him/her a bad person. Maker of bad choice(s), at least that one instance? Sure. I believe that we have/will all made/make one or two bad choices in our lifetime. But I think the intentions behind our actions, even when the actions turn out to be good, can be indicators of how good or bad a person we are.

It's good to know that you have turned away from your old ways. I am reminded of 1st Corinthians 13:11 of the Bible, which states that: "when I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things." Unfortunately, many are stuck in the childish ways even when we become adults.

It is also good that you have come to the realization that marriage is not for you and chosen to spare others. I wish more people will get to the realization that marriage is not for them, if it is not for them, or at least that it is not for them at the current point in their life, rather than getting into marriage to fulfill all societal righteousness, and causing their partners pain.

gypsey:
I said i ve slept with nearly 150 women and you labelled me a who're. how is that not judging? do you even know what a who're is?
And then you said me and my colleague, what does that mean? more judging.

And then you concluded by Asserting that you hoped i ended up marrying a who're as we both would understand each other. I guess you believe you are on a Moral High horse.

I am sorry that you feel judged, as that was not my intention. And no, I don't think I am morally superior.

But I insist that having slept with give or take 150 partners fits the label. Unfortunately it is mostly used to describe women because of how most societies are. You and I know darn well that if your comment came from a female, she would have been taken to the cyber gulag, for example. Also, it is only fair that you marry someone with the same/similar outlook/history, so that there'll be less judgement or comparisons, do you not agree? Maybe colleague was a wrong choice of word, cohort should have been used.

gypsey:
Do you really think i care?

I wouldn't call any woman a wh'ore, Any Any adult has the right to do have sex with with anyone, Anyhow or Any way they want. i am not in the possition to Judge, like you. i am also not a hyporcrite..

FYI, i ve been married twice and divorced twice. So don't worry about me getting married to a LovePeddler, Infact. Whores are Not hyporcrites atleast.

You think those women who you call "Girlfriend" are not whores? I Admire your Naivety.

You read to respond, not to comprehend. I wrote that I hope you are not one of those hypocrites, as you rightly labelled them, that would call women with your history wh0res. That is not judging you, but you must admit that that is what obtains in a lot of societies. Identifying what you stated that you do as whoring is not judging you either. It is in fact what you said you do. Look up the definition. I did also write that I respect the pride with which you embrace what you are.

EDIT
Furthermore, in the event that my referring to your outlook on sex as reckless (a person that acts, or an action that is taken, without thoughts or regard to the consequences) is what you consider judging you, if you can convincingly explain how engaging in care-free sex from the age of 14 could have been an action taken with thoughts to potential consequences (such as unwanted pregnancy, STI/Ds, emotional attachment to multiple people that may inhibit one from being truly committed to one person when one is the right person), I will apologize for judging you, and navigate away knowing I just learned something new.

I took the pain to edit, so that we are not confusing younger people that promiscuity is okay as long as we don't care about what others think. But if you disagree, I hope you'll share so that we can all be free to go whoring about without any care.

Your last sentence is neither here nor there, I am afraid, so please forgive me for not responding to that.

gypsey:
I have been having sex since i was 14, if Anyone has sexual urges they should go And fu ck someone or a prostitute. I don't get married anytime i get an erection. even while i was married i was still fu king other women.

I have fu ked nearly 150 women some of them are prostitutes, random women, holiday one night and drunken sex with any female. if i had got married anytime i get an erection, I wouda been married nearly 150 times. the so called presenter is Dumb.

In short, you've been whoring the best part of your life? I respect the pride with which you are strutting your sexual recklessness and whorism, but I hope you are not one of those men who have the audacity to call a woman like you, your colleague in whorism, promiscuous. I do also hope you end up with one of them in marriage, as you both will understand each other, and can better manage any situation of comparison to past experiences that arise.

mvem:
...i thought the bible advise a man that can't control his urges to go get married... Am I wrong?

I believe you are right, correct person. Leave these religious warriors alone to argue and condemn her religion based on ignorance.

OkunrinOloro:


Hehehe!!! See a classic mentally deformed MOOSLIME trying to use a story about childhood marriage to start a public debate which she hopes will lead to the acceptance of marriage between 55 year old men and 6 year old girls

You can keep childhood marriage and all its consequences like VVF, urinal and bowel incontinence up in the North where it belongs.

I hope you won't take this as an insult but a statement of fact, evidenced by your post; you are the one exhibiting mental deformity here.
1) You could have gone to find the full video on YouTube to confirm that what happened was accurately reported, knowing how the media is wont to sensationalize things.
2) Even if it happened as reported, the twisted quote from her stated that she said that early marriage is not Islamic, and she would rather her child waited till adulthood.
3) If you had mental or emotional intelligence of the level required to participate in public discourse, you would have watched past videos to gain insight into Ny'mat, to know she wouldn't support the 55/6 child bride scenario you painted up there.

Let's not have a bunch of lousy kids claiming intelligence without actually working towards gaining intelligence.

For anyone who is after fact and not mischief, her response to whether she would allow her hypothetical 14 year old daughter get married was that she would exhaust other options to dissuade a child that is not of marriage age from giving in to sexual urges, but if that fails, she would rather have the child go on and marry than be engaged in premarital sex. While I don't personally subscribe to underage marriages (the focus here is where the age gap between both parties is reasonable, 1 or both is yet to reach the acceptable marriage age, and one is not an adult; child bride scenario as the 55/6 painted by OkunrinOloro), I see her point. Where we differ in our views is that I would like to think that I will be able to force that underage child from giving in, but you never know until you are faced with it. I can't rationalize allowing a child get married under any circumstance, but I also don't see premarital sex as THE cardinal sin as do most Nigerians (Christians or Muslims). I think premarital sex complicates relationships and makes it difficult to move on completely when it is over, and young people don't realize this when they are "in looove", but I don't look at it from the angle of sin. As to religion, I know of a Christian couple who took serious the Christian teaching against premarital sex, and got married as soon as they were both above 18, but waited years to have kids. The only difference in their case was that they made that decision to wait and respect the Christian teaching on their own. I don't see the sense in that because I don't know what is so crazy about sexual urge that cannot be controlled when one is not a dog or how a child can say they have sexual urge if they've been raised right and have not had the unfortunate experience of being sexually abused, but you never know until you walk in someone else's shoes. The Christian couple are still married, over a decade after, and still very religious.

Back to Ny'mat, she went on to explain what she thought was the "marriage age," and said it varies by society. Along the line, she mentioned that some states in the US allow kids as young as those in the case study get married with parental consent, as with Islamic culture. People have crucified her for that and claimed she does not know about US laws, when they just could have researched. Would a lawyer go on national TV to say what she has not researched? (Don't answer that, some do, unfortunately) While I don't think Nigerian laws should be tailored around foreign laws or to meet what members of other societies have agreed to live by, and don't like the idea of using other societies' custom to argue for or against Nigerian laws, here is support for what she said for those who can read: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/table_marriage.

I have disagreed with Ny'mat, and essentially all of the other ladies of Your View, on several positions she's taken thus far, but I think we should respect her enough not to crucify her for seeing things differently or misrepresent her position just to make a point.

Nigerian social media warriors, please read beyond the headlines, and do your own independent research. Don't be so quick to add your cyber voice to every issue, lest you make it seem like MBB was right when he called Nigerian youths lazy.

Is Nairaland’s problem the age of the commenters, intelligence of its commenters, the free for all, or all of the above? How does one interpret doing a home (furnishing/equipping it) with building (constructing/raising) a home? Or do these people know the difference but need something to rant about to temporarily forget their own worries? Let there be full employment starting 2019! Vote wisely to help the Nigerian Youth!

ideylaff:
There was no need to be cheeky

I am in the medical field and also know the family very well. I’m speaking from that angle

Apologies. I’ve known Fewa from birth

It worries me that this is the quality of medical practitioners roaming Nigeria, or wherever you are. You are in the medical field but don’t knoe that Autism is called a spectrum disorder because the severity ranges from very mild to extremely severe? Or that there isnt one umbrella symptom that autistic people present? And if you know him from birth, shame on you! Folks like you should be avoided like a plague. Shouldn’t you protect him from the kind of ridicule the ignorant people here have been subjecting him to just for having a disability he did not ask to have? Just because you needed to gain relevance by forming familiarity, you couldn’t restrain yourself from showing your ignorance. Go read a book!

Who exposed these people to the internet to spew their stupidity?

To those making fun of his condition; I hope you are not planning to have your family line continue because Autism isn’t such a rare condition after all, not to talk of other disabilities that abound. Internet has given everyone the impetus to act out.

This looks like C, any why didnt you bring the comment to another line instead of enclosing in a bracket, anyway i don't know how to use java.

none of the two comments is enclosed in a bracket. Those are valid comment syntax, but you can write it anyhow you find to be more readable. In a case where it's a comment for a single line of code, the above is more commonly used. That is Java, not C. Most OOPs do look alike.

Its still the same, since he has already declared i=33

is it? Considering that the question said to print from 30? If it is, when would 30 ever be printed?