Oblivion34's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Oblivion34's Profile › Oblivion34's Posts
The ASUU President, Prof. Emmanuel Osodeke had in a recent interview noted that the lecturers had called off their action and returned to work but were challenged by the nonpayment of their eight months salaries which had posed a huge challenge for the lecturers to meet their daily needs and be able to discharge their responsibilities to the returning university students. Mr. Odiir said the returning lecturers might not give their best because of the obvious challenge of lack of funds, “and that means that the universities would be reopened but teaching and learning might not take place because the lecturers are not motivated. “So we are appealing to the Federal Government to fulfill its part of the bargain to effect the payment of the salaries of the returning lecturers to enable them fully resume work. “There is no doubt that the lecturers would obey the court ruling and resume classes but they would certainly not be able to engage in lecturing if they don’t start getting their eight months salaries. “That is why the Federal Government should pay them without further delay in the spirit of the agreement brokered by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. “We also appeal to the Speaker to do a follow up to the good work he initiated to have the lecturers call off the action by impressing on all the relevant authorities to have the salaries paid so that our public universities can roar back to life.
|
sultan003:We are already seeing it... You should watch out and wait for the end of the Almighty union that never ceases to mark every year with strike |
Jessewizy:You are not bad, yet you mark every year with strikes. Resume and rush students, with two weeks revision, and exams, and repeat the process the following year. While you get paid in full for staying at home and frustrating students. Glad to know the union has finally met it's waterloo, and glad to know everyone is starting to see how selfish and self centered the union is.
|
budaatum:The government was not owing lecturers salary before they declared strike. The union chose to go on hunger strike, and was okay with it because they wanted this and that The only money that the government owes the union is minimum wage salary arrears, and we all know it takes time to process that.
|
AsuuKiller:I have seen ASUU union members say "Why will government pay bandits and not pay them?" That's their mentality |
sultan003:Do your worse. You will all be disgraced in the long run |
sultan003:How's it going? |
Lanretoye:Who said I am yet to graduate? I am currently running my 3rd degree program. I am not supporting anyone. All my points are unbiased. You have no business with whether the government children are not schooling here. You can also send your kids abroad if you can afford it |
9jatriot:There's no need to go to court. So ASUU will demand for their withheld salaries before they call off strike. Then they will have the balls to declare 5 years strike tomorrow because their paycheck is guaranteed in the long run. The union claim to be intellectual, but they are the opposite At least for once FG has shown them that they are still their superior, and not the other way around! |
Ebubu:The almighty ASUU has finally been disgraced |
Seefinish:What's ASUU problem with APC? PDP was in power for over 3 decades and they could not stop ASUU from striking almost every year. Please shut up if you don't have anything sensible to say |
JJuanMiguel:ASUU will resume after they've been disgraced. They are too big to beg because they have PhD. |
immortalcrown:What's your point? |
JJuanMiguel:It's almost as if they are been sponsored by a different political party to paint APC black. Because they always make emphasis on voting out APC whenever the union makes a statement. As if APC was in power from 1992-2013 when they recorded 21 years of strike. 1992-2013= 21 years
|
Ebubu:They'll have no choice to RESUME or be ready to bear legal consequences. |
henrybomb:Why are varisty lecturers comparing theirselves with politicians? All of your points do not hold water because they are not enough reason to hold students down for more than 6 months. It's not as if the government was owing the union monthly salary before they declared strike aside the minimum wage arrears, and the need for salary increment. The government don't care because they have their children abroad. We agree! ¹ But most lecturers pushing for this strike either have their children abroad or they no longer children schooling. Most professors do not care if the strike last for 5 years because they don't have their children schooling here. Stop blaming the government. ¹ The ones at the receiving end are junior lecturers who are just starting their career, and the students. Speaking on how quick the government came to the aid of the aviation industry. I know for a fact that they've not been striking since the 90's! For over 3 decades, ASUU has a record of over 24 yearly strikes. Are varsity lecturers the only civil servant in Nigeria?[/b] ² The No Work, No Pay policy will end all of those rubbish! ASUU are slowly loosing respect, and attention because we know they must mark every year with a strike. Even during waves of the global pandemic, ASUU still declared strike to show how insensitive, arrogant, and self-centered they are. |
immortalcrown:You are writing out of context. Let's go by the book (Law). A policy is a policy, and no body can say they were not aware. They chose to keep stressing the strike, while expecting to bear the consequences If we are to also judge by competency. How many professors are competent enough to lecture? Most of them can't even mark scripts by theirselves because they are too old to see clearly. How many professors come to classes to lecture? Nobody is perfect |
Anigreat:That's because they can't claim ignorant of the policy since March.
|
YeyeGbami:75% is still much. 50% is reasonable enough! |
immortalcrown:The law has no respect for anybody. ASUU cannot claim ignorant of the policy since march.
|
The federal government has sued ASUU since they have been unreasonable with negotiations. They have been unreasonable since day one such as seeking over 150% salary increment and adopting a self-designed payment platform among others. I want the government to understand that ASUU is a loser! And they can't win this case anywhere. They are very much aware of the "No Work, No Pay" policy. A Policy is a deliberate system of guidelines to guide decisions and achieve rational outcomes. In this case, FG imposed this policy to put an end to yearly strikes from ASUU. Because ASUU is now accustomed to striking for as long as they want. Then they'll resume, get paid for all the months they did not work for, and then come stamp their foot in the ground in lecture theater while claiming that "they'll get paid irrespective of whether they come to class or not" The union will show no concern for students who will lose passion for schooling, diversify into crime, etc. The FG should not be intimidated by how many SANS ASUU has hired to defend them. It is "NO WORK, NO PAY" and not "No work, Get Paid Later" A policy is a policy! Let the government stand with this until the end, and let's see if we won't end ASUU yearly strikes! The best FG can do is to give them one month's salary, because all the backlog of work they claim they'll do is not up to a month It is always two weeks of revision, and two weeks of examination. Then students will fail, and many students will digress from bagging a good grade. That is the usual tradition, and why most 2.1 students will end up bagging 2.2. (I stand to be corrected!) They can't win this case anywhere. I support the motion because ASUU is arrogant while always comparing itself with politicians. What business do you have with how much the federal government is paying bandits for holding humans hostage? Why are they applying the same strategy in pushing their demands? What business do they have with how politicians are living, or how they spend their money? The federal government has done all it can to end this strike, but ASUU is the one that chose to stress this strike while using the government's flaws against them to gain public sympathy. We've seen how ASUU members are always quick to insult people who are against them, and we've once seen their president insult the minister of labor on live TV. That's evidence of their arrogant nature while pressing their demands ASUU should be made to understand that you don't DICTATE to your employer. It's never done anywhere! The best you can do is to beg and ask for better working conditions. If you say you want a 180% salary increment and the government says we can only afford to give 25% you are expected to beg, and not prove superior to your employers. ASUU is not willing to beg. They believe they have equal rights with politicians, and they keep displaying their arrogant nature. We've all seen how ASUU members are always quick to insult anyone against them or anyone who advises them to try other approaches. For example, we've seen the ASUU president insult the minister of labor on live TV. That is evidence of how arrogant they are when on the negotiation table. The federal government cannot overdo it because federal university lecturers are not the only civil servants in Nigeria.
|
They should continue proving superior to the federal government because they have PhD |
The federal government has sued ASUU since they have been unreasonable with negotiations. They have been unreasonable since day one such as seeking over 150% salary increment and adopting a self-designed payment platform among others. I want the government to understand that ASUU is a loser! And they can't win this case anywhere. They are very much aware of the "No Work, No Pay" policy. A Policy is a deliberate system of guidelines to guide decisions and achieve rational outcomes. In this case, FG imposed this policy to put an end to yearly strikes from ASUU. Because ASUU is now accustomed to striking for as long as they want. Then they'll resume, get paid for all the months they did not work for, and then come stamp their foot in the ground in lecture theater while claiming that "they'll get paid irrespective of whether they come to class or not" The union will show no concern for students who will lose passion for schooling, diversify into crime, etc. The FG should not be intimidated by how many SANS ASUU has hired to defend them. It is "NO WORK, NO PAY" and not "No work, Get Paid Later" A policy is a policy! Let the government stand with this until the end, and let's see if we won't end ASUU yearly strikes! The best FG can do is to give them one month's salary, because all the backlog of work they claim they'll do is not up to a month It is always two weeks of revision, and two weeks of examination. Then students will fail, and many students will digress from bagging a good grade. That is the usual tradition, and why most 2.1 students will end up bagging 2.2. (I stand to be corrected!) They can't win this case anywhere. I support the motion because ASUU is arrogant while always comparing itself with politicians. What business do you have with how much the federal government is paying bandits for holding humans hostage? Why are they applying the same strategy in pushing their demands? What business do they have with how politicians are living, or how they spend their money? The federal government has done all it can to end this strike, but ASUU is the one that chose to stress this strike while using the government's flaws against them to gain public sympathy. We've seen how ASUU members are always quick to insult people who are against them, and we've once seen their president insult the minister of labor on live TV. That's evidence of their arrogant nature while pressing their demands ASUU should be made to understand that you don't DICTATE to your employer. It's never done anywhere! The best you can do is to beg and ask for better working conditions. If you say you want a 180% salary increment and the government says we can only afford to give 25% you are expected to beg, and not prove superior to your employers. ASUU is not willing to beg. They believe they have equal rights with politicians, and they keep displaying their arrogant nature. We've all seen how ASUU members are always quick to insult anyone against them or anyone who advises them to try other approaches. For example, we've seen the ASUU president insult the minister of labor on live TV. That is evidence of how arrogant they are when on the negotiation table. The federal government cannot overdo it because federal university lecturers are not the only civil servants in Nigeria.
|
NezzyMike:ASUU also shares the blame on this Asking for 180% of salary increment is called what? |
sultan003:Sounds fair! At least everyone will get to see who you really are- A selfish and self centered union Let everyone start afresh, heavens won't fall |
It's no longer news that ASUU declared a strike on February 14, while hoping to get rapid action from the government. The union is always focused on using yearly strikes to attack the government & the educational system. The union is also known for using government flaws to gather public sympathy. They have however shown that they have no sympathy for their beloved students by not calling off strike since the government met over 60% of their demands! The union has always slammed the government for how they spend money on other irrelevant things, rather than channeling the money at them! For example, the union recently slammed the government for increasing tour allowance for politicians by over 50% Although the union keeps trying to get public sympathy, we all know ASUU is greedy and selfish with its demands. But they have no right to question how the government spends money. For example, we've heard the union push for 180% of salary increments, amongst other ridiculous demands. That means a lecturer earning #100k will start receiving #280k They want to receive the same salary as politicians but don't have the balls to pursue political ambitions. Someone said "most politicians can't sleep with their two eyes closed because of fear of the unknown" Someone also highlighted the difference in numbers between politicians and university lecturers. For example, three universities may have more civil servants compared to the total number of prime ministers, and perm secretaries. Is it then fair to compare how the government increases its earned allowances? While some lecturers are agitating about the need to go on tours, most people kicked against the idea. Someone said "Stop eying the living standards of politicians, If you want money quit your job and join politics. There are no civil servants in Nigeria that are more privileged than university lecturers." While some people added that the union's envious natures towards politicians will get them nowhere, he advises them to quit the teaching Profession and joins politics so that they will earn money like them. While majority calls for the dissolution of the union since they have done more harm than good to the educational sector with their yearly strikes! ASUU keep forgetting that university lecturers are never on the same level as the government, and as such, they have no right to compare how the government spends its earnings. The union has no business with how the government carries out its daily activities such as sponsoring neighborhood countries, increasing its allowance, etc. It is best to also remind the union that: (I) There are other civil servants with poorer working conditions and salaries. Yet we don't see them going on yearly strikes (II) The government pays ASUU members, and not the other way around. (III) ASUU president is not a god that should be worshipped, and the government can choose to fire him and render him jobless tomorrow. (IV) The government can choose to order compulsory resumption, while defiant lecturers stand a 90% chance of losing their jobs The (III) & (IV) points above show that the government isn't as bad as everyone thinks. (V) They only get paid for services rendered: A major reason why the "No Work, No Pay" policy is "Legal". The union is accustomed to using the key point "They don't care, because their children don't school here" to gather public sympathy and slam the government whereas the union has been unreasonable with its frivolous demands since day 1. It is fair to also say that most ASUU members don't care about how long the strike lasts because the majority of their children are in private universities or abroad. Meanwhile, the newly elected NANS president keeps making waves about how he's going to end the strike. Someone should ask how much he has in his account before anything. I am #Oblivion
|
Heterodox:Nobody is paying me to do anything (Although I don't mind some incentives) It hurts you that I write the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. No Work, No Pay!!! Besides the government initiated the policy one month after the strike. The union can't claim that they were not informed. Federal government will win this case if it was to be tabled in front of a court of law |
JJuanMiguel:Let's see how this plays out since their president is so smart in leading them into shame and irrelevancy |
Niklaus398:Paying that money has been the landmark for yearly strikes. Let the government do something different, and we'll see a new structure in academic activities. Selfish union! |
Niklaus398:Keep fighting, I hope you win! Merry and Christmas and happy new year in advance ![]() If you like fight for 5 years. But... The "No Work, No Pay" policy must stand! |
sultan003:We've seen other schools call off strike and start exams under short notice. It will be no different when ASUU decides to call off strike. They don't deserve a penny! |
sultan003:It's called negotiation for a reason, but must the union be unreasonable with it's demands? The way I see it, the Union choose to stress this strike while blaming the govt for not caring. That is one of the reasons why I support the "No Work, No Pay" policy |