Odiks's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Odiks's Profile › Odiks's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 30 pages)
The hope of the sacked Imo State Governor, Hon. Emeka Ihedioha, to have the judgement that sacked him reviewed by the Supreme Court seems to be dim, following yesterday’s verdict of the apex court wherein it upheld its earlier decision sacking the then governor-elect of Bayelsa State, David Lyon. The same fate likely awaits the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Zamfara State. The judgement as delivered in the Bayelsa matter portrayed a likely situation where the apex court will decline to reverse itself. The Supreme Court had refused to review its earlier judgement of February 13, 2020, which sacked Lyon and his deputy, Senator Biobarakuma Degi-Eremienyo of APC. The apex court consequently dismissed the two applications that sought to set aside the said judgement for being “vexatious, frivolous and constituted a gross abuse of court process.” A seven-man panel of the apex court led by Justice Sylvester Ngwuta held that the applications amount to an invitation for the apex court to sit in appeal on its earlier judgement in violation of the constitution. Justice Ngwuta held that it would amount to violating the finality of its judgement if the applications were granted. Justice Amina Augie who read the lead judgement held that granting the applications would open a floodgate for the review of decisions of the Supreme Court. She said the request to review the judgement was vexatious, frivolous and regrettable. Augie in the unanimous ruling came down heavily on the counsel to the applicants, Are Afe Babalola (SAN) and Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) for filing the motions, which the court described as regrettable motions and a deliberate desecration of the judiciary. She held that with tears in her eyes, she regretted that “very senior” lawyers were responsible for filing the applications. “With tears in my eyes, I feel sad that senior counsel in this case would ever bring this kind of frivolous applications during my life time,” Justice Augie said. Justice Augie held that by Order 8, Rule 16 of the Supreme Court, the court has no powers or authority to review any judgement delivered on merit, safe for clerical error. This court is not authorised and indeed lacked jurisdiction to review any judgment delivered on merit, more so when the applicants have not pointed out any accidental error or slip in the judgement. There must be an end to every litigation. “This is final court and its decisions are final for all ages so as to ensure certainty in law. “The two applications brought before us today lacked merit and constituted abuse of this court and they are liable to dismissal and are hereby dismissed,” the court held. With the verdict of the apex court, the coast seems unclear for Ihedioha and Zamfara APC as the Supreme Court hears the applications on Monday. https://www.newtelegraphng.com/judgement-review-hope-dims-for-ihedioha-zamfara-apc/ |
With the refusal of Supreme Court to review its decision on Bayelsa judgement I CONGRATULATE Sen Hope Uzodinma in ADVANCE, ahead of Monday's hearing of PDP application to Review it's final judgement that granted him victory earlier this year. In refusing the Bayelsa application for Review, Justice Amina Augie who coincidentally is also member of IMO review panel had this to say.... Justice Amina Augie who read the lead judgment said the applications amount to an invitation for the apex court to sit in appeal on its earlier judgment in violation of the Constitution. She held that it would amount to violating the finality of its judgment if the applications were granted. She said granting the applications would open a floodgate for the review of decisions of the Supreme Court. “There must be an end to litigation,” she said, adding, “the decision of the Supreme Court is final for ages in a matter” and only legislation could change it. She said with tears in her eyes, she regretted that “very senior” lawyers were responsible for filing the applications. Even if we review this judgment, every disaffected litigant will bring similar applications and the finality of Supreme Court judgments will be lost. https://punchng.com/breaking-supreme-court-dismisses-apcs-application-to-review-bayelsa-judgment/
|
Good |
The text of the press conference read: “The National Working Committee, NWC, of the PDP, after comprehensive consultations, states that our party has no choice left, given the manner with which the APC has conducted itself than to ask for a review of the judgment of the Presidential election petition tribunal, where the issue of certificate forgery and or presentation of false information in aid of qualifications was clearly established against the APC and her presidential candidate. “The same applies to the judgment on the Katsina governorship election petition, where lawyers also established a similar issue of certificate forgery. “The PDP equally has no choice than to ask the Supreme Court to review the Kano, Kaduna and Katsina election judgments, because of manifest violence and substantial non-compliance to our electoral law. “The PDP also asks the Supreme Court to review its judgment on the Osun Governorship election in view of manifest, complete and total disregard to our electoral rules in the conduct of the elections.” Speaking further, the publicity scribe said the country “is already aware of the desperation by the APC to annex the Supreme Court, subjugate and browbeat the justices and direct judicial determinations to suit their selfish ends. “The public space is already awash with reports of how the APC has been threatening and piling pressure on the justices of the Supreme Court to force a reversal of valid judgments already delivered on the Bayelsa and Zamfara governorship elections, where the party (APC) suffered self-inflicted losses. “Nigerians know that the APC has been going through a haemorrhage since the Supreme Court delivered valid judgments on Bayelsa and Zamfara and as a result, they are no longer interested in the logic of these judgments. “They have since thrown caution to the wind to destabilize our nation and destroy our hard-earned democracy especially the judiciary. The federal government is leading all forms of battles against the rule of law and constitutionalism. “The PDP holds that our sacrifices for the sustenance of democracy, as demonstrated in our patriotic comportment towards the verdicts of the court on the Presidential election as well as Osun, Kano, Katsina and Kaduna governorship elections tribunal, subsist. “Moreover, there is a consensus among majority of Nigerians and even the international community that there was obvious miscarriage of justice by the Supreme Court panel on the Imo state governorship election, for which the PDP accordingly reverted to the Supreme Court asking it to correct the manifest mistakes and errors in that judgment, which are already in the public domain. “However, the PDP finds it ludicrous, ridiculous and insulting to the sensibilities and respect of the Supreme Court Justices for the APC to hurriedly and malevolently head to the Supreme Court to attempt to arm-twist the lord justices to effect a forceful reversal of the valid, flawless and faultless judgments on Bayelsa and Zamfara states governorship elections.” According to him, the PDP will not fold its hands and “watch enemies of our hard-earned democracy, who contributed nothing to its birth, to continue to appropriate our collective sovereignty for their selfish political gains while destroying our institutions and holding our people to ransom.” The APC, it would be recalled, recently lost control of the Bayelsa Government House to the PDP following Supreme Court’s disqualification of the former deputy governor, Degi Biobarakuma on account of multiple identities. However, the ruling party has also approached the apex court seeking the disqualification of the incumbent deputy governor, Lawrence Ewhrudjakpo for allegedly forging a National Youth Service Corps, NYSC Exemption Certificate. https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/02/updated-pdp-demands-review-of-2019-presidential-poll/ |
vicdom:I also have this feeling too because if any of these cases are reviewed then the Supreme Court of Nigeria will cease to be Supreme and trust Nigerian politicians to take advantage of it and there would be no end to litigation. |
fergie001:That's why am quietly and patiently waiting to see how this whole thing plays out. |
The Ekiti State chapter of the All Progressives Congress has advised a former governor of the state, Ayodele Fayose, to perish the thought of defecting to the APC.https://punchng.com/youre-not-qualified-to-join-us-apc-tells-fayose/
|
The review might end up being an academic exercise going by the extant laws that barred the supreme court from reviewing herself despite her infallibility but after going through the certified true copy of the supreme court judgement on IMO gubernatorial tussles I can deduce as follows that; Ihedioha’s counsels only fixated on Nwosu while under rating Hope Uzodinma. I can bet that the review will not yield the expected expectations of Ihedioha’s camp. The dissenting judgement of the appeal court dealt a great blow to Ihedioha’s case. They could have presented a more superior evidence to convince the courts that Uzodinma was parading what they termed “fake results”. I will also blame INEC for not coming to the the aid of PDP and Ihedioha by challenging the results from the 388 polling units with facts; Had INEC presented results countering the ones paraded by Uzodinma’s counsels, the case will not have gone the way it did. Mark these points below; 1) PDP could not present a result to counter what Uzodinma has. 2) INEC failed to produce the authentic results from the 388/polling units 3) INEC did not convince the court with reasons and verifiable evidence why they excluded the results from the unit in view of reason the learned judges relied on the facts before them in arriving at the judgement 4) INEC confirmed that election held in the excluded units and failed to convince the court with facts on why it excluded the results 5)PDP agreed that election held in those areas too and also failed to proof that their allegations of forgery against Uzodinma can be substantiated 6) INEC should have ordered for a rerun in those units instead of outright exclusion this error gave Uzodinma’s case more validity and credibility. 7)On the issue of over voting, Uzodinma did not approach the court with an issue of electoral malpractices as seen in IMO rather he sought the help of the court to ask INEC why the votes from the 388 polling units was excluded while claiming that those units are his strongholds. Get yourself a certified true copy of the supreme court judgement on IMO guber (Jan.14th 2020) https://imostateblog.com/uzodinma-and-apc-vs-ihedioha-and-pdp-my-take-by-okoro-peters-obinna/?fbclid=IwAR3y7PlG3pEmcp2AVYYbP_jV9T6CgeTTVQ9SmaT2qlW0yWo0WyUujUTk5GY |
Esseite:That is your own inference from the orders but that was not explicitly stated in the judgement. |
EdoBoy90:Yes disqualified but no word on the votes they already scored in the election. Except you are inferring? |
ojikeebere12:Mmmmmh |
In the Zamfara Case the Supreme Court in its judgment specifically nullified the votes scored by APC and termed it wasted votes. See Supreme Court orders on Zamfara below: Consequently, the apex court, in its lead verdict that was prepared and delivered by Justice Paul Galinje, dismissed an appeal the APC lodged to challenge the appellate court’s judgement. Besides, Justice Galinje, awarded a cost of N10million against the APC. “I find that the lower court was right in holding that there were no primary elections in Zamfara State. “The appeal had no merit and it should be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed. “The party that has no candidate cannot be declared a winner of the election. Therefore, all votes that are credited to such party is deemed as wasted voted. “Candidates of parties with the highest number of valid votes cast with the required spread stands elected in Zamfara”, the Supreme Court held. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2019/05/breaking-supreme-court-sacks-zamfara-gov-elect-awards-n10m-cost-against-apc/amp/ However in the case of Bayelsa the Supreme did not specifically nullify the votes of APC in the said election like it did in Zamfara but it was silent on the votes. See Supreme Court Order on Bayelsa: In the lead judgment delivered by Justice Ejembi Eko in the appeal filed by the .PDP challenging the ruling of the Court of Appeal, which affirmed the candidacy of Degi-Eremienyo in the last governorship election in the state, the Supreme Court held: • That this appeal be and is hereby allowed; • That the judgment of the lower court delivered on the 23rd of December, 2019 be and is hereby set aside; •That the judgment of the trial court delivered on the 12th day of November, 2019 including all the orders made therein, be and is hereby reinstated; •That the joint ticket of the 1st and 2nd respondents sponsored by the 3rd respondent was vitiated by the disqualification of the 1st respondent; • That both candidates disqualified be and are hereby deemed not to be candidates at the governorship election conducted in Bayelsa State; •That INEC (the 4th respondent herein) declare as winner of the governorship election in Bayelsa State the candidate with the highest number of lawful votes cast with the requisite constitutional (or geographical) spread; •That the 4th respondent (INEC) shall withdraw the certificate of return issued to the 2nd and 1st respondents and issue certificate of return to the candidate who had the highest number of lawful votes cast in the governorship election and who also had the requisite constitution (of geographical spread); •That the parties bear their respective costs; and •That by consent of all counsel, Appeal SC. 2/2020 shall abide the outcome of this Appeal No. SC.1/2020. https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2020/02/14/pdp-reclaims-bayelsa-as-supreme-court-sacks-apcs-governor-elect/ So how will INEC determine the candidate with the highest number of votes and geographical spread in the Bayelsa election when the APC votes were not specifically nullified as was in the case of Zamfara?
|
*Father allegedly collected over N48billion as security votes in eight years **Speaker son operates 100 accounts with 80% still active ***How BVN exposed looted funds The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has launched a massive probe into alleged looting of over N150 billion by the immediate past governor of Abia State, Chief Theodore Orji, and members of his family. His sons – Chinendum Orji Eyinanya (currently Speaker, Abia State House of Assembly) and one Ogonna Orji – are also being investigated for having a hand in the alleged looting. Orji is currently the senator representing Abia Central in the National Assembly. The EFCC suspects that Senator Orji collected N48billion as security votes during his eight years in office at N500million per month. He is said to have also been the authorising officer for the monthly withdrawal of N500million when he was the Chief of Staff to the jailed ex-Governor Orji Uzor Kalu. Investigators handling the probe rate Chinedum as a key player in laundering money for his father. As at Thursday, the EFCC had traced 100 slush accounts to Chinedum. Eighty per cent of the accounts are still active, The Nation gathered. Chinedum went through a fresh round of grilling on Thursday before he was released on administrative bail. However, a source told The Nation in Abuja that what has been uncovered so far against ex-Governor Orji and his sons, is a “tip of the iceberg” because more accounts linked to the family have just been uncovered. “We are investigating the ex-governor and members of his immediate family, especially his two sons. They are Chinendum Orji Eyinanya (who is the present Speaker of Abia State House of Assembly) and one Ogonna Orji,” a reliable source said. “The former governor has been intermittently coming for interrogation since November 22, 2018. So, for more than 13 months, our detectives have been painstaking in their covert operation including surfing of documents and invitation of some public officers. But the quizzing of ex-Governor Orji’s two sons has led to the unearthing of dirty deals during his tenure as the governor of Abia State. He is now a serving Senator. “Preliminary investigation revealed that over 145 accounts have been linked with the family and the amount allegedly looted in eight years by the ex-governor was over N150billion. Chinedum alone has been operating 100 out of the 45 accounts with 80 per cent of them still active. “Although we are still profiling more accounts, records confirmed that the ex-governor earned about N48billion in eight years as security votes at N500 million per month. He was also the authorising officer of the N500 million per month as security votes when the convicted ex-Governor Orji Uzor Kalu was the governor. He was Kalu’s Chief of Staff. “The most interesting aspect of the investigation by EFCC is that most of the looted funds were withdrawn in cash and deposited in cash. “Our detectives recorded a breakthrough on this fraud case through Bank Verification Number (BVN) system. So, it is not a case of witch-hunt, it is a matter of facts and figures in all the accounts.” A brief on the preliminary investigation obtained from the EFCC gave an insight into the alleged looting of Abia State as follows: “A petition dated March 17, 2017 was by filed by Fight Corruption: Save Nigeria Group alleging that the former Abia governor, Theodore Orji of receiving and diverting various sums of monies that accrued to Abia State. “Such monies were: *N383 billion revenue from federal accounts *N55 billion Excess Crude Revenue *N2.3 billion Sure-P *N1.8 billion Ecological funds *N10.5 billion loan from First Bank of Nigeria through the Ministry of Chieftaincy and Local Government Affairs. *N4 billion loan from Diamond Bank *N12 billion Paris Club refund *N2 billion Agricultural loan for farmers *N55 billion ASOPADEC “The petitioners alleged that the funds were received by Abia State government and nothing could be shown in commensurate with the received funds. Based on the petition, the EFCC commenced investigations. “In the course of investigation, it was discovered that the former governor who was Chief of Staff to the convicted ex-governor Orji Kalu was the Authorising Officer drawing N500 million monthly purported to be Security Votes which were being converted. “As he became the governor in 2007, he continued to draw the N500 million cash monthly from June 2007 to May 2015. “The N500 million, investigation revealed, is aside of the security funds expended on the Nigeria Police, The Nigerian Army, DSS, Navy anti-Kidnapping Squad, Anti- robbery Squad, purchase of Security equipment and vehicles for the security agencies. “Investigation was extended to his family members to ascertain the link and culpability of the alleged fraud. “The ex-governor’s first son, Chinendum Orji Eyinanya, who is currently the Speaker of the Abia State House of Assembly, is now a frequent guest at the EFCC headquarters to throw light on his involvement in the fraud. “A check on his financial activities revealed that he had about 100 accounts in different banks, with over 80% of the accounts still very active. The accounts which were both corporate and individual received so much deposit in cash without evidence of job or services rendered. “Fotoworld Industry Limited, with GTB account number 2022025805 is traced to Chinedum. The company received deposit of $20, 849, 044.21 “Same company with another account number 2022025764 in First Bank of Nigeria (FBN) received a cumulative deposit of N362, 573, 056.50. “Fotoworld has several other accounts with FBN. The accounts and deposits are: 2026144229, $84, 000 cash deposit between 2014 and 2015; between 2012 and 2015, account number 2022025764 housed N342, 573, 056.50; Account number 2022025939between November 2012 and July 2015 received a deposit of £1, 689, 320.89. “The GTB account 0039060117 of the same company housed N88, 300, 000 between February 2009 and July 2014. “Exact Construction Limited, traced to Chinedum, is believed to have no record of any construction work in the country; also received humongous deposits in Keystone Bank where account was opened. “Between October 2008 and February 2015, the company account number 005374800 had deposits of N1, 188, 924, 190.41(One billion, one hundred and eighty eight thousand nine hundred and twenty four thousand one hundred and ninety naira forty one kobo). “Another deposit of N636, 372, 642.85 into Exact Construction Limited, Keystone Bank account number 1001538949. “The GTB account 0039060117 of the same company housed N88, 300, 000 between February 2009 and July 2014. “FBN account number 2008232908 also received lodgment of N599, 771, 424.25 between January 2011 and June 2016; account number 200823298 had N731, 135, 357.04 between 2007 and 2016. “Fotofast Industry Limited is another company registered by the first family to siphon the resources of the state. Several accounts were opened in FBN by the company. “The sum of N20, 861, 165.95 entered into the FBN account number 2014629152 between 2011 and 2017. Between 2011 and 2016, another N223, 929, 515.37 was lodged in Fotofast’s account number 2015559102 domiciled in FBN. “Other lodgments in different Fotofast Industry Limited accounts with FBN were: account number 2014629152, n4, 103, 574, 603.59; account number 2015559102 (N223, 929, 515.37); account number 2005428513 had N1, 719, 939, 006.77 between 2007 and 2015; account number 2015559102 had N273, 941, 436.47. Between 2011 and 2015, FBN account number 2014668964, received the sum of N64, 898, 657.77. “Several accounts were also opened in GTB by Fotofast Industry Limited. They include: account number 0040777462 which received deposits of N425, 606, 131.71 between 2002 and 2009; account number 0040777479 received N71, 815, 987 between 2002 and 2008; account number 0040777486 had N23, 463, 880 between 2008 and 2010 while N158, 499, 815 was the deposit in the GTB account number 0040777493. Another N50 million was lodged in GTB account number 0039691058. “Orji Chinendum Eyinaya’s Diamond’s (now Access bank) personal account number 0029937780 in 2011 alone had $47, 726. 64. His personal account number 2014435973 with FBN had N117, 743, 822.01; his account number 0023390147 with Diamond Bank had $124, 284, 624.18; while his FBN account number 2005428506 had N342, 699, 356.36 between 2007 and 2017. “Other personal account of the Speaker is the FCMB account number 3237996011 with N384, 914, 501.50 between 2016 and 2019; another n205, 508, 500 in FCMB account number 3237996028 between 2016 and 2019. “Another FBN account number of the son, 2024073408 also received $601, 716.62 between 2013 and 2015. His FBN account number 2014435973 also had N153, 943, 822.01 between 2009 and 2016. Another N153, 000, 000 was deposited in account number 2014435973. His Access bank account number 0023390147 had N178, 389, 547.25 between 2011 and 2019 and another $48, 000 in the same bank account number 0029937780 in 2010. “Cheetah Press Limited is another concern of the ex governor’s son now Speaker of the State Assembly. The company with FBN account number 2006413367 had deposits of N1, 083, 731, 890.93 between 2007 and 2017. In Union Bank, the same company had a deposit of N430, 980, 632.18 in account number 0034400341 (This account had consistent cash lodgment to the said amount.) “Cheetah’s Standard Chartered account number 000171072 had N42, 009, 795.36 between 2011 and 2016. “In GTB account number 0107577738, N241, 059074. 24 was traced to Cheetah Press between 2011 and 2016 and another N966, 041, 454 between 2011 and 2016. In UBA alone, Cheetah’s account number 1015210129 had N143, 851, 800 between 2010 and 2018; while account number 1008016040 had N2, 226, 458, 581.35 between 2016 and 2020. Yet another UBA account number 1011361993 of Cheetah had N782, 694, 255.77 between 2007 and 2019. “Travel BETA. COM Ltd with 3002133811 had $788, 174.22 between 2016 and 2020; BETA.COM, yet another concern of the Orji’s had $788, 174.22 between 2016 and 2020. “The analysis of several other accounts are still ongoing. The Speaker, Abia State House of Assembly was with operatives of the Commission on Thursday in continuation of the investigation.” https://thenationonlineng.net/efcc-quizzes-another-ex-gov-sons-over-n150b-fraud/
|
ojikeebere12:Can the supreme court in an appeal over a matter it has decided? |
*...ON SUPREME COURT AND OVERRULING ITSELF IN ELECTION PETITION CASES!*� ...Election Petitions are *suis generis*, meaning that they are unique, have a life of their own, have special character and are governed by procedures peculiar to it. It is a time conscious trial. Under the 1999 Constitution as amended and the extant Electoral Act, 2010 as amended, the chances of the Supreme Court overruling itself in an Election Petition it has conclusively *decided and disposed of* and in the particular case of Imo State is nil and non-existent. We make this strong statement because among other things- (a) there is no statutory provision for it, and (b) the lapse of the almighty sixty days constitutional timeline within which the Supreme Court must hear and dispose of Election Petition appeals from the date of delivery of the judgement of the Court of Appeal has foreclosed any such novel window. It is instructive that the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja handed its judgement in the Imo Governorship Election Petition Appeals on 19 November 2019. The Supreme Court in turn disposed the appeal on 14 January 2020. Going by computation of time therefore, embarking on a street protest on 19 January 2020 and orally asking the Supreme Court to overrule itself is plain mischief calculated to embarrass and denigrate the integrity of the eminent Law Lords. The sixty days timeline for disposing election petition appeals is a constitutional provision and a non-negotiable part of our electoral laws that must be rigidly obeyed as it is said to stand firm and unmoveable like the *Rock of Gibraltar.* Even as the Oracle of the law, the Supreme Court is not entitled to rewrite, amend, add or subtract from constitutional provisions. They must give effect to constitutional provisions however harsh or unsavoury the result may be. That is what the Supreme Court held in its 2012 decision in the controversial Imo Governorship Election Petitition *PDP V GOVERNOR OKOROCHA & 10 OTHERS* in Suit No. SC/17/2012 delivered on 2nd March 2012. It is important to further enlighten that the old case of *ADEGOKE MOTORS LTD V ADESANYA* (1989) 13 NWLR (Pt. 109) being bandied around here and there and cited as authority for the Supreme Court to overrule itself is inapplicable in the 2019 Imo Election Petition matter or any Election Petition matter. This is because the said ADEGOKE CASE (Supra) is not an election petition matter. It was a 1989 decision that did not have the contemplation of the mandatory requirement for conclusion of election petition appeals in the Supreme Court within 60 days as provided for in the present 1999 Constitition of Nigeria as amended. It remains to be said that in sync with their constitutional powers and relying on clear constitutional provisions and our electoral laws, the Supreme Court has disposed of the 2019 Imo Governorship appeals and can never revisit it. This is again supported by the decision of the Supreme Court in an Election Petition case *PDP V GOVERNOR OKOROCHA & 10 OTHERS in Suit No. SC/17/2012 delivered on 2nd March 2012,* where Odili, JSC, held in a most profound manner and characteristic candour as follows- *"...What is to be disposed has in a way hit the rock and can go nowhere else. That is to say the legal dispute or process has reached its final destination and is at grand finale...."* We can then conveniently restate that when the Supreme Court finally disposes of an election petition, the legal dispute has come to a full and final stop at the last legal and judicial bus stop because of the special nature of election petitions and its time sensitive nature. It is in public interest that there should be an end to litigation- *Interest rei publicae ut sit finis litium* which is an alternative Latin phrase for *expedit rei publicae ut.* Remember always that the Supreme is final but not infallible. A new normal is possible! *Prof Obiaraeri, N.O.* |
Imo State governor, Hope Uzodinma has said he is unperturbed by the return of ousted governor, Emeka Ihedioha to Supreme Court to seek a review of the judgment that removed him from office.https://www.sunnewsonline.com/ihediohas-bid-to-reverse-supreme-court-judgement-based-on-falsehood-uzodinma-2/
|
Chai |
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Imo State suffered another major blow, yesterday, following the defection of eight of its lawmakers to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).https://www.newtelegraphng.com/apc-overruns-pdp-takes-over-imo-state-assembly/
|
The member representing Ikeduru constituency in Imo State House of Assembly, and a chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Hon. Uche Ogbuagu, has decamped to the governing All Progressives Congress (APC). This was contained in a letter Dated, Jan 28, 2020, and addressed to the Speaker of the Imo House of Assembly, Hon. Chiji Collins, and made available to DAILY POST on Tuesday morning. Ogbuagu, said his decision was in the interest of his Ikeduru constituents. He also claimed that he defected to the APC over unfair treatment meted out to him by the PDP. https://dailypost.ng/2020/01/28/imo-pdp-lawmaker-uche-ogbuagu-decamps-to-apc/
|
kahal29:O di egwu |
The members who defected are: 1) Nwangele LGA: Chyna IWUANYANWU PDP - APC 2) Ideato North LGA. Innocent Egwim AA - APC 3) Okigwe LGA: Chidem EMELUMBA PDP - APC 4) Nkwerre LGA : Obinna Okwara AA - APC 5) Onuimo LGA : Paul Emeziem APGA - APC 6) Orsu LGA : Ekene Nnodumele - APGA - APC 7) Ideato South LGA: Duru Johnson is AA - APC 8. Isu LGA: SN Obiefule AA - APC 9) Ohaji-Egbema LGA: Herculus Okoro PDP - APC Recall that the Deputy Speaker [PDP] resigned his position and defected to APC immediately after the Speaker Hon. Chiji Collins also defected from the Peoples Democratic Party to the All Progressive Congress https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/imo-deputy-speaker-resigns-as-nine-lawmakers-defect-to-apc.html |
Nine lawmakers of the Imo State House of Assembly, on Tuesday, defected to the All Progressives Congress from Peoples Democratic Party, All Progressives Grand Alliance, and Action Action. The lawmakers who defected are Authur Egwim (Ideato North) from AA to APC; Chyna Iwuanyanwu(Nwangele), PDP; Chidiebere Ogbunikpa(Okigwe), PDP; Obinna Okwara(Nkwerre), AA; and Paul Emeziem (Onuimo) also from PDP to APC. Others are Ekene Nnodimele (Orsu) from APGA to APC, Johnson Duru (Ideato South), AA; Ngozi Obiefule (Isu) AA; and Heclus Okorocha (Ohaji/Egbema) from PDP to APC. The speaker, Collins Chiji, read their letters of defection on Tuesday. The plenary is currently ongoing. Details later… https://punchng.com/breaking-nine-imo-lawmakers-defect-to-apc/ |
Nine lawmakers of the Imo state House of Assembly, have defected to the All Progressives Congress, APC, just as the Deputy speaker of the House, Okey Onyekanma, resigned his position.https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2020/01/breaking-9-imo-lawmakers-defect-to-apc-for-uzodinma/amp/
|
The Peoples Democratic Party has hailed the Supreme Court for refusing to reverse its judgment, voiding participation of the All Progressives Congress and its candidates in Zamfara State in the 2019 general elections. The party gave the commendation in a statement issued by its National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Kola Ologbondiyan, on Monday in Abuja. Ologbondiyan said the Supreme Court by its decision had once again saved the nation from a huge constitutional crisis. SEE ALSO: Supreme Court strikes out APC’s request for review of judgment on party’s candidates in Zamfara He described the demand by the APC to the Supreme Court as blackmail set to ambush and destroy the integrity of the apex court. Ologbondiyan said asking the Supreme Court to “embark on a journey to nowhere” was to subvert Nigeria’s democratic system. “This is also to force on Nigerians, a system that is completely alien to our constitutional democracy and outside the confines and dictates of the 1999 Constitution (as amended). “APC’s demand is a direct threat to our democracy, peace and stability of our nation and shows its unwillingness, as a party, to abide by the rule of law.” Ologbondiyan said that the situation must be condemned by all. He urged all well-meaning Nigerians, institutions of democracy, as well as security agencies to be cautious of actions not committed to the unity and stability of the nation. https://www.google.com/amp/s/punchng.com/pdp-hails-supreme-courts-refusal-to-reverse-judgment-on-zamfara/amp/ |
Governors elected on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has said that the comment of leaders of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on the judgement of the Supreme Court sacking Emeka Ihedioha as Imo state governor was a call for anarchy. The governors under the aegis of the Progressive Governors Forum described the statement of leaders of the PDP was contemptuous and disrespectful to the nation’s democracy. Chairman of the PGF and Governor of Kebbi state, Atiku Bagudu said in a statement in Ahuja that it was unfortunate that those who are supposed to defend the judiciary are the same people disparaging them because the judgement on the Imo election did not go in their favour. The statement reads: “Following the verdict of the Supreme Court in respect of Imo State election petition, which declared Sen. Hope Uzodinma of the All Progressives Congress as the winner of the March 9, 2019 Governorship election, the National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) proclaimed the judgement as “miscarriage of justice” and alleged that the judiciary is “heavily compromised” and has “lost credibility”. “These are depressing allegations coming from supposedly democratic leaders who should ordinarily be in the forefront of protecting and defending the judicial institution as the sanctuary of our democracy. It is contemptuous and disrespectful to our democracy. “This is most unfortunate and condemnable. We call on Nigerians and all lovers of democracy in the country to rise to the defence of our democratic institutions, especially the judiciary. “We must prevail on the PDP leadership and all politicians to exercise restraint by demonstrating unalloyed loyalty and respect for our democratic institutions, particularly our judiciary, which is the most important pillar of democratic governance. “To allege that a judgement delivered by Supreme Court Judges is “procured” simply because it does not favour the PDP is an invitation to anarchy. “It is on record that President Muhammadu Buhari has at all times stated his commitment to democracy and rule of law. Our party has lost elections we thought we would win. Equally, our party has been stopped from participation in elections by the judiciary, for example in Rivers State. “The case of Zamfara where we won the election but the Supreme Court in its wisdom nullified all our votes and declared PDP candidates as winners is another experience. In addition, our party members have lost many cases, and even though our views differ from the judgement delivered, we do not disparage the judiciary, yet our views of the judgement differ from the court. “As Progressive Governors, we hereby declare abiding faith in our judiciary and will at all times respect all decisions of our Judges at all levels no matter the circumstances. Our party and our members believe in the sanctity of our judicial institution as the last hope for justice for our people. “We wish to unequivocally state our resolve to work with all democrats in the country to ensure adequate protection of democratic governance by respecting all judgements from our courts”. https://thenationonlineng.net/imo-pdp-statement-call-for-anarchy-apc-governors/ |
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) yesterday challenged the Justice Tanko-led Supreme Court panel that heard the 2019 governorship appeal on Imo to recuse itself from the pending cases on Bauchi, Sokoto, Benue and Adamawa states. The PDP argued that sequel to the judgement delivered on the Imo state governorship election last Tuesday, it was clear to it that the panel cannot be neutral in the pending cases. Addressing a press conference yesterday in Abuja, the PDP National Chairman Prince Uche Secondus said the party would resist any attempt to subvert the will of the people in Sokoto, Benue, Adamawa and Bauchi. Secondus who asked the apex court to review and reverse the judgement on Imo governorship election in favour of the PDP, alleged that the verdict was a product of executive manipulation and recipe for crisis. He also argued that the judgement was a miscarriage of justice and coup against the PDP and the people of Imo. “What is more perplexing is the fact that INEC produced a schedule of reasons why results were not produced from the 388 units. “Indeed election did not even take place in most of the units for one reason or another, like violence and so no result could possibly be obtained from those units. The results were not merely rejected or cancelled by INEC. “None of the candidates or their counsel, except perhaps APC, as we speak, are aware of the number of votes scored by each party from the 388 polling units. The tribunal or Court of Appeal did not mention or ascribe any figure from the units to any party in their decisions. “In fact, in the cross examination of the APC Candidate, Sen. Hope Uzodinma, he could not read any figure from the “Oluwole” results. He said that the figures were not clear. And so it beats our imagination where the Supreme Court conjured and manufactured the figures it used in declaring Uzodinma/APC as duly elected. “In the light of extraordinary circumstances that vitiates that judgment as a product manipulation and a clear coup d’etat against the will of the people of Imo State, we demand that the decision of the Supreme Court on the Imo governorship election be reviewed and reversed in the interest of justice. “Furthermore we demand that Justice Tanko Mohammed, the CJN and his colleagues on the Imo governorship panel recuse themselves from the remaining cases involving PDP in the Supreme Court,” he said. https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/pdp-to-cjn-recuse-yourself-in-bauchi-sokoto-other-govship-appeals.html |
Zamfara was a wrap. The people had voted. And you know power belongs to the people. But the Supreme court took power from the party the people had given it to and gave it to another party. The party the people didnt want at the polls. *The Supreme court said it was following the law and not sentiments of the people of Zamfara. They clapped for the rule of law. They said the supreme court was the last hope of the common man.* The supreme court literally handed over the entire state to a party that won no single seat in the state. They hailed the supreme court and the new chief Justice. On the eve of the Rivers governorship election the supreme court shut the door of the elections against one of the two major parties in the state. And this literal banishment happened despite the fact that the party ,an autonomous organism ,had through its heart - the NEC , working through its mind- the NWC, announced its TRUE candidates . *The supreme court said it was defending the constitution against the wishes of the heart and soul of the party.* The supreme court by its action that elections eve, literally handed one of the most important states in the country to one party . Two days ago, the supreme court allowed the *Egbe* of cooked votes in Mbaise to perch and allowed the *Ugo* of cooked votes in Orlu zone to perch. But they now want nku to kwala the supreme court. They now want the CJN crucified. Ndi mmadu sef! By Ugo Egbujo |
A former governor of Imo State, Senator Rochas Okorocha, on Thursday dispelled the speculation that he was having a serious political battle with the new governor of the state, Senator Hope Uzodinma. The PUNCH had reported that Uzodinma, on Wednesday night, called for the probe of three former governors of the state including Okorocha. However, Okorocha, who spoke to our correspondent, said that the political disagreement he had with Uzodinma in the build-up to the All Progressives Congress governorship primary election in the state in 2018 did not resort to quarrel. Okorocha, who spoke to our correspondent through his spokesperson, Sam Onwuemeodo, described the governor as his brother and party man, adding that whatever disagreement he had with Uzodinma remained “politics” and noting more. The former governor explained that he shared a cordial relationship with Uzodinma. He said, “There is no quarrel between Senator Rochas Okorocha and the new governor, Senator Hope Uzodinma. Whatever transpired during the APC primary election remained politics and nothing more. “Senator Rochas Okorocha and the new governor, Senator Hope Uzodinma are brothers, friends and party men. There is no quarrel between them. They are seasoned politicians and they understood that all that happened remained politics and nothing else.” https://punchng.com/uzodinma-is-my-brother-friend-and-party-man-okorocha/ |
Dr. Mahmood Halilu Ahmed @realMahmoodhali , the Minister Of Niger Delta Affairs Mr Godswill Akpabio on their way to Imo state to attend the swearing in for the governor Elect Senator Hope Uzodenma in Owerri, Imo
|
Rochas reconciles with Oshiomole
|
Ebonyi State Governor David Umahi has lashed Peoples Democracy Party (PDP) members planning defection to the All Progressives Congress (APC), saying he is “100 per cent APC.”https://thenationonlineng.net/i-also-belong-to-apc-says-pdp-governor-umahi/
|
Former Abia State Governor, Orji Kalu, who was sentenced to 12 years in prison for fraud, was seen asking prison warders, “where are you taking us to?” After his sentencing. Kalu, who is the Senate Chief Whip also begged the prison warders not to handcuff him in public. The former governor, who appeared shaken, said, “Where are you taking us to now? Please don’t handcuff me. I will follow you.” Kalu’s associate, Udeogu, was sentenced to 10 years in prison while the company which was used in perpetrating the fraud, Slok Limited, was ordered to be wound up by Justice Idris Mohammed. https://punchng.com/please-dont-handcuff-me-convicted-ex-gov-kalu-begs/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
|