₦airaland Forum

Amatarasha:
onye Yoruba we are returning ur favor , u know buhari is a total.terrorist and a failure but tribalism blocked ur brains.

Amatarasha:
onye Yoruba we are returning ur favor , u know buhari is a total.terrorist and a failure but tribalism blocked ur brains.

EmptyGarden:
This one don learn lesson... If she take eye see wetin resemble ring next time, na fence she go fly escape.

BigBashiru:
i think part of the reason russia/China have a stand off with the West asides Ukraine is because in addition to Ukraine issue, the West is also losing their African colonies.... France lost central african republic around 2019 and they are currently about to lose Mali.

Aguilar:
The fate of the world depend on those countries.

Allahismad:
This is a war between capitalism and communism period.
But don't does eastern countries have the right to use or align whoever they feel secure with in security, does russia want them to be left vulnerable to their terrorism?
Am not understanding at all.

igbesachick:
i mean the indian. i really no idea they have such a strong presence in and around lagos. you surely enumerate those factotries with indian , instead of chinese?


by the words out of your mouth, indian have more factories in nigeria and they even build schools for their kids. at least chinese never consider africa as a home.

CSTRR:
They are emerging countries because of their policy and reforms, not because of their landmass and population.

I know what BRICS stand for.

The best countries of the world don't have a great land mass.

Sambisa forest alone is bigger than most countries in the highly developed Western Europe.

Land mass is good, but not everything.

Good governance and a productive and enlightened population is the main determinant of a great country.

CSTRR:
You are just jumping up and down into things you have no clue about.

India is a manufacturing giant. Mexico is a manufacturing hub for US companies looking for cheap labour.

Even then they are not developed.

Large percentage of their population is poor and under developed.
Inequalities and poverty is still very prevalent in those countries.

The GDP of Germany, UK and France are over $3 trillion respectively.
They don't have a huge landmass or a great population.

If you go down a bit to the likes of Norway, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland, and Sweden
A great GDP, low population.

Those are developed countries.

India, Mexico, Turkey are not developed countries.

Even in Africa, Botswana which is possibly the best economically conducive state in Africa has a small landmass and population.

CSTRR:
You are just jumping up and down into things you have no clue about.

India is a manufacturing giant. Mexico is a manufacturing hub for US companies looking for cheap labour.

Even then they are not developed.

Large percentage of their population is poor and under developed.
Inequalities and poverty is still very prevalent in those countries.

The GDP of Germany, UK and France are over $3 trillion respectively.
They don't have a huge landmass or a great population.

If you go down a bit to the likes of Norway, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland, and Sweden
A great GDP, low population.

Those are developed countries.

India, Mexico, Turkey are not developed countries.

Even in Africa, Botswana which is possibly the best economically conducive state in Africa has a small landmass and population.

CSTRR:
You are just jumping up and down into things you have no clue about.

India is a manufacturing giant. Mexico is a manufacturing hub for US companies looking for cheap labour.

Even then they are not developed.

Large percentage of their population is poor and under developed.
Inequalities and poverty is still very prevalent in those countries.

The GDP of Germany, UK and France are over $3 trillion respectively.
They don't have a huge landmass or a great population.

If you go down a bit to the likes of Norway, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland, and Sweden
A great GDP, low population.

Those are developed countries.

India, Mexico, Turkey are not developed countries.

Even in Africa, Botswana which is possibly the best economically conducive state in Africa has a small landmass and population.

CSTRR:
You are just jumping up and down into things you have no clue about.

India is a manufacturing giant. Mexico is a manufacturing hub for US companies looking for cheap labour.

Even then they are not developed.

Large percentage of their population is poor and under developed.
Inequalities and poverty is still very prevalent in those countries.

The GDP of Germany, UK and France are over $3 trillion respectively.
They don't have a huge landmass or a great population.

If you go down a bit to the likes of Norway, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland, and Sweden
A great GDP, low population.

Those are developed countries.

India, Mexico, Turkey are not developed countries.

Even in Africa, Botswana which is possibly the best economically conducive state in Africa has a small landmass and population.

CSTRR:
You are just jumping up and down into things you have no clue about.

India is a manufacturing giant. Mexico is a manufacturing hub for US companies looking for cheap labour.

Even then they are not developed.

Large percentage of their population is poor and under developed.
Inequalities and poverty is still very prevalent in those countries.

The GDP of Germany, UK and France are over $3 trillion respectively.
They don't have a huge landmass or a great population.

If you go down a bit to the likes of Norway, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland, and Sweden
A great GDP, low population.

Those are developed countries.

India, Mexico, Turkey are not developed countries.

Even in Africa, Botswana which is possibly the best economically conducive state in Africa has a small landmass and population.

CSTRR:
You are just jumping up and down into things you have no clue about.

India is a manufacturing giant. Mexico is a manufacturing hub for US companies looking for cheap labour.

Even then they are not developed.

Large percentage of their population is poor and under developed.
Inequalities and poverty is still very prevalent in those countries.

The GDP of Germany, UK and France are over $3 trillion respectively.
They don't have a huge landmass or a great population.

If you go down a bit to the likes of Norway, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland, and Sweden
A great GDP, low population.

Those are developed countries.

India, Mexico, Turkey are not developed countries.

Even in Africa, Botswana which is possibly the best economically conducive state in Africa has a small landmass and population.

igbesachick:
indian have schools and factories ? i thought their business is much weaker than the chinese.

why chase chinese away ? the things imported are from china too.

CSTRR:
Germany, Norway, Italy, southkorea, are tiny countries in populatation and landmass.

Mexico, Indonesia, Turkey, India, vIetnam, are not developed.

Only america, China, and maybe Russia and to a tiny extent Brazil pass that test.

So the vast majority of the world's developed are tiny both in population and landmass.

CSTRR:
Germany, Norway, Italy, southkorea, are tiny countries in populatation and landmass.

Mexico, Indonesia, Turkey, India, vIetnam, are not developed.

Only america, China, and maybe Russia and to a tiny extent Brazil pass that test.

So the vast majority of the world's developed are tiny both in population and landmass.

CSTRR:
Germany, Norway, Italy, southkorea, are tiny countries in populatation and landmass.

Mexico, Indonesia, Turkey, India, vIetnam, are not developed.

Only america, China, and maybe Russia and to a tiny extent Brazil pass that test.

So the vast majority of the world's developed are tiny both in population and landmass.

seanwilliam:
i love your choice of word, "one of the most" not actually " the most".. besides all of these are not battle-tested... forget what is written on paper sir.

CSTRR:
Oya list 10 developed countries with huge land mass, and population.

CSTRR:
You are only vomiting what you have seen dimwits write on nairaland.

None of these are your own ideas, neither are they factual.
H

CSTRR:
You are only vomiting what you have seen dimwits write on nairaland.

None of these are your own ideas, neither are they factual.

CSTRR:
You are only vomiting what you have seen dimwits write on nairaland.

None of these are your own ideas, neither are they factual.

CSTRR:
Who is "you"??

You are suffering from half education.

CSTRR:
It further proves my point that land mass has little to do with viability.

Next time don't bring land mass into discussion.

Stop jumping up and down.

seanwilliam:
not sure if u understand the point im tryin to make. if war is determined by defence budget self then usa should be able to defeat all other super powers combined..

seanwilliam:
not sure if u understand the point im tryin to make. if war is determined by defence budget self then usa should be able to defeat all other super powers combined..

seanwilliam:
not sure if u understand the point im tryin to make. if war is determined by defence budget self then usa should be able to defeat all other super powers combined..