₦airaland Forum

Senigentle:
Read your scriptures well....God uses Prophet Samuel to tell about the fall of king Saul and the rise of King David

yes you're right but you can't compared those prophets of those days to ours, infact the distance long from here to Australia, God would sent his prophets to informed king he would die tomorrow if he derailed from his way and the prophets would delivered the message and nothing would changed but now can you tell me one man of God in this our country that so much close to God to the extent of sending him to the president and it will come to pass,,those olden days prophets closed to the almighty that they can hear from God directly,all what we are seeing today is just prediction and imagination don't let anybody deceive you my brother,try your best spiritually and leave the rest,our God can't dwell in dirty environment like ours where blood of innocent full our hands and all sort of corruptions,any man of God can't deceive me because I have my Bible.

God did not show fr.mbaka how Nigeria will change to good and way forward but showing him somebody who is going to reclaim his mandate through falsehood,,our God is not irritating God but God of light and holy,,,mbaka should face his cultism,,yeye

LaIabobo:
Sadly, it is a tale of the more you look, the less you see.

But this same supreme court ruled against APC in Rivers, Bauchi and Zamfara state... Now they ruled in favour of APC and no one seems to understand the basis of the ruling. Crazy old men and women.

Politics in this nation is mad, insane, and crazy.

remove Bauchi from your analysis,PDP won Bauchi in an election not supreme Court rules get your facts accurate

By Liborous oshiomaCOPIED.

THE IMO GUBERNATORIAL JUDGMENT - A PAINFUL BUT LEGALLY CORRECT VERDICT!

It is indeed a perplexing paradox: Hope Uzodinma may not have won the 2019 Imo State gubernatorial election, yet the Supreme Court, on the facts, was right in declaring him the winner of that election in law. The error was not the Supreme Court's, but that of Governor Emeka Ihedioha's legal team; and it was a crucially fatal error.

What happened was this: apparently concocted results, perhaps not having any basis whatsoever in reality, BUT SIGNED BY INEC PRESIDING OFFICERS, were turned in from more than 350 polling units, giving Hope Uzodinma of the APC an incredibly unassailable lead. When those results were transmitted to the wards collation centres, the collation officers, who had no power in law to cancel or reject them, rejected the said polling units results, and refused to collate them, thereby effectively excluding them from the total tally of the governorship result that was eventually declared by the Returning Officer.

The exclusion of the results of those polling units was the fulcrum of the petition presented at the Tribunal by Hope Uzodinma. Ever since David Mark V. ABUBAKAR USMAN, and DOMA V. INEC, the law has been settled that neither collation officers nor a returning officer, has the power in law to exclude a polling unit result duly signed by the presiding officer at the polling unit; only the election tribunal possesses the power to cancel or exclude such a result. So, at the point of its presentation, Senator Uzodinma's petition was potentially viable, in spite of the apparent dubiousness of the polling units results on which it was anchored, there being a REBUTTABLE presumption of regularity and correctness, by virtue of both the Electoral Act and Evidence Act, enuring in favour of any result declared by a presiding officer.

The backbreaking and fatal error made by Ihedioha's legal team was in not filing a CROSS PETITION fiercely challenging the integrity of the suspect polling units results upon which Uzodinma was relying, and praying the election tribunal to formally nullify the said results. Without a cross petition, none of the grounds under section 138 (1) of the Electoral Act for questioning the elections conducted in those polling units in which Uzodinma "won" could have been competently raised by Governor Ihedioha in his defence to Uzodinma's petition. This was the ratio decidendi of the old Court of Appeal decision in IDRIS V. A.N.P.P.(2008)8 NWLR(PT.1088) Page 1. In the recent Court of Appeal decision in ATIKU ABUBAKAR V. BUHARI, the Court of Appeal again invoked the principle in dismissing Buhari's contention that Atiku ABUBAKAR was born in Cameroun to parents who originally were Camerounians, and thus disqualified from contesting the election. Dismissing the contention, the Court of Appeal held that the issue was incompetent, since Buhari did not file a cross petition.

Ihedioha indeed did set up facts in his Reply to the petition rehashing the serial infractions that led to the exclusion of the results of the said 300 plus polling units. But that was legally not enough, in the absence of a cross petition. Besides, such renditions by a Respondent in a mere Reply or Statement of Defence are clearly incompetent. The reason for the incompetence was was made clear by the Court of Appeal in NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL & ORS V. HON. JUSTICE JUBRIL BABAJIDE ALADEJANA & ORS(2014) LPELR - 2413 (CA) Page 31, paras C - F, at ratio 3 thus -

"The law is that it is a plaintiff who by his statement of claim primarily nominates issues to be tried in a suit and which he relies on to have the judgment of the Court. For a defendant, it is only necessary to resist the plaintiff's claim on the facts pleaded. It is not for a defendant to set up facts which would convey that it is not just setting up a defence but setting up a new case of his own. He can only do so by way of a counter claim..."

Shorn of the legalese, what the above authority is simply saying is that since the issue nominated for trial by Hope Uzodinma was the unlawfulfulness or otherwise of the exclusion of the results of the 300 plus polling units by the ward collation officers, Ihedioha's defence was therefore necessarily restricted by law to showing that those who excluded the results had the power in law to exclude them. Without a cross petition praying for the nullification of those results, the law forbade Governor Ihedioha as respondent from raising the issue of the alleged serial corrupt practices and irregularities marring the said results, in a mere statement of defence; that was a new issue not nominated by Uzodinma as petitioner. Ihedioha, being a Respondent, could only have competently raised them via a cross petition, being a new issue not nominated by Uzodinma, the petitioner.

Tragically, Ihedioha's legal team forgot to include the pivotal cross petition. And in the absence of a cross petition, the Supreme Court was right in law, painfully though it may seem, to rely on the presumption of regularity and correctness enshrined by both the Electoral Act and Evidence Act in favour of the said results, and to reckon with them and add them up to the final result, since Ihedioha's legal team had woefully failed to effectively attack the results and rebut that presumption. For the Supreme Court, this was the legally correct conclusion to come to, having found that INEC had no power in law to exclude polling units results duly affirmed by the various polling units presiding officers!

COPIED.

THE IMO GUBERNATORIAL JUDGMENT - A PAINFUL BUT LEGALLY CORRECT VERDICT!

It is indeed a perplexing paradox: Hope Uzodinma may not have won the 2019 Imo State gubernatorial election, yet the Supreme Court, on the facts, was right in declaring him the winner of that election in law. The error was not the Supreme Court's, but that of Governor Emeka Ihedioha's legal team; and it was a crucially fatal error.

What happened was this: apparently concocted results, perhaps not having any basis whatsoever in reality, BUT SIGNED BY INEC PRESIDING OFFICERS, were turned in from more than 350 polling units, giving Hope Uzodinma of the APC an incredibly unassailable lead. When those results were transmitted to the wards collation centres, the collation officers, who had no power in law to cancel or reject them, rejected the said polling units results, and refused to collate them, thereby effectively excluding them from the total tally of the governorship result that was eventually declared by the Returning Officer.

The exclusion of the results of those polling units was the fulcrum of the petition presented at the Tribunal by Hope Uzodinma. Ever since David Mark V. ABUBAKAR USMAN, and DOMA V. INEC, the law has been settled that neither collation officers nor a returning officer, has the power in law to exclude a polling unit result duly signed by the presiding officer at the polling unit; only the election tribunal possesses the power to cancel or exclude such a result. So, at the point of its presentation, Senator Uzodinma's petition was potentially viable, in spite of the apparent dubiousness of the polling units results on which it was anchored, there being a REBUTTABLE presumption of regularity and correctness, by virtue of both the Electoral Act and Evidence Act, enuring in favour of any result declared by a presiding officer.

The backbreaking and fatal error made by Ihedioha's legal team was in not filing a CROSS PETITION fiercely challenging the integrity of the suspect polling units results upon which Uzodinma was relying, and praying the election tribunal to formally nullify the said results. Without a cross petition, none of the grounds under section 138 (1) of the Electoral Act for questioning the elections conducted in those polling units in which Uzodinma "won" could have been competently raised by Governor Ihedioha in his defence to Uzodinma's petition. This was the ratio decidendi of the old Court of Appeal decision in IDRIS V. A.N.P.P.(2008)8 NWLR(PT.1088) Page 1. In the recent Court of Appeal decision in ATIKU ABUBAKAR V. BUHARI, the Court of Appeal again invoked the principle in dismissing Buhari's contention that Atiku ABUBAKAR was born in Cameroun to parents who originally were Camerounians, and thus disqualified from contesting the election. Dismissing the contention, the Court of Appeal held that the issue was incompetent, since Buhari did not file a cross petition.

Ihedioha indeed did set up facts in his Reply to the petition rehashing the serial infractions that led to the exclusion of the results of the said 300 plus polling units. But that was legally not enough, in the absence of a cross petition. Besides, such renditions by a Respondent in a mere Reply or Statement of Defence are clearly incompetent. The reason for the incompetence was was made clear by the Court of Appeal in NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL & ORS V. HON. JUSTICE JUBRIL BABAJIDE ALADEJANA & ORS(2014) LPELR - 2413 (CA) Page 31, paras C - F, at ratio 3 thus -

"The law is that it is a plaintiff who by his statement of claim primarily nominates issues to be tried in a suit and which he relies on to have the judgment of the Court. For a defendant, it is only necessary to resist the plaintiff's claim on the facts pleaded. It is not for a defendant to set up facts which would convey that it is not just setting up a defence but setting up a new case of his own. He can only do so by way of a counter claim..."

Shorn of the legalese, what the above authority is simply saying is that since the issue nominated for trial by Hope Uzodinma was the unlawfulfulness or otherwise of the exclusion of the results of the 300 plus polling units by the ward collation officers, Ihedioha's defence was therefore necessarily restricted by law to showing that those who excluded the results had the power in law to exclude them. Without a cross petition praying for the nullification of those results, the law forbade Governor Ihedioha as respondent from raising the issue of the alleged serial corrupt practices and irregularities marring the said results, in a mere statement of defence; that was a new issue not nominated by Uzodinma as petitioner. Ihedioha, being a Respondent, could only have competently raised them via a cross petition, being a new issue not nominated by Uzodinma, the petitioner.

Tragically, Ihedioha's legal team forgot to include the pivotal cross petition. And in the absence of a cross petition, the Supreme Court was right in law, painfully though it may seem, to rely on the presumption of regularity and correctness enshrined by both the Electoral Act and Evidence Act in favour of the said results, and to reckon with them and add them up to the final result, since Ihedioha's legal team had woefully failed to effectively attack the results and rebut that presumption. For the Supreme Court, this was the legally correct conclusion to come to, having found that INEC had no power in law to exclude polling units results duly affirmed by the various polling units presiding officers!

COPIED.

THE IMO GUBERNATORIAL JUDGMENT - A PAINFUL BUT LEGALLY CORRECT VERDICT!

It is indeed a perplexing paradox: Hope Uzodinma may not have won the 2019 Imo State gubernatorial election, yet the Supreme Court, on the facts, was right in declaring him the winner of that election in law. The error was not the Supreme Court's, but that of Governor Emeka Ihedioha's legal team; and it was a crucially fatal error.

What happened was this: apparently concocted results, perhaps not having any basis whatsoever in reality, BUT SIGNED BY INEC PRESIDING OFFICERS, were turned in from more than 350 polling units, giving Hope Uzodinma of the APC an incredibly unassailable lead. When those results were transmitted to the wards collation centres, the collation officers, who had no power in law to cancel or reject them, rejected the said polling units results, and refused to collate them, thereby effectively excluding them from the total tally of the governorship result that was eventually declared by the Returning Officer.

The exclusion of the results of those polling units was the fulcrum of the petition presented at the Tribunal by Hope Uzodinma. Ever since David Mark V. ABUBAKAR USMAN, and DOMA V. INEC, the law has been settled that neither collation officers nor a returning officer, has the power in law to exclude a polling unit result duly signed by the presiding officer at the polling unit; only the election tribunal possesses the power to cancel or exclude such a result. So, at the point of its presentation, Senator Uzodinma's petition was potentially viable, in spite of the apparent dubiousness of the polling units results on which it was anchored, there being a REBUTTABLE presumption of regularity and correctness, by virtue of both the Electoral Act and Evidence Act, enuring in favour of any result declared by a presiding officer.

The backbreaking and fatal error made by Ihedioha's legal team was in not filing a CROSS PETITION fiercely challenging the integrity of the suspect polling units results upon which Uzodinma was relying, and praying the election tribunal to formally nullify the said results. Without a cross petition, none of the grounds under section 138 (1) of the Electoral Act for questioning the elections conducted in those polling units in which Uzodinma "won" could have been competently raised by Governor Ihedioha in his defence to Uzodinma's petition. This was the ratio decidendi of the old Court of Appeal decision in IDRIS V. A.N.P.P.(2008)8 NWLR(PT.1088) Page 1. In the recent Court of Appeal decision in ATIKU ABUBAKAR V. BUHARI, the Court of Appeal again invoked the principle in dismissing Buhari's contention that Atiku ABUBAKAR was born in Cameroun to parents who originally were Camerounians, and thus disqualified from contesting the election. Dismissing the contention, the Court of Appeal held that the issue was incompetent, since Buhari did not file a cross petition.

Ihedioha indeed did set up facts in his Reply to the petition rehashing the serial infractions that led to the exclusion of the results of the said 300 plus polling units. But that was legally not enough, in the absence of a cross petition. Besides, such renditions by a Respondent in a mere Reply or Statement of Defence are clearly incompetent. The reason for the incompetence was was made clear by the Court of Appeal in NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL & ORS V. HON. JUSTICE JUBRIL BABAJIDE ALADEJANA & ORS(2014) LPELR - 2413 (CA) Page 31, paras C - F, at ratio 3 thus -

"The law is that it is a plaintiff who by his statement of claim primarily nominates issues to be tried in a suit and which he relies on to have the judgment of the Court. For a defendant, it is only necessary to resist the plaintiff's claim on the facts pleaded. It is not for a defendant to set up facts which would convey that it is not just setting up a defence but setting up a new case of his own. He can only do so by way of a counter claim..."

Shorn of the legalese, what the above authority is simply saying is that since the issue nominated for trial by Hope Uzodinma was the unlawfulfulness or otherwise of the exclusion of the results of the 300 plus polling units by the ward collation officers, Ihedioha's defence was therefore necessarily restricted by law to showing that those who excluded the results had the power in law to exclude them. Without a cross petition praying for the nullification of those results, the law forbade Governor Ihedioha as respondent from raising the issue of the alleged serial corrupt practices and irregularities marring the said results, in a mere statement of defence; that was a new issue not nominated by Uzodinma as petitioner. Ihedioha, being a Respondent, could only have competently raised them via a cross petition, being a new issue not nominated by Uzodinma, the petitioner.

Tragically, Ihedioha's legal team forgot to include the pivotal cross petition. And in the absence of a cross petition, the Supreme Court was right in law, painfully though it may seem, to rely on the presumption of regularity and correctness enshrined by both the Electoral Act and Evidence Act in favour of the said results, and to reckon with them and add them up to the final result, since Ihedioha's legal team had woefully failed to effectively attack the results and rebut that presumption. For the Supreme Court, this was the legally correct conclusion to come to, having found that INEC had no power in law to exclude polling units results duly affirmed by the various polling units presiding officers!

Lobatan,,,Mr.integrity has spoken,, because those Fulani herdsmen won't be able to perpetrate their evil if amotekun start their operation but to favour his people he declared Amotekun illegal,,,,Once again I salute your courage mr.integrity,,,,,yeye dey smell

HegenIkomkeh:
This fool has not only cemented the hardship and suffering of Nigerians,he has completely destroyed the fragile fabrics of our hard fought democracy.There are 3 more years to go folks,brace up for more.
Now I'm fully convinced that this country might never recover from the destruction that would be done by this mistake of a president. If you have a chance to emigrate, please do oh. No hope again!

yes completely agreed with you,,but this Man have people working with him now are they dunce together

kiyosaki1:
https://thenationonlineng.net/why-man-was-arrested-by-dss-for-allegedly-using-buharis-daughters-line/

lies from the pit of hell,, according to okolie DSS did not even charge him to court but calling Buhari daughter while she told them that she had exam then after some weeks released him and still give him back the sim,I don't know why this Buhari followers just like to be covered their master sin, God will punish all of you one by one including the OP

itsme01:




First class degree in Photography?? wetin rich man pikin no fit study...

Flying her in a Country Owned Private Jet and wasting fuel on private visit is a big NO NO, even Dangote's children dont waste money on such stupidity,

Two of Dangote's daughter came to ibadan to commission structures donated by Dangote Foundation to University of Ibadan school of post graduate studies, both girls rode in the same SUV, no escort, no Private Jet, they were freindly and open.. they wouldnt had used more than 30 litters for the important journey, no wasting of money

Flying a Jet that cost over $3000 an hour to fly just to take some pictures is the height of wastefulness and abuse of office previledge, what is the cormercial value of the photograph to Nigerian economy or even to the economy of Buhari's household

..

my brother you can see it now that they deceived us about Buhari integrity,,he didn't have any integrity at all,I have also heard about the humbleness of Dangote children meanwhile the humbleness comes from their parents,I have reached the conclusions on my own Buhari does not have what it takes to be a leader but just struggling to be enjoying the benefits of being a president shikena

KingAzubuike:
These people are just shouting 'he was a terrorist' up and down yet there's no single solid proof he had business with any american or responsible for any bullshit. It was just a case of a premeditated attack gone wrong. They had no idea soleimani was in that vehicle and wouldn't be so foolish to kill an iranian general without being bothered about the consequences. They realized their mistake and started telling the whole world cheap excuses. They even went as far as saying soleimani was planning an attack on american soil in the upcoming months lol

cc kolafolabi

you're real olodo, some Nigerian likes to be talking rubbish why would you say they did not knowing sulaimoni was not in the vehicle before they strikes, sulaimoni was their target,so you thought they're insane and coward like you and your ologogoro president,mtcheeeew

betterpikinn:
LOL
DO YOU HAVE BRAINS AT ALL?
COMPARING ISRAEL TO USA IS LIKE COMPARING ABA MARKET TO THE WHOLE CHINA COUNTRY.
PLEASE GROW UP.
ISRAEL IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WITHOUT USA.
DO YOU KNOW THAT THERE IS NO RECORD ANYWHERE THAT ISRAEL HAS NUCLEAR BOMB?
EVERYTHING UV BEEN HEARING IS ALL SPECULATIONS. I CHALLENGE YOU TO DO YOUR RESEARCH.
NIGERIAN CHRISTAINS CAN BE VERY DAFT.
THEY USUALLY JUST BLINDLY SUPPORT ISRAEL AT ANY WILL.
A COUNTRY THAT GIVE NO SHlT TO CHRISTAINS. THE POPULATION IS CHRISTAINS IN ISRAEL IS NOT EVEN UP TO 5 % WHILE MUSLIMS ARE EVEN MORE THAN 15%. YOU PEOPLE SHOULD USE YOUR BRAINS

I can never agree with you on this,if you look at the map very well you will see isreal surrounded by Arab countries assuming those Arab countries have war power to suppress isreal they would have done so,if Pakistan killed two isrealites, isreal would killed 100 pakistans,any arab countries can never face isreal,,then most Americans army were isrealites if you don't know this facts,,I just tell you for the first time, hypocrite like you.

betterpikinn:
I JUS PITY ISREAL IN ALL OF THESE MESS


BY THE MENTION OF IRAN, ISRAEL USUALLY PEE IN THEIR PANTS.

IF NOT FOR USA, ISRAEL WOULD HAVE BEEN A FORGOTTEN REGION...


ONE THING I KNOW FOR SURE IS, IF ALL THESE WAR STARTS, ISRAEL AND IRAN WILL SURELY BE THE BATTLE GROUND.

AS FOR ALLIES, I TRUST NORTH KOREA, CHINA AND RUSSIA TO SUPPORT IRAN.

USA CAN NOT CONTINUE TO BULLY EVERYONE...

THE WORLD IS WATCHING...

USA GO HEAR AM....

you're wrong do your research very well on isreal America can't fight isreal I mean they can't win isreal talkless of small iran,,iran, Iraq, Philistines join with saudi can not win only isreal,no be moinmoin

CAPSLOCKED:
AS USUAL, CHRISTIANS ARE JUBILATING BECAUSE IT'S ISLAM THAT IS BEING PULLED.
BUT IF YOU BAN A CHRISTIAN FROM PREACHING OR PRAYING PUBLICLY, OR YOU BAN CHRISTIAN RELIGIOUS BOOKS OR ITEMS YOU'LL FIND THEM WAILING ABOUT THE ATTACK ON CHRIST AND HOW THE GATES OF HELL CANNOT PREVAIL, ALONG WITH OTHER NONSENSES THEY UTTER WHENEVER THEIR RELIGIOUS ACTIONS ARE QUESTIONED.


THE TRUTH IS, CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS.... YOU ARE ONE.

YOU ALL HAVE TO STOP FIGHTING EACH OTHER. YOU NEED TO EMBRACE EACH OTHER LIKE ONE LARGE CONGREGATION OF GULLIBLE DIRECTIONLESS HERD OF CATTLE THAT NEITHER KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING OR WHERE THEY'RE GOING.

preacher(pastor) jailed for Nine years in china recently,did you ever see anybody complaining here because that is their culture and rules,it is only in Nigeria we are religious bigot,so shut up

What is he saying,why telling us did our constitution allow him to run for third term the answer is capital No,he should follow the constitution and stop telling us rubbish, Nigerian did not believe in Buhari anymore in 2015 he said he would only ran for one term but when the time came the story changed, leopard will never change its skin,we knew him he didn't follow rule of law,but if he had third term agenda,he should forget we will never agree with him

kunleweb:
Na wa o. Aggressive village people. An entire family. Una try


Even if a fire extinguisher costs 20,000Naira please buy it and have like 2 in your car. The cost of loss far outweighs the cost saved from ignoring needful amenities that are many times overlooked and ignored. The same thing applies to all other things we ignore and overlook but are needful. The culture of saving money by not buying needful safety and security amenities like this always, I repeat always often can lead to scenarios where losses are experienced and when weighed far outweighs the cost of purchasing these items/having them in place

do you believe they can even remember fire extinguisher in this sinero,most people kept their fire extinguisher at back of the car in this situation I don't think anyone of them can come out to use the extinguisher unless good Samaritan can use his or her own to save lives

Bedwyr:
You have forgotten Boko Haram under GEJ

-Was bombing several cities in the North at will...including attacking Abuja three times via bomb attack.
-Fulani herdsmen were also very active under GEJ....especially in Benue.
And a host of other things.

Anyway, Buhari hasn't made much improvement. SUre...Boko has been beaten back , but security is still bad.

thanks

Bedwyr:
-There was no quota system in 1961.
-Yes, Buhari did wrong, and what he did in 1983 was treason.
-By the time Buhari took over in 1983, Nigeria was already in recession since October 1982. Same thing that happened when he took over in 2015...we had been in recession since April 2014 when oil prices started to crash both times. Where Bubu errs in economic development is by continuing increase government spending...when it should be cut.
-True...cabals exist.
-True...and it was a feature of the past governments since 1999. That's why the 1966 coup was a mistake...we lost a chance to mature as a democracy.
-Nigeria in 1983-5 was actually relatively peaceful. Infact there were more killings under the Shagari and IBB administrations than under the Buhari adminsitration. Also, more people died under GEJ than under Buhari...though let's be frank, Buhari is no paragon of security.
-True...and also true of most Nigerian governments, excepting probably Murtala Muhammed (who was no paragon of virtue by the way, but still)

I can never agree with you on what you just said comparing dead people under gej to major General Buhari, percentage of people died under major Buhari was alarming have you forgotten Fulani killer herdsmen or you are just sarcastic

Sirjamo:
The man that took power from Buhari, what did he do with it? He completely destroyed Nigeria within eight years, annulled the best election in our history and was eventually kicked out by civilians who made life miserable for him.

Buhari on the other hand, got a public apology from Abacha and was handed the best intervention fund in history.

you spew thrash or may be you don't know what you're saying IBB leads in building infrastructure go and check it out in eight years he built most infrastructure in Abuja,thirdmainland bridge in Lagos those parastatals,the only negative thing about Bababgida was the annulment,for corruption all our past head of state were corrupt,you can never compare Buhari to IBB interns of achievement,go and goggle IBB achievement you will surprised,,,Buhari is a disaster

I can't doubt all these facts but another war is coming,"this visa on arrival policy will bring another insecurity to Nigeria, Nigeria will soon become no man's land

PDP likely make the same mistake it made in Osun state

This is exactly what he knows how to do, deliver speech, talk talk

Mouth Gig:
EVEN DIS RAM RENO,

THEY ARE ALL DIS SAME.

NO SINGLE RIGHTEOUS PATRIOTIC NIGERIAN

BOTH MALE AND FEMALE, THEY ARE ALL THIEVES AND SELLOUT

EVEN, THOSE CRITICS OF DIS ADMINISTRATION AND THE LOVERS, ARE ALL HYPOCRITES.

EVEN CHRISTIANS, MUSLIMS AND OTHERS, THEY ALL

SMH

good, I love your submission but you exclude yourself, for me every Nigerian re thieves including me nd u, corruption is running in our veins only hypocrite can debunk this bitter truth

As a good and sincere pastor, Osinbajo should have resigned his appointment before 2019 election but power is so sweet that he can never do that, Osinbajo is very sound professor but Buhari had made him so cruel and confused man, lie, lie, lie just bcoz you wanted to plz your master after Buhari administration Osinbajo name will die politically

The only thing Osinbajo knows how to do very well is talk talk, he can talk very well but no action even if Osinbajo is the President that is what he will be doing talking without action that is why I prefer Fashola to any other person, Fashola is an action man.

Bayusity:
Saw it coming.. Adelabu has no case, he should rather ensure to stay relevant till 2023 as he have a great chance of becoming the next governor after GSM. I don't see oyo State people giving Makinde second term no matter the miracle he might perform as we've definitely learnt the implications of second term form Mr constituted authority

speak for yourself you have just only one vote

OladimejiRufai:
Agbaya ni yin!


Seeking opportunities to troll younger generations

haaaaaa o ti te aso agba monle omode yii, ko daju wipe o fe dagba

I beggie Nigerian just get mouth like ajeakara they can't do poo, if that guy get mind to come to Nigeria I can bet it nothing will happen to him we just like ti rant on social media how many politician you have crushed in Nigeria although I didn't support that South African guy o but Nigeria get mouth than action

hisgrace090:
Osinbajo is a tireless worker and I love that, if given the power he will do more as he is surrounded by monitoring spirit called CABALS.

yea osinbajo is an ntelligent man but is a coward, I prefer Fashola to osinbsjo

kunmiiii:
Fayose is a thug and a joke, I don't know why his disregard for institutions always seem exciting to some people, is this how a civilized person should behave, barge into offices when you haven't been formally invited.

but when buhari disregarded court order you were praising him abi, you double speak my kid