ParisLove1's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ParisLove1's Profile › ParisLove1's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (of 9 pages)
^ howdy Mac, Juma'at Mubarak ![]() |
Islam's religious leaders must be caught between rage and despair now. Hahahahahah Rage for all the obvious reasons, but despair also because there are no lightening bolts from the sky, no army of angelic hosts sent to avenge Muhammad's honor, All Islam has now are impotent old men who rely on their semi-literate thugs to threaten violence on others who dare criticize them. ![]() At this point we should keep hammering home this message and maybe, just maybe, Muslims will begin to realize that raving like lunatics and destroying everything around them is not exactly the best way to respond. ![]() PS; am just exercising my freedom of speech that's enshrined in the constitution of federal republic of Nigeria. No offense... |
tbaba1234: https://www.nairaland.com/1053141/5-examples-supreme-muslim-toleranceAbeg your sorry thread has been debunked. Front page indeed. @mod why is the spam bot banning me here and there in this section? And since it's the work of spambot to detect spamming, why did you ban me(or was it me?) for 3 months cus of that? You ran 0ut of every reasonable excuse to ban abi? #Godiswatchingyou# ![]() |
LagosShia: Burn The Daughter!First of all most of the verses you quote re old testaments which was referring to Isrealites living under the law. It no longer applies to Christians as NT made it clear several times John1:17 God gave the law through moses, but grace and truth came through Christ. So with Jesus’ atonement, we are no longer required to keep the Law. We are not under Law, but grace ( Rom. 6:14-15) The rest of your quotes are warning to sinners. Can you say your allah let sinners go free? You also quoted 1corintians i don't know what you're saying by that as the verse made it clear if the woman does not cover her head, she might as well cut her hair, but since it's a shameful thing for a woman to shave her hair, she should cover it. Then verse 16 says her long hair is given unto her as her covering. But since you the decided to play the 'you too' argument,let's play it. *. its being lawful for men to have four wives, but for a woman to have only one husband; Surah4:3 If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; *“When Eve ate fruit which He had forbidden to her from the tree in Paradise, the Lord, be He praised, cursed women with eighteen punishments one of which is: * menstruation; Surah2:222 They question thee (O Muhammad) concerning menstruation. Say it is an illness:O beat them Surah4:34 ...As to those women On whose part ye fear Disloyalty and ill-conduct Admonish them (first)], (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them Lock them away till death take their poor soul. Surah415 Those who commit unlawful sexual intercourse of your women confine the guilty women to houses until death takes them or Allah ordains for them [another] way. Women re majority in hell Bukhari 7.62.125 "Then I saw the (Hell) Fire, and I have never before, seen such a horrible sight as that, and I saw that the majority of its dwellers were women." Angels will curse women Bukhari 4.54.450 Allah's Apostle said, "If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning." Bukhari 4.54.450 It is hilarious to think that the angels have nothing better to do than sit around and curse the poor woman all the night for depriving them from watchingthe live Indecency show. If Allah must punish woman for not satisfying the sexual needs of their husbands whydoes he needs angels to lobby him for it? Isn’t it a waste of angel’s resources? In one sense this is all truly very funny. But in another, much larger sense, it is a tragedy. * And can you please show us the verse that deals about ®ape? Seems allah left that out |
‘I’m not the one going into the streets with stones and Kalashnikovs’: Charlie Hebdo editor rejects responsibility for violence over naked Mohammad cartoons The editor of French magazine Charlie Hebdo has said that when his magazine ridiculed the Prophet Mohammad on Wednesday by portraying him naked in cartoons, he and his organization were not responsible for fuelling the anger of Muslims around the world who are already incensed by a video depicting him as a lecherous fool. The editor, Stephane Charbonnier, also known as Charb, rejected criticism. “ We have the impression that it’s officially allowed for Charlie Hebdo to attack the Catholic far-right but we cannot poke fun at fundamental Islamists ,” he said. “It shows the climate. Everyone is driven by fear , and that is exactly what this small handful of extremists who do not represent anyone want: to make everyone afraid, to shut us all in a cave,” he told Reuters. “Muhammad isn’t sacred to me,” he said in an interview at the weekly’s offices on the northeast edge of Paris. “I don’t blame Muslims for not laughingat our drawings. I live under French law; I don’t live under Koranic law .” Charbonnier said he had no regrets and felt no responsibility for any violence. “I’m not the one going into the streets with stones and Kalashnikovs,” he said. “We’ve had1,000 issues and only three problems, all after front pages about radical Islam.” One cartoon alluded to the scandal over a French magazine’s publication of topless photos of the wife of Britain’s Prince William. It showed a bare female torso topped by a beard with the caption “Riots in Arab countries after photos of Mrs Mohammad are published”.... For more [url=http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/09/19/im-not-the-one-going-into-the-streets-with-stones-and-kalashnikovs-charlie-hebdo-editor-rejects-responsibility-for-violence-over-naked-mohammad-cartoons/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NP_Top_Stories+%28National+Post+-+Top+Stories%29][size=30pt]Read More[/size] [/url]
|
odehaj: "Koran which most Moslems call it Prophet Mohammed's only miracle was written by Ottoman, the third Khalif some twenty-five to sixty years following the death of the Prophet. Therefore, the Holly book of Koran is nothing but a collection of "I heard him say" "-Parvin(Iranian apostate).@hadbak:IF YOU LIKE, LIVE & DIE IN YOUR ILLUSIONS.Word!! |
So as you can see the sources make it very clear that these 2 not only mocked the prophet and insulted him, they also INSTGATED their people to attack and harm the Muslims! Hence these people were not mere poets writing mocking poems, they were inciting violence and hatred against the Muslims! They were inciting their people to rise up to fight and kill the Muslim population, and this made them direct enemy combatants because they were inciting violence against the Muslims. Therefore as we can see, there is nothing wrong in what was done against them, they brought it on themselves, you don't have to hold a sword to be an enemy or an enemy combatant, inciting violence and instigating violence is just as bad and is the exact same thing. Even in today's world men who preach ?hate' and incite violence will be arrested and imprisoned.Lol is that your source @ bolded? America trust publications?? Why didn't you quote from the Sira itself? Since you did not I'll take the pleasure of doing that.FROM THE SIRAT RASUL ALLAH (THE LIFE OF THE PROPHET OF GOD), BY IBN ISHAQ (1), page 675: SALIM B. UMAYR'S EXPEDITION TO KILL ABU AFAK Abu Afak was one of the B. Amr b. Auf of the B. Ubayda clan. He showed his disaffection when the apostle killed al-Harith b. Suwayd b. Samit and said: "Long have I lived but never have I seen An assembly or collection of people More faithful to their undertaking And their allies when called upon Than the sons of Qayla when they assembled, Men who overthrew mountains and never submitted, A rider who came to them split them in two (saying) "Permitted", "Forbidden", of all sorts of things. Had you believed in glory or kingship You would have followed Tubba. [NOTE: the Tubba was a ruler from Yemen who invaded that part of what is present Saudi Arabia: the Qaylites resisted him] The apostle said, "Who will deal with this rascal for me?" Whereupon Salim b. Umayr, brother of B. Amr b.Auf, one of the "weepers", went forth and killed him. Umama b. Muzayriya said concerning that: You gave the lie to God's religion and the man Ahmad! [Muhammad] By him who was your father, evil is the son he produced! A "hanif" gave you a thrust in the night saying "Take that Abu Afak in spite of your age!" Though I knew whether it was man or jinn Who slew you in the dead of night (I would say naught). Afak urged the people who lived in Medina to doubt and leave Muhammad. Afak found that Muhammad's sayings were strange and dictatorial. He chided the Arabs that put their faith in Muhammad. Muhammad heard of this and viewed the 120 year old man as a threat to his credibility, not to his life. Nowhere does itsay that Afak urged his fellow Arabs to attack or harm Muhammad. Certainly a 120 year old man was not a physical threat to Muhammad or his followers. What I find interesting is the last statement in Umama b. Muzayriya's verse: "Though I knew whether it was man or jinn Who slew you in the dead of night (I would say naught)." This statement displays that the Muslims knew exactly what they were doing. They knew it was cold-blooded murder that they were doing at Muhammad's request. They wanted to keep it secret, they wanted to hide their evil deeds from the populace at large. That's why Umama said he wouldn't reveal who murdered Afak. The line [b]"Take that Abu Afak in spite of your age!" [/b]also indicates a certain bad conscience about this deed even though it is overlayed with triumphalism trying to silencing this inner voice indicating that this was wrong. So lemme ask; (1)What does it say about Muhammad that he would have a 120 year old man murdered because he urged his fellow citizens to doubt his message and not to follow him? 2) Yes, Abu Afak was a threat to Muhammad's credibility.But did he deserve to be murdered, in cold blood, in the night, secretly, while he was sleeping? Was his opinion that much of a threat to Muhammad? Didn't the angels help Muhammad at the Battle of Badr? If so, why was Muhammad afraid of a 120 year old man? 3) Are these "Islamic" values compatible with the values in America? Should Americans who criticize Muhammad expect to have their freedom of speech threatened, or should they live in fear of being killed for speaking their mind? Remember, Muslims in America have already begun to murder Americans for the sake of their religion, both abroad and in the USA itself. |
LagosShia: So reauters and all major news outlets are lying?Asalam Aleikum my brother. I didn't say all the major media outlets are lying. You know how this western media re, they go about publishing stories that boko haram, al queda all this terrorists are muslims but we all know the truth. Its only fair to give them an element of doubt. Well i have dug around and the story is true after all. I found the website of the newspaper that published the blasphemy. It has the cartoons and all in it, it's all french by the way. Here: http://www.bivouac-id.com/billets/les-nouvelles-caricatures-de-charlie-hebdo/ |
Ayoobscom: When kufars (unbelievers) stones at the prophet and God asks the noble prophet Mohammed (saw) through angel Jibril.''those people stoning at you o my Ahmad my chosen one, ask of me any wrath and I will unleash on them..and guess what the prophet has to say..he says O Allah punish them not but showeth them the right path so they may not die ignorant,so that they may turn to know you and be amongst the righteous (Muslims)Jazakalahu Khairani read a muslim quote this some time and here is what Ali Sina asked/told him. [b] This actually proves that Muhammad was a narcissist. Did anyone but Muhammad hear Gabriel making such an offer? How do we know that Muhammad did not make up this tale to soothe his wounded ego? Isn’t this a typical response of a child (all children have high doses of narcissism) when humiliated and cannot retaliate? Here we have a classic case of a narcissist response. He is beaten up and disgraced and he takes a high moral ground to assuage his injured pride. Can you point out to a single incident where Gabriel destroyed a city or harmed anyone? No, there is none. All the destructions were made by Muhammad and his befooled marauding gang of thugs. If Gabriel was able to sandwich a city between two mountains why he did not protect Muhammad from those stones that you say were hurled at him and wounded him? He could stop those stones hitting the prophet, couldn’t he? He could make them miss him, pulverize them before they reach him or convert them into cotton balls. These miracles would have been a lot easier than moving two montains and they may have helped the people of Taif to see that Muhammad is really a prophet. These are simple questions that if a Muslim dares to ask, he or she will come to see the fraud of Muhammad. Why Gabriel did not save Muhammad from humiliation? Tell us please in which instance Gabriel did anything that we can know he is real and not a figment of Muhammad’s hallucination. Which city he destroyed? Which man he killed? Tell us why when Gabriel is so capable of moving two mountains to crush a city in between them, all the killings had to be done by the Muslims? Why convert ordinary people into bloodthirsty murderous beasts when if it had been Allah’s will to kill the kafirs he can without the help from humans? Or is it that Allah’s power is limited to deceiving people? Wouldn’t it have been more impressive if Allah destroyed a city on his own without the intervention of a bunch of bloodthirsty believers after his prophet fixed the date of its destruction? How can we know that Muhammad and his gang of jihadists were not inspired by Satan? All their actions were satanic – raiding, looting, rapin. Are these divine actions? Is God so helpless to depend on Muhammad’s gang of believers to do his dirty work? What is the difference between Allah and a mafia godfather? Both are helpless without their followers. Both commit their crimes through their proxies – men who become their devotees and do their biddings. Is this the kind of God you worship? Muslims are not worshipping God but Satan.[/b] any muslim can answer ![]() |
NeuroBoss: Where are the MacLatunji's of this world? I'm dying to know their take on this. PISS! Okija_juju: This is Politics section.. That Hezbollah Taliban Mujahadeen has no Jurisdiction here... Thats why people are free to say how they really feel.. I can imagine him sitting in front of his Laptop boiling angry, his AK-47 in his left hand firing at the roof of his house..Lwkmdfor here o ![]() |
![]() |
bilms: here is the link. bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19644897It's not working K |
Nawa o No picture No prove No nothing What kind of baseless accusation is this? SMH ![]() |
Photoshopped + wishful thinking. You really think Allah can pull a stunt like that? ![]() |
To all non-Muslims, if you cannot spell Allah or God with initial caps as you would for any other proper noun, get ready for appropriate sanctions.What of those muslims that do spell "jesus" without initial caps as they would do for "Allah or "God"? Will they get appropriate sanctions. Or does it not apply to them? Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. The basic principle of humanity. I wonder if your "noble" prophet taught you that. Shalom ![]() |

Rage for all the obvious reasons, but despair also because there are no lightening bolts from the sky, no army of angelic hosts sent to avenge Muhammad's honor,
