Paschal007's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Paschal007's Profile › Paschal007's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 (of 37 pages)
Smh< ![]() |
ogusbaba1: am a male, friendlol so why did you put the (f) thing on your name? ![]() |
ogusbaba1: ehen?Are you? |
ogusbaba1: I wonder oi didn't know you're a girl |
takeprofit: 1. Dressing. They dress more decent, especially their women. Some Christians think there is nothing wrong with how you dress. They even wear half naked clothes to the alter as wedding gowns. Pastor Chris of Christ Embassy is not helping the matter.Yeah you're right to an extent, most of the things you said above are enforced by the state(islamic) or the society. Failure to comply one would face wrath of shariah law. I don't know if i agree with no.5 memorizing isn't the same as study. Its all good. So take profit you haven't seen a classical mosque before? |
. |
[quote author=Atheist:-D]What type of comfrontation? Nothing too aggressive I hope? Isnt it better to talk things through? To discuss a lot and get to fully understand their choices?[/quote]They'll make their choices and live by it just like i made mine. And no the confrontation wasn't aggressive. Just the usual question and answer, they thought i joined a cult. Cultist activities was making waves around that time. ![]() |
[quote author=Atheist:-D]Damn right. So what about you? What would you do if your kid wanted to be a muslim or atheist?[/quote]I guess i'll do what my parents did when i stopped attending their own church. Let them be after confrontation. |
[quote author=Atheist:-D]If he/she wanrs to be a xtian, muslim, hindu, buddhist, pagan or any other religion it is their preserved right and I will support them. As long as they dont bexome evil with their religion i.e. boko haram extremist or tithe robbing pastor.[/quote]Good to know |
Gombs: Ok na.....Seun shd fire d mod who brought dat fake news to d frnt page,or bann d Op for d rest of the year,or bothlol cool down bros. |
BetaThings: Human beings have been committing sins since the time of Adam |
[quote author=Zhul-fiqar]MUTAH MARRIAGE IN THE BIBLE: http://mutah.com/mutahinbible.htm Sunnis,or the rich Saudi Wahhabis among them,abusing the system of mutah marriage which has conditions and regulation,does not make the system itself bad.it is the people abusing the system who should be condemned and not the system itself. more on mutah marriage: www.mutah.com [/quote]Clicked your link saw nothing meaningful. |
Presidential aide denied that he married actress Nkiru Sylvanus www.nairaland.com/1163000/presidential-aide-responds-rumors-he#13839488 |
The media spokesman of Vice President Namadi Mallam Umar Sani has reacted to the report, calling it ridiculous and a figment of the writer’s imagination. “The report is very funny. How can you marry somebody you have not seen for over three months? The last time I saw her was in September so how can a marriage take place when the subject matters have not seen each other? I have not married Nkiru Sylvanus and if a wedding of such took place, people should be able to name the place, date and time. It is not true”. He told reporters at the Presidential Villa in Abuja this evening.. http://africanspotlight.com/2013/01/presidential-aide-responds-to-rumours-that-he-married-actress-nkiru-sylvanus/ |
Logicboy03: Why? This is now becoming a new phenomena! Almost every month, some poor child who stops going to church or stops believing in God gets kicked out and we see it on facebook or reddit or other social networks.Colossians 3:21 - Fathers, do not provoke your children, lest they become discouraged. I totally condemn the action of this parent if this story is true. The alleged actions of the parent goes against the teachings of Christ. That said i hope and pray that the evangelical, fanatic atheist on this forum who spend up to 19-22 hrs obsessing about God don't kick their kids out if they dare become religious. |
VladimirLenin: This article says that this practice of temporary marriage, i.e. prostitution behind the hypocritical fig leaf of a "marriage" with a time limit, violates Islamic law. However, it is actually an established Shi'ite concept that is also prevalent among some Sunnis. We saw it taking place in Egypt last summer. It is also rising among Saudis, even though Sunnis ostensibly reject it.Shout out to my Shia pim'ps ![]() |
komole: CLEAR FACTS TO PROVE WHY THE WHOLE WORLD NEEDS TO EMBRACE ISLAMOk
|
Hi Mods consider for frontpage. thanks www.nairaland.com/1161852/doctor-27-murdered-lagos-traffic |
. |
[quote author=PAGAN 9JA]please go home and read the quraan yourself. ive read enough and ive seen enough. The myth that warfare is only justified in Islam under the condition of self-defense is disproved by the account of the Battle of Badr, in which Muhammad sent his men out to raid caravans, then deliberately provoked a battle with the Meccan army sent out to defend them. The case for aggressive warfare is also supported by the fate of the three Jewish tribes of Medina, who were cleansed because they had rejected Muhammad’s claims of prophethood (and because the Muslims wanted their possessions). Consider the fate of the Banu Mustaliq, an Arab tribe: "The Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives" (Bukhari 46:717) Although there are many reliable accounts from the Hadith and Sira that mention the Mustaliq grazing cattle, not one mentions Muhammad making any effort at peacemaking. In this case, Muhammad's men rap.ed the women (with his approval) after slaughtering the men (Sahih Muslim 3371). What does rapi.ng a female captive have to do with self-defense? In many situations, Muhammad waged war for the purpose of revenge, such as the attack on the Lihyan, in which the people were clearly not prepared for war and saved themselves only by fleeing into the hills (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 718). Muhammad also attacked the people of Taif as soon as he had the opportunity to avenge their rejection of him (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 280 & 872). Also disproving the myth that Muhammad only fought in self-defense is the account of his first attack on the Christians. There was no compelling reason for him to send an army to Muta (in Syria, where they met with disaster at the hands of the Byzantines). Had this been a matter of self-defense, then the enemy would surely have followed the routed army back to Arabia, but this was not the case (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 791). Near the end of his life, the prophet of Islam directed military campaigns for the mere purpose of spreading Islamic rule. He knew that some cities would resist and others would not. He left instructions to his people for dealing with each case: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: If you come to a township (which has surrendered without a formal war) and stay therein, you have a share (that will be in the form of an award) in (the properties obtained from) it. If a township disobeys Allah and His Messenger (and actually fights against the Muslims) one-fifth of the booty seized therefrom is for Allah and His Apostle and the rest is for you. (Sahih Muslim 4346) As can be seen, those who were not at war with the Muslims are to be subjugated anyway, and their property seized. The only distinguishing factor is the extent of Muslim entitlement following the victory. Military campaigns to extend Islamic domination include the raid on Tabuk, which was a second incursion into the Christian territory of Syria, in which Muhammad forced the local populace to pay him tribute after ambushing and killing local civilians to assert his authority (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 903). Another example would be the “convert or die†mandate given to an Arab tribe, the Banu al-Harith: Then the apostle sent Khalid bin Walid… to the Banu al-Harith and ordered him to invite them to Islam three days before he attacked them. If they accepted then he was to accept it from them, and if they declined he was to fight them. So Khalid set out and came to them, and sent out riders in all directions inviting the people to Islam, saying, “If you accept Islam you will be safe.†So the men accepted Islam as they were invited. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 959) Obviously self-defense was not a factor in any of these cases (even though some Muslims are prone to embellish the record with imaginary details not found therein). As with the capture of Mecca in 630, these early Muslims had clear military superiority and the target of their aggression was in no position to defend itself. In fact, the first part of the 9th Sura, the most bellicose chapter of the Qur’an, was revealed shortly after the Muslims had established military dominance in Mecca. Consider one of the more violent verses: But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them (9:5) The words, “when the forbidden months are past,†precludes the possibility that this was a matter of self-defense. The Muslims had already been given the divine right to fight during the sacred months, and it is simply implausible that they would have suffered attacks over a four month period without defending themselves. That they were not under attack is consistent with the historical context, in which the Haj period was a traditional time of peace and tolerance throughout Arabia. Although not under attack from the pagans, Muhammad ordered his men to chase and kill the unbelievers following the Haj. The pagans who agreed to become Muslim (ie. practice the pillars of Islam, zakat and salat) would be allowed to live following their conversion. Verse 9:29 offers a separate rule for Jews and Christians, allowing them to keep their religion as long as they pay protection money to Muslims and acknowledge the inferiority of their faith. Should they resist, then they should be killed. One of the best documented examples of Muslim aggression during the lifetime of Muhammad is the attack on the peaceful community of Khaybar. This followed the treaty of Hudaibiya between the Muslims and Meccans, which called for a period of peace between the two groups. The treaty was controversial with Muslims, not only because it contradicted Allah’s prior mandate to “drive out†the Meccans with violent force (2:191), but also because Muhammad agreed not to be recognized as a prophet in the document (Muslim 4401). Muhammad decided that it was prudent to attack the Jews at Khaybar in order to regain the trust of his people and placate their grumbling with military victory and (especially) the stolen wealth that followed. This is embarrassing to modern-day Muslim apologists, who try to justify the siege by imagining that the sleepy farming community, located about 100 miles outside of Medina, posed some sort of necessary threat. Unfortunately for contemporary apologists, not only is there no supporting evidence that the Muslims were under attack by the Khaybar, there are at least three historical references that flatly contradict any notion of self-defense on the part of Muhammad. The first is a description of the initial attack by Ibn Ishaq/Hisham: We met the workers of Khaybar coming out in the morning with their spades and baskets. When they saw the apostle and the army they cried, “Muhammad with his force,†and turned tail and fled… The apostle seized the property piece by piece… (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 757) The people of Khaybar were not attacking Muhammad. They were farming their land with shovels and buckets, not even knowing that they were supposed to be at war. This is further confirmed in the same text: When the apostle raided a people he waited until the morning. If he heard a call to prayer he held back; if he did not hear it he attacked. We came to Khaybar by night, and the apostle passed the night there; and when morning came he did not hear the call to prayer, so he rode and we rode with him. (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 757) Muhammad attacked only after waiting to see if the people of Khaybar issued a morning call to prayer. This would have no possible relevance had they already been at war with him. Perhaps the best proof that Muhammad was not acting in self-defense is the fact that his own people did not understand why they were marching to war. His son-in-law, who was in charge of the military expedition, had to ask for justification: Allah's Messenger called Ali [and said]: “Proceed on and do not look about until Allah grants you victory,†and Ali went a bit and then halted and did not look about and then said in a loud voice: “Allah's Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people?†Thereupon he (the Prophet) said: â€Fight with them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger…†(Sahih Muslim 5917) The question Ali posed would have been unnecessary had the Muslims been under attack by the Khaybar or if the answer to the question were obvious. As it is, Muhammad’s reply underscores the ostensible purpose of the campaign, which was to force the Jews into acknowledging the superiority of Islam. Muhammad’s men easily captured Khaybar and divided up the loot. The prophet of Islam tortured the community’s treasurer to extract information, then had him killed (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 764). Muhammad then took the man’s widow, Saffiya, as his wife after trading two other captured women to one of his lieutenants (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 758). The surviving Jews were allowed to stay on their land provided that they gave their Muslim masters an ample share of their crops. Therefore, the rule of aggression in Islam, from the example set by Muhammad, is that it is proportional to the power held by Muslims, and not the persecution that they are under. The rare verses of peace in the Qur'an were "revealed" in Mecca, when true oppression existed (in some cases). The verses of violence that are revealed later correspond to Muslim military might even as any persecution of Muslims had largely dried up. [size=16pt]I HAVE FRIENDS FROM MANY OF THE ABOVE ARAB TRIBES, AND THE POOR FELLOWS DONT KNOW THE TRUE HISTORY OF WHAT HAPPENED TO THEIR ANCESTORS! BLINDLY READING THIS EVIL BOOK![/size] [/quote]wow |
[quote author=AWKA_MADE_GUN]Salami stop it where is your town sef. The governor has done tremendously well. Am from Ekwulobia he has done well for my villa which he turned into a semi-urban center. I was in Awka for a wedding on the 29th, I could not but continue to see cool and nice edifices with hospitality industry and night life booming. Udoka and Abuja estates, roads that were tarred within estates. And more roads are also being tarred within Ngozika est. Obi has laid down the framework and masterplan for speedy advancement of Anambra. Even Osha is receiving its measure attention in the area of road reconstruction, the Onitsha expressway is presently under reconstruction and remodeling into 8 lanes starting from Head Bridge. The next governor will actually continue from where he stopped. Obi cannot do it all alone within 8 yrs.[/quote]see lie at bolded. Which roads are tarred? Is this how you paid agents lie with straight face? Can you post the pictures Of Udoka estate lets see? |
Demdem: Pictures please.There's no pictures to show jare. If you go near unizik junction or govt house the only thing you'll see is huge billboards of Peter Obi advertising how he distributed 10 laptops to schools or built a library(with no books) or constructed drainage(like that's not his job). It's crazy men, i've not seen anything he's doing except sounding like woman. If you enter Awka ehn. Smh |
. |
https://assets.punchng.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Minister-of-Information-Mr.-Labaran-Maku-360x225.jpg Minister of Information, Mr. Labaran Maku The Federal Executive Council on Wednesday approved the establishment of three additional federal universities in the country. The approval was given at the council’s first meeting of the year presided over by President Goodluck Jonathan. Minister of Information, Mr. Labaran Maku, briefed State House correspondents on the outcome of the meeting alongside his counterparts- Mr. Edem Duke (Tourism and Culture); Prof. Ruqqayatu Rufai (Education); and Dr. Yerima Ngama (State, Finance). The three newly-approved universities, according to Rufai, are the Federal University of Birnin-Kebbi, Kebbi State; Federal University of Gusau, Zamfara State, and Federal University of Gashua, Yobe State. The minister said the new universities would take off during the 2014/2015 academic session. She said, “We have been battling with the problem of access to education every year, cutting across primary, secondary and tertiary. We record between 1.3million and 1.5million applicants through JAMB every year.” Rufai said having approved the establishment of three additional universities, every state in the country now has federal university. Meanwhile, the President on Wednesday handed down a marching order to the ministers to buckle up in order to make more dividends of democracy available to Nigerians in the New Year. Maku said, “President Jonathan told us that we must all buckle up, work as a team and individually to make our MDAs achieve their key goals in terms of service delivery and meeting targets. “In railway sector, last year was very good for the country and this year will be better and will lead to greater activities in the economy. Power sector also recorded appreciable growth last year. This year, power will stabilise more than that of last year by the time we commission the projects currently under construction.” Maku expressed the confidence that by the time the 2013 budget is finally signed into law, government would perform better. Ngama said based on the growth being experienced in the country’s economy, the World Bank had offered Nigeria additional shares as part of its new policy to give more voice to developing countries. He said, “Nigeria’s economy is very strong. Our GDP has grown very significantly; we are growing faster and overtaking some countries.” http://www.punchng.com/news/fec-approves-three-more-federal-varsities/ |
Onlytruth: It is good that when our leaders are working, we should say so and encourage them. I saw first hand that Anambra state roads are now mostly tarred. It was not like that in the last few years.How come no one is seeing this? Am not seeing any camera flashy roads at Awka ![]() |
fellis: What bothers me is that this topic has been trending for about three days now.Elliot Carver in tomorrow never dies: There's no news, like bad news! https://www.vintagemovieposters.co.uk/shop/media/gbu0/prodsm/tnd1stadvanceuksmall.jpg |
J12: Its their culture and tradition. Who are we to oppose?silly question |
That picture is too graphic...damn it, mods please remove it...just lost my appetite... |
maclatunji: @Paschal007, I have started penalising people like you who quote very long articles from other websites without giving credit to the source.sorry sir very unlike me. I forgot here it is http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/018-suicide-bombing.htm |


for a specified time by mutual agreement.

